There are two paths in which we could take, one being, of course, the stereotypical view of a colony on Mars or the Moon, but on the other hand, it is feasible to have humans living in orbit with the advent of new technology. There is a general argument to be made for both, for example, colonization on a planet, although extremely expensive, could have that issue overlooked through alternative means. In Kelsey Tollefson’s, author of Asteroid Prospects II: Between a Rock and a Hard Place, own words, “The United States, for one, has set its sights on the Red Planet. NASA’s Journey to Mars initiative hopes to achieve “Earth Independence” by the year 2030. NASA’s estimated budget for 2017 is set at $19 billion, much of which would go towards developing technology capable of sending humans to Mars” (Tollefson). One may wonder why Mars is the center of attention for many researchers, and the answer to that is quite simple. As Edward McCullough, lead scientist for the Boeing Company, mentions, “Mars is a user-friendly world, rife with many industrially useful minerals for construction and manufacturing purposes. It has a suite of ‘ates,’ ‘ites’ and ‘ides’ of common metals with common non metals. The red planet is also wrapped in abundant carbon dioxide which will be fairly easy to condense” (David). McCullough was also quoted as saying, “There is abundant evidence of past…