Both Han China, and the Roman Empire had problems with epidemics, and corrupt leaders. In the beginning, when the Silk Roads were first developed, all the civilizations saw it as a great way to trade, which it was. It was also great for the spread of culture, technology, and mixing many religions to create new beliefs. It was going great, until diseases broke out, and started to spread quickly all over the silk roads and back inside the cities. Because of the epidemics, cities tried to refrain from sending merchants, and traders out because they could get so easily infected. This caused all of the civilizations to become more independent, so they wouldn’t need to go outside of their own walls to get what they needed as much as they did originally; which now stopped all the spreading of culture, and made some of the civilizations weak. The emperors started to become very brutal, and crazy. A lot of them were killed, and plotted against by angry citizens who couldn’t put up with them, or by leaders who were corrupt, and wanted to be emperor. Mainly consisted of generals, sons of emperors, and other rich romans that were all trying to outsmart the other, while trying to survive in the current corruption of the Roman government. These corrupt leaders were a result of 25 out of 26 dead roman emperors in a span of 50 years. In Han China it wasn’t as obvious, but there were many cases of backstabbing, and infighting between officials, and others. This mainly consisted of peasant rebellions, and outbreaks within the cities for many reasons.
Although Imperial Rome and Han China had some similar problems they also divided they're kingdoms differently, and had different conflicts. Both empires were huge, with very large populations and social classes. With many invasions by outside tribes and some outbreaks from the inside of Rome, they decided it would be best to divide they're empire into two parts, but remained one central ruler. They then divided each half into two subgroups. This would help the empire control more easily, and efficiently. It took away from the central power, but also spread the army throughout the whole empire, instead of having one central army, which would put a big delay on defending they're cities. Han china, having not as big of a population, or empire, decides to also divide they're empire for easier control. They divide it into three separate kingdoms, instead of two or four like Rome. Unfortunately, these kingdoms only lasted a few years before it finally collapsed, and were over taken by landowners. Both empires also faced many conflicts, internal and external. Nomads entered, and effected both empires; however, in Rome they invaded, and tried to overpower them, while in Han China they came in peacefully. Partially due by the corrupt leadership, Han China had a lot of peasant rebellions against the government, due to land distribution, and various other reasons. Also with the Germanic tribes pushing on both empires, it was hard to prosper. Rome had invasions from the Germanic tribes, because of the pressure of Attila, and the Huns, on the tribes to retreat. If Attila would of went straight for Rome, Rome would of defended they're empire easily, but because of Attila’s idea to push the Germanic tribes in before them, Rome eventually collapsed. Han China didn't fall from attacks, or invasions, but because of its own internal problems to keep a stable government that everyone would cooperate with, and that they could easily control.
Summarily, Han china and the Roman Empire collapsed, not from a greater army, or greater power than themselves, but from their own failure to contain and protect such a large civilization. Once they divided they're empire, each part slowly fell. In Han China, each part was taken over but, in Rome, one half fell, while the other stayed strong for a little longer, until they both fell. Now we will let these lessons remind us how important it is to maintain control of the little things, like defense, land distribution, corrupted leadership, and many other things these civilizations failed to do, which caused the downfall of the Imperial Roman Empire, and the large Han Dynasty.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Both Han China and Imperial Rome used a centralized government with roads to help them rule their large empire, yet Han China had Confucianism to legitimize their rule while Roman emperors were dependent on the support of a large military force for legitimacy from 204 B.C.E to 476 C.E.…
- 287 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were two very large empires. Both of these empires were considered golden ages in one form or another. Han was considered a Golden Age in general because of its length and prosperity, while Rome also promoted prosperity it was mainly the Golden Age of Latin Literature. These empires were similar technologically while different politically.…
- 382 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
For the differences, Rome was followed up by another great civilization; the Byzantine Empire, while Han China was divided up into separate states after the empire fell. Rome managed to conquer regions…
- 180 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Han China (206 B.C.E. – 220 C.E.) and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E. – 476 C.E.) have some similarities and differences such as in foundation, governmental control, and collapse. These factors either helped their empire or weakened them influencing their fall.…
- 644 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The aftermath of the fall of Han China was much different than that of Imperial Rome. After Han China collapsed, and the barbarians invaded, the region was in chaos for around 350 years. Despite that, China was reassembled under new dynasties and they remained an empire until the early 20th century. On the contrary, the Roman Empire was broken up and integrated into new civilizations and combined with many other ideals. Nevertheless, the Roman Empire never rose again in any form. The effect of these empires collapse was the biggest difference in the fall of Han China and Imperial Rome.…
- 887 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…
- 315 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Han Dynasty and The Western Roman Empire are two of the greatest empires that have ever lived but that all comes to an end when disasters start occurring left and right. However, the methods of achieving greatness varied immensely their actions had helped them in the long run but soon failed miserably.…
- 407 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Han and Rome were two great empires that had similarities and differences. Han and Rome at a similar decline because of the lack of a stable economy. The different political systems caused Han and Rome to rise differently.…
- 288 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Although both Han China and Imperial Rome had large, long lasting empires with similar economies and some similar policies centralized governments and similar administrative policies regarding land reform, their techniques of imperial administration differed in terms of how it came to be and how emperors ruled.…
- 795 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were very common in the aspect of their downfall and collapse. Han China had a well-organized bureaucracy based upon Confucian ideas and education. In addition, they also had emphasis on family ancestors (patriarchal), reliance on landed gentry, and accomplishments in engineering; which includes roads, canals, and the Great Wall. The Roman Empire contained a well-organized bureaucracy as well which was founded on Roman law and classical learning. They also implied emphasis on family (pater familias), had reliance on patricians, and had engineering accomplishments; including roads, aqueducts, amphitheaters, domes, sewage systems, and central heating. Although, unfortunately the two become even more common…
- 286 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Han and the Romans both had very passive views when it came to technology, both sharing the "good is good enough" mindset. This appears through people of high class wanting higher quality materials and laborers, the Han enjoying a superb invention but not outwardly seeking to improve it, as well as the Romans appreciated fantastic inventions without searching for ways to improve…
- 64 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rome and Han China had both similar and different characteristics about their empires, while existing at the same time. While thousands of miles separated Rome and Han China, neither influenced the other. They both lasted approximately 400 years, with populations of about 50 million. The Roman Empire encompassed all the land that surrounded the Mediterranean Sea, as well as large portions of Continental Europe and the Middle East. The Han Empire however, stretched from the Pacific ocean to the oases of Central Asia.…
- 1002 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Around 200 B.C.E. to 200 C.E. the empires of Rome and Han China flourished in the 1.5 million square miles. Each of their societies developed in vastly different lands. Separated from each other, Rome and China’s empires grew individually. Although separated by thousands of miles and differences of language, each society developed their own individual yet similar aspects. The societies of Ancient Rome and Han China were similar because of their patriarchal values which shaped their families and the status of their wealthy classes. Rome and China were different in their societies because of their individual uses of slavery and language.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Though both the Chinese and Roman Empires were huge, wealthy, and powerful, they both had tragic falls. China was destroyed by nomadic invaders, a lack of army, and the influence of Buddhism. Rome, on the other hand was ruined by attacks by other civilizations, the loss of productive members of society, and the influence of Christianity. Both empires suffered from similar ideas, such as religion, or a lack of military, but each idea impacted them in different ways. Though the Chinese and Roman Empire were truly remarkable, like many other ancient empires, they had a devastating…
- 716 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays