Preview

Comparative Politics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
638 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparative Politics
1. Presidential systems combine the head of state and the head of government into the chief executive, the president. Parliamentary systems are distinguished by the executive branch (head of state) of government being dependent on the election by and support of the parliament. This dependency on the legislative body eliminates the separation between the executive and legislative bodies created with presidential systems. The focus of parlimentary systems is that the chief executive (prime minister, premier, etc.) is usually a member of the parliament. The prime minister appoints members to a cabinet as does a president. The dependency of support from the parliament allows an easier removal of the prime minister than the removal of a president. Parliament can oust a prime minister and his cabinet (government) with a vote of no-confidence. A president has a set time he/she will serve and is elected independently. The legislative body of a presidential system has no such capabilities to remove the president. The ease or cabinet removal by parlimentary systems causes instability in systems without a party majority in parliament. Presidential systems are more stable because of the inability of the legislature to oust the president. France has a hybrid of the two, a semipresidential system with both an executive president and a premier. The president is elected directly by the people for a set amount of time, giving it some presidential system features. The president is responsible for appointing a premier but does not have authority to remove him/her. The premier selects his/her own cabinet and no approval of the parliament is needed. The National Assembly (legislative body) can however censure the premier forcing resignation. The president cannot veto legislation. De Gaulle defined the role of president as a "guide" and "arbiter" of the country. Cohabitation, as instituted by Premier Jacques Chirac and President Fracois Mitterrand, deligated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When one thinks of presidents residing over a country, the most coveted powers come to mind, especially for United States citizens, where its chief has centralized command over important facets of the government. However, not all presidential systems are the same. For some, the title only bears a symbolic representation for head of state and nothing more. Other presidents find themselves sharing powers with additional officials. The most interesting comparison between presidential systems that have different processes of election and distributions of authority is the United States and France. The examination of the nomination process, voting measures, campaign spending, the media and debates will distinguish the election process. Only then is it fitting to compare and contrasts constitutional powers that each president holds and the shaping of these powers by the governmental system.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Governments play a large part in our lives. We are so used to their role, that much of their influence goes unnoticed. Governments differ from country to country, but their influence remains. Canada is a democracy with a parliamentary system of government. The United States of America is also a democracy but with a presidential system of government. Canada's parliament consists of the Queen, the Senate and the House of Commons. In the Canadian parliamentary system the Prime Minister is the Head of Government and is also a member of the House of Commons. The Prime Minister is the leader of the winning party in the federal election. This person is appointed by the Governor General as the Prime Minister. Even though they are appointed, they are elected first. The American system of government is established by the United States Constitution, which provides for three separate but equal branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Together, these branches govern the country. In the American presidential system the President is the head of government and chief executive officer. Both Canada and the United States are representative democracies with a federal structure. I prefer The Canadian parliamentary system of government over the American Presidential system of government. The leader of a political party in the American presidential system of government may only be reelected once. The leader of the political party in the American presidential system of government is not a member of Congress (legislative branch). As well, Voters must wait for regular elections to unseat an unsatisfactory president or member of Congress. In this essay the three branches of government, elections in the United States and Canada, the Head of State, similarities and differences to both systems of governments and the strengths and weaknesses to both systems of government will be examined and explained in depth for a better understanding of both the Canadian Parliamentary…

    • 1969 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the two most prominent forms of government are the Parliamentary form of government, often known as the Westminster system seen in the commonwealth nations; and the Presidential form of government seen in the United States. Throughout the years, many debates have been discussed over the question of which form is better; no definitive answer has ever come forward, for the exception that they are both quite different in theory and in practice. Principally, the difference among them is the separation power seen in the Presidential system, and the coexistence of power seen in the Parliamentary system; represented chiefly by party discipline. However, more than this difference alone separates the two. Both forms of government are characterized by how their power is distributed, how laws are created and chosen, party discipline and also the responsibility of each Head of State. Each system has its own dynamic and ever-changing functionality, creating advantages and disadvantages for each system.1…

    • 1624 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare, critically, the organization of Government in Canada and the United States. The parliamentary system is constructed of the crown, executive and legislative branch. The constitution monarchy is that the the Crown which is the Queen is represented by the GG. The executive branch are the PM and the Cabinet, in the Parliamentary system, they are elected members of the parliament. The legislative branch is parliament includes the opposition. This shows that the government is very complex. In the parliamentary system we have separation of powers meaning each branch is separate. The US system is not as different as the Canadian system because check and balance. Example, president appoint judges. currently, congress refuse to confirm. 100 judges not confirm.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States of America is an example of the presidential system. The presidential system has a strong and independent chief executive with extensive powers related to both domestic and internal affairs and foreign policy. The president independence from legislature is based on election by people to whom he or she is directly accountable. The legislative branch is made up of two houses of congress. The House of Representatives and the senate. The duty of the legislative branch is to make laws which are written discussed and voted on in the Congress. The senate approves the nominations made by the president to the cabinet, Supreme Court and other post. The executive branch of the US is responsible for enforcing laws; this facilitates responsibities of the federal government such as collecting taxes, safe guarding the homeland and representing the US political and economic interest worldwide. The power is vested in the president. The president is the head of the executive branch. The president is elected by the entire country every four years and is also the one that approves and carry out the laws made by the executive…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A parliamentary system is a system of governing in which there is a close interrelationship between the Prime Minister and the parliament (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). A presidential system is a system of governing in which the president and congress each separately derive their authority from being elected by the people, and has a fixed term of office (Mintz, Close, Croci 349). When dealing with the strengths of a parliamentary system, we must first consider responsible government. Responsible government is when the political executive is accountable to parliament for its actions and mist retain the support of the elected members to remain in office (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). Of course, in the presidential system, there is no form of responsible government. This to me is a weakness of presidential systems. There are three…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament Vs President

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Presidential and parliamentary government systems are two main forms of democratic political systems and executive-legislative relations. Both hold advantages, disadvantages and similarities. With fluctuating stability, both systems of government have had their share of prosperity, with the ability to maintain.…

    • 658 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The video, “A Tale of Two Political Systems”, investor and political scientist Eric X. Li speaks about the electoral democracy in the U.S. versus the one party system in China. Mr. Li presents different statics and views on why a one party system isn’t as bad as it seems. He then goes on to explain that a one party system has helped China become the second largest economy in the world and that their people are living in comfort. Mr. Li states this is possible because of three characteristics, adaptability, meritocracy, and legitimacy. He also points out the different components of the one party system and in China it takes candidates about 30 years of experience and career to become President. Mr. Li is very fund of the one party system and…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president and the prime minister are both important roles for a country to function properly. Being president or prime minister takes time and lots of decision making.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The nature of parliamentary rule governments depends, to a vast degree, on the responsibility of the official. Researchers place the light on the parliament's part in making and breaking governments, concentrating on the arrangement and disintegration of governments, the allotment of cabinet portfolios, and cabinet term. In contrast with the presidential system, the official is not specifically chosen but rather normally rises or is drawn from the chosen parliament and, not at all like a straightforwardly chosen president. This type of parliamentary official normally comprises of an executive and a board of ministers. The cabinet or assembly is the executive official body. Generally the pioneers of the biggest party in the assembly, or the governing inside it, take the official offices (executive). Not at all like presidents, who are the main authorities with general obligations regarding government undertakings, parliamentary officials should share duties with the members. This implies that the cabinet, with the prime minister, is together in charge of the considerable number of activities of the legislature, and the head administrator, subsequently, is just first among equals. Truth be told, prime ministers in numerous nations have obtained more power than this. The principle components of a parliamentary system, along these lines, are: a straightforwardly chosen administrative body, a mix of executive…

    • 1444 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    presidential system and parliamentary system. The president of Sri Lanka is the head of the state, head of the…

    • 4436 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays