Preview

Common Causes Of Wrongful Conviction

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
Wrongful convictions happen all over the world. Wrongful convictions are defined as a conviction of a person who was factually innocent, leading them to a live in prison for a certain amount of time. Putting the wrong person in the system can ruin their life and reputation. These people can spend just a few years, a big portion of their life, or even die while incarcerated if they are on death row. The most common causes of wrongful convictions are eyewitness misidentification, improper forensic science, false confessions, government misconduct, informants/jailhouse snitches, and inadequate counseling.
Bruce MacFarlane, a Canadian lawyer said that the single most important factor leading to wrongful convictions is eyewitness misidentification.
…show more content…

The misidentification of culprits by eyewitnesses is the number one leading cause of wrongful convictions. Eyewitness misidentification plays a role in 72% of convictions overturned, those of which are from DNA testing. (INNOCENCE PROJECT) In 1999, it was noted that many of the suspects now exonerated by DNA testing would have been indicted prior to its use. This implies that there may have been a false conviction rate in the past of more than 10% for criminal cases where DNA testing is now possible. According to the Innocence Project even after thirty years of social science eyewitness identification is often reliable. Research shows that the human mind is not at all like a tape recorder. People neither record events exactly as they see them, nor recall them like a tape that has been rewound. Witness memory is comparable to other evidence in case in that it must be preserved carefully and retrieved very meticulously or else it can become …show more content…

Brenton was simply walking to a local block buster to fill out a job application when he was stopped by police and question about a murder that happen miles away from his house. The victim was a tourist visiting the city of Jacksonville with her husband. Mary Ann and James Stephens, an older couple, were staying at a local Ramada Inn and had just taken advantage of the hotel’s free breakfast. When they were heading back to their room they were confronted by an African American man that was demanding Mary Ann’s purse with a gun held to her face. Mr. Stephens had a very small amount of time to try and remember the culprit’s face before he shot his wife and ran off with her purse. Brenton Butler was brought to Mr. Stevens who automatically said he was the culprit. James Stephens said he was certain Brenton was the killer. Although Brenton had an alibi he was taken down to the station and the nine hour interrogation

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Smalarz and Wells (2014), the leading cause of wrongful convictions is eyewitness misidentification. Smalarz and Wells described a unique case where a rape victim, JT, had the opportunity to correctly identify her attacker. JT’s lawyer had received reports of her attacker bragging about getting away with the rape while he was in prison for another crime. The victim, JT, incorrectly identified the attacker, she actually choose the same person she choose in her first line up after the assault. The information JT’s lawyer presented her had essential information on the case and to convict the culprit but, the timing of the information was received too late.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unit 6 Assignment

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are several reasons that wrongful convictions happen, and essentially what it boils down to is errors of either the criminal justice professional, or the eyewitness testimony. In many of the cases of wrongful conviction there were a lot of the same errors that led to the conviction of innocent people. Errors in eyewitness identification; in some cases the eyewitness was pressured into identifying someone, even if they were not sure. Antiquated forensic testing; in many cases outdated equipment and methods had been use during forensic tests, which lead to inaccurate results. Testimony by questionable informants; during the trials there were witness testimonies that were questionable, because their stories were not straight, or the witness themselves had a background that would make their story questionable. These are just a few of many reasons why innocent people were incarcerated.…

    • 836 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 5 describes how, within the last century, mounting scholarly evidence has exposed institutional flaws within our judicial and police systems, resulting in the convictions of innocent persons for capital crimes. In some cases, overzealous behavior by police and prosecutors, led to the imprisonment of “factually” innocent defendants. While police sometimes coerced confessions or failed to conduct full investigations, prosectors and judges failed to evidence which might exonerate the defendant. Other judicial violations found through study included failure to follow courtroom procedures related to rule of law. One of the first wrongful conviction initiatives was through a congressional investigation in 1912. Although a noble undertaking for its time, the reports was flawed in its evidentiary compilation. The data was poorly collected and its findings poorly deduced. According to the report, no innocent person had been executed by the Federal government.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    These wrongful convictions occur because the criminal justice system had many flaws. It was not only the system that had flaws, but also the people on the board. The…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since 1992, almost three hundred people in the United States have been exonerated by the Innocence Project. What this means is that almost three hundred people have been acquitted for a crime that they were falsely convicted of committing and were then released back into society. Many of these false convictions were the result of a lack of technology back in the time of the trials which lead to unvalidated or improper use of forensic science. Some additional reasons that people are wrongfully convicted are misidentifications from eyewitnesses and false confessions. In this paper, I plan to write about Kenneth Ireland. His story shows how wrongful convictions and exonerations are issues in the United States.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I am completely appalled by the fact that we are still giving so much credit to the accounts of eyewitnesses. As we have learned in our studies, our memories easily become contaminated by things like, post-event misinformation, retroactive interference, errors in source monitoring, not to mention things like the stress of the event, which can also influence our memories (Matlin, 2012). If fact the act of recalling an event is more like trying to put together a puzzle with missing pieces, than simple reviewing a video. And when we take into account that “eyewitness misidentification is the greatest contributing factor to wrongful convictions proven by DNA testing, playing a role in more than 70% of convictions overturned through DNA testing…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The reliability of eyewitness identification has attracted concern from legal professions in England for a number of years, particularly following the acknowledgment of the erroneous identifications responsible for convicting Adolf Beck in 1904. The case was followed by the Establishment of the Court of Appeal in England and Wales (Bromby, MacMillan & McKellar, 2007). Mistaken eyewitness identification testimony was central to the convictions of innocents who were later exonerated by forensic DNA testing (Gary L. Wells). Although through studies information has been acquired about how to decrease the likelihood of mistaken identifications, many courts around the world still conduct identification using approaches largely unsupported by scientific…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Results from the researchers questionnaire sent to exonerated individuals, Innocence Project attorneys, and incarcerated inmates claiming innocence will be analyzed thoroughly based off the information of the individual’s charges, sentence served, reasons they were wrongfully convicted, key evidence that reversed the initial charges, and reasons that made it difficult for inmates to have access to post-conviction procedures. Feedback from the Innocence Project attorneys and incarcerated but claiming innocent inmates will also be analyzed. These results will be compared and put together for an explanation regarding the reasons that lead to wrongful convictions. Results leading to inaccurate eyewitness identification as the top reason that leads toward wrongful conviction and poor development of eyewitness identification procedures would confirm the hypothesis. However, if results showed otherwise, with inaccurate eyewitness identification as not the most common element and statistics show eyewitness identification procedures are frequently developed and improved, this type of result will disconfirm the researchers…

    • 2617 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The innocence project and forensic science are two forms that can help determine who the actual preparatory was and can help people who have been wrongly convicted in a crime he/she did not commit. In many cases the forensic such as DNA, blood sample, or semen and other evidence that have been lost or even wrongly tested can end up becoming a big mistake that can send someone to jail that did not commit the crime. In the article, Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions (2009) states that, the most wrongful convictions involve more than one contributing cases, for example, if an eyewitness may have wrongly identified an innocent person, and in the same case a forensic analyst may have testified that hairs from the crime scene match the defendant’s hair. In the jury’s eyes, the eyewitness testimony is strengthened by the forensic evidence (Forensic Problems and Wrongfully Convictions, 2009). Not always the eye witnesses are right with what they say so having the right forensic evidence can help with determine who is actually the perpetrator. Such as this case were the eyewitness was not so good and also a lot of the evidence was miss communicated.…

    • 1479 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are plenty of reasons why wrongfully convicted criminals are an issue to me. I myself had personal experiences dealing with being wrongfully accused when my uncle and I were pulled over due to a mechanical problem of the car, we received a fix-it ticket where a certain part of a car must be fixed and renewed. My uncle was taken to court to brief…

    • 914 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “Safeguards Against Wrongful Conviction in Eyewitness Identification Cases: Insights from Empirical Research,” Andrew Smith and Lisa Dufraimont (2014) address how eyewitness identifications are vital factors in convicting suspects. However, some of those identifications are inaccurate or mistaken, and innocent people can be wrongly convicted. In fact, mistaken eyewitness identification is the main factor in wrongful convictions of the innocent (Smith and Dufraimont, 2014). Furthermore, eyewitness identifications are not the only factors to consider. Law enforcement personnel and lawyers can also “contribute to wrongful convictions” (Smith & Dufraimont, 2014 p. 200). As a result, precautions were established to prevent such…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A wrongful conviction is when a subsequent investigation finds that an individual who has been tried and found guilty of a crime is, in fact, innocent of that crime” (Bako). A wrongful conviction is not just a simple mistake, lives and families are devastated. This happens more often than people think it does. Even though this person very well may be innocent, it takes years to even appeal their case if they can even get that far. The key issues with wrongful convictions are that prosecutors rely on unreliable evidence such as eyewitness identification of a person that does not really know what he or she saw on that specific date and much, much more. The Innocence project strives to exonerate those whose rights have been unconstitutionally taken away from them through the use of DNA evidence. “The development of DNA testing has allowed the Innocence Project to help exonerate 344 innocent Americans - 20 of whom were on death row (Bako).” These 344 exonerees represent how the American criminal justice system can fail the people she was designed to protect. The innocence project works to raise awareness to the issue our justice system faces when it comes to minorities in particular. Continued research and advocacy, as well as improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice process itself, are all necessary steps to ensuring the innocence of those wrongly accused of a crime. Over 75% of…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Imagine a completely innocent individual being convicted for a crime he or she had no involvement in but being in the wrong place at the wrong time. The individual lives out his or her jail sentence in an orderly fashion only to be found not guilty after more than a decade with the discovery of vital evidence produced by advanced technology. This is just one of countless cases of wrongful conviction of innocent people by the justice system. Since 1989, countless of cases were found wrongfully convicted after the case had been closed, but were reopened thanks to the advancement in the justice system such as the usage of DNA testing. Problem is, if this is the state of our justice system at the moment, where there is such a large chance of someone being wrongfully accused and having to serve in prison for so many years and only to be released after the damage has already been done, one would always fear that type of justice system. The innocent should fear the justice system no matter how…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But, can have steady impacts on someone who did not commit a crime being accused. For instance, within our adversarial process, the role of bias plays a big part in how the case is run. Whether it be deeply ingrained biases growing up, or just a prejudice that came about from growing up it has immense repercussions on wrongful convictions. Next, is a huge factor that affects many wrongful convictions cases. That would be eyewitness identification. Eyewitness identification has some good factors but also many bad factors. For instance, we looked into many studies on how sequential lineups can reduce false identifications of innocent suspects by reducing eyewitnesses’ reliance on relative judgment processes (Lindsay & Wells, 1985, p. 556). But also how people struggle to recall a certain person they have maybe seen in another situation. Another topic that’s become a growing topic is forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many aspects can go into the makings of forensic evidence misconduct/errors. Many researchers like to study the quality control and training. The growing concern is whether bias and beliefs can greatly affect the outcome of an expert interpreting information like finger…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In one case example involving eyewitness misidentification, a man named Walter served over twenty five years for a rape and robbery he did not commit. The prosecution's case against him stemmed from a seriously flawed eyewitness identification procedure that led to misidentification. A pregnant woman was…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays