Preview

commodity

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1636 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
commodity
Commodities are objects that satisfy human needs and wants. Commodities are the fundamental units of capitalism, a form of economy based on the intense accumulation of such objects. The basic criterion for assessing a commodity’s value is its essential usefulness, what it does in the way of satisfying need and wants. This usefulness is its use-value, a property intrinsic to the commodity. Commodities also possess an exchange-value, the relative value of a commodity in relation to other commodities in an exchange situation. Unlike use-value, exchange-value is not intrinsic to a commodity. Exchange-value allows one to determine what one commodity is worth in relation to another commodity, for example how many units of corn one might exchange for a given unit of linen. In a complex market, all sorts of different commodities, although satisfying different needs and wants, must be measurable in the same units, namely money.
Exchange-value as monetary value is what one means when one says a commodity has “value” in a market. Marx poses the question of where this value comes from. His answer is that universal measure for value, expressed in terms of money, corresponds to the amount of labor time that goes into the making of each commodity. Labor time is the only thing that all commodities with different use-values have in common and is thus the only criterion by which they are comparable in a situation of exchange. This is Marx’s labor theory of value. This theory implies that commodities have a social dimension because their exchange value is not intrinsic to them as objects but instead depends on the society’s entire division of labor and system of economic interdependence, in which different people produce different products for sale on a common market. Exchange-value allows this market to function. As an expression the amount of “congealed labor” in a given commodity, the value of that commodity, measured in monetary terms, always refers to the system of social and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Traditionally when discussing value we refer to the economic systems three variables; Exchange value, utility value, and intrinsic value. In simplistic terms, this is basically the value of the object, what the object is used for and the personal experience gained from…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    terms of jsis 200

    • 9460 Words
    • 15 Pages

    used as a means of exchange. This creates a de facto gold standard, where the value…

    • 9460 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitutional Convention began as an attempt to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention directed at making an entirely new government. The meeting was privately held, which permitted the members to talk their intellectual capabilities without fear of political retribution. A single matter on which there was complete agreement that George Washington should be the head of state in the Convention. Incorporating, Washington, there was forty-five other representative attended. The states had voted for members to go to the convention who were, for the most part, members of the academic and community elite. The members were rich, and desire to strengthen the national government to protect trade and upgrade financial…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx’s philosophy has been the subject of so much judgement and Scrutiny on if his beliefs will truly save the working man. The bourgeois interlocutor believe Marx’s belief would be more detrimental to the people as a whole. They believe that by wishing to abolish private property, communism will become a danger to freedom and eventual end up destroying the very base of all personal freedom, activity, and independence. Marx responds to these comments by stating that wage labor does not create any property when considering the laborers affairs. It only creates capital, a property which works only to increase the social injustice of the worker. This property called capital, is based on class antagonism. Having linked private property…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern political economic theory and philosophy can be greatly attributed to the works of two men who seemingly held polar opposite views on the subject. Adam Smith, a Scottish philosopher, published his most well known work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations in 1776 and is most often associated with the ideas and principles of the political economic system known as Capitalism. At the other end of the spectrum is Karl Marx; the German philosopher most often associated with Communism and the author (or co-author) of The Communist Manifesto. This paper seeks to discuss the core differences in their respective political economic philosophies with regards to what economic value is and what the role of government should be in their versions of political economy. This will conclude with the argument that while Smith's work had laid the foundation for modern economic philosophy, it was Marx who would ultimately leave the most significant impression upon the world with his revolutionary ideas.…

    • 2054 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx is the first to state that capitalism is based on the accumulation and hyper-consumption of commodities. As such, commodities are meaningful both because of their monetary/exchange value and because they reflect the social relations of production that went into making them. In The Fetishism of the Commodity, Marx says that the inherent problem with the capitalist structure is that society tends to focus only on the monetary and exchange value of the commodity. Marx uses the word “fetish” to describe commodities and show how they cause society to fixate on their monetary and exchange values, while ignoring the exploitative nature of the market that produced them. To illustrate his point, Marx uses the example of wood used by a worker to create a table. “The form of wood, for instance, is altered, by making a table out of it. Yet, for all that, the table continues to be that common, every-day thing, wood” (1). While a commodity, in this case a table, is only valuable because of the labor used to make it, it is difficult to place a specific monetary value on labor quality, so capitalist society treats commodities as if they has intrinsic value. The value of the labor is…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx believed the factory system had resulted in a “cash economy”. Owning the means of production, the bourgeoisie kept wages low in order to get cheap supplies, improve the technology of their factories and increase their markets. According to Marx, dependency on low wages had reduced factory workers to “wage slaves,” deprived them of the satisfaction that should be found from working and made it more difficult for the lower class to provide for their basic needs. He wrote, “The work of the proletarians has lost all individual character…and all charm for the workman. He becomes an appendage of the machine.” (Paragraph 22)…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In contrast, Karl Marxl reasoned that workers would be broken by any capitalist, or factory owners, because he believed that a capitalist system provides an advantage for the rich and a disadvantage for the poor. The rich would get richer and the poor would get poorer. Furthermore, the “capitalist” is always in a better position to negotiate a low wage for his workers, he argued. One of his notable and more arguable theories claims that the value of a good or service is directly connected to the amount of labor required for its production. Interestingly, Karl Marx also had his own drastic, political ideas that were far away from those of Adam Smith’s.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Commodity Fetishism

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Marx defined a commodity as an article produced from the start for large-scale market exchange rather than for its own immediate consumption. The product becomes increasingly one-sided when in commodity form. Its…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx defines a commodity as “an external object, a thing which satisfies through its qualities human needs of one kind or another” (Marx). The value of said commodity, does not come from its use value, but in its exchange value or what it can be traded for. A commodity can also have sign-exchange value, which refers to the elevated social status the commodity gives to its owner (Tyson, 62). Marx states in his book Capital Volume that, "The common substance that manifests itself in the exchange value of commodities, whenever they are exchanged, is their value. That exchange value is the only form in which the value of commodities…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, a commodity is a good or service that is actively produced for sale in a labour process. A commodity can result from peasant, petty commodity, state production, cooperative production, or social enterprise as well as capitalist production – what matters is its production for sale (Polanyi 2001, 71). Fictitious commodities as for instance labour are things that were not originally produced to be sold on a market. Even though under certain conditions labour can transformed into commodity (Polanyi 2001, 71).…

    • 829 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This progression has afforded capitalist leaders the ability to achieve social control over the masses. Marx, in the essay Fetishism of Commodity, criticizes capitalism for exploiting people for their labor. A commodity, according to Marx, can have a use-value because it satisfies a person’s need or it can have an exchange-value, because it has value in relation to something else. Regardless, all commodities are a result of an infusion of labor.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith to Durkheim

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Smith saw two kinds of value: the value in use and the value in exchange. The value in use is the amount of use that a product has, water for example has a great value in use. The other one is the value in exchange, which is the amount of value a thing has that allows a person to exchange it for another or to purchase another. The measure of this exchangeable value consists in the labor that was spent on it. There are of course, two kinds of labor as well. The labor content and labor commanded. Man his self interest goes into labor and the labor content is that amount of labor which allows him to supply himself. With the arrival of the division of labor, the effort man places in supplying himself is lessened…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In a capitalist economy, production of a commodity is decided by the forces of demand and supply. As the production of a commodity depends upon its demand and supply,…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics