Preview

Common Law Reasoning

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10934 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Common Law Reasoning
Common law reasoning and institutions Study Pack

page 11

6

‘The Judicial Practice of Precedent’ Adam Gearey

Staff and students of the University of London External Laws Programme are reminded that copyright subsists in this extract and the work from which it was taken. This copy has been made under a licence from the Copyright Licensing Agency of the UK (www.cla.co.uk). Any digital or printed copy supplied to or made by you under the terms of this licence is for use in connection with this course of study. You may retain such copies after the end of the course, but strictly for your own personal use. This reading was written for the Common Law Reasoning and Institutions study pack by Adam Gearey. Copyright © 2007 University of London. All rights reserved. This reading is for use in connection with this course of study. Except as provided by copyright law, no further copying, storage or distribution (including by email) is permitted without the consent of the copyright holder. The author has moral rights in this work and neither staff nor students may cause or permit the distortion, mutilation or other modification of the work, or any other derogatory treatment of it, which would be prejudicial to the honour or reputation of the author(s). This reading relates to the Common law reasoning and institutions subject guide, Chapter 6. Except as provided by copyright law, no further copying, storage or distribution (including by email) is permitted without the consent of the copyright holder. The author has moral rights in this work and neither staff nor students may cause or permit the distortion, mutilation or other modification of the work, or any other derogatory treatment of it, which would be prejudicial to the honour or reputation of the author(s). Reproduced by the University of London External Programme, 2007. Scanning authorised by Professor Wayne Morrison (designated person). Common law reasoning and institutions course (LLB, Diploma).

page 11
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Etma01
    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Etma01

    Houston [1996] S.C.L.R. 943 Reading 3, W150 An Introductory to law in contemporary Scotland, Milton Keynes, The open University.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Advantages and Disadvantages of Conditional Fee Arrangements for Legal Aid
    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The Advantages and Disadvantages of Conditional Fee Arrangements for Legal Aid

    The conditional fee arrangement was introduced by the Access to Justice Act (AJA) 1999, as an attempt to transfer legal funding from the treasury to the private sector. This occurred as a result of an increasing and ridiculous growth in the cost of legal aid, namely from a few hundred million to well over 2.1 billion pounds from the 1980s to 2000. Moreover, it was not because demand was growing. Rather, number of cases relying on legal aid had decreased. Due to the need to control budget, Conditional fee arrangements are used to fund many civil cases which legal aid now excludes, and the issues brought about by conditional fee arrangements have been debated over the last decade. The conditional fee arrangements are sometime known as ‘no win, no fee’ agreements, which are not used for family or criminal matters, but can be used in many types of civil action. The no win no fee concept was first introduced in the UK under the Solicitors Conditional Fee Agreements act in 1995. The primary reason for the no win no fee system was to make sure that individuals who did not qualify for legal aid could still make personal injury claims, regardless of their personal situation. Section 58 of the Courts and legal Services Act (CLSA) 1990 permitted the Lord Chancellor to introduce conditional fee arrangements. By 2000 legal aid was actually abolished for personal injury claims, resulting in the no win no fee personal injury claim system being the normal system that most claims work under. The beauty of the policy is that if you do not win your case, you are not required to pay any sort of fees to your no win no fee solicitor. Instead, the insurance will cover any costs and expenses of all parties involved, including your no win no fee lawyer. This allows you the safety and security of knowing that even if you are someone who is financially struggling, you still have the right to make a claim, and you will not have to pay if you for some reason lose your case. If you happen to…

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Common Law Dbq
    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Common Law Dbq

    Equity was developed over centuries but initially as a reaction to the “harshness of the common law or lack of developments in common law”. Furthermore, the common law system went unchanged for centuries and was a system were petitions were presented to the King for his grace in some complaint where “the usual royal answer was let him sue in common law”. In addition, complainants often complained about officials in respect of misconduct and unfairness.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Common Law Assignment
    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Common Law Assignment

    The issue is it’s unclear whether Jessie is making an offer to sell or an offer simply as a gift as they have been friends for 15 years. In order to determine if a valid offer has been made application of the objective test would be applied1. Would a reasonable person in these circumstances believe there to be a valid offer and what is the relative importance of the statement to each party2? Jessie’s statement made to Ian that he is happy to ‘let go’ of his car with the wording he has used has the potential to make the situation somewhat ambiguous, Jessie’s true intentions are unclear. The statement is not definite and lacks sufficient finality for the statement to be classed as an offer3. Although his wording is uncertain the courts will also look at what context the statement was made and because Ian did state he wanted to ‘buy’ a car for his daughter then the statement can be argued both ways. Jessie then invited Ian to his home to look at the car although there is still no conversation about the sale of the car. This offer doesn’t have terms that are clear and final and therefore the requirement of a valid offer has not been satisfied.…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of Massimo Calabresi's Troublemaker
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A Rhetorical Analysis Of Massimo Calabresi's Troublemaker

    Massimo Calabresi’s “Troublemaker” is an article about Putin and his relations with the United States. The article contains several complex topics but there is one imminent goal, to expose the efforts Russia is making in degrading the standard of professionalism carried by the United States. Calabresi writes to an audience that is the typical United States citizen. Mr. Calabresi has proven his credibly by the several documentaries and articles that he has previously done for TIME magazine. Massimo Calabresi is the senior correspondent for TIME magazine therefore his title is backed with years of credible and interesting articles. Calabresi starts creating his credibility by providing reputable sources, citing straight facts, and successfully catering to emotional appeals; however, around the end of the article, his attempts to appeal to…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy Research Paper
    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Fusion Fallacy Research Paper

    And, as Spigelman CJ has recently reminded us, the method of common law systems demands that lawyers ‘acknowledge and respect the collective wisdom of our predecessors’,[6] a comment that is, of course, as applicable in…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Creation of U.S. Laws
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Creation of U.S. Laws

    Thorpe, M. (2012). U.S. Law and the History of English Common Law. Retrieved from http://www.godlessgeeks.com/LINKS/CommonLaw.htm…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Henry Bibb
    • 2760 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Henry Bibb

    It was a hot blistering summer day not a leaf in sight or a hint of shade to be found. Mouth is dry as cotton from thirst and hands bleeding and blistering from a hard days work, exhausted from fatigue and hunger, because Master had me out here since the crack of dawn. Tending to the crops in the field and told me not come until every last crop has been tended which is about three football fields long. This is some of the Vigorous work that slaves had to endure. Slavery is a big part of American history. Many of the African Americans you see today are descendants of the 500,000 plus Africans who were sent to North America as slaves. To work the degrading lower class works of the Europeans with no wages or dignity to have. Slavery had existed in America for almost 250 years. In the United States, slaves had no rights. According to the Constitution, a slave was considered three-fifths of a person. A slave could be bought and sold just like a cow or horse. Slaves had no say in where they lived or who they worked for. They had no representation in government. Slaves could not own property and were not allowed to learn or be taught how to read and write. Slavery came to an end in 1865 when the 13th Amendment came into play after the end of the Civil War. One of those 500,000 slaves was Henry Bibb an American slave.…

    • 2760 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Role of Magistrates & Jury in England & Wales
    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Role of Magistrates & Jury in England & Wales

    This essay will discuss the role of the magistrate and jury in the English and Welsh legal decision-making process. It will assess both the advantages and disadvantages of both mechanisms and give an opinion on the contribution they make in the process.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Court Visit
    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Court Visit

    Unlocking the English legal system 3rd edition with Rebecca Huxley-Binns and Jacqueline Martin. Hodder Education.…

    • 2134 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Article 6, 'the Right to a Fair Trial'
    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Article 6, 'the Right to a Fair Trial'

    This essay briefly traces the history of the constitutional mandate or prerogative powers, discusses the hierarchy of the English legal system and the sovereignty of Parliament. It then examines the contention vis-à-vis the right to a fair trial in relation to EU…

    • 3137 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal liability for murder by omission
    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Criminal liability for murder by omission

    Bibliography: Allen, M. & Cooper, S. (2010) ‘Actus Reus’, in Allen, M. & Cooper, S. (10th Ed) (2010) Elliott and Wood’s Cases and Materials on Criminal Law, Ashford Colour Press, Gosport.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fusion or no fusion of equity and the common law at a substantive level
    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fusion or no fusion of equity and the common law at a substantive level

    Those arguing for the fusion of Equity and Common Law at a substantive level often comment on the inconsistency created by equity’s intervention in law. ‘There would sometimes be arbitrary gaps in the common law, that is situations where the common law refused a claim despite allowing claims in other situations which were materially similar.’1 With both Common Law and Equity offering different solutions to the same legal issues, it is argued that for justice there must be consistency with judicial rulings. 2 The current system means that in certain cases the right to an equitable remedy is more valuable.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitutional Conventions
    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Constitutional Conventions

    • Bradley, A.W. & Ewing, K.D. (2003), ‘Constitutional and Administrative Law’ (13th Ed), Essex, Pearsons Educational Limited.…

    • 2824 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Judicial Precedent Is Best Understood as a Practice of the Courts and Not as a Set of Binding Rules. as a Practice It Could Be Refined or Changed by the Courts as They Wish.’ Discuss
    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ‘Judicial Precedent Is Best Understood as a Practice of the Courts and Not as a Set of Binding Rules. as a Practice It Could Be Refined or Changed by the Courts as They Wish.’ Discuss

    The doctrine of precedent, or stare decisis, lies at the heart of the English legal system. The doctrine refers to the fact that within the hierarchical structure of the English courts, a decision of a higher court will be binding on a court lower that is in that hierarchy. In general terms this means that when judges try cases they will check to see if a similar situation has come before a court previously. If the precedent was set by a court of equal or higher status to the court deciding the new case, then the judge in the present case should follow the rule of law established in the earlier case. Where the precedent is from a lower court in the hierarchy, the judge in the new case may not follow but will certainly consider it. It is noted that the doctrine of precedent depends for its operation upon the principle that the courts form a hierarchy with each court standing in a definite position in relation to every other court. The structure of this hierarchy must now be considered for the purposes if the doctrine of precedent. Decisions of the highest courts are binding on lower courts. The House of Lords decisions are binding on all other courts in the legal system, except the House of Lords itself.…

    • 2223 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics