Community Participation N Solid Waste Management
[pic]
By:
Mahlet Seleshi
Submitted to:
Ato Chala Amdissa
A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor in Public Administration and Development Management in the Faculty of Business and Education and Department of Public Administration and Development Management
July, 2009
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Thank to the almighty God.
I want to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Ato Chala Amdissa for his unreserved and constructive comments and directions while carrying out this research.
My deepest gratitude also goes to my beloved brothers Tsegaselassie Seleshi and Fanuiel seleshi for their support in any way possible. I am indebted to you both.
I also like to forward my heart felt appreciation to Azeb Mengistu for her valuable comments starting from proposal development to the finalization of the write up.
My sincere thanks go to Anteneh M., W/ro Emrakeb, and Assistant professor Mekuria Mekasha for their support with valuable advice and comments.
I am also thankful to Dr. Weldeab, Ato Biniam, Dr. Sherman, Ato Yimer, Ato Wondu, and other friends of mine who have helped me through all the processes of the research and the providing me with materials used in the research.
Last but not the least I want to thank Merid for conducting the interviews: and for all the respondents that have participated in the study for sacrificing their precious time.
Table of Content Page No.
Acknowledgment i
Table of Content ii-iii
Lists of Table iv
Lists of Graph v
Acronyms vi
Abstruct vii
Chapter One 1 1.1. Background of the Study 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Questions 5 1.4. Study Objectives 5 • General Objective 5 • Specific Objectives 5 5. Methodology 6 1. Justification of the Case 6 2. Methods 6 1. Data Collection Method 7 2. Interview 7 3. Observations 7 3. Sampling Method 8 1. Sample Method and Sample Size Determination 8 4. Data analysis 9 6. Study Limitations 9 7. Significance of the Study 10 8. Organization of the Paper 10 Chapter Two 11 1. Definitions and Conceptual Framework 11 1. Clarifications and proposed definitions of community, participation and community participation 11 1. The Nature and Implementation of Community Participation 13 2. Participation in Practice and the Elements of Community Participation 16 3. The Needs and Benefits of Community Participation 18 2. Solid Waste Management 20 1. Concepts of Waste Management 20 2. Types of Solid Waste 23 3. Methods of Waste Management 24 3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management 26 4. Empirical Literature 29 1. Practices of Community Participation in Solid Waste Management 29
Chapter Three 31 2. Data Analysis and Interpretation 31 1. Socio-demographic background 31 2. Evaluation of solid waste management problem at the two study area 35 3. Causes of the SWM problem 36 4. The responsibility 39 5. Awareness on solid waste management mechanism/technique 40 6. Types of the solid waste at the two study area 44 7. Solid waste collection transportation and disposal service provider to the community 46 8. Timeliness of the services 47 9. Participation in Solid Waste Management 50 10. Payment for SWM service 52 11. Level of solid waste disposing serice in Merkato and Atikilt Tera 53 12. Community participation other than paying fees for SWM service 55
Chapter Four 60 3. Summary 60 1. Major findings 60 2. Factors Affecting Community Participation 60 3. Conclusion 61 4. Recommendation 62
Reference 70
Aneexes
Lists of Tables
Table Nol. Title Page
Table 1A and 1B: Respondent educational background
Table 2: Responent evaluations of solid waste management problem
Table 3: Respondent view on the cause of solid waste management problem
Table 4: Respondent opinion on responsiblie body for waste problems
Table 5A: Respondent awareness regarding the SWM mechanisms/techniques
Table 5B: Respondent awareness in relation to waste separtation, reduction and desposing
Table 6: Respondents opinion on awareness raising responsibilities
Table 7: Respondent action if they found the container full or absences form the study area
Table 8: Payments for SWM service
Table 9: Amount of fee per month for waste disposal
Table 10A: Vender respondent involvement
List of Graph
Graph 1: Respondents sex
Graph 2A and 2B: Respondents age
Graph 3: SWM serice provider
Graph 4: Timeliness of the serice
Graph 5: Respondent answers weather they ask their rights or no
Anexess
Anex A: Interview guid with venders
Anex B: Interview guid with buyers
Anex C: Interview guid with government officials
Anex D: Interivew guid Micro and Small Scale Interprise
Anex E: Interivew guid with
Acronyms
AU African Union
CBO Community Based Organization
CP Community Participation
ECA Economic Commission for Africa
ENDA Environmental Development Action
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
ICO Information Commissioner's Office
ILF Independent Living Fund
MSSE Micro and Small Scale Enterprise
NGO Non Governmental Organization
RLDS Regional and Local Development Studies
SBPDA Sanitation Beautification & Parks Development Agency
SW Solid Waste
SWM Solid Waste Management
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Program
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Abstract
Background: inadequate solid waste management in urban areas is a major factor affecting the health of citizens and other environmental disasters. This problem is said to exist in the capital city, Addis Ababa. Anecdotal evidences show that specific areas like Atikilt Tera and Merkato are believed to have low level of SWM. In addition, the low level of community participation in SWM is frequently referred to as the main factors for the waste management crisis.
Objective: the objectives of this study was thus to investigate the solid waste management practice and assess the level of Community Participation at Merkato and Atikilt Tera area. The specific objectives are to assess the solid waste situation; assess the role of Community Participation in the process of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal; identify the factors which affect the collection and disposal of solid waste; and measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible bureaus (SBPDA) in solid waste management of Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
Method: A semi structured interview is used with random sampling technique for sample selection for vendors and buyers. An interview is used with purposive sampling techniques for the officials. Observation was also used in the study.
Conclusion and recommendations: there is a serious lack of SWM in the two study areas. Aside from the other causes for this problem the lack of community participation is the major factor contributing to it. According to this study, the lack of awareness, lack of government concern, the presence of information gap between government and community; lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider are the most important factors for the absence of community participation. The study recommends adequate government support, devising a technique to compost wastes, developing alternative waste disposal options, involving private sectors, active community participation, and preparing appropriate policies in SWM.
Chapter One
1. Background of the Study
Addis Ababa is the capital city of Ethiopia and a diplomatic center for Africa, home to African Union (AU) and Economic commission for Africa (ECA). The city is also a seat for regional head quarters of many organizations like UNDP, UNICEF, UNHCR, FAO, ILF, and ICO (Å”w 2®®®:15). Although basic infrastructures and other social services are found relatively in better situation than other cities of Ethiopia, the city is still little more than a town in many respects. The city is full of social, economic and demographic problems. One of the major problems is the inadequacy of the solid waste management and it is considered as the major environmental problem in Addis Ababa. Inadequate solid waste management has resulted in the accumulation of waste in open lands, in drains and in the residential and commercial area of many people, causing health problems, environmental pollution (water, soil and air pollution), and clogging of drain (Tadesse, 2004:1). World Bank (1993:63) also said that environmental pollution affects human health in a variety of ways, from itchy eyes and chest discomfort, to chronic bronchitis and asthma attacks, to premature death.
This situation is believed to be a consequence of poor environmental conditions and an ever-present risk of epidemics, which in turn present a formidable threat to health and productivity. There is thus a need for improved waste management (Tadesse, 2004:1).
Currently, solid waste collection coverage has reached 81.3 % (www.addisababacity.gov.). This indicates that, the remaining 19 percent of waste is disposed off through informal means. In this regard, community participation (CP) is argued to be low in terms of waste removal.
For several reasons, improving this environmental problem in the city has to be related more directly to the issues of enhancing community participation. Just about everyone is involved to improve the above mentioned environmental problem. Community Participation is intended to bring empowerment to influence priority setting in pollution management and support for enforcement (David and Melinda, (1992:4), Glasson and etal (1994:141-142), World Bank (1999:72)).
Involvements of private institutions, non-governmental institution and community at large, in waste management particularly controlling generation of waste at the source, and also participation in collection, transportation and disposal process is highly important. It is anticipated to bring the power to exercise or ask their right (since they are taxpayers) and control over waste management service to the point where they actually get service delivered, thereby improving accountability and effectiveness, and promoting people's felling of ownership of the service executed in their compounds and surroundings (Ibid) . Therefore, community participation in improving the existing service delivery in the city is very crucial.
One of the sub-city of the Addis Ababa, Addis Ketema, meaning New Town in Amharic, located west of Arada, is best known for its open market, Merkato, which competes with Roque Santeiro in the Angolan capital Luanda and Oshodi market in Lagos (Nigeria) for the title of largest market in Africa (www.addis-ababa.wantedinafrica.com). The central wholesale fruit and vegetable market called Atikilt Tera, is located in Arada Sub City. Local shopkeepers and stallholders live in poor conditions in the densely populated residential and market areas on the edge of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. There are high volume of waste produced at the time of selling and buying process.
It is clear from the above description of the activities and the whole situation of the sub-city that there is a need to strengthen the waste disposal system and devise a mechanism for community participation in the process.
1. Statement of the Problem
Various researches, such as a Masters Thesis study was conducted by Solomon Asrat (AAU- RLDS, 2008) recommended that waste management can be best delivered only when the community takes active participation in the service. Beyene also recommended that raising public awareness not only on the importance of creating a healthy environment but also on the mechanisms of controlling waste generated at the source, alternative disposal mechanisms and the spirit to shoulder responsibilities among the general public, local and traditional institutions, business community, non-government and governmental institutions through regular campaign, education and training programs should be stressed. In addition to this, as with any other environmental strategy, there is a need for public involvement and political support in the identification of priorities and the implementation of the necessary enabling measures (World Bank 1999:31).
Also city Administration Mekuria Haile, Said all concerned bodies should exert efforts to solve the sanitation problem since the current status of the city which is the capital of Africa and seat of various international organizations is not up to its standard (Addis Ababa City Administration).
According to some official records, most people do not participate in environmental cleaning campaigns organized by kebeles (Å”w' 2®®®:15). This fact shows of the trend on how low the participation is in terms of waste management, in most parts of the city including in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera Addis Ketema Sub-City of Addis Ababa.
Inadequate municipal and business as well as household solid waste collection and disposal creates a range of environmental problems in Addis Ketema Sub City particularly at the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. Low level community participation has its own negative impact on solid waste collection. Any person while walking around Merkato and Atikilt Tera will able to observe, flying 'festal' (which is increasingly used for packaging), solid waste are deposited and scattered on public spaces like road sides and open spaces. Dumps containing a large range of waste, the bad smell and the hazards it poses for the people. The situation is exacerbated around Merkato and Atikilt Tera area where households and businesses cannot make use of garbage collection containers. Lack of the most basic solid waste management services in the two areas causes negative effect on business and profitability of the vendors. The adverse effect of inadequate solid waste service on productivity and economic development of the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera is expected to be significant.
Thus, attempt will be made to find out the level of community participation in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera, in the solid waste management service, which is currently run under the responsibility of Sanitation Beautification & Parks Development Agency (SBPDA).
2. Research Questions
The study will attempt to address the following question: 1. What is the participation level of the community in collocating, transportation and disposing solid wastes in the Atikilt Tera and Merkato? 2. What are the factors affecting the level of community participation in solid waste management in the two areas? 3. How much and how well do the City Administration and Merkato and Atikilt Tera Kebele Administrations cover waste management needs in the areas? 4. How much and how well do the private sector and community-based organizations participation in the waste management process? 4. Study Objectives
General Objective: • To investigate the solid waste management practice and assess the level of Community Participation at Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
Specific Objectives: ➢ To assess the solid waste situation in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera area ➢ To assess the role of Community Participation in the process of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. ➢ To identify the factors which affect the collection and disposal of solid waste in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. ➢ To measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible bureaus (SBPDA) in solid waste management of the Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
5. Methodology 1. Justification of the Case
The study population is selected from Atakilit Tera and Merkato areas. These areas are selected based on the following criteria:
• The volume of solid waste produced: In the areas there are high volume of waste produced at the time of selling and buying process, especially when the product is fruits and vegetables.
• Population density in the area: People from those area as well as from other areas are gathered for shopping purpose. More people are believed to dispose more waste.
2. Methods
The data collection involves methodological triangulation and data triangulation, or a combination of methods and data sources were important way to strengthen a study design in a single problem (Patton, 1990:187). The use of several methods (qualitative and quantitative) and different data sources (primary and secondary) were helpful to find adequate information and to get individual, group and institutional views (Yeraswork, 2000:296).
In general, qualitative and quantitative data were generated from primary and secondary sources. The secondary sources include legislation and policy documents, research works and other pertinent documents. Regarding the primary sources, fresh (qualitative and quantitative) data were generated to supplement the secondary data reviewed. These data were gathered by both structured and in-depth interviews from respondents at the selected areas.
1. Data Collection Method
The study was applied to different techniques in course of significantly assessing the community participation in solid waste management in the two areas. For the collection of primary data, interview and direct personal observation were employed and secondary data from various documents were reviewed.
2. Interview
Semi-structured interviews were held with randomly selected buyers and sellers in the selected areas. Interview was also conducted with the relevant and concerned officials. These include Addis Ababa City Administration Office (SBPDA Office), Merkato and Atikilt Teras Kebele Chair and Micro and Small Scale Enterprises and an NGO called Green and Clean Addis Ababa Organization. This organization was selected because it work on creating awareness on solid waste management mechanism/techniques. Interviews were held to extract necessary information for the study. The interviews were conducted by using recording instrument by the data collectors or interviewer.
3. Observations
Personal observations through using photographs of the setting of the study were conducted to support the data analysis with valid pictorial inputs for the study.
3. Sampling Method
The fact that the area of this study is a market place has made it difficult to acquire a complete list of all the study population from the respective management organ, the kebele. Hence the respondents of the interview were selected using opportunistic random sampling technique. i.e. the people found at the study areas at the time of data collection will have equal chance of being interviewed. Therefore the sample size is determined to be 50 taking all the time and resource constraints of the study in to account.
Hence, since the total day of data collection is 6 days (Monday to Saturday), interviewees will be given to an amount of four respondents for the first five days and five respondents on Saturday. One additional respondent is included at Saturday since there were usually be more people (buyers) coming on the day. The same techniques were used for both Merkato and Atikilt Tera areas.
A total of 50 semi structured interviews were conducted rom both the areas (twenty five from each area). Eighteen vendors and seven buyers from each area were selected randomly and the interview had taken place. Moreover, in-depth interview from the two areas was conducted with Kebles administrators (Kebele 01/02/03 Administration Office from Merkato Kebele 01/02 Administration Office from Atikilt Tera) and Addis Ketema and Arada Sub-City administration officers, SBPDA officers, Green and Clean Addis Ababa Organization manager, MSSE head and member and also with Atikilt Tera are venders committees chair.
The responses from both the semi-structured interviews and In-interview incorporated with observations are discussed and the implications are also presented. An attempt is made to include interpretation in line with the basic research questions raised in chapter one.
Interviews that were conducted with concerned government officials, MSSEs and NGOs were selected based on purposive sampling method. Hence the number of interviewees were determined by the information gathered each time an interview is conducted. The interview was continued until the information is saturated.
4. Data Analysis
Information obtained through the various document analyses was integrated with the one obtained through semi-structured and in-depth interview. The data are presented using photgraph, frequency tables; charts, figures and other statistical analysis tools.
6. Study Limitations
Due to constraints of time and resources and to make the study manageable, the primary data collection task of the study was geographically confined to the Atikilt Tera and Merkato areas on matters of community participation in Solid waste management. Other aspect of waste management is not discussed in this study. Besides that study covers only aspects related to government and the community based SWM system ignoring the contribution of individual effort and other variables.
7. Significance of the Study
The significance of the study is to identify the strengths and weakness of CP in waste Management and recommend some of the basic mechanisms of ensuring effective and sustainable community participation to enhance sustainable solid waste management. To be able to achieve this purpose the study will assess the level of community participation in solid waste management and to identify the factors affecting the level of participation. The study will also explain the impact of the ongoing participatory programs on solid waste management and their effect on the improvement of the livelihood of the community and environmental protection.
8. Organization of the Paper
This study comprised four chapters. In chapter one, the introduction part, the researcher have deal with the statement of the problem and objectives of the study. In this part is also presented the methodology used to conduct the study. Chapter two presents the theoretical and conceptual framework. It discussed the concepts of community participation and sustainability, the indicators of community participation and the concerned bodies involved in Community Participation. It provides some information that is vital to understand and analyze the situation of solid waste management services of the city. Chapter three analyses and discusses the practices of community participation in solid waste management in the study area. Chapter four summarizes the major findings, conclusions and suggests recommendations based on the analyses and discussions.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2. Definitions and Conceptual Framework
1. Clarifications and proposed definitions of community, participation and community participation
For the purpose of this paper, here are presents definitions and concepts more related with the study topic.
Community is defined as “the term which is applied to societies and social groups where they are considered from the point of view of the geographical distribution of the individuals and institutions of which they are composed". It follows from the definition that every community is a society, but not every society is a community. National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations quoted (Park and et.al. 1959:24). "The community should be viewed as a process involving social structure and cultural behavior..." (Brokensha and Hodge, 1969:1)
Participation is defined by World Bank as “a process through which stakeholders influence and share control over development initiatives and the decisions and resources which affect them” (qtd in Chambers, 2005:103).
Community Participation – “By definition, community participation can only be expressed through an activity of some kind. Hence there is always an interaction between the activity itself and the community group involved with that activity” (Abbott, 1996: 131).
In the late 1960s there was some exploration of different models of participation and their relationship to community development. Since then concern around popular and community participation in key agencies such as the United Nations, has been part of the discourse of community development. As Midgley et al (1986: 23) have noted, the notion of popular participation and that of community participation were interlinked. The former was concerned with broad issues of social development and the creation of opportunities for the involvement of people in the political, economic and social life of a nation, 'the latter connotes the direct involvement of ordinary people in local affairs'. As such community participation can be seen as linking with older concerns with associational democracy and the like. In some countries the notion of community participation has reappeared in discussions around the need to bring some local services and facilities more directly into the control of local people (community development @ the encyclopaedia of informal education, n.d)
Shepherd (1998:7) describes it “for more than two decades development theorists and practitioners have lectured the world about the need for participation of ordinary people in development”. According to some, participation express “as currently understood, participation involves various communities and interest groups having a say in and contributing to the development processes that affect them” (Eversole and Martin, 2005:7).
One online integrated pilot project on community participation in solid waste management (1996:3) study, express that, “Community participation is the process by which individuals and families assume responsibility for their own health and welfare and for those of community and develop the capacity to contribute to theirs and the community development”. In addition to this it said, “They come to know their own situation better and are motivated to solve their common problems. This enables them to become agents of their own development instead of beneficiaries of development aid” (Ibid).
Another writer also stated that “community participation is a process in which community members are involved at different stages and degrees of intensity in the project cycle with the objective to build the capacity of the community to maintain services created during the project after the facilitating organizations have left” (Laroui, 2000: front page).
On the other hand, Oakley stated, “Participation emphasizes on the achievement of predetermined targets rather than the act of participation, it is essentially a short term exercise. This is to mean that local people are mobilized to directly involve in the existing task, but the participation evaporates once the task is completed” (qtd. in Gebremedihin's 2004:18). The expression indicates that participation is a vehicle to achieve predetermined temporary objectives.
A book entitled Community organization in Africa argued that “citizen participation does not just happen. It must be sought energetically and imaginatively and developed continuously. This is a job never completed” (1959: 260-261). This argument suggests participation as an ongoing activity which should not be used as an instrument to achieve predetermined once short term activity.
According to Reid (2000:6) “Community participation is one of the key ingredients of an empowered community”. He also express that “Participation is the heart that pups the community's life blood - its citizens in to the community's business. …. Community participation is far more than a requirement; it is a condition for success” (Ibdi)
1. The Nature and Implementation of Community Participation
Different scholars explain the nature of community participation in different ways. According to Abbott (1996:4), “Community participation is relevant in every sector of development whether it is education, health, conservation, agriculture, or water and sanitation. When it is practiced successfully it transforms programs and provides the critical component which can promote sustainable development”.
He gives emphasis on the understanding of the nature of community participation and said, “In a world of rapid change, effective and meaningful community participation is a fundamental basis of security, either of the individual or of the state. A clear understanding of the nature of participation is central to the search for peace, social justice and democracy” (Ibid).
Abbott (1996:4) also argued that:
"As with any concept which has strong social and political implications, it is often convenient for those who interact with the process to interpret it in a way which meets their own interest, as well as their own particular perceptions. Thus, for example countries might see community participation simply as a way of mobilizing community support for projects; NGOs in the field, as well as CBOs, may see it as a vehicle through which local communities can take control of the development process and bring about sweeping political change; development agencies may see it as a method of improving project performance, whereas many governments and civil servants view it simply as threatening and subversive"
Yeraswork has also said that “the nature of participatory intervention is expected to bring about has to be determined first. That is an intervention, which seeks to promote participation must be aware and defined clearly at the start of the intervention as to the likely nature of the participation it expects to promote. He also said that "In fact, this may change with the nature of the intervention. This awareness might help projects or development initiatives to determine the appropriate methodologies to promote participation” (qtd. In Gebremedin 2004:18).
Moser recognized that: “...historically, where the activity is a project, then the project has tended to dominate and determine the nature of the participation process” (qtd in Abbott 1996:131). Thus it is said that the relationship between the two as one of dominance/subservience, the basis of the end approach to participation was the dominance of the participation process over the project (Ibid).
Apart from the above explanation in Oakley and et.al., the means and end approach has been explained. “Participation as a means is said to imply the use of participation to achieve some predetermined objectives. This is to say that participation is a way of harnessing the existing physical, economic and social resources of rural people in order to achieve the objectives of development programs and projects”. Participation as an end, on the other hand, “is seen essentially as a process which reveals overtime and whose purpose is to develop and strengthen the capabilities of rural people to intervene more directly in development initiatives” (qtd. in Gebremedihin, 2004: 16-17).
Moser argued that (qtd. In Abbott (1996:131):
"In reality it is not the evaluation participation either as a means or as an end which is important, but the identification of the process where by participation as a means has the capacity to develop in to participation as an end. Thus there is a transition from dominance of the project to dominance of the participation process. This seems logical in theory, but it has serious practical difficulties”.
Abbott (1996:131), concludes that, “The fundamental flaw from which most research suffers is that it is reductionist in its approach, rather than analytical. Thus it seeks to explain community participation in terms of a single, clearly defined ideal”. He also said, “to achieve this goal, key phrases have been developed which aim to encapsulate the essence of the community participation process and develop a single form of participation which is applicable to all situations in all parts of the world”. In his consideration “the interaction between the activity and the beneficiary community does not operate in that way and should be seen rather as a symbiotic relationship between two complex processes”.
Abbott also put the nature of activity in two ways as follows:
“Depending on the nature of the activity this interaction is believed to operate in two ways. The first is limited to the beneficiary group and the activity, whereas the second is wider, embracing a range of outside actors”. He supposes that the elements of community participation are the products of these interactions and says that it is these elements which translate the conceptual framework from a theoretical concept to a practical vehicle applicable to real situations” (Ibid).
2. Participation in Practice and the Elements of Community Participation
There are different ways that are believed to be right to achieve deep community involvement by different writers. This implies that there is no one right way that applies for every community. Yet, there are some common elements to sound participation that will be found in all communalities. These elements as stated by Norman (2000:3-4), are:
Many people: the first and most obvious principle of participation is that many people are involved. The work of the community is not considered to be the special province of a knowledgeable few-perhaps the same elite leadership who has always run community affairs-but it is the business of everyone. Participating communities engage many people in their work (Ibid).
Many Centered: Participating communities are open to involvement by many groups. They divide up responsibilities in a way that draws on the special talents and interests of contributing organizations by assigning responsibility for independent action to these groups. In short, under the overall umbrella of a representative community board, power and responsibility are decentralized in a participating community. The result is a community that has many centers to activity and that is capable of reaching deeply into the natural enthusiasm and talents of its citizens (Ibid).
Open and Advertised: The business of participating communities is open to all and widely publicized. Citizens are informed by a variety of means about the community's work, and opportunities for citizens to find meaningful roles in contributing to that work (Ibid).
Open to All Ideas: In participating communities, there is no such thing as a bad idea. All ideas are welcomed and treated with respect. This not only honors the person whose idea is put forward, but it also sets a welcoming tone (Ibid).
Inclusive and Diverse: In a participating community, no distinctions are drawn among various groups and types of personalities who offer themselves to community involvement. All should be welcomed into useful roles. Participating community do not sit by passively, waiting for a diverse groups of citizens to present themselves for involvement (Ibid).
Open Mind, Open Process: Participating communities operate so that it is clear to all that they are not controlled by any one organization, do not represent any one group of people, and are not limited to any one philosophy or way of doing business (Ibid).
Another writer, (Abbott, 1996:132), on the other hand has generated a total of 11 elements which appear to be important and need to be accounted for the community participation structure. These are:
• The objectives of the activity;
• The intensity of participation;
• The instruments of participation;
• The wider surround or environment which influences the participation process;
• The specific arena within which the participation process operates;
• Identification of the primary actors;
• The roles, agendas and relationships of the different actors;
• The point of input into the participation process, and who decided this;
• The practical implantation the participation framework;
• The differing needs of the community;
• The needs of the other actors.
3. The Needs and Benefits of Community Participation
It has been described in Barratt et.al, the need to participate in the analysis of the situation, to bring about awareness of the problem, is essential. When interventions are undertaken with the community, to meet their own needs, the people respond readily. Their taboos, cultures and values can not be broken down when they participate. But if the people had not been involved, they would have felt that their traditions were being undermined as usual, which is the response to many imposed interventions (1976:60).
Among the various benefits of community participation the following are the few that benefit mostly to the society that are identified by a solid waste specialist, A. Subash (n.d):
• Building local capacities and capabilities. for instance increase awareness of knowledge and capacities, may improve the ability to negotiate as equals with authorities and other stakeholders to promote common objectives and increase responsiveness to conflicts with the community • Involvement in decision making. Participation can ensure that the different needs and problems of the community are integrated in any interventions. • Empowerment. Community participation may give people the opportunity to devise and initiate strategies to improve their situation. • Involving the community in the project may increase local ownership of projects and enhance a sense of responsibility for maintaining services provided by projects. These aspects are both essential for the durability and continuity of interventions.
Reid (2000:35) has also explains the benefits of community participation as:
Community participation is not an idle principle. Communities that have chosen to follow it find that not only do they derive more satisfaction from the joy that comes from open community involvement, but they also said to achieve more results, more rapidly, and with greater benefit to the community as a whole. In short, participating communities succeed better than those that only talk about this important principle ... communities that engage their citizens and partners deeply in the work of community development are believed to raise more resources, achieve more results, and develop in a more holistic and -ultimately-more beneficial way.
2. Solid Waste Management
1. Concepts of Waste Management
Pollution and waste accumulation have plagued human beings ever since man started living in permanent settlements, and a multitude of solutions have been developed throughout the centuries reflecting contemporary attitudes toward sanitation and ideas with respect to a decent environment (Grava, 1969:1).
Issue of waste management is not a problem of modern times only, but it is an old aged problem of mankind that did not get a lasting solution so far. Most people have mostly been careful to remove wastes from their own private dwelling, but the wastes are usually dumped immediately outside. This inherent public irresponsibility is a curious, human characteristic which was in evidence in the ancient advanced civilizations and is still with us today (Biruck 1969:17). Thus an organized community must therefore protect itself against the negligence of its own members through regulations, public works programs, and enforcement of quality levels as defined by itself (Grava, 1969:1).
In Ethiopia solid waste and solid waste management has been defined by Federal Negarit Gazeta (No. 13, 12th February, 2007… page3525) 12th ) as follows:
"Solid Waste means any thing that is neither liquid not gas and is discarded as unwanted"; "Solid Waste Management means the collection, transportation, storage, recycling or disposal of solid waste, or the subsequent use of a disposal site that is no longer operational.
The level of industrialization increases or even simply as a result of growing access to packaged and consumer goods, waste disposal becomes an increasing problem in virtual societies. The problems are typically associated with nonbiodegradable or bioaccumulative substances such as waste pesticides, solvents, heavy metals, adn chemical sludges. These are often production wastes, but they can also arise from inapproprte application (pesticides) or poor consumer behavior (waste motor oils). The development and widespread use of new substances such as plastics and the products that they have made possible have improved the standard of living for millions, but they have also introduced new threats to the environment (World Bank, 1998:30). Thus appropriate waste management techniques as to apply.
Wentz (1989:117) point up waste management techniques accordingly. "Solid waste management is an all-encompassing term. It can be used to describe several distinct processes: the elimination or reduction of waste; the recycling or reuse of waste material; the treatment or destruction of waste".
Wikipedia one of online free encyclopedia put in plain words and diagram about the concepts of waste management as follows:
• "Waste hierarchy - the waste hierarchy refers to the "3 Rs" reduce, reuse and recycle, which classify waste management strategies according to their desirability in terms of waste minimization"(en.wikipedia.org/wiki).
Wentz (1989:117) also state waste minimization as "the optimum choice of waste management techniques".
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki).
"The aim of the waste hierarchy is to extract the maximum practical benefits from products and to generate the minimum amount of waste" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki).. • Extended producer responsibility - Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), as stated in the wikipedia, is a strategy designed to promote the integration of all costs associated with products throughout their life cycle (including end-of-life disposal costs) into the market price of the product. It is also described that extended producer responsibility is meant to impose accountability over the entire lifecycle of products and packaging introduced to the market. This, according to this explanation, means that firms which manufacture, import and/or sell products are required to be responsible for the products after their useful life as well as during manufacture (Ibid).
• Polluter pays principle – the third concept which is Polluter Pays Principle is a principle where the polluting party pays for the impact caused to the environment. This is suggested with respect to waste management, which generally refers the requirement for a waste generator to pay for appropriate disposal of the waste (Ibid).
Some are put the wastes management refers to the “4 Rs” in the following ways:
Four Rs (Refuse, Reuse, Recycle, Reduce) to be followed for waste management (http://edugreen.teri.res.in/explore/solwaste/segre.htm):
1. Refuse. Instead of buying new containers from the market, use the ones that are in the house. Refuse to buy new items though you may think they are prettier than the ones you already have. 2. Reuse. Do not throw away the soft drink cans or the bottles; cover them with homemade paper or paint on them and use them as pencil stands or small vases. 3. Recycle. Use shopping bags made of cloth or jute, which can be used over and over again [will this come under recycle or reduce?].Segregate your waste to make sure that it is collected and taken for recycling. 4. Reduce. Reduce the generation of unnecessary waste, e.g. carry your own shopping bag when you go to the market and put all your purchases directly into it.
These solid waste management mechanisms/techniques were found to be adopted by the Green and Clean Initiative Addis Ababa as the 4 "S" rules (¾îÆ“ ›[”ÕÈ ›Ç=e ›uv T?u`, 2®®1).
2. Types of Solid Waste
Solid waste can be classified into different types based on different criterions. For instance, solid waste products may be described according to particle size as rubble, gravel, grit, ash, or dust; or according to their origin as overburden or spoil from mining operations, or slag or clinker from industrial processes. The chemical constituents of wastes are loosely classified into organic or inorganic substance. The imprecise term 'organic' is used for compounds of carbon, other than its oxides, metallic carbonates and related compounds. Many organic waste compounds originate from living organisms, but others are manufactured. All other chemical compounds are described as non-organic or inorganic in composition. Small quantities of so-called biological wastes are produced by some food processing plants and medical and research institutions. These solid and effluent wastes are characterized by the presence of micro-organisms and a wide range of complex organic compounds (John and etal. 1981:21).
The previously cited book on the other hand classifies wastes based on their production sectors. There are eight broad sectors, according to the type of producers or industry from which the solid waste originates. These are:
• Domestic sector, commercial and retail trade sector, industrial manufacturing sector, construction industry sector, extractive industry sector, agricultural sector, nuclear industrial and power sector, food processing industry sector (Ibid)
3. Methods of Waste Management
It is inevitable that as there are different types of waste there will be varying methods of waste disposal. Briefly most solid wastes are deposited on land as tips or spoil heaps, or as land infill to quarries and mine shafts, or as dumps containing a large range of materials. Waste is produced continually so there is often a need for some sort of storage facility. In respect of environmental pollution the quantity, the treatment, and disposal methods of waste are of prime importance (John and et.al. 1981: 84).
As has been stated in the Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki) there are three major methods of waste management:
1. Disposal methods: there are two methods of waste disposal (Ibid).
• Landfill method: involves waste to dispose it off, and are often established in abandoned or unused quarries, mining voids or borrow pits. • Incineration: is a disposal method that involves combustion of waste material and converts waste materials into heat, gas, steam, and ash 2. Recycling methods: is the process of extracting resources or value from waste. There are three methods of recycling (Ibid). • Physical reprocessing: reuse of every day waste materials such as empty beverage containers are collected and sorted into common types so that the raw materials from which the items are made can be reprocessed into new products. • Biological reprocessing: waste materials that are organic in nature, can be recycled using biological composting and digestion processes to decompose the organic matter that can then be recycled as mulch or compost for agricultural or landscaping method. • Energy recovery: the energy content of waste products can be harnessed directly by using them as a direct combustion fuel, or indirectly by processing them into another type of full. 3. Avoidance and reeducation methods: is the prevention of waste material being created, also known as waste reduction. Methods of avoidance include reuse of second-hand products, repairing broken items instead of buying new, designing products to be refillable (Ibid).
Waste avoidance and utilization can be seen as part of a broader hierarchy of approaches to achieving sustainable development. At the highest level are approaches that seek to satisfy human needs and requirements in ways that do not waste resources or generate harmful by products or residuals. These approaches include changing consumer behavior and reexamining the range and character of the products and services produced. At a slightly lower level are efforts to redesign products and services and to raise consumers' awareness about the impacts of their decisions (World Bank, 1998:30).
3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management
Like any other intervention there is a need for community participation in solid waste management.
The disposal of garbage is a worldwide problem and a nightmare for many authorities. Some municipalities fall behind in collecting garbage, which then piles up in the streets. As good citizens, Christians are among the first to respond and comply with Caesar’s laws without complaining (Watchtower 2008:11).
Keeping any solid waste management systems running, at a minimum participation of the community is required in putting the garbage at the street in a proper way at the right time (Subash, n.d). It is written by William apart from removal there is no question that society must prepare for extensive recovery and reuse of wastes if waste generation is to be substantially reduced (qtd. in Biruck, 1996:37).
Consumers in some of the wealthier countries are moving toward a greater awareness about the need for waste reduction, as shown by participation in recycling schemes and some demand for environmentally friendly products (World Bank 1998:30).
In addition to individual responsibility, people are believed to be collectively responsible in more or less organized activities, like meetings, clean-up campaigns, and awareness-raising activities (Subash, n.d.).
William has also stated that society will have to considered balances and choices within the environment as a whole and take full advantage of natural process to destroy harmlessly those residual wastes which can't be recycled (qtd. in Biruck, 1996:37).
Watchtower (2008:11), the family may decide to clean the house regularly each week and to schedule a thorough cleaning once or twice a year. And how about outside the house?
True Christians are willing to go the extra mile to make a contribution in this regard. They are interested in a clean environment and take the initiative in cleaning up, …they understand that cleanliness is a reflection of good training and responsible behavior. It starts with each individual and each family. Simple application of sanitation and cleanliness around the house will lead to better health as well as improve the overall appearance of the neighborhood.
Subash (n.d) said that community participation may involve making material, financial or physical contributions to activities of solid waste management, for instance working as cart operator or sweeper, and paying fees for waste collection. The success of community participation in solid waste management depends on other actors involve, such as the municipality, community-based organizations (CBOs), micro enterprises and local leaders. Community participation of any kind is not also an end by itself; if its’ sustainability is not assured by other means. Subash has considered the following factors to favor the sustainability of community participation and hence of services, like waste collection and separation:
← Communication strategies are said to be essential to generate a broad-based understanding of solid waste issues among community members on the one hand and responsiveness of the stakeholders to the demands of the community on the other. ← Representative local leaders and Community-based organizations (CBOs) are believed to stimulate community participation and ensure that community needs are taken into account. ← Women are also believed to play a determining role in waste management and they form important channels of communication. ← Community initiatives and CBOs are said to be less durable if they are not, at some point, recognized and supported by the local authority. ← Cooperation between the CBO and the local authority to maintain and operate the service system according to formal agreements with stakeholders. ← Follow-up support should also be given after project implementation to reinforce awareness and new practices and assist when required with operation and management of new organization.
Regarding effective and sustainable waste management, each and everyone has to involve in cleaning, collecting and appropriate disposing of waste. Attitude of the community, such just clean their closed environment and put out of their mind about their neighborhood as to change. And, the involvement of each and everyone, in cleaning their around one self's home as well as keeping clean their surround in continuous manner that improve the problem of waste management.
Environmental Development Action in Third World Enda-Ethiopia believes that individual efforts have a sustainable impact in so far they combine with the actions of others. And it says that, the participation of all those involved at different levels in the development process is sought (www.geocities.com).
4. Empirical Literature
1. Practices of community participation in solid waste management
Community participation has been vital instrument in response to environmental pollution caused by inadequate solid waste management in many developing countries. The major reasons of raising the issues of community participation in line with solid waste management in different countries are to improve their inappropriate solid waste management through creating awareness, initiatives & mobilizing the community.
In the city of Luanda- Angola, a pilot initiative was implemented to develop and test a model for the sustainable management of solid waste in the musseques that are not served by environmental sanitation programmes. The project was conducted with assistance from Canadian and Swiss organizations. Active participation of the community was a key component.
Another pilot project was conducted by Subash (n.d) on community participation in Bangalore- India on waste management the fourteen wards of Bangalore, Nagapura, was chosen. The ward is mostly residential with some major commercial centers, which are described to be the major waste generators. Besides other things community participation was the most crucial component of the project to clean the ward. Community members have participated in different ways, such as paying collection fees, offering waste at the appropriate time and separating recyclable materials. Furthermore, community members have involved in awareness-raising activities, participate in meetings to influence the process of the project or be part of committees that manage waste services. It is proposed in the paper that appropriate time frame, achievable objectives and adaptive planning can effect community participation in a positive way (A.Shabash n.d).
Since community participation is unquestionable for improving the problem of solid waste management, city administration is indispensable for a consistent path of environmental protection by increasing necessary ongoing awareness of the environmental problem due to in adequacy of solid waste management at stake in the community, and mobilizing them to bring valuable community participation.
Moser put important implications for the way in which community participation as a means and end, “participation is interpreted as a means, it generally becomes a form of mobilizations to get things done, as an end the objective is not a fixed quantifiable development goal but a process whose outcome is an increasingly meaningful participation in the development process” (qtd. in Abbott, 1996:36).
In short community participation is both a means and an end by itself.
Chapter Three
3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management in Merkato and Atikilt Tera Areas
The study was conducted in two areas namely Merkato, which is located in Addis Ketema sub city; and Atikilit Tera which is located in Arada sub city. This chapter deals with the presentation of facts; and the interpretation and implications of each result.
The presentation begins with brief description of the background information of the respondents and the presentation of data in photograph, tabular and graph form using frequency counts and percentages.
1. Socio-demographic background of respondents
The background information of the major study subjects’ (interviewed venders and buyers) is briefly discussed as follows.
Both Venders and buyers respondents from the two study area were asked to identify their background information through semi structured interview. In this respect the collected data were examined to describe the characteristics of the respondents’ in terms of sex, age and educational background.
A total of 50 respondents were contacted through semi-structured interview, from Merkato area (9 male and 9 female venders) and (4 male and 3 female buyers) from Atikilt Tera area (11 male and 7 female venders) and (1 male and 6 female buyer).
From the graph, it can easily be understood that the number of male venders contacted around Atikilt Tera area is grater than females. In addition, there are more female buyers in the area when compared to that of Merkato area. An attempt was made to balance these numbers but there were less number of female at the time of data collection.
Most of venders (33.33%) respondents of Merkato area found to be between the age 26 – 35. A large number of vender respondents (38.89%) of Atikilt Tera areas found between the ages 15 – 25. (See graph 2A and graph 2B) This indicates that the majority of vender respondents were within in the range of the productive age group in both the areas.
Educational background
As far as education status of the sample interviewee is concerned, 11.11% of Merkato area venders and 16.67% of Atikilt Tera area venders have never attended school. Also 11.11% of venders from Merkato and 5.56% Atikilt Tera area respondents can read and write.
Most vender respondents (44.44%) and (38.89%) from Merkato and Atikilt Tera area respectively have attend secondary school.
Only one male vender have firs degree and one buyer have second degree from Merkato area.
Table 1A respondent educational background (Merkato)
|No. |Item |Respondents |
| | |Merkato |
| | |Venders |Buyers |
| | |Male |
| | |Merkato |
| | |Venders |Buyers |
| | |Male |Female |
| | |Merkato |Atikilte Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |% |F |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |f |% |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |% |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |Payer |14 |77.78 |13 |72.22 |
|2 |None payer |4 |22.22 |5 |27.78 |
| |Total |18 |100.00 |18 |100.00 |
Among those respondents who said they pay fees to MSSE at the area of Merkato the most of respondents (28.57%) made payment between the amount ranges of 16-20 per each shop per/month. While at area of Atikilt Tera the majority (53.85%) of respondents made payment between the amounts 26-30 not per each shop it is per each person (See Table 9).
Table - 9 Amount of fee per month for waste disposal
|Amount of fee |Respondents |
| |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| |f |% |f |% |
|5 -10 |2 |14.29 |0 |0.00 |
|11-15 |3 |21.43 |1 |7.69 |
|16-20 |4 |28.57 |3 |23.08 |
|21-25 |3 |21.43 |0 |0.00 |
|26-30 |2 |14.29 |7 |53.85 |
|above 30 |0 |0.00 |2 |15.38 |
|Total |14 |100 |13 |100 |
Thus from the above response it is understood that the amount and mode of payment in the two studies areas is different from each other. It may be because of the rate and type of waste produced in the two areas.
2. Level of solid waste disposing service in Merkato and Atikilt Tera
It is obvious that the overall goal of urban solid waste management is to collect, transport and dispose of solid waste generated by all urban population groups in an environmentally and socially satisfactory manner using the most economical means available.
Among those respondents who are paid waste collection fees to their service provider only 22% of Merkato area respondents are satisfied but the majority of service receivers are unsatisfied. (See Table 10)
Table -10. Vender respondent view on the service they get is satisfactory or not
|No |Respondents views on the service |Venders Respondents |
| |they get is satisfactory or not | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |Satisfied |0 |0 |0 |0 |
|2 |Accepted |5 |27.78 |0 |0 |
|3 |Dissatisfied |13 |72.22 |18 |100 |
| |Total |18 |100 |18 |100 |
This indicates that MSSE do not play vital role in providing satisfactory solid waste management at the two study areas. This could also mean that the government official particularly Kebele administrations do not have any controlling mechanism over such enterprises whether they are carrying out their function properly or not. According to some respondents the government does not have any regulation mechanisms except for giving license to such institution.
Graph 5. Respondent answers weather they ask their rights or not
The respondents were also asked whether they informed the responsible organs about their dissatisfaction with the service they get or not. In this regard 46.15% respondents from Atikilt Tera area and 28.57% of respondent from Merkato area have found to report to the situation to responsible body (See graph 5).
This indicates that most of the respondent do know the existence of problems, and accomplish their duties. However most of them have difficulties to get proper services and to get their right to live in clean environment is protected.
3. Community participation other than paying fees for SWM service
A large number (72%) of Atikilt Tera area vender respondents unlike Merkato’s (11.11%) have participated in financial contribution other than paying SWM service to MSSE monthly and sanitation service in annually to the government. (See Table 11A).
Table – 11A Vender Respondent contributions
|NO |Item |Venders Response |
| | |Response |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |f |% |f |% |
|22.1. |financial contribution other than paying fees for waste |yes |2 |11.11 |13 |72.22 |
| |collection/disposal services | | | | | |
| | |No |16 |88.89 |5 |27.78 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.2 |labor contribution to activities of solid waste |yes |0 |0.00 |2 |11.11 |
| |management | | | | | |
| | |No |18 |100 |16 |88.89 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.3 |material contribution |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.4 |no contribution |yes |14 |77.78 |5 |27.78 |
| | |No |4 |22.22 |13 |72.22 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.5 |other |yes |0 |0.00 |1 |5.56 |
| | |No |18 |100 |17 |94.44 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
According to A.Subash (n.d), in addition to paying fees for waste collection service and other financial contributions, the community involved in awareness raising campaigns and meetings by establishing a committee that control solid waste management services. However, in the study areas, besides participating in awareness raising and clean-up campaigns, the communities do not play any further role. They believe that awareness rising is only the government’s responsibility.
In Merkato unlike Atikilt Tera, the community does not have any self controlling mechanisms over solid waste facility. Surprisingly, the waste situation in Atikilt Tera area is worse than Merkato. Atikilt Tera area venders attempt efforts to ask their right from responsible bodies through their representatives. 44.44% respondents explain that they providing communities meeting throughout the process for solid waste collection, transportation and storage or disposal facilities, and express their concerns over solid waste management service through their representatives (see Table 11B). In this regard buyers participation were insignificant only 1 respondents tried to express his concern over solid waste problem for the vender (See Table 10C).
There is venders association in the area of Atikilit Tera which has “legal vendor” members. The association established new committee to solve the various problems the vendors are facing in their work. Among the issues handled by this association is SWM. Even if the majority of venders respondent not participate in the meeting because of time constraint, as one of the respondent explanation they are willing to accept and perform the committee decisions over the solid waste controlling facilities and the like.
As this committee chair from Atikilt Tera area presented it, all venders paid 148 birr per month for trade license to municipal service in addition to the monthly payments of waste collection fees for MSSE. This committee has gone through a lot of work to change the situation in the surrounding. Almost all shop owners agreed to contribute 100-500 per month. This is temporary remedy for the encountered problem. He also added that we need the government support or else solving this problem is not essay for us.
Table – 11B. Vender respondent contributions other than financial, labor and material
|No |Item |response |Venders respondent |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |providing communities meeting throughout the process for|yes |0 |0.00 |8 |44.44 |
| |solid waste collection , transportation and storage or | | | | | |
| |disposal facilities, and express their concerns over solid| | | | | |
| |waste management service through their representative | | | | | |
| | |No |18 |100 |10 |55.56 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|2 |providing awareness-raising activities by the community |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100.00 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|3 |preparing clean-up campaigns by the community |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|4 |Specify if any |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100.00 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
A particular location which is found around the traffic light square besides Atikilt Tera areas then cleaned and promoted into a “park” or green area. Also the committee tried to make new contract with other two private enterprises which is believed to have better facilities and potential than the MSSE to give not only waste collection service but also transportation service to the disposal area in order to clean Atikilt Tera area.
But still the volume of waste produced in a day and the available transpiration service is not corresponding and the solution to the problem is said to lacks sustainability, that the initiative lacks continuity.
Table – 10 C. Buyer Respondent contributions
|No |Participation |Buyers Respondents |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |F |% |F |% |
|1 |express your concern over solid waste problem for the vender |0 |0.00 |1 |14.29 |
|2 |express your concerns over solid waste problem of this area for |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| |the responsible officials | | | | |
|3 |by keeping your waste until you get waste container |4 |57.14 |3 |42.86 |
|4 |nothing |3 |42.86 |3 |42.86 |
|5 |other/specify |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| |Total |7 |100 |7 |100 |
As opposed to this view, the SBPDA officials said they are responsible for this improvement. She said “the extra ordinary smell coming from the hill type waste which was accumulated around the area calls for us. It is not because the community has communicated us about the situation.”
On the other hand, the Arada sub city chair, supporting the idea of committee chair said the committee has played the major role on the beautification of the area, that the community participation is the vital player. According to him the Atikilt Tera area waste production is very high, they have only 3 trucks. MSSEs haven’t their own transpiration mechanism. Their roles were collection solid waste from the venders shop. Providing transpiration was our role. Yet we have shortage of track in addition to this the track loading capacity is only 10mc if we transport the waste 4 times in a day only120mc waste can transported to disposal site at Ripe area, the remaining is live there so the waste become buildup. Thus the problem is become very serious. At the moment Atikilt Tera area community make an effort to improve this problem. So that particular place now change in to a green area the community spend hug amount of money for this.
As a result the level of community participation in SWM problem is very significant at the area of Atikilt Tera unlike in the cases of Merkato area. As the researcher consistent observation the researcher also witnessed improvements in the area of Atikilt Tera. In addition to this the government support is fundamental to ensure sustainability of the community participation.
Chapter four
Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations
3. Summary,
This study tried to assess solid waste management practice and assess community participation in SWM at the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera.
The focus areas of the study include the solid waste situation; the role of the community participation in the process of SWM; identify factor affecting the community participation; measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible offices (SBPDA) in solid waste management of the Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
1. Major findings;
2. Factors Affecting Community Participation
From the two study area the entire investigation can be deduced that the following are,
Factors affecting participation
➢ The existence of illegal venders with legal vendors who don’t pay fees for waste collection ➢ Lack of time and awareness of the venders on solid waste management mechanisms/techniques such as waste separation, waste reduction, and reuses of waste instead of buying new items. ➢ Lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider is the major barriers. ➢ Information gap between government and community ➢ Lack of awareness about the importance of support and mutual cooperation among the stakeholders. ➢ Lack of adequate temporary waste storage place. ➢ Lack of alternatives of waste disposal mechanism. ➢ Lack of guarantee to get a response after asking for their rights. ➢ Lack of government concern. ➢ Mismatch of waste production rate and governments waste collection capacity.
➢ The restriction of role of MSSE to waste collection that transportation and disposal.
3. Conclusion
The major factor that has been revealed in the study which has affected the prevailing situation in both the study areas is lack of awareness. The community both the areas haven’t been introduced to the current SWM techniques and the appropriate facilities are not established. This has resulted in the accumulation of waste which in response tends to be a risk factor for the physical and mental well being of the community; the waste should have been recycled and used as a source of income for the government rather than additional cost. In general terms the solid waste situation in the area is worsen by the absence of consciousness about the consequences. The responsible government and nongovernmental organs have hardly given their attention to this end.
Among which, lack of awareness on solid waste management such as waste separation, waste reduction, and reuses of waste instead of buying new items; lack of government concern, the presence of information gap between government and community; lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider are the most important factors. Only an informed, educated and conscious community can have a significant impact on the performance of the community role in line with SWM.
Private sectors and responsible offices have also their share on the reduction of the solid waste management. MSSEs as an instance have helped the community providing a temporary disposal of the wastes. However, these groups have not been empowered financially to do all the SWM. The responsible offices did not give a practical solution to the problems faced by the community.
According to this study participation has been witnessed from both the areas although the degree of participation varies. Specifically, the Atikilt Tera vendors have done their best to overcome the problem concerning solid waste from their area. On the contrary the situation is aggravated in this area. The reason is partly from the load of waste produced from the area. However the major contribution is from ignorance of the government. The community lacks support from the government. It can be concluded from this case that no matter how well community participated in the issue, the absence of support from the government has negatively affected the SWM.
4. Recommendation
➢ Community participation in solid waste management should be considered as crucial element to ensure the sustainability of the solid waste problem. The government support for new and existing community participation will improve overall solid waste problem. Therefore government should have to support them.
➢ Active community participation in SWM must be ensured through effective mobilization and awareness creation on the mechanisms of solid waste reduction at the source, waste separation; waste minimization and reduction and the like. In this regard government should have to increase awareness of the community by reconsidering its awareness raising mechanism. The public should be made aware by arranging awareness site that the waste should not be spread on streets, roads, etc. People should be made aware of the fact that if the waste is properly disposed off from the house/shop then the environmental will not get polluted. Many severe diseases can spread by improper disposal of SW.
➢ Waste disposal options/equipment/ should be available in proper manner. By providing proper and plenty alternatives of solid waste avoidance or disposal mechanism also can create awareness in practical way such as how to and where to the community dispose their solid wastes. Thus the number of staff members should be adequate according to the population of the area and the waste production rate, provision of bins, containers, trolleys and trucks. Their number should be sufficient and the government should take care that the number of these equipments and material of the containers should be okay. Proper finances and system to system coordination is an important issue.
➢ Community members also should be encouraged to demand and fight for their right.
➢ The government should have to be concerned and give due attention for the community in order to alleviate the existing problem of the two study areas.
➢ Government should have to provide alternative mechanisms or place to dispose the solid wastes and have to prepare temporary waste storage mechanism or temporary waste storage place very close to the two areas.
➢ Government should have to assess new mechanisms to change the solid waste become marketable.
➢ Composting could also be an economic feasible alternative. By composing solid waste can be utilize organic fertilizer instead of using chemical fertilizers. Proper marketing by government so that the organic fertilizer produced should be sold out.
➢ Opportunities and concepts for private sector involvement require special consideration
➢ A wide-ranging policy framework is needed at the local level to link public health, environmental, privatization, delegation (transfer the service provision to local government) and financially viable mechanism policies to the needs of the solid waste sector so that they are mutually supportive.
Reference
A. Subash, Solid Waste Management specialist, TNUDP-III; Community participation in Solid Waste management. Satrday, November 23, 2008, 10:43:23 AM from http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/UpdData/Presentations/Train/ MRASU18.PDF
Addis Ababa City Administration-Addis Ababa City Sanitation and Parks Development Agency. Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 9:45:08 AM. From http//www.addisababacity.gov.
Addis Ababa City Administration-Administration urges metropolitans to take part clean. Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 11:58:23 AM. From http//www.addisababacity.gov.
Addis Negari Gazeta of the city government of Addis Ababa. 2nd year No. 29, Addis Ababa 19th February, 2004.
Andrew Shepherd (1998). Sustainable Rural Development. 1st published in Gret Britain 1998 by Macmillan Press Ltd and United States of America by St. Martin's Press, inc.
Beyene Geleta, (1999) Integrated development for water supply and sanitation, Managing Solid Waste in Addis Ababa, 25th WEDC Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,. Thursday, November 27, 2008, 1:13:01 PM. from http//wedc.lboro.ac.uk/conferences/pdfs/25/323.pdf-.
Biruck Wondimu (1969). Solid Waste Management and its effect in Addis Ababa with specific reference to four kebele: Senior Essay, Addis Ababa University.
Broakensna, D. and Hodge, P. (1969). Community Development and Interpretation, Chondler Publisiour Company. USA.
Charles A. Wentz(1989). Hazardous Waste Management; Argonne National Laboratory. by McGraw-hill, Inc.
Clarifications and Proposed Definitions: Urban Environment, Participation, Shared management-Integrated management. Tuesday December 30/2009 01:12:03pm from http://www.globenet.org/preceup/pages/frlch apitre/essaidef/edang.htm
Communication for Development One World, Multiple Cultures: Hampton Press, Inc. (1999). Jan Servaes Katholieke Universiteit Brussel.United States of America.
Community Organization in Action: Basic National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations (1959). Literature and Critical comments. Association Press, 291 Broadway. New York.
Community Participation in Solid Waste Management in Patan (1996): Integrated Pilot Project of Patan Conservation and Development Program; Case :Solid Waste Management in Subahal Tole : Prepared For Urban Waste Expertise Programme Waste. Kathmandu, Nepal. Saturday November 22, 2008, 04:50:08 PM. From www.globenet.org/preceup/pages/ang/chapitre/capitali/cas/nepal.htm#chap1
Community development @ the encyclopaedia of informal education Wednesday, January 21, 2008, 02:13:01 PM. from http://www.infed.org/community/b-comdv.htm.
David R. Powelson and Melinda A. Powelson (1992): The Recycler's Manual for Business, government and Environmental Community. Van Nostrand Reinhold, USA.
Edenu, G. and Haigh, M. (1994). Water and Environmental Management in Europe and North America; a Comparison of Methods and Practices. Ellis Horwood Limited
Environmental Development Action in Third World- ENDA-Ethiopia. Friday, November 7, 2008, 6:02:07PM from http://www.geocities.com/akababi/enda.htm?200910.
Gebremedihin Yihidego (2004). Community Participation and Sustainable Soil and Water Conservation Management. The Case of Zala-Daget project: Dogu'a Tembiem Woreda-Tigray High lands. Addis Ababa Univrsity -IRLDS.
Green and Cleen Addis Ababa Organization(2001). Cleean Addis Ababa by using Solid Waste 4"S" (4"R") rules; Cleen Weeks from Hdar 12 – 18/2001; Brhan and Selam Printing Press.
J. Norman Reid (2000): Community Participation: How People Power Brings Sustainable Benefits to Communities. USDA Rural Development Office of Community Development. Monday, December 15, 2008, 10:36:01 AM from http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/ezec/Pubs/commparticrept.pdf
John Abbott, (1996). Community Participation in Urban Management. Earthscan Publications Limited.
John Glasson, Riki Therivel, Andrew Chadwick (1994). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Principles & Procedures, Process, Practice and Prospects, 1st Published in 1994 by UCL Press, 3rd Impression 1995.
John Wiley & Sons ltd (1981). Environmental Pollution: Atmosphere, Land, Water and Noise. H.M. Dix Department of Science Huddersfield Techbnical College.
Klundert, A. Vande and Lardinois, I. (1995). Community and Private (formal and Informal) Sector Involvement in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries: Background Paper for the UMP Workshop in Itlingen, 10-12 May, 1995.
Laura Moningka, supervisors: Dr. M. Muller, Dr. Ir. F. Laroui (2000). Community Participation in Solid Waste Management, Updated: Tuesday 24 May 2005. Friday, December 12, 2008, 9:33:05 AM. from http://www.waste.nl/page/305.
Making Development Sustainable: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank(1994). Washington, D.C. 20433, USA.
Making Development Sustainable: The World Bank Group and Environment (1994). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank, Washington DC.
Michael Q. Patton (1990). Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc. USA. 2nd Ed.
Paul Arnold, Ethiopia Solid waste management in Addis Ababa, 2st WEDC Conference Kampala, Uganda, 1995.
Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook: Toward Cleaner Production (1999). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Robert Chambers (2205). Ideas for Development; Institutions of Development Studies: by Earthscan in the UK and USA.
Robyn Eversole and Jhon Martin (2005) participation and Governance in Regional Development: Global Trends in an Australian Context.
Samuel Jilo (2008). Community Participation and Public Works in Productive Safety Net program. The Case of Boricha Woreda of Sidama zopne, SNNPRS. Addis Ababa University - IRLDS.
Sigurd Grava (1996). Urban Planning Aspects of Water Pollution Control: Columbia University Press (1996). New York and London.
Solomon Asrat, Solid Waste Management: A Case Study of Household in Arada Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Senior Essay, Jun (2008). Addis Ababa University-IRLDS.
Tadesse Kuma, (January, 2004). Dry Waste Management in Addis Ababa City, Teaching Workshop on, Accounting for Urban Environment, January 5th – 16th, 2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Friday, November 28, 2008, 4:49:41 PM. from www.ictp.trieste.it/~eee/workshops/smr1597/Kuma_1.doc.
The Watchtower (2008). Announcing Jehova’s Kingdom. December,2008. Vol. 129, No.23
Wanted in Africa. Monday, November 24, 2008, 11:38:19 AM. from http://addis-ababa.wantedinafrica.com/articles/complete_articles.php?id_art=662.
Waste Management methods; Waste Hierarchy, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wednesday December 10, 2008, 11:43:06 AM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ File:Wastehierarchy.svg
Yeraswork Admassie (2000). Twenty years to Nowhere: Property rights, Land Management and Conservation in Ethiopia. The Read Sea Press, Inc.
Å”w' ›Ç=e ›uv Ÿ}T Å”u TeŸu`' pê 1 lØ` 1' c’@ 2®®®
¾îÆ“ ›[”ÕÈ ›Ç=e ›uv T?u`' ¾Å[p qhh ›^~ ¾«S´ QÑA‹” uSÖkU ›Ç=e ›uv” îÆ ?“É`Òƒ' ¾îǃ XU”ƒ IÇ` 12 - 18/2001 ¯.U w`H”“ cLU T}T>Á É`σ /wag`e/
----------------------- Prevention
Minimization
Reuse
Recycling
Energy recovery Disposal
most favoured option
least favoured option
Graph 2A respondents age (Merkato)
Graph 2B respondents age (Atikilt Tera)
Graph 2A respondents age (Atikilt Tera)
Picture 2 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 1 Merkato area
Picture 3 Merkato area
Picture 4 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 5 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 5 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 6 Merkato area
Picture 5 Merkato area
Graph 1 Respondents sex
By:
Mahlet Seleshi
Submitted to:
Ato Chala Amdissa
A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Bachelor in Public Administration and Development Management in the Faculty of Business and Education and Department of Public Administration and Development Management
July, 2009
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Thank to the almighty God.
I want to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor Ato Chala Amdissa for his unreserved and constructive comments and directions while carrying out this research.
My deepest gratitude also goes to my beloved brothers Tsegaselassie Seleshi and Fanuiel seleshi for their support in any way possible. I am indebted to you both.
I also like to forward my heart felt appreciation to Azeb Mengistu for her valuable comments starting from proposal development to the finalization of the write up.
My sincere thanks go to Anteneh M., W/ro Emrakeb, and Assistant professor Mekuria Mekasha for their support with valuable advice and comments.
I am also thankful to Dr. Weldeab, Ato Biniam, Dr. Sherman, Ato Yimer, Ato Wondu, and other friends of mine who have helped me through all the processes of the research and the providing me with materials used in the research.
Last but not the least I want to thank Merid for conducting the interviews: and for all the respondents that have participated in the study for sacrificing their precious time.
Table of Content Page No.
Acknowledgment i
Table of Content ii-iii
Lists of Table iv
Lists of Graph v
Acronyms vi
Abstruct vii
Chapter One 1 1.1. Background of the Study 1 1.2. Statement of the Problem 3 1.3. Research Questions 5 1.4. Study Objectives 5 • General Objective 5 • Specific Objectives 5 5. Methodology 6 1. Justification of the Case 6 2. Methods 6 1. Data Collection Method 7 2. Interview 7 3. Observations 7 3. Sampling Method 8 1. Sample Method and Sample Size Determination 8 4. Data analysis 9 6. Study Limitations 9 7. Significance of the Study 10 8. Organization of the Paper 10 Chapter Two 11 1. Definitions and Conceptual Framework 11 1. Clarifications and proposed definitions of community, participation and community participation 11 1. The Nature and Implementation of Community Participation 13 2. Participation in Practice and the Elements of Community Participation 16 3. The Needs and Benefits of Community Participation 18 2. Solid Waste Management 20 1. Concepts of Waste Management 20 2. Types of Solid Waste 23 3. Methods of Waste Management 24 3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management 26 4. Empirical Literature 29 1. Practices of Community Participation in Solid Waste Management 29
Chapter Three 31 2. Data Analysis and Interpretation 31 1. Socio-demographic background 31 2. Evaluation of solid waste management problem at the two study area 35 3. Causes of the SWM problem 36 4. The responsibility 39 5. Awareness on solid waste management mechanism/technique 40 6. Types of the solid waste at the two study area 44 7. Solid waste collection transportation and disposal service provider to the community 46 8. Timeliness of the services 47 9. Participation in Solid Waste Management 50 10. Payment for SWM service 52 11. Level of solid waste disposing serice in Merkato and Atikilt Tera 53 12. Community participation other than paying fees for SWM service 55
Chapter Four 60 3. Summary 60 1. Major findings 60 2. Factors Affecting Community Participation 60 3. Conclusion 61 4. Recommendation 62
Reference 70
Aneexes
Lists of Tables
Table Nol. Title Page
Table 1A and 1B: Respondent educational background
Table 2: Responent evaluations of solid waste management problem
Table 3: Respondent view on the cause of solid waste management problem
Table 4: Respondent opinion on responsiblie body for waste problems
Table 5A: Respondent awareness regarding the SWM mechanisms/techniques
Table 5B: Respondent awareness in relation to waste separtation, reduction and desposing
Table 6: Respondents opinion on awareness raising responsibilities
Table 7: Respondent action if they found the container full or absences form the study area
Table 8: Payments for SWM service
Table 9: Amount of fee per month for waste disposal
Table 10A: Vender respondent involvement
List of Graph
Graph 1: Respondents sex
Graph 2A and 2B: Respondents age
Graph 3: SWM serice provider
Graph 4: Timeliness of the serice
Graph 5: Respondent answers weather they ask their rights or no
Anexess
Anex A: Interview guid with venders
Anex B: Interview guid with buyers
Anex C: Interview guid with government officials
Anex D: Interivew guid Micro and Small Scale Interprise
Anex E: Interivew guid with
Acronyms
AU African Union
CBO Community Based Organization
CP Community Participation
ECA Economic Commission for Africa
ENDA Environmental Development Action
FAO Food and Agriculture Organization
ICO Information Commissioner's Office
ILF Independent Living Fund
MSSE Micro and Small Scale Enterprise
NGO Non Governmental Organization
RLDS Regional and Local Development Studies
SBPDA Sanitation Beautification & Parks Development Agency
SW Solid Waste
SWM Solid Waste Management
UN United Nations
UNDP United Nations Development Program
UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees
UNICEF United Nations Children Fund
Abstract
Background: inadequate solid waste management in urban areas is a major factor affecting the health of citizens and other environmental disasters. This problem is said to exist in the capital city, Addis Ababa. Anecdotal evidences show that specific areas like Atikilt Tera and Merkato are believed to have low level of SWM. In addition, the low level of community participation in SWM is frequently referred to as the main factors for the waste management crisis.
Objective: the objectives of this study was thus to investigate the solid waste management practice and assess the level of Community Participation at Merkato and Atikilt Tera area. The specific objectives are to assess the solid waste situation; assess the role of Community Participation in the process of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal; identify the factors which affect the collection and disposal of solid waste; and measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible bureaus (SBPDA) in solid waste management of Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
Method: A semi structured interview is used with random sampling technique for sample selection for vendors and buyers. An interview is used with purposive sampling techniques for the officials. Observation was also used in the study.
Conclusion and recommendations: there is a serious lack of SWM in the two study areas. Aside from the other causes for this problem the lack of community participation is the major factor contributing to it. According to this study, the lack of awareness, lack of government concern, the presence of information gap between government and community; lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider are the most important factors for the absence of community participation. The study recommends adequate government support, devising a technique to compost wastes, developing alternative waste disposal options, involving private sectors, active community participation, and preparing appropriate policies in SWM.
Chapter One
1. Background of the Study
Addis Ababa is the capital city of Ethiopia and a diplomatic center for Africa, home to African Union (AU) and Economic commission for Africa (ECA). The city is also a seat for regional head quarters of many organizations like UNDP, UNICEF, UNHCR, FAO, ILF, and ICO (Å”w 2®®®:15). Although basic infrastructures and other social services are found relatively in better situation than other cities of Ethiopia, the city is still little more than a town in many respects. The city is full of social, economic and demographic problems. One of the major problems is the inadequacy of the solid waste management and it is considered as the major environmental problem in Addis Ababa. Inadequate solid waste management has resulted in the accumulation of waste in open lands, in drains and in the residential and commercial area of many people, causing health problems, environmental pollution (water, soil and air pollution), and clogging of drain (Tadesse, 2004:1). World Bank (1993:63) also said that environmental pollution affects human health in a variety of ways, from itchy eyes and chest discomfort, to chronic bronchitis and asthma attacks, to premature death.
This situation is believed to be a consequence of poor environmental conditions and an ever-present risk of epidemics, which in turn present a formidable threat to health and productivity. There is thus a need for improved waste management (Tadesse, 2004:1).
Currently, solid waste collection coverage has reached 81.3 % (www.addisababacity.gov.). This indicates that, the remaining 19 percent of waste is disposed off through informal means. In this regard, community participation (CP) is argued to be low in terms of waste removal.
For several reasons, improving this environmental problem in the city has to be related more directly to the issues of enhancing community participation. Just about everyone is involved to improve the above mentioned environmental problem. Community Participation is intended to bring empowerment to influence priority setting in pollution management and support for enforcement (David and Melinda, (1992:4), Glasson and etal (1994:141-142), World Bank (1999:72)).
Involvements of private institutions, non-governmental institution and community at large, in waste management particularly controlling generation of waste at the source, and also participation in collection, transportation and disposal process is highly important. It is anticipated to bring the power to exercise or ask their right (since they are taxpayers) and control over waste management service to the point where they actually get service delivered, thereby improving accountability and effectiveness, and promoting people's felling of ownership of the service executed in their compounds and surroundings (Ibid) . Therefore, community participation in improving the existing service delivery in the city is very crucial.
One of the sub-city of the Addis Ababa, Addis Ketema, meaning New Town in Amharic, located west of Arada, is best known for its open market, Merkato, which competes with Roque Santeiro in the Angolan capital Luanda and Oshodi market in Lagos (Nigeria) for the title of largest market in Africa (www.addis-ababa.wantedinafrica.com). The central wholesale fruit and vegetable market called Atikilt Tera, is located in Arada Sub City. Local shopkeepers and stallholders live in poor conditions in the densely populated residential and market areas on the edge of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. There are high volume of waste produced at the time of selling and buying process.
It is clear from the above description of the activities and the whole situation of the sub-city that there is a need to strengthen the waste disposal system and devise a mechanism for community participation in the process.
1. Statement of the Problem
Various researches, such as a Masters Thesis study was conducted by Solomon Asrat (AAU- RLDS, 2008) recommended that waste management can be best delivered only when the community takes active participation in the service. Beyene also recommended that raising public awareness not only on the importance of creating a healthy environment but also on the mechanisms of controlling waste generated at the source, alternative disposal mechanisms and the spirit to shoulder responsibilities among the general public, local and traditional institutions, business community, non-government and governmental institutions through regular campaign, education and training programs should be stressed. In addition to this, as with any other environmental strategy, there is a need for public involvement and political support in the identification of priorities and the implementation of the necessary enabling measures (World Bank 1999:31).
Also city Administration Mekuria Haile, Said all concerned bodies should exert efforts to solve the sanitation problem since the current status of the city which is the capital of Africa and seat of various international organizations is not up to its standard (Addis Ababa City Administration).
According to some official records, most people do not participate in environmental cleaning campaigns organized by kebeles (Å”w' 2®®®:15). This fact shows of the trend on how low the participation is in terms of waste management, in most parts of the city including in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera Addis Ketema Sub-City of Addis Ababa.
Inadequate municipal and business as well as household solid waste collection and disposal creates a range of environmental problems in Addis Ketema Sub City particularly at the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. Low level community participation has its own negative impact on solid waste collection. Any person while walking around Merkato and Atikilt Tera will able to observe, flying 'festal' (which is increasingly used for packaging), solid waste are deposited and scattered on public spaces like road sides and open spaces. Dumps containing a large range of waste, the bad smell and the hazards it poses for the people. The situation is exacerbated around Merkato and Atikilt Tera area where households and businesses cannot make use of garbage collection containers. Lack of the most basic solid waste management services in the two areas causes negative effect on business and profitability of the vendors. The adverse effect of inadequate solid waste service on productivity and economic development of the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera is expected to be significant.
Thus, attempt will be made to find out the level of community participation in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera, in the solid waste management service, which is currently run under the responsibility of Sanitation Beautification & Parks Development Agency (SBPDA).
2. Research Questions
The study will attempt to address the following question: 1. What is the participation level of the community in collocating, transportation and disposing solid wastes in the Atikilt Tera and Merkato? 2. What are the factors affecting the level of community participation in solid waste management in the two areas? 3. How much and how well do the City Administration and Merkato and Atikilt Tera Kebele Administrations cover waste management needs in the areas? 4. How much and how well do the private sector and community-based organizations participation in the waste management process? 4. Study Objectives
General Objective: • To investigate the solid waste management practice and assess the level of Community Participation at Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
Specific Objectives: ➢ To assess the solid waste situation in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera area ➢ To assess the role of Community Participation in the process of solid waste collection, transportation and disposal in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. ➢ To identify the factors which affect the collection and disposal of solid waste in the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera. ➢ To measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible bureaus (SBPDA) in solid waste management of the Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
5. Methodology 1. Justification of the Case
The study population is selected from Atakilit Tera and Merkato areas. These areas are selected based on the following criteria:
• The volume of solid waste produced: In the areas there are high volume of waste produced at the time of selling and buying process, especially when the product is fruits and vegetables.
• Population density in the area: People from those area as well as from other areas are gathered for shopping purpose. More people are believed to dispose more waste.
2. Methods
The data collection involves methodological triangulation and data triangulation, or a combination of methods and data sources were important way to strengthen a study design in a single problem (Patton, 1990:187). The use of several methods (qualitative and quantitative) and different data sources (primary and secondary) were helpful to find adequate information and to get individual, group and institutional views (Yeraswork, 2000:296).
In general, qualitative and quantitative data were generated from primary and secondary sources. The secondary sources include legislation and policy documents, research works and other pertinent documents. Regarding the primary sources, fresh (qualitative and quantitative) data were generated to supplement the secondary data reviewed. These data were gathered by both structured and in-depth interviews from respondents at the selected areas.
1. Data Collection Method
The study was applied to different techniques in course of significantly assessing the community participation in solid waste management in the two areas. For the collection of primary data, interview and direct personal observation were employed and secondary data from various documents were reviewed.
2. Interview
Semi-structured interviews were held with randomly selected buyers and sellers in the selected areas. Interview was also conducted with the relevant and concerned officials. These include Addis Ababa City Administration Office (SBPDA Office), Merkato and Atikilt Teras Kebele Chair and Micro and Small Scale Enterprises and an NGO called Green and Clean Addis Ababa Organization. This organization was selected because it work on creating awareness on solid waste management mechanism/techniques. Interviews were held to extract necessary information for the study. The interviews were conducted by using recording instrument by the data collectors or interviewer.
3. Observations
Personal observations through using photographs of the setting of the study were conducted to support the data analysis with valid pictorial inputs for the study.
3. Sampling Method
The fact that the area of this study is a market place has made it difficult to acquire a complete list of all the study population from the respective management organ, the kebele. Hence the respondents of the interview were selected using opportunistic random sampling technique. i.e. the people found at the study areas at the time of data collection will have equal chance of being interviewed. Therefore the sample size is determined to be 50 taking all the time and resource constraints of the study in to account.
Hence, since the total day of data collection is 6 days (Monday to Saturday), interviewees will be given to an amount of four respondents for the first five days and five respondents on Saturday. One additional respondent is included at Saturday since there were usually be more people (buyers) coming on the day. The same techniques were used for both Merkato and Atikilt Tera areas.
A total of 50 semi structured interviews were conducted rom both the areas (twenty five from each area). Eighteen vendors and seven buyers from each area were selected randomly and the interview had taken place. Moreover, in-depth interview from the two areas was conducted with Kebles administrators (Kebele 01/02/03 Administration Office from Merkato Kebele 01/02 Administration Office from Atikilt Tera) and Addis Ketema and Arada Sub-City administration officers, SBPDA officers, Green and Clean Addis Ababa Organization manager, MSSE head and member and also with Atikilt Tera are venders committees chair.
The responses from both the semi-structured interviews and In-interview incorporated with observations are discussed and the implications are also presented. An attempt is made to include interpretation in line with the basic research questions raised in chapter one.
Interviews that were conducted with concerned government officials, MSSEs and NGOs were selected based on purposive sampling method. Hence the number of interviewees were determined by the information gathered each time an interview is conducted. The interview was continued until the information is saturated.
4. Data Analysis
Information obtained through the various document analyses was integrated with the one obtained through semi-structured and in-depth interview. The data are presented using photgraph, frequency tables; charts, figures and other statistical analysis tools.
6. Study Limitations
Due to constraints of time and resources and to make the study manageable, the primary data collection task of the study was geographically confined to the Atikilt Tera and Merkato areas on matters of community participation in Solid waste management. Other aspect of waste management is not discussed in this study. Besides that study covers only aspects related to government and the community based SWM system ignoring the contribution of individual effort and other variables.
7. Significance of the Study
The significance of the study is to identify the strengths and weakness of CP in waste Management and recommend some of the basic mechanisms of ensuring effective and sustainable community participation to enhance sustainable solid waste management. To be able to achieve this purpose the study will assess the level of community participation in solid waste management and to identify the factors affecting the level of participation. The study will also explain the impact of the ongoing participatory programs on solid waste management and their effect on the improvement of the livelihood of the community and environmental protection.
8. Organization of the Paper
This study comprised four chapters. In chapter one, the introduction part, the researcher have deal with the statement of the problem and objectives of the study. In this part is also presented the methodology used to conduct the study. Chapter two presents the theoretical and conceptual framework. It discussed the concepts of community participation and sustainability, the indicators of community participation and the concerned bodies involved in Community Participation. It provides some information that is vital to understand and analyze the situation of solid waste management services of the city. Chapter three analyses and discusses the practices of community participation in solid waste management in the study area. Chapter four summarizes the major findings, conclusions and suggests recommendations based on the analyses and discussions.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
2. Definitions and Conceptual Framework
1. Clarifications and proposed definitions of community, participation and community participation
For the purpose of this paper, here are presents definitions and concepts more related with the study topic.
Community is defined as “the term which is applied to societies and social groups where they are considered from the point of view of the geographical distribution of the individuals and institutions of which they are composed". It follows from the definition that every community is a society, but not every society is a community. National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations quoted (Park and et.al. 1959:24). "The community should be viewed as a process involving social structure and cultural behavior..." (Brokensha and Hodge, 1969:1)
Participation is defined by World Bank as “a process through which stakeholders influence and share control over development initiatives and the decisions and resources which affect them” (qtd in Chambers, 2005:103).
Community Participation – “By definition, community participation can only be expressed through an activity of some kind. Hence there is always an interaction between the activity itself and the community group involved with that activity” (Abbott, 1996: 131).
In the late 1960s there was some exploration of different models of participation and their relationship to community development. Since then concern around popular and community participation in key agencies such as the United Nations, has been part of the discourse of community development. As Midgley et al (1986: 23) have noted, the notion of popular participation and that of community participation were interlinked. The former was concerned with broad issues of social development and the creation of opportunities for the involvement of people in the political, economic and social life of a nation, 'the latter connotes the direct involvement of ordinary people in local affairs'. As such community participation can be seen as linking with older concerns with associational democracy and the like. In some countries the notion of community participation has reappeared in discussions around the need to bring some local services and facilities more directly into the control of local people (community development @ the encyclopaedia of informal education, n.d)
Shepherd (1998:7) describes it “for more than two decades development theorists and practitioners have lectured the world about the need for participation of ordinary people in development”. According to some, participation express “as currently understood, participation involves various communities and interest groups having a say in and contributing to the development processes that affect them” (Eversole and Martin, 2005:7).
One online integrated pilot project on community participation in solid waste management (1996:3) study, express that, “Community participation is the process by which individuals and families assume responsibility for their own health and welfare and for those of community and develop the capacity to contribute to theirs and the community development”. In addition to this it said, “They come to know their own situation better and are motivated to solve their common problems. This enables them to become agents of their own development instead of beneficiaries of development aid” (Ibid).
Another writer also stated that “community participation is a process in which community members are involved at different stages and degrees of intensity in the project cycle with the objective to build the capacity of the community to maintain services created during the project after the facilitating organizations have left” (Laroui, 2000: front page).
On the other hand, Oakley stated, “Participation emphasizes on the achievement of predetermined targets rather than the act of participation, it is essentially a short term exercise. This is to mean that local people are mobilized to directly involve in the existing task, but the participation evaporates once the task is completed” (qtd. in Gebremedihin's 2004:18). The expression indicates that participation is a vehicle to achieve predetermined temporary objectives.
A book entitled Community organization in Africa argued that “citizen participation does not just happen. It must be sought energetically and imaginatively and developed continuously. This is a job never completed” (1959: 260-261). This argument suggests participation as an ongoing activity which should not be used as an instrument to achieve predetermined once short term activity.
According to Reid (2000:6) “Community participation is one of the key ingredients of an empowered community”. He also express that “Participation is the heart that pups the community's life blood - its citizens in to the community's business. …. Community participation is far more than a requirement; it is a condition for success” (Ibdi)
1. The Nature and Implementation of Community Participation
Different scholars explain the nature of community participation in different ways. According to Abbott (1996:4), “Community participation is relevant in every sector of development whether it is education, health, conservation, agriculture, or water and sanitation. When it is practiced successfully it transforms programs and provides the critical component which can promote sustainable development”.
He gives emphasis on the understanding of the nature of community participation and said, “In a world of rapid change, effective and meaningful community participation is a fundamental basis of security, either of the individual or of the state. A clear understanding of the nature of participation is central to the search for peace, social justice and democracy” (Ibid).
Abbott (1996:4) also argued that:
"As with any concept which has strong social and political implications, it is often convenient for those who interact with the process to interpret it in a way which meets their own interest, as well as their own particular perceptions. Thus, for example countries might see community participation simply as a way of mobilizing community support for projects; NGOs in the field, as well as CBOs, may see it as a vehicle through which local communities can take control of the development process and bring about sweeping political change; development agencies may see it as a method of improving project performance, whereas many governments and civil servants view it simply as threatening and subversive"
Yeraswork has also said that “the nature of participatory intervention is expected to bring about has to be determined first. That is an intervention, which seeks to promote participation must be aware and defined clearly at the start of the intervention as to the likely nature of the participation it expects to promote. He also said that "In fact, this may change with the nature of the intervention. This awareness might help projects or development initiatives to determine the appropriate methodologies to promote participation” (qtd. In Gebremedin 2004:18).
Moser recognized that: “...historically, where the activity is a project, then the project has tended to dominate and determine the nature of the participation process” (qtd in Abbott 1996:131). Thus it is said that the relationship between the two as one of dominance/subservience, the basis of the end approach to participation was the dominance of the participation process over the project (Ibid).
Apart from the above explanation in Oakley and et.al., the means and end approach has been explained. “Participation as a means is said to imply the use of participation to achieve some predetermined objectives. This is to say that participation is a way of harnessing the existing physical, economic and social resources of rural people in order to achieve the objectives of development programs and projects”. Participation as an end, on the other hand, “is seen essentially as a process which reveals overtime and whose purpose is to develop and strengthen the capabilities of rural people to intervene more directly in development initiatives” (qtd. in Gebremedihin, 2004: 16-17).
Moser argued that (qtd. In Abbott (1996:131):
"In reality it is not the evaluation participation either as a means or as an end which is important, but the identification of the process where by participation as a means has the capacity to develop in to participation as an end. Thus there is a transition from dominance of the project to dominance of the participation process. This seems logical in theory, but it has serious practical difficulties”.
Abbott (1996:131), concludes that, “The fundamental flaw from which most research suffers is that it is reductionist in its approach, rather than analytical. Thus it seeks to explain community participation in terms of a single, clearly defined ideal”. He also said, “to achieve this goal, key phrases have been developed which aim to encapsulate the essence of the community participation process and develop a single form of participation which is applicable to all situations in all parts of the world”. In his consideration “the interaction between the activity and the beneficiary community does not operate in that way and should be seen rather as a symbiotic relationship between two complex processes”.
Abbott also put the nature of activity in two ways as follows:
“Depending on the nature of the activity this interaction is believed to operate in two ways. The first is limited to the beneficiary group and the activity, whereas the second is wider, embracing a range of outside actors”. He supposes that the elements of community participation are the products of these interactions and says that it is these elements which translate the conceptual framework from a theoretical concept to a practical vehicle applicable to real situations” (Ibid).
2. Participation in Practice and the Elements of Community Participation
There are different ways that are believed to be right to achieve deep community involvement by different writers. This implies that there is no one right way that applies for every community. Yet, there are some common elements to sound participation that will be found in all communalities. These elements as stated by Norman (2000:3-4), are:
Many people: the first and most obvious principle of participation is that many people are involved. The work of the community is not considered to be the special province of a knowledgeable few-perhaps the same elite leadership who has always run community affairs-but it is the business of everyone. Participating communities engage many people in their work (Ibid).
Many Centered: Participating communities are open to involvement by many groups. They divide up responsibilities in a way that draws on the special talents and interests of contributing organizations by assigning responsibility for independent action to these groups. In short, under the overall umbrella of a representative community board, power and responsibility are decentralized in a participating community. The result is a community that has many centers to activity and that is capable of reaching deeply into the natural enthusiasm and talents of its citizens (Ibid).
Open and Advertised: The business of participating communities is open to all and widely publicized. Citizens are informed by a variety of means about the community's work, and opportunities for citizens to find meaningful roles in contributing to that work (Ibid).
Open to All Ideas: In participating communities, there is no such thing as a bad idea. All ideas are welcomed and treated with respect. This not only honors the person whose idea is put forward, but it also sets a welcoming tone (Ibid).
Inclusive and Diverse: In a participating community, no distinctions are drawn among various groups and types of personalities who offer themselves to community involvement. All should be welcomed into useful roles. Participating community do not sit by passively, waiting for a diverse groups of citizens to present themselves for involvement (Ibid).
Open Mind, Open Process: Participating communities operate so that it is clear to all that they are not controlled by any one organization, do not represent any one group of people, and are not limited to any one philosophy or way of doing business (Ibid).
Another writer, (Abbott, 1996:132), on the other hand has generated a total of 11 elements which appear to be important and need to be accounted for the community participation structure. These are:
• The objectives of the activity;
• The intensity of participation;
• The instruments of participation;
• The wider surround or environment which influences the participation process;
• The specific arena within which the participation process operates;
• Identification of the primary actors;
• The roles, agendas and relationships of the different actors;
• The point of input into the participation process, and who decided this;
• The practical implantation the participation framework;
• The differing needs of the community;
• The needs of the other actors.
3. The Needs and Benefits of Community Participation
It has been described in Barratt et.al, the need to participate in the analysis of the situation, to bring about awareness of the problem, is essential. When interventions are undertaken with the community, to meet their own needs, the people respond readily. Their taboos, cultures and values can not be broken down when they participate. But if the people had not been involved, they would have felt that their traditions were being undermined as usual, which is the response to many imposed interventions (1976:60).
Among the various benefits of community participation the following are the few that benefit mostly to the society that are identified by a solid waste specialist, A. Subash (n.d):
• Building local capacities and capabilities. for instance increase awareness of knowledge and capacities, may improve the ability to negotiate as equals with authorities and other stakeholders to promote common objectives and increase responsiveness to conflicts with the community • Involvement in decision making. Participation can ensure that the different needs and problems of the community are integrated in any interventions. • Empowerment. Community participation may give people the opportunity to devise and initiate strategies to improve their situation. • Involving the community in the project may increase local ownership of projects and enhance a sense of responsibility for maintaining services provided by projects. These aspects are both essential for the durability and continuity of interventions.
Reid (2000:35) has also explains the benefits of community participation as:
Community participation is not an idle principle. Communities that have chosen to follow it find that not only do they derive more satisfaction from the joy that comes from open community involvement, but they also said to achieve more results, more rapidly, and with greater benefit to the community as a whole. In short, participating communities succeed better than those that only talk about this important principle ... communities that engage their citizens and partners deeply in the work of community development are believed to raise more resources, achieve more results, and develop in a more holistic and -ultimately-more beneficial way.
2. Solid Waste Management
1. Concepts of Waste Management
Pollution and waste accumulation have plagued human beings ever since man started living in permanent settlements, and a multitude of solutions have been developed throughout the centuries reflecting contemporary attitudes toward sanitation and ideas with respect to a decent environment (Grava, 1969:1).
Issue of waste management is not a problem of modern times only, but it is an old aged problem of mankind that did not get a lasting solution so far. Most people have mostly been careful to remove wastes from their own private dwelling, but the wastes are usually dumped immediately outside. This inherent public irresponsibility is a curious, human characteristic which was in evidence in the ancient advanced civilizations and is still with us today (Biruck 1969:17). Thus an organized community must therefore protect itself against the negligence of its own members through regulations, public works programs, and enforcement of quality levels as defined by itself (Grava, 1969:1).
In Ethiopia solid waste and solid waste management has been defined by Federal Negarit Gazeta (No. 13, 12th February, 2007… page3525) 12th ) as follows:
"Solid Waste means any thing that is neither liquid not gas and is discarded as unwanted"; "Solid Waste Management means the collection, transportation, storage, recycling or disposal of solid waste, or the subsequent use of a disposal site that is no longer operational.
The level of industrialization increases or even simply as a result of growing access to packaged and consumer goods, waste disposal becomes an increasing problem in virtual societies. The problems are typically associated with nonbiodegradable or bioaccumulative substances such as waste pesticides, solvents, heavy metals, adn chemical sludges. These are often production wastes, but they can also arise from inapproprte application (pesticides) or poor consumer behavior (waste motor oils). The development and widespread use of new substances such as plastics and the products that they have made possible have improved the standard of living for millions, but they have also introduced new threats to the environment (World Bank, 1998:30). Thus appropriate waste management techniques as to apply.
Wentz (1989:117) point up waste management techniques accordingly. "Solid waste management is an all-encompassing term. It can be used to describe several distinct processes: the elimination or reduction of waste; the recycling or reuse of waste material; the treatment or destruction of waste".
Wikipedia one of online free encyclopedia put in plain words and diagram about the concepts of waste management as follows:
• "Waste hierarchy - the waste hierarchy refers to the "3 Rs" reduce, reuse and recycle, which classify waste management strategies according to their desirability in terms of waste minimization"(en.wikipedia.org/wiki).
Wentz (1989:117) also state waste minimization as "the optimum choice of waste management techniques".
(en.wikipedia.org/wiki).
"The aim of the waste hierarchy is to extract the maximum practical benefits from products and to generate the minimum amount of waste" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki).. • Extended producer responsibility - Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), as stated in the wikipedia, is a strategy designed to promote the integration of all costs associated with products throughout their life cycle (including end-of-life disposal costs) into the market price of the product. It is also described that extended producer responsibility is meant to impose accountability over the entire lifecycle of products and packaging introduced to the market. This, according to this explanation, means that firms which manufacture, import and/or sell products are required to be responsible for the products after their useful life as well as during manufacture (Ibid).
• Polluter pays principle – the third concept which is Polluter Pays Principle is a principle where the polluting party pays for the impact caused to the environment. This is suggested with respect to waste management, which generally refers the requirement for a waste generator to pay for appropriate disposal of the waste (Ibid).
Some are put the wastes management refers to the “4 Rs” in the following ways:
Four Rs (Refuse, Reuse, Recycle, Reduce) to be followed for waste management (http://edugreen.teri.res.in/explore/solwaste/segre.htm):
1. Refuse. Instead of buying new containers from the market, use the ones that are in the house. Refuse to buy new items though you may think they are prettier than the ones you already have. 2. Reuse. Do not throw away the soft drink cans or the bottles; cover them with homemade paper or paint on them and use them as pencil stands or small vases. 3. Recycle. Use shopping bags made of cloth or jute, which can be used over and over again [will this come under recycle or reduce?].Segregate your waste to make sure that it is collected and taken for recycling. 4. Reduce. Reduce the generation of unnecessary waste, e.g. carry your own shopping bag when you go to the market and put all your purchases directly into it.
These solid waste management mechanisms/techniques were found to be adopted by the Green and Clean Initiative Addis Ababa as the 4 "S" rules (¾îÆ“ ›[”ÕÈ ›Ç=e ›uv T?u`, 2®®1).
2. Types of Solid Waste
Solid waste can be classified into different types based on different criterions. For instance, solid waste products may be described according to particle size as rubble, gravel, grit, ash, or dust; or according to their origin as overburden or spoil from mining operations, or slag or clinker from industrial processes. The chemical constituents of wastes are loosely classified into organic or inorganic substance. The imprecise term 'organic' is used for compounds of carbon, other than its oxides, metallic carbonates and related compounds. Many organic waste compounds originate from living organisms, but others are manufactured. All other chemical compounds are described as non-organic or inorganic in composition. Small quantities of so-called biological wastes are produced by some food processing plants and medical and research institutions. These solid and effluent wastes are characterized by the presence of micro-organisms and a wide range of complex organic compounds (John and etal. 1981:21).
The previously cited book on the other hand classifies wastes based on their production sectors. There are eight broad sectors, according to the type of producers or industry from which the solid waste originates. These are:
• Domestic sector, commercial and retail trade sector, industrial manufacturing sector, construction industry sector, extractive industry sector, agricultural sector, nuclear industrial and power sector, food processing industry sector (Ibid)
3. Methods of Waste Management
It is inevitable that as there are different types of waste there will be varying methods of waste disposal. Briefly most solid wastes are deposited on land as tips or spoil heaps, or as land infill to quarries and mine shafts, or as dumps containing a large range of materials. Waste is produced continually so there is often a need for some sort of storage facility. In respect of environmental pollution the quantity, the treatment, and disposal methods of waste are of prime importance (John and et.al. 1981: 84).
As has been stated in the Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki) there are three major methods of waste management:
1. Disposal methods: there are two methods of waste disposal (Ibid).
• Landfill method: involves waste to dispose it off, and are often established in abandoned or unused quarries, mining voids or borrow pits. • Incineration: is a disposal method that involves combustion of waste material and converts waste materials into heat, gas, steam, and ash 2. Recycling methods: is the process of extracting resources or value from waste. There are three methods of recycling (Ibid). • Physical reprocessing: reuse of every day waste materials such as empty beverage containers are collected and sorted into common types so that the raw materials from which the items are made can be reprocessed into new products. • Biological reprocessing: waste materials that are organic in nature, can be recycled using biological composting and digestion processes to decompose the organic matter that can then be recycled as mulch or compost for agricultural or landscaping method. • Energy recovery: the energy content of waste products can be harnessed directly by using them as a direct combustion fuel, or indirectly by processing them into another type of full. 3. Avoidance and reeducation methods: is the prevention of waste material being created, also known as waste reduction. Methods of avoidance include reuse of second-hand products, repairing broken items instead of buying new, designing products to be refillable (Ibid).
Waste avoidance and utilization can be seen as part of a broader hierarchy of approaches to achieving sustainable development. At the highest level are approaches that seek to satisfy human needs and requirements in ways that do not waste resources or generate harmful by products or residuals. These approaches include changing consumer behavior and reexamining the range and character of the products and services produced. At a slightly lower level are efforts to redesign products and services and to raise consumers' awareness about the impacts of their decisions (World Bank, 1998:30).
3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management
Like any other intervention there is a need for community participation in solid waste management.
The disposal of garbage is a worldwide problem and a nightmare for many authorities. Some municipalities fall behind in collecting garbage, which then piles up in the streets. As good citizens, Christians are among the first to respond and comply with Caesar’s laws without complaining (Watchtower 2008:11).
Keeping any solid waste management systems running, at a minimum participation of the community is required in putting the garbage at the street in a proper way at the right time (Subash, n.d). It is written by William apart from removal there is no question that society must prepare for extensive recovery and reuse of wastes if waste generation is to be substantially reduced (qtd. in Biruck, 1996:37).
Consumers in some of the wealthier countries are moving toward a greater awareness about the need for waste reduction, as shown by participation in recycling schemes and some demand for environmentally friendly products (World Bank 1998:30).
In addition to individual responsibility, people are believed to be collectively responsible in more or less organized activities, like meetings, clean-up campaigns, and awareness-raising activities (Subash, n.d.).
William has also stated that society will have to considered balances and choices within the environment as a whole and take full advantage of natural process to destroy harmlessly those residual wastes which can't be recycled (qtd. in Biruck, 1996:37).
Watchtower (2008:11), the family may decide to clean the house regularly each week and to schedule a thorough cleaning once or twice a year. And how about outside the house?
True Christians are willing to go the extra mile to make a contribution in this regard. They are interested in a clean environment and take the initiative in cleaning up, …they understand that cleanliness is a reflection of good training and responsible behavior. It starts with each individual and each family. Simple application of sanitation and cleanliness around the house will lead to better health as well as improve the overall appearance of the neighborhood.
Subash (n.d) said that community participation may involve making material, financial or physical contributions to activities of solid waste management, for instance working as cart operator or sweeper, and paying fees for waste collection. The success of community participation in solid waste management depends on other actors involve, such as the municipality, community-based organizations (CBOs), micro enterprises and local leaders. Community participation of any kind is not also an end by itself; if its’ sustainability is not assured by other means. Subash has considered the following factors to favor the sustainability of community participation and hence of services, like waste collection and separation:
← Communication strategies are said to be essential to generate a broad-based understanding of solid waste issues among community members on the one hand and responsiveness of the stakeholders to the demands of the community on the other. ← Representative local leaders and Community-based organizations (CBOs) are believed to stimulate community participation and ensure that community needs are taken into account. ← Women are also believed to play a determining role in waste management and they form important channels of communication. ← Community initiatives and CBOs are said to be less durable if they are not, at some point, recognized and supported by the local authority. ← Cooperation between the CBO and the local authority to maintain and operate the service system according to formal agreements with stakeholders. ← Follow-up support should also be given after project implementation to reinforce awareness and new practices and assist when required with operation and management of new organization.
Regarding effective and sustainable waste management, each and everyone has to involve in cleaning, collecting and appropriate disposing of waste. Attitude of the community, such just clean their closed environment and put out of their mind about their neighborhood as to change. And, the involvement of each and everyone, in cleaning their around one self's home as well as keeping clean their surround in continuous manner that improve the problem of waste management.
Environmental Development Action in Third World Enda-Ethiopia believes that individual efforts have a sustainable impact in so far they combine with the actions of others. And it says that, the participation of all those involved at different levels in the development process is sought (www.geocities.com).
4. Empirical Literature
1. Practices of community participation in solid waste management
Community participation has been vital instrument in response to environmental pollution caused by inadequate solid waste management in many developing countries. The major reasons of raising the issues of community participation in line with solid waste management in different countries are to improve their inappropriate solid waste management through creating awareness, initiatives & mobilizing the community.
In the city of Luanda- Angola, a pilot initiative was implemented to develop and test a model for the sustainable management of solid waste in the musseques that are not served by environmental sanitation programmes. The project was conducted with assistance from Canadian and Swiss organizations. Active participation of the community was a key component.
Another pilot project was conducted by Subash (n.d) on community participation in Bangalore- India on waste management the fourteen wards of Bangalore, Nagapura, was chosen. The ward is mostly residential with some major commercial centers, which are described to be the major waste generators. Besides other things community participation was the most crucial component of the project to clean the ward. Community members have participated in different ways, such as paying collection fees, offering waste at the appropriate time and separating recyclable materials. Furthermore, community members have involved in awareness-raising activities, participate in meetings to influence the process of the project or be part of committees that manage waste services. It is proposed in the paper that appropriate time frame, achievable objectives and adaptive planning can effect community participation in a positive way (A.Shabash n.d).
Since community participation is unquestionable for improving the problem of solid waste management, city administration is indispensable for a consistent path of environmental protection by increasing necessary ongoing awareness of the environmental problem due to in adequacy of solid waste management at stake in the community, and mobilizing them to bring valuable community participation.
Moser put important implications for the way in which community participation as a means and end, “participation is interpreted as a means, it generally becomes a form of mobilizations to get things done, as an end the objective is not a fixed quantifiable development goal but a process whose outcome is an increasingly meaningful participation in the development process” (qtd. in Abbott, 1996:36).
In short community participation is both a means and an end by itself.
Chapter Three
3. Community Participation in Solid Waste Management in Merkato and Atikilt Tera Areas
The study was conducted in two areas namely Merkato, which is located in Addis Ketema sub city; and Atikilit Tera which is located in Arada sub city. This chapter deals with the presentation of facts; and the interpretation and implications of each result.
The presentation begins with brief description of the background information of the respondents and the presentation of data in photograph, tabular and graph form using frequency counts and percentages.
1. Socio-demographic background of respondents
The background information of the major study subjects’ (interviewed venders and buyers) is briefly discussed as follows.
Both Venders and buyers respondents from the two study area were asked to identify their background information through semi structured interview. In this respect the collected data were examined to describe the characteristics of the respondents’ in terms of sex, age and educational background.
A total of 50 respondents were contacted through semi-structured interview, from Merkato area (9 male and 9 female venders) and (4 male and 3 female buyers) from Atikilt Tera area (11 male and 7 female venders) and (1 male and 6 female buyer).
From the graph, it can easily be understood that the number of male venders contacted around Atikilt Tera area is grater than females. In addition, there are more female buyers in the area when compared to that of Merkato area. An attempt was made to balance these numbers but there were less number of female at the time of data collection.
Most of venders (33.33%) respondents of Merkato area found to be between the age 26 – 35. A large number of vender respondents (38.89%) of Atikilt Tera areas found between the ages 15 – 25. (See graph 2A and graph 2B) This indicates that the majority of vender respondents were within in the range of the productive age group in both the areas.
Educational background
As far as education status of the sample interviewee is concerned, 11.11% of Merkato area venders and 16.67% of Atikilt Tera area venders have never attended school. Also 11.11% of venders from Merkato and 5.56% Atikilt Tera area respondents can read and write.
Most vender respondents (44.44%) and (38.89%) from Merkato and Atikilt Tera area respectively have attend secondary school.
Only one male vender have firs degree and one buyer have second degree from Merkato area.
Table 1A respondent educational background (Merkato)
|No. |Item |Respondents |
| | |Merkato |
| | |Venders |Buyers |
| | |Male |
| | |Merkato |
| | |Venders |Buyers |
| | |Male |Female |
| | |Merkato |Atikilte Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |% |F |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |f |% |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |% |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |Venders |Buyers |Venders |Buyers |
| | |f |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |Payer |14 |77.78 |13 |72.22 |
|2 |None payer |4 |22.22 |5 |27.78 |
| |Total |18 |100.00 |18 |100.00 |
Among those respondents who said they pay fees to MSSE at the area of Merkato the most of respondents (28.57%) made payment between the amount ranges of 16-20 per each shop per/month. While at area of Atikilt Tera the majority (53.85%) of respondents made payment between the amounts 26-30 not per each shop it is per each person (See Table 9).
Table - 9 Amount of fee per month for waste disposal
|Amount of fee |Respondents |
| |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| |f |% |f |% |
|5 -10 |2 |14.29 |0 |0.00 |
|11-15 |3 |21.43 |1 |7.69 |
|16-20 |4 |28.57 |3 |23.08 |
|21-25 |3 |21.43 |0 |0.00 |
|26-30 |2 |14.29 |7 |53.85 |
|above 30 |0 |0.00 |2 |15.38 |
|Total |14 |100 |13 |100 |
Thus from the above response it is understood that the amount and mode of payment in the two studies areas is different from each other. It may be because of the rate and type of waste produced in the two areas.
2. Level of solid waste disposing service in Merkato and Atikilt Tera
It is obvious that the overall goal of urban solid waste management is to collect, transport and dispose of solid waste generated by all urban population groups in an environmentally and socially satisfactory manner using the most economical means available.
Among those respondents who are paid waste collection fees to their service provider only 22% of Merkato area respondents are satisfied but the majority of service receivers are unsatisfied. (See Table 10)
Table -10. Vender respondent view on the service they get is satisfactory or not
|No |Respondents views on the service |Venders Respondents |
| |they get is satisfactory or not | |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |Satisfied |0 |0 |0 |0 |
|2 |Accepted |5 |27.78 |0 |0 |
|3 |Dissatisfied |13 |72.22 |18 |100 |
| |Total |18 |100 |18 |100 |
This indicates that MSSE do not play vital role in providing satisfactory solid waste management at the two study areas. This could also mean that the government official particularly Kebele administrations do not have any controlling mechanism over such enterprises whether they are carrying out their function properly or not. According to some respondents the government does not have any regulation mechanisms except for giving license to such institution.
Graph 5. Respondent answers weather they ask their rights or not
The respondents were also asked whether they informed the responsible organs about their dissatisfaction with the service they get or not. In this regard 46.15% respondents from Atikilt Tera area and 28.57% of respondent from Merkato area have found to report to the situation to responsible body (See graph 5).
This indicates that most of the respondent do know the existence of problems, and accomplish their duties. However most of them have difficulties to get proper services and to get their right to live in clean environment is protected.
3. Community participation other than paying fees for SWM service
A large number (72%) of Atikilt Tera area vender respondents unlike Merkato’s (11.11%) have participated in financial contribution other than paying SWM service to MSSE monthly and sanitation service in annually to the government. (See Table 11A).
Table – 11A Vender Respondent contributions
|NO |Item |Venders Response |
| | |Response |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |f |% |f |% |
|22.1. |financial contribution other than paying fees for waste |yes |2 |11.11 |13 |72.22 |
| |collection/disposal services | | | | | |
| | |No |16 |88.89 |5 |27.78 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.2 |labor contribution to activities of solid waste |yes |0 |0.00 |2 |11.11 |
| |management | | | | | |
| | |No |18 |100 |16 |88.89 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.3 |material contribution |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.4 |no contribution |yes |14 |77.78 |5 |27.78 |
| | |No |4 |22.22 |13 |72.22 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|22.5 |other |yes |0 |0.00 |1 |5.56 |
| | |No |18 |100 |17 |94.44 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
According to A.Subash (n.d), in addition to paying fees for waste collection service and other financial contributions, the community involved in awareness raising campaigns and meetings by establishing a committee that control solid waste management services. However, in the study areas, besides participating in awareness raising and clean-up campaigns, the communities do not play any further role. They believe that awareness rising is only the government’s responsibility.
In Merkato unlike Atikilt Tera, the community does not have any self controlling mechanisms over solid waste facility. Surprisingly, the waste situation in Atikilt Tera area is worse than Merkato. Atikilt Tera area venders attempt efforts to ask their right from responsible bodies through their representatives. 44.44% respondents explain that they providing communities meeting throughout the process for solid waste collection, transportation and storage or disposal facilities, and express their concerns over solid waste management service through their representatives (see Table 11B). In this regard buyers participation were insignificant only 1 respondents tried to express his concern over solid waste problem for the vender (See Table 10C).
There is venders association in the area of Atikilit Tera which has “legal vendor” members. The association established new committee to solve the various problems the vendors are facing in their work. Among the issues handled by this association is SWM. Even if the majority of venders respondent not participate in the meeting because of time constraint, as one of the respondent explanation they are willing to accept and perform the committee decisions over the solid waste controlling facilities and the like.
As this committee chair from Atikilt Tera area presented it, all venders paid 148 birr per month for trade license to municipal service in addition to the monthly payments of waste collection fees for MSSE. This committee has gone through a lot of work to change the situation in the surrounding. Almost all shop owners agreed to contribute 100-500 per month. This is temporary remedy for the encountered problem. He also added that we need the government support or else solving this problem is not essay for us.
Table – 11B. Vender respondent contributions other than financial, labor and material
|No |Item |response |Venders respondent |
| | | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | | |f |% |f |% |
|1 |providing communities meeting throughout the process for|yes |0 |0.00 |8 |44.44 |
| |solid waste collection , transportation and storage or | | | | | |
| |disposal facilities, and express their concerns over solid| | | | | |
| |waste management service through their representative | | | | | |
| | |No |18 |100 |10 |55.56 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|2 |providing awareness-raising activities by the community |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100.00 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|3 |preparing clean-up campaigns by the community |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
|4 |Specify if any |yes |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| | |No |18 |100 |18 |100.00 |
| |Total | |18 |100 |18 |100 |
A particular location which is found around the traffic light square besides Atikilt Tera areas then cleaned and promoted into a “park” or green area. Also the committee tried to make new contract with other two private enterprises which is believed to have better facilities and potential than the MSSE to give not only waste collection service but also transportation service to the disposal area in order to clean Atikilt Tera area.
But still the volume of waste produced in a day and the available transpiration service is not corresponding and the solution to the problem is said to lacks sustainability, that the initiative lacks continuity.
Table – 10 C. Buyer Respondent contributions
|No |Participation |Buyers Respondents |
| | |Merkato |Atikilt Tera |
| | |F |% |F |% |
|1 |express your concern over solid waste problem for the vender |0 |0.00 |1 |14.29 |
|2 |express your concerns over solid waste problem of this area for |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| |the responsible officials | | | | |
|3 |by keeping your waste until you get waste container |4 |57.14 |3 |42.86 |
|4 |nothing |3 |42.86 |3 |42.86 |
|5 |other/specify |0 |0.00 |0 |0.00 |
| |Total |7 |100 |7 |100 |
As opposed to this view, the SBPDA officials said they are responsible for this improvement. She said “the extra ordinary smell coming from the hill type waste which was accumulated around the area calls for us. It is not because the community has communicated us about the situation.”
On the other hand, the Arada sub city chair, supporting the idea of committee chair said the committee has played the major role on the beautification of the area, that the community participation is the vital player. According to him the Atikilt Tera area waste production is very high, they have only 3 trucks. MSSEs haven’t their own transpiration mechanism. Their roles were collection solid waste from the venders shop. Providing transpiration was our role. Yet we have shortage of track in addition to this the track loading capacity is only 10mc if we transport the waste 4 times in a day only120mc waste can transported to disposal site at Ripe area, the remaining is live there so the waste become buildup. Thus the problem is become very serious. At the moment Atikilt Tera area community make an effort to improve this problem. So that particular place now change in to a green area the community spend hug amount of money for this.
As a result the level of community participation in SWM problem is very significant at the area of Atikilt Tera unlike in the cases of Merkato area. As the researcher consistent observation the researcher also witnessed improvements in the area of Atikilt Tera. In addition to this the government support is fundamental to ensure sustainability of the community participation.
Chapter four
Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations
3. Summary,
This study tried to assess solid waste management practice and assess community participation in SWM at the area of Merkato and Atikilt Tera.
The focus areas of the study include the solid waste situation; the role of the community participation in the process of SWM; identify factor affecting the community participation; measure the role of the private sector, community-based organizations and the responsible offices (SBPDA) in solid waste management of the Merkato and Atikilt Tera area.
1. Major findings;
2. Factors Affecting Community Participation
From the two study area the entire investigation can be deduced that the following are,
Factors affecting participation
➢ The existence of illegal venders with legal vendors who don’t pay fees for waste collection ➢ Lack of time and awareness of the venders on solid waste management mechanisms/techniques such as waste separation, waste reduction, and reuses of waste instead of buying new items. ➢ Lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider is the major barriers. ➢ Information gap between government and community ➢ Lack of awareness about the importance of support and mutual cooperation among the stakeholders. ➢ Lack of adequate temporary waste storage place. ➢ Lack of alternatives of waste disposal mechanism. ➢ Lack of guarantee to get a response after asking for their rights. ➢ Lack of government concern. ➢ Mismatch of waste production rate and governments waste collection capacity.
➢ The restriction of role of MSSE to waste collection that transportation and disposal.
3. Conclusion
The major factor that has been revealed in the study which has affected the prevailing situation in both the study areas is lack of awareness. The community both the areas haven’t been introduced to the current SWM techniques and the appropriate facilities are not established. This has resulted in the accumulation of waste which in response tends to be a risk factor for the physical and mental well being of the community; the waste should have been recycled and used as a source of income for the government rather than additional cost. In general terms the solid waste situation in the area is worsen by the absence of consciousness about the consequences. The responsible government and nongovernmental organs have hardly given their attention to this end.
Among which, lack of awareness on solid waste management such as waste separation, waste reduction, and reuses of waste instead of buying new items; lack of government concern, the presence of information gap between government and community; lack of controlling mechanism over the service provider are the most important factors. Only an informed, educated and conscious community can have a significant impact on the performance of the community role in line with SWM.
Private sectors and responsible offices have also their share on the reduction of the solid waste management. MSSEs as an instance have helped the community providing a temporary disposal of the wastes. However, these groups have not been empowered financially to do all the SWM. The responsible offices did not give a practical solution to the problems faced by the community.
According to this study participation has been witnessed from both the areas although the degree of participation varies. Specifically, the Atikilt Tera vendors have done their best to overcome the problem concerning solid waste from their area. On the contrary the situation is aggravated in this area. The reason is partly from the load of waste produced from the area. However the major contribution is from ignorance of the government. The community lacks support from the government. It can be concluded from this case that no matter how well community participated in the issue, the absence of support from the government has negatively affected the SWM.
4. Recommendation
➢ Community participation in solid waste management should be considered as crucial element to ensure the sustainability of the solid waste problem. The government support for new and existing community participation will improve overall solid waste problem. Therefore government should have to support them.
➢ Active community participation in SWM must be ensured through effective mobilization and awareness creation on the mechanisms of solid waste reduction at the source, waste separation; waste minimization and reduction and the like. In this regard government should have to increase awareness of the community by reconsidering its awareness raising mechanism. The public should be made aware by arranging awareness site that the waste should not be spread on streets, roads, etc. People should be made aware of the fact that if the waste is properly disposed off from the house/shop then the environmental will not get polluted. Many severe diseases can spread by improper disposal of SW.
➢ Waste disposal options/equipment/ should be available in proper manner. By providing proper and plenty alternatives of solid waste avoidance or disposal mechanism also can create awareness in practical way such as how to and where to the community dispose their solid wastes. Thus the number of staff members should be adequate according to the population of the area and the waste production rate, provision of bins, containers, trolleys and trucks. Their number should be sufficient and the government should take care that the number of these equipments and material of the containers should be okay. Proper finances and system to system coordination is an important issue.
➢ Community members also should be encouraged to demand and fight for their right.
➢ The government should have to be concerned and give due attention for the community in order to alleviate the existing problem of the two study areas.
➢ Government should have to provide alternative mechanisms or place to dispose the solid wastes and have to prepare temporary waste storage mechanism or temporary waste storage place very close to the two areas.
➢ Government should have to assess new mechanisms to change the solid waste become marketable.
➢ Composting could also be an economic feasible alternative. By composing solid waste can be utilize organic fertilizer instead of using chemical fertilizers. Proper marketing by government so that the organic fertilizer produced should be sold out.
➢ Opportunities and concepts for private sector involvement require special consideration
➢ A wide-ranging policy framework is needed at the local level to link public health, environmental, privatization, delegation (transfer the service provision to local government) and financially viable mechanism policies to the needs of the solid waste sector so that they are mutually supportive.
Reference
A. Subash, Solid Waste Management specialist, TNUDP-III; Community participation in Solid Waste management. Satrday, November 23, 2008, 10:43:23 AM from http://www.swlf.ait.ac.th/UpdData/Presentations/Train/ MRASU18.PDF
Addis Ababa City Administration-Addis Ababa City Sanitation and Parks Development Agency. Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 9:45:08 AM. From http//www.addisababacity.gov.
Addis Ababa City Administration-Administration urges metropolitans to take part clean. Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 11:58:23 AM. From http//www.addisababacity.gov.
Addis Negari Gazeta of the city government of Addis Ababa. 2nd year No. 29, Addis Ababa 19th February, 2004.
Andrew Shepherd (1998). Sustainable Rural Development. 1st published in Gret Britain 1998 by Macmillan Press Ltd and United States of America by St. Martin's Press, inc.
Beyene Geleta, (1999) Integrated development for water supply and sanitation, Managing Solid Waste in Addis Ababa, 25th WEDC Conference, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia,. Thursday, November 27, 2008, 1:13:01 PM. from http//wedc.lboro.ac.uk/conferences/pdfs/25/323.pdf-.
Biruck Wondimu (1969). Solid Waste Management and its effect in Addis Ababa with specific reference to four kebele: Senior Essay, Addis Ababa University.
Broakensna, D. and Hodge, P. (1969). Community Development and Interpretation, Chondler Publisiour Company. USA.
Charles A. Wentz(1989). Hazardous Waste Management; Argonne National Laboratory. by McGraw-hill, Inc.
Clarifications and Proposed Definitions: Urban Environment, Participation, Shared management-Integrated management. Tuesday December 30/2009 01:12:03pm from http://www.globenet.org/preceup/pages/frlch apitre/essaidef/edang.htm
Communication for Development One World, Multiple Cultures: Hampton Press, Inc. (1999). Jan Servaes Katholieke Universiteit Brussel.United States of America.
Community Organization in Action: Basic National Board of Young Men's Christian Associations (1959). Literature and Critical comments. Association Press, 291 Broadway. New York.
Community Participation in Solid Waste Management in Patan (1996): Integrated Pilot Project of Patan Conservation and Development Program; Case :Solid Waste Management in Subahal Tole : Prepared For Urban Waste Expertise Programme Waste. Kathmandu, Nepal. Saturday November 22, 2008, 04:50:08 PM. From www.globenet.org/preceup/pages/ang/chapitre/capitali/cas/nepal.htm#chap1
Community development @ the encyclopaedia of informal education Wednesday, January 21, 2008, 02:13:01 PM. from http://www.infed.org/community/b-comdv.htm.
David R. Powelson and Melinda A. Powelson (1992): The Recycler's Manual for Business, government and Environmental Community. Van Nostrand Reinhold, USA.
Edenu, G. and Haigh, M. (1994). Water and Environmental Management in Europe and North America; a Comparison of Methods and Practices. Ellis Horwood Limited
Environmental Development Action in Third World- ENDA-Ethiopia. Friday, November 7, 2008, 6:02:07PM from http://www.geocities.com/akababi/enda.htm?200910.
Gebremedihin Yihidego (2004). Community Participation and Sustainable Soil and Water Conservation Management. The Case of Zala-Daget project: Dogu'a Tembiem Woreda-Tigray High lands. Addis Ababa Univrsity -IRLDS.
Green and Cleen Addis Ababa Organization(2001). Cleean Addis Ababa by using Solid Waste 4"S" (4"R") rules; Cleen Weeks from Hdar 12 – 18/2001; Brhan and Selam Printing Press.
J. Norman Reid (2000): Community Participation: How People Power Brings Sustainable Benefits to Communities. USDA Rural Development Office of Community Development. Monday, December 15, 2008, 10:36:01 AM from http://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rbs/ezec/Pubs/commparticrept.pdf
John Abbott, (1996). Community Participation in Urban Management. Earthscan Publications Limited.
John Glasson, Riki Therivel, Andrew Chadwick (1994). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Principles & Procedures, Process, Practice and Prospects, 1st Published in 1994 by UCL Press, 3rd Impression 1995.
John Wiley & Sons ltd (1981). Environmental Pollution: Atmosphere, Land, Water and Noise. H.M. Dix Department of Science Huddersfield Techbnical College.
Klundert, A. Vande and Lardinois, I. (1995). Community and Private (formal and Informal) Sector Involvement in Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries: Background Paper for the UMP Workshop in Itlingen, 10-12 May, 1995.
Laura Moningka, supervisors: Dr. M. Muller, Dr. Ir. F. Laroui (2000). Community Participation in Solid Waste Management, Updated: Tuesday 24 May 2005. Friday, December 12, 2008, 9:33:05 AM. from http://www.waste.nl/page/305.
Making Development Sustainable: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank(1994). Washington, D.C. 20433, USA.
Making Development Sustainable: The World Bank Group and Environment (1994). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The World Bank, Washington DC.
Michael Q. Patton (1990). Evaluation and Research Methods. Sage Publications, Inc. USA. 2nd Ed.
Paul Arnold, Ethiopia Solid waste management in Addis Ababa, 2st WEDC Conference Kampala, Uganda, 1995.
Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook: Toward Cleaner Production (1999). The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
Robert Chambers (2205). Ideas for Development; Institutions of Development Studies: by Earthscan in the UK and USA.
Robyn Eversole and Jhon Martin (2005) participation and Governance in Regional Development: Global Trends in an Australian Context.
Samuel Jilo (2008). Community Participation and Public Works in Productive Safety Net program. The Case of Boricha Woreda of Sidama zopne, SNNPRS. Addis Ababa University - IRLDS.
Sigurd Grava (1996). Urban Planning Aspects of Water Pollution Control: Columbia University Press (1996). New York and London.
Solomon Asrat, Solid Waste Management: A Case Study of Household in Arada Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Senior Essay, Jun (2008). Addis Ababa University-IRLDS.
Tadesse Kuma, (January, 2004). Dry Waste Management in Addis Ababa City, Teaching Workshop on, Accounting for Urban Environment, January 5th – 16th, 2004, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Friday, November 28, 2008, 4:49:41 PM. from www.ictp.trieste.it/~eee/workshops/smr1597/Kuma_1.doc.
The Watchtower (2008). Announcing Jehova’s Kingdom. December,2008. Vol. 129, No.23
Wanted in Africa. Monday, November 24, 2008, 11:38:19 AM. from http://addis-ababa.wantedinafrica.com/articles/complete_articles.php?id_art=662.
Waste Management methods; Waste Hierarchy, Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Wednesday December 10, 2008, 11:43:06 AM. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ File:Wastehierarchy.svg
Yeraswork Admassie (2000). Twenty years to Nowhere: Property rights, Land Management and Conservation in Ethiopia. The Read Sea Press, Inc.
Å”w' ›Ç=e ›uv Ÿ}T Å”u TeŸu`' pê 1 lØ` 1' c’@ 2®®®
¾îÆ“ ›[”ÕÈ ›Ç=e ›uv T?u`' ¾Å[p qhh ›^~ ¾«S´ QÑA‹” uSÖkU ›Ç=e ›uv” îÆ ?“É`Òƒ' ¾îǃ XU”ƒ IÇ` 12 - 18/2001 ¯.U w`H”“ cLU T}T>Á É`σ /wag`e/
----------------------- Prevention
Minimization
Reuse
Recycling
Energy recovery Disposal
most favoured option
least favoured option
Graph 2A respondents age (Merkato)
Graph 2B respondents age (Atikilt Tera)
Graph 2A respondents age (Atikilt Tera)
Picture 2 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 1 Merkato area
Picture 3 Merkato area
Picture 4 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 5 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 5 Atikilt Tera area
Picture 6 Merkato area
Picture 5 Merkato area
Graph 1 Respondents sex
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I further express gratitude to all my teachers for their valuable guidance and supervision during this study. I am especially thankful to most respected Dr. Noor Ahmed Memon for his professional, constructive and enlightening guidance in the completion of this research work. Indeed it was a sense of colossal support and help to have supervision of such a great scholar who guided me during the course of this research. In last I appreciate the help and support of my family members and my friends without which, it could not be possible.…
- 12491 Words
- 50 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I would like to thank the following people for their generous help and guidance. Without them the completion of this project would be impossible.…
- 5628 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The researchers would like to extend their greatest gratitude to the following persons and entities that has helped them in the study:…
- 1265 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
I take this occasion to thank the Almighty GOD for blessing me with his grace. I extend my sincere gratitude to my MKU supervisors for giving the right guidance while undertaking this research proposal. My thanks to my beloved parents whom am forever indebted to for their inspiration, love, financial and moral support they have offered me since the onset up to the completion of this proposal.…
- 1851 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Last but not the least I would further like to acknowledge the efforts of my friends for their indispensable support to make this project a success.…
- 5423 Words
- 22 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies, Bugema University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Educational Management…
- 21637 Words
- 87 Pages
Good Essays -
Lastly, I am thankful to my family members for supporting me in my project work.…
- 21510 Words
- 87 Pages
Powerful Essays -
A senier ESSAY SUBMITTED in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Bachelor of Arts degree in public administration and development Management…
- 14445 Words
- 58 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I wish to thank and acknowledge my module tutor Mr. Sabarjeet Mukherjee and Mr. Mahindra Balasuriya for guiding me throughout my research. I would like to extend my sincere thanks to my colleagues for their advice and help.…
- 9378 Words
- 38 Pages
Powerful Essays -
First I would like to thank my supervisor Max Rapp Ricciardi who has guided me through the writing process, taken the time to read and comment my drafts and shared his knowledge within the research field. I would also like to thank Karin Stübner and Svante Thurén for answering all my questions and helping me with the practical arrangements. Finally, I would like to thank all the interviewees, my dear friend Hanna Sundström for all the sound advices and my beloved fiancé Johan Zätterström for always listening and supporting me. Many thanks to you all!…
- 28098 Words
- 113 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Dr. Ing. Jiˇ´ Matas, for the guidance rı and advice he has provided throughout the research. I would also like to thank Jan ˇ Sochman for helping me especially in the technical issues.…
- 26086 Words
- 105 Pages
Better Essays -
I would like to thank my advisor Dr.Majid Rashidi and Dr.Paul Bellini, who provided essential support and assistance throughout my graduate career, and also for their guidance which immensely contributed towards the completion of this thesis. This thesis would not have been realized without their support. I would also like to thank Dr.Asuquo.B.Ebiana and Dr.Rama.S.Gorla for being in my thesis committee. Thanks are also due to my parents,my brother and friends who have encouraged, supported and inspired me.…
- 16180 Words
- 65 Pages
Good Essays -
The researchers would like to acknowledge the assistance, cooperation, sympathy and contribution of the following people in the completion of this research:…
- 2704 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
Technological device(s) that tertiary students currently use for study and their one preferred device that best suit them…
- 3831 Words
- 16 Pages
Powerful Essays -
We, the fourth year students would like to express our deepest and sincerest gratitude to the following people who in one-way have given help to make this piece of work possible. Our Research Adviser MRS. KARLA MAE LOPEZ for giving us suggestions for the process and improvement of the research work and for understanding our every shortcoming. We would like to thank MRS. MELANY BOTE for giving us references and for the developments with regards to our project. Also to DR. ALISHA REYES for sharing us her knowledge and skills to make the research work more efficient. Next…
- 4852 Words
- 20 Pages
Powerful Essays