Preview

Compare and Constrast Classical China and Classical India

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
602 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Constrast Classical China and Classical India
Though they had some different qualities, Classical China and India were very similar. The complexities of both India and China’s social hierarchy systems were very different. However their religious views and ideas were similar, and they both began to decline but were able to recover and maintain stability. Both China and India used social hierarchy systems, but they were used differently. India used a very strict system called Varna, or the caste system. People only associated with people in their class. Marriage outside of your class and helping people in lower classes was absolutely forbidden. People couldn’t even eat or drink with people outside of their class. The Chinese rules of social hierarchy were very different. The Chinese believed in reciprocal respect within relationships. For example, the ruler respects the subject and the subject respects the ruler. Another major difference was the specific levels of the social ladder. The caste system of India had four basic levels: the Brahmins (priests), followed by the Kshatriyas (warriors), then the Vaishyas (work people), and finally the Shudras (peasants). All four of these castes were divided into subgroups called jati. This system was very complex and stratified and a person could not change castes. The Chinese only had three steps on their social ladder. On top was the educated bureaucrats and landowners. The peasants and the urban artisans were in the middle class and the “mean” or meaningless people were at the bottom. Priests in India were considered very powerful and they were at the top of society. The Classical Chinese emperors used a centralized religion called Confucianism and a priest class wasn’t necessary. There was other religions in China but the priests were isolated from the rest of the population. The Chinese social system was very simple and the Indian caste system was more specific. India and China used different hierarchy systems, but they had similar religious views and ideas. At

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The political structure of both Han China and Mauryan/Gupta India were distinct because Han China focused…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Rome and Han China had some similarities and differences in their foundation. In the eight century B.C.E., Rome began as a small city-state on the western side of Italy. Originally they were a monarchy but in 509 B.C.E. they knocked off the monarchy and made themselves republic. In their republic system, the wealthy class, known as patricians, dominated. The lower class was called plebeians. The Romans had laws that protected the lower class form abuse. The Romans took great pride in their system, believing it gave them more freedom. With this political system, the Romans launched their empire, a process that took more than 500 years. The Chinese were not building a new empire yet they were restoring the old. The Chinese empire started as early as 2200 B.C.E. By 5oo B.C.E. the Chinese state was in shambles which they considered as the warring states, which were seven kingdoms within the Chinese government fighting against each other. China finally reunified in 221 B.C.E. Han China and Imperial Rome are similar because they both flourished at about the same time (200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E.), conquered about the same amount of land (about 1.5 million square miles), and had about the same population (50 to 60 million). The reason for the similarities and differences in the foundation in both of the empires was because Rome was a new empire while the Han dynasty was just restoring the old but they were still the dame due to their similarity in the time era both empires flourished, they occupied a similar area, and they contained a similar population.…

    • 644 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both of these cultures needed to keep order and stability within their borders to maintain a prosperous society. Han China and Gupta India both implemented a tight social class…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the classical period two early civilizations appeared. Ancient Athens arose with its intelligence and love for the human physique, while Han China arose with its strong beliefs of religion and love of nature. Even though Han China and Ancient Athens both have politically strong governments, they are very different in cultural beliefs and social structure because of how they treat women and how they feel about infanticide of babies.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A similarity between Han China and Imperial Rome was their religious policies. Both China and Rome blocked the spread of other religions from nearby empires to come into their nations such as Hinduism from India or Stoicism from the Greeks. The religion that was practiced in Rome (after being legalized in 312) was Christianity by the Emperor Constantine while the religious practice of Buddhism was incorporated with Confucianism and Daoism. Another similarity between the two empires was the significance of their army. Both China and Rome were ruled by generals and the armies were a crucial part in maintaining political stability against their enemies. Han China and Imperial Rome were often threatened by surrounding opponents who frequently attempted to assert their authority upon them. Also, the high cost of the armies often caused for bankruptcy in the empires and forced the taxes of the people to go up. Both of these empires also struggled from retaliations from the people because of these high taxes and poor treatments to the less fortunate. In both China and Rome, the emperor received many revolts against his policies. The revolts were mostly from the people of lower status such as the slaves in Rome and the peasants in China. Finally, the role of the emperor was very similar in these two empires as well. Both Han China and Imperial Rome believed that not one single imperial family should rule forever. The Romans chose their emperors based of whoever was their best general while China…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Social orders in both of the empires were actually similar. Imperial Rome and Han China were dominated under Patriarchy. Both Empires also had issues with taxes, which was the main reason why they practiced a patriarchal system. (DC) Han China was very dedicated to filial piety. Young children have to honor their parents and bring honor to their families. This link with Imperial Rome’s Paterfamilias, which is…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Ancient times, China and India both had their own set of beliefs; Han Wudi excerised Confucianism in China and Ashoka promoted Buddhism in India but Han Wudi was not a lover of Confucian where Ashoka himself practiced Buddhism. However both ruled with a centralized bureaucracy and policed the provinces to maintain order and policies. And lastly, neither had strict policies constricting their people nor did they have much of a justified social structure.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han vs Mauryan

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The social aspects of both empires had a lot in common because gender-roles, family and relationships were looked at in the same way. During the Mauryan/Gupta as well as the Han Dynasty, women were subservient to men and families relied on patriarchs. In both empires there were close knit villages, landowners had power and merchants took second role in the social system. However, the two had their differences. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire put emphasis on caste while the Han Dynasty was based on a social structure. The Mauryan/Gupta Empire’s caste system was an important social bond and a crucial part of the political structure. At the top of the system were the priests, then the warriors and rulers, followed by the merchants, skilled traders and minor officials, after that were the unskilled workers and finally the “untouchables”, who were outcastes and barely considered as people. The strict caste system provided a network of rules by which people could regulate their lives and activities and also promoted public order which helped politically. The caste system was so strictly enforced that no one could intermarry or be moved up a class so it determined where you would be for all your life. The caste system also played a role in religion which encouraged the use of a caste system rather than people look down upon it. On the other hand, the Han Dynasty relied on a highly structured system of classes. The most powerful was the emperor, the nobles and the military officers, who made up the first class. Next came the farmers and peasants who made up the second tier. Lastly, the third class was made up of merchants, commoners and servants. This system…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The differences between Han China and Rome’s political methods include religion, democracy and social classes. Confucianism played a major part In Chinese culture and politics however their religion did not have as much power over the power over the emperor like Christianity. In Rome, if an emperor did not listen to the Pope, the Pope can then ex- communicate the emperor. The Pope can then replace the emperor. In China, you can’t just have a Buddhist remove an emperor out of power. Secondly, in Rome the citizens had more of a democratic government. Landowners and merchants formed the Roman Republic where they could help pass laws and etc. In China only the emperor had that kind of power. By having a more democratic government the Roman citizens can have more of a say whereas the Chinese citizens can’t. Lastly, in China if you were born…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    No matter where an empire is located, maintaining a vast empire always comes with many hardships, and the Roman and Chinese Empires were no exception. In the time of city-states, the Romans had developed a Republican form of government, which successfully met its needs. However, the Romans failed to develop a new form of government that catered to the demands of an expanding empire, resulting in the fall of the Republic, and Roman emperors were never able to develop an effective ideology of rule. Coupled with armies' loyalties to generals rather than the state, the empire was prone to bloody civil wars and frequent change in rulers who only reigned for several months or years. Also, the empire's obsession with expanding and protecting its borders also led to an increased demand for military service, after which many small farmers had no work, leading to growing populations stuck in poverty and prone to riots. Furthermore, these small farms, which used to produce grain, were replaced, and the empire had to rely on imported grain for sustenance. These events led to the third century crisis, in which the Roman Empire faced a period in which political, military, and economic problems nearly destroyed the empire. China, despite being located in a different hemisphere, faced incredibly similar problems. Both the Roman and Chinese Empires had significant political and social turmoil due to conflicts between independent regions over power. Because it was impossible to communicate any faster than the speed of a horse, empires relied on autonomous local leaders to maintain control. However, many local leaders and military generals being more interested in their own political power, which led to internal conflicts and civil wars. The expanding borders also required greater protection, and both of the administrative centers of these empires were located far from its long borders. In order to maintain and protect its borders, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Classical China and Classical India are one of the most unique early civilizations during the Classical Period. They are known for their contributions to its modern world. China and India are similar and different in many ways. Both China and India had many similarities and differences in politics, economics, and religion.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Classical China and Classical India have many similarities, but some ideas like politics and the social classes can differ from one or another. Politics was a way on how these classical civilizations had a government and what made the government had power to lead their civilization. Social class was a way to put people in ranks which was also a way for the different types of jobs they did. Politics also goes with social class since it showed that only certain types of people could be in the government.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Europe and China were two civilizations in the post classical era that thrived in religion and philosophy. Europe and China were similar in that they both had monasteries to teach and spread their religion and gender was unaffected, but different because China had rival religions.…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Han China

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the Classical Period, though miles apart, both Imperial Rome and Han China had parallels and differences in methods of political control. The two civilizations both used the aspects of religion and belief systems to attain political influence over their subjects, but had differing methods to reach this goal. Standardization and cultural unity was a key factor in both civilizations regarding political control, as was expansion and growth of trade.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Around 5,000 years ago early civilizations settled near rivers. Ancient China civilizations established on the Huang-He River Valley, while early Mesopotamian civilizations settled near the Tigris and Euphrates River Valley. While both Huang-He River Valley and Mesopotamia have similar politics they also differed in the interactions with the environment and economics.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays