Com156 R7 Revision Analysis
University of Phoenix Material
Revision Analysis
Part 1
In the tables below, list the details provided in your feedback from different sources: your instructor, WritePoint®, Plagiarism Checker, and your peers. In the second column, explain what changes you will make to your paper based on that feedback. Address one specific area of feedback in each row.
Example:
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. My instructor indicated that my research paper should not be written in first person.
I will review each page of my paper and remove the use of first person. I will rewrite each sentence properly in third person. I will also review the material in the Center for Writing Excellence that will help me better understand how to use third person correctly.
Instructor Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. XX Post a copy of the results from the Center for Writing Excellence
Post a copy of the results from the Plagiarism Checker
I was unable to properly use grammarly, and still unable to do so.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
WritePoint® Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. I had a few spelling errors that Office did not pick up
Corrected my spelling mistakes.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Plagiarism Checker
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. no changes needed
2.
3.
4.
Peer Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. The feedback I received from peers was it looked fine to them.
2.
3.
4.
Part 2:
In a new Microsoft® Word document, write a 300- to 400-word response to the following:
Describe, in detail, the feedback you received from WritePoint®, from the Plagiarism Checker report through the Center for Writing Excellence, from your facilitator, and from any peers in a peer-review thread.
Explain the changes you will make to revise your own paper based on this feedback.
In your response, explain whether you have
Revision Analysis
Part 1
In the tables below, list the details provided in your feedback from different sources: your instructor, WritePoint®, Plagiarism Checker, and your peers. In the second column, explain what changes you will make to your paper based on that feedback. Address one specific area of feedback in each row.
Example:
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. My instructor indicated that my research paper should not be written in first person.
I will review each page of my paper and remove the use of first person. I will rewrite each sentence properly in third person. I will also review the material in the Center for Writing Excellence that will help me better understand how to use third person correctly.
Instructor Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. XX Post a copy of the results from the Center for Writing Excellence
Post a copy of the results from the Plagiarism Checker
I was unable to properly use grammarly, and still unable to do so.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
WritePoint® Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. I had a few spelling errors that Office did not pick up
Corrected my spelling mistakes.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Plagiarism Checker
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. no changes needed
2.
3.
4.
Peer Feedback
Feedback Received
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback
1. The feedback I received from peers was it looked fine to them.
2.
3.
4.
Part 2:
In a new Microsoft® Word document, write a 300- to 400-word response to the following:
Describe, in detail, the feedback you received from WritePoint®, from the Plagiarism Checker report through the Center for Writing Excellence, from your facilitator, and from any peers in a peer-review thread.
Explain the changes you will make to revise your own paper based on this feedback.
In your response, explain whether you have