Preview

Compare And Contrast Ancient Rome And The Common Good

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Ancient Rome And The Common Good
The Roman Empire and the Common Good
Graphic Organizer

Rome had ways and arrangements that help them function. They had parts that work very well and was successful, while others were unfair and not as successful.

Purpose of Government Provide public service Grade A

http://historylink101.com/2/Rome/roman-aquaducts.htm

Rome was very advanced, romans had public roads where carriages drove, they had public baths were a man or women could wash up by putting a special kind of mud on their whole body and washing themselves in a lake. They also had a public police, hospital, and fire department. Great and highly advanced Roman waterway system are among the greatest accomplishments in the ancient world. The running water, indoor plumbing
…show more content…

They were tired of being ruled by kings. They wanted to rule themselves. So after years of fighting against the last king of Rome, Tarquin the people of Rome created a new form of government. It was called a republic. In a republic, every citizen votes for leaders who create their laws. But only adult free men could be citizens. That meant women, children and slaves were not citizens, and could not vote or hold place in the government. They also wanted to make sure that the law applied to everyone, rich and poor. So they engraved the law on tablets of metal and put them in the forum for everyone to read. These laws were called the Twelve Tables because there had twelve different sections. These laws were about crime and property and family matters like marriage and …show more content…

No women. Every Roman soldier was a Roman citizen. He had to be at least 20 years old. Men were not supposed to get married while he was a soldier. Most soldiers in the Roman empire came from countries outside Italy. There were Roman soldiers from Africa, France, Germany, the Balkans, Spain and the Middle East. Soldiers had to stay in the army for at least 25 years. Then they could retire, with a gift of land to farm. There were other levels/league of but soldiers legionaries were the best Roman soldiers, and the best paid. Depending on the level or how good the soldiers were ones got paid more than the others soldiers. They often settled down at an old age together, in a military town or coast. Romans had very advanced armor and were designed as years went by new styles of protection were made and mixed into the legions. It was not unusual to have the men of a legion to wear a mix of different types of armor. There was quite a lot of different types of style that could be found in each armor type. In a particular legion one soldier's mail armor may have had straight edges. His companion may have been wearing mail edged with a zig-zag cut. Still another soldier might have extra flaps of mail on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Early Roman Empires DBQ

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Forum was the central gathering for the Romans. The Forum was considered to be their capital, and with a centralized place, comes centralized government and laws (8). The Romans also held the importance of Senators, and ruling office very close. The senators were the ones who were able to keep the native-born citizens living a hectic free lifestyle (5). Religious views and inputs were also held very high in Rome. The Romans placed material goods higher up in their life (6). Rome also classified their citizens into three different social categories. First were the Egyptians and natives who were very poor citizens, second was the mercenaries who were an undiscipled body, and the third was Alexandrians who unlike their mercenaries, followed the Hellenistic customs, and were of Greek origin (10).…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the primary reasons that Rome fell was they had poor government. First of all, Rome may have good rules, but they did not enforce them. For example, too many people were exempt from conscription. (Document B) This was a problem because they didn’t have enough people in the army because everybody turned down going to the army. Also, Rome failed to enforce their laws. According to Priscus, wealthy lawbreakers in Rome were able to get away with crimes. (Document E) This was…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient Rome DBQ Essay

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    farmers gave up when the grain price decreased with the massive importation of grain from Sicily and North Africa. When they gave up they moved to cities and joined the work force there. Then, a change in society started to happen. The number of people in the countryside was reduced because they wanted to escape war or would rather settle in the cities than in the countryside after war. As a result, Rome became overpopulated. Another change that happened because of the Punic Wars was the Senate gained power and the society realized that the Senate had authority over military action. The Punic Wars really transformed Rome and helped to build their empire and society.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever thought that the U.S. government is easily comparable to the Roman's version of government? Maybe that's because the U.S. government is roughly parallel with the Ancient Roman Government. The Romans did not have a constitution, like us Americans, but their division of executive, legislative, and judicial branches is similar. The Roman government served as a template for the American government. As you read further, you will see how the governmental structures, with detail, are similar by first making points on the American style contrasted with the Roman style of government.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Romans were great diplomats. They were firm when necessary and smart about granting citizenship. They also let citizens participate in domestic affairs. Their military was made up of strong, persistent soldiers. If a substantial amount of men were lost in battle they wouldn’t just surrender, but instead recruit new soldiers. They would build up new armies so that they could keep fighting. The Romans were also good strategists. By the year 264 BCE Rome had established colonies in strategic spots throughout Italy. By connecting these settlements with roads, they built a military and communication network that helped them rule more effectively. By getting military help from allies, they mobilized Italy’s military…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome before 264BC

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman army before 264BC was a citizens’ army, comprised of farmers and the population, with very little to no full time soldiers. Every man was expected to provide his own gear, and as such it was very difficult to recruit the poor or slaves to fight, and when they were recruited, it was at the expense of the state. Another problem with a citizens’ army is that they are not full time soldiers, and many are often inexperienced in combat, and lacked the training necessary to be truly superior to any opponent.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government recruits mercenaries, foreign soldiers who fought for money to defend threats. These people would get paid less than Romans, but didn’t have loyalty to the empire like Romans did…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * In about 450 B.C., the first Roman code of laws was written. Called the Twelve Tables, the code gave plebeians some degree of protection against unfair and oppressive patrician officials, who could interpret customary law in arbitrary way.…

    • 966 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government that Rome had was an Empire, that means the emperor decides what to do to the people, the law, or anything that makes him pleased but won't cause a crisis. When Rome became an empire, it meant that Rome had dynasties or states under a single ruler, usually an emperor or empress. After the fall of the Roman Republic, their emerged Rome's absolute ruler named Augustus, or Octavian. At that time, the Romans wanted to recover their great republic, and Octavian had told them he would restore the power of the Senates and the Roman people, but at that time, Octavian already was the emperor in complete control. Roman emperors had a role in Rome's daily life as well.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imperial Rome’s political control was mainly based on social status. For instance wealthy men dominated over women, and poor men. They had a written code of law that offered plebeians (poorer class) protection from abuse. This gave the plebeians an opportunity to shape public policy. Romans took great pride in this, and believed they enjoyed greater freedom than most of their neighbors. They had a rule of law, the rights of citizens, the absences of pretension, upright moral behavior, and keeping ones word. This was later recognized as “the way of the ancestors.”…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When we analyze the United States’s similarities and differences with Rome, there’s always an obvious juxtaposition that’s unmistakable. The similarities between these two great societies are considered and analyzed from many aspects like politic, military and culture. The political aspect of the United States and the ancient Rome has its root in the concept of republic. Militarily, both the U.S and ancient Rome are considered superpowers of their time. And from the cultural aspect, there’re a lot of comparisions made between these two societies. Here I will discuss more about these.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Greece and Rome had two different types of government. Rome had a republic, whereas Greece had a direct democracy. The republic of Rome was a type of government where the people were involved in their government but were left out of much more than in a democracy. The people were informed by the government of what was going on and the people had their say. However that did not mean that the government had to listen. They had a senate and at the head of the republic sat two consuls that were elected by the senate. The senate was comprised mostly of wealth Aristocrats who held most of the offices in the government. They would meet in assemblies and gatherings to appoint a magistrate or other official and the public would not have a lot of input. However in Greece they had a direct democracy. The Greeks actually came up with the idea of democracy. In this democracy the people would all come together and they would hold a meeting. They would meet every ten days to make decisions for themselves. They would elect a temporary judge or other official of some sort to help in the process and then they would come before the assembly (the people) to be…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government was not well organized and the branches fought against each other and didn't really focus on helping Rome but just fighting to see whose branch was better and had more control. If we still had the laws that Rome had we would have lots of fighting and we would still have slaves and people were based on wealthiness and they were treated different because of that and we still have people…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rome Essay Question

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages

    My plan is to take the main examples provided for why each is successful and format it as follows: Roman Republic, Roman Empire, both, hit on other civilizations, misc. I’m planning to link examples that explain how other emperors didn’t do what Rome did correctly directly with my fact on what Rome did do correct. As far as the second half of the question goes I am planning on taking what I have on each empire and try to make references to them during my arguments above. Tom L. was emphasizing Assyria during his explanation of this response. I listed some main points to hit on for every civilization below. Then with the remaining information I’m planning on just picking and choosing whatever fits. If you want me to send a list of my sources or an unrefined copy of my original notes let me know, it is kind of a cluster fuck but has some other background information.…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States and the Roman Empire share many differences and, even more, similarities. Some are evident while others are hardly noticeable. The Roman Empire faced attacks from the Huns like we face attacks from terrorists. Natural disasters caused many deaths and they still do today. The Romans lack of care and negligence for their well-being cost them in battle. The same will probably happen to us. It may not really seem like it but the United States is following in the footsteps of the Roman Empire. The similarities of the foreign threats, natural and environmental disasters, and laziness may be what will cause the fall of the United States.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays