Preview

Compare And Contrast Galileo Galilei And John Locke

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1392 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Galileo Galilei And John Locke
Fazeel Hussain Throughout time, mankind has always been afraid to speak or act against authority; the majority of people did what they were told. For this reason, dictators and monarchs were able to do as they please without much opposition. John Locke and Galileo Galilei both stated that God has endowed humans with reason to make rational choices. Both argue that each human should question ideas as they desire. Humans should not obey an authority figure without reason. Their ideas provided society with new ways of viewing life. “The second Treatise of Government” written by John Locke and “Science and Scripture” written by Galileo Galilei explain the importance of human rationality. According to John Locke, a successful community …show more content…
Both their views on human reason are very similar. John Locke stated that God empowered people with reason to stand up and revolt against an unrighteous authority. He gave individuals this gift to protect their freedom and property. Locke asserts the fact that if another individual tries to claim someone else’s possessions, that all men should stand up and fight the offender. Locke States “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which obliges every one: and reason, which is that law, teaches all mankind, who will but consult it, that being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions: for men being all the workmanship of one omnipotent, and infinitely wise maker” (SB, 35). Locke explains that humans are all equal due to the fact that God created them that way. If someone breaks a law, takes another person’s life, or property they shall be punished by the entire community. Galileo Galilei promotes the same behavior as John Locke when he states “No one should be scorned in physical disputes for not holding to the opinions which happen to please other people best…” (SB, 22). Galelei states that just because every individual has different ideas from the majority does not give the right for anyone to be looked down upon. Humans should help one another to create a prosperous society. People need to conform together with reason in order to balance power. This reasoning is what holds the community together. In doing so, people will no longer relinquish total control to just one individual. Allowing everyone to be equal and state their opinion without fear will create a world without

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were very different Enlightenment philosophers.They had many similarities and differences on what form of government they should form for the people.For example Thomas Hobbes believed in a powerful government,and John Locke believed in a limited government where the government should protect the people’s natural rights. Both of these philosophers were seventeen century enlightenment thinkers.Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different points of view on how the government should be formed for the people.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For the past many years, people have been trying to figure out the relationship between the government and nature of man. The theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau about the connection between nature of man and the government have been debated for many years. These three philosophers have remarkably influenced the way our system works today. Although each theory had its flaws and merits, Jean Jacques Rousseau’s theory is superior in comparison to Thomas Hobbes and John Locke.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The lack of an impartial judge is a defining characteristic of the state of nature, and this lack of a common judge can lead to confusion and violence therefore leading to the state of war. The state of nature and the state of war are not two separate concepts but the state of nature has the fundamental problem and civil government is the solution for the problems of the state of nature.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In years past, the majority of governmental ideas were based on a ruler with absolute power, such as the king or queen of a country. The common belief of the ruling class during the pre enlightenment period was that humans were born dirty, unhealthy, and were generally unable to govern themselves. With a “caring” and “fair” ruler they could be saved from the burden of their own judgement. In contrast, Enlightenment thinkers like John Locke, Baron De Montesquieu, Mary Wollstonecraft, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau thought that people were born pure and only were bad from the “corruption of society”, thus they should have a say in…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Locke, a seventeenth century Englishman who reclassified the way of government. Similarly, Locke concurred with Hobbes in regard to the self-intrigued nature of human, despite everything he had an idealistic point of view toward their capacity to reason. he was substantially more hopeful about their capacity to utilize motivation to stay away from oppression. In his Second Treatise of Government, Locke recognized the premise of a honest to goodness government. As per Locke, a ruler picks up specialist through the assent of the represented.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Locke agrees with Hobbes that the purpose of government is to create order in society but contends that people are reasonable and would cooperate with each other and could rebel if ruler were tyrant. Ruler stays in power only as long as he has consent of those governed. He said people had natural rights, including right to life,…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Locke and Hobbes

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    How does the founders' view of power affect the framers' reactions to John Locke? According to Locke, how does man enter the political society and what is the purpose of that society? What obligations does the government have in the civil society? What obligation does the individual have? How do Hobbes and Locke differ? Do you think Americans would agree with Locke? You may read the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence to assist you. What evidence do you have to support your view?…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many philosophers, such as John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, have discussed over the years if he human race is naturally good or evil. People than choice their side of the argument, one side believing that humans have a basically good nature that is corrupted by society, while the other side believes that humans have a bad nature that is kept in check by society. As John Locke believes that the human race is good, it is reasonable to accept as true because we are born neutral, with free will, and fear of a higher power.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    HIST Assignment 1

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In John Locke’s “The Second Treatise of Government” and Galileo Galilei’s “Science and Scripture,” it shows both of the authors have distinct and influential views of human reason and the legitimacy of authority. Locke believes that humankind’s relationship should not have any spiritual basis or religious rule and it should rely on a government system which holds authority of a society but cannot overpower its citizens. On the contrary, Galilei believes that humankind’s relationship should be based on the scripture as well as the law of nature. Galilei places emphasize on the biblical authority and everyone should listen to the God says in the bible. Despite the fact that Locke and Galilei appears to have different views, nevertheless, they trust that human beings are rational animals and God is the one who gives them reason.…

    • 1167 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Checks and Balances

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This essay will discuss the Constitutional principle of Checks and Balances. It will explain the concept and effectiveness of the separation of power. As an example, the case of Brown v. The Board of Education will be used to explain the concept and effectiveness of the separation of power. Brown v. The Board of Education is a famous case that ended segregation in schools in 1954 during the Civil Rights Movement.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Following the Revolutionary War, many tribulations arose in the newly independent thirteen colonies. Problems such as disunity, slavery, foreign/interstate relations, land disputes, and national debt led to the formation of the Articles of Confederation in 1777. America's first constitution, however, only lasted ten years until fifty-five delegates met in Philadelphia with the same common purpose: to preserve the American union, protect the American democracy from abroad, and curb the unrestrained social reformation rampant in other states.…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the start of the Scientific Revolution, people started thinking differently. Scholars and philosophers began to rethink their views about the old society and the way of living. Aspects of government, religion, economics and education were criticized. Two political thinkers, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke both experienced political hardships throughout their times, however they both came to two totally different conclusions on how future government should be ran.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John locke

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Western Civilization encompasses many new innovations, theories, and discoveries. However only the greatest people, events, and concepts of Western Civilization are still known and used today. In my opinion one of the most influential people of this time period is John Locke. Locke discovered multiple breakthroughs on natural law that still have a great impact on our modern society.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all my life I have discovered many things. My discoveries have allowed us to make more new discoveries. But a problem I think of is what the world would be like if I never existed. To start things off one important discovery I made was modern physics. If I was never to make the discoveries in optics, motion, and mathematics modern physics wouldn’t of existed which means that scientist wouldn’t have never known that every object in the universe has a force that attracts each other. Something else the world would have never found would be my laws of motion. The laws of motion gave people a better understanding regarding movement which helps people today in space travel and mechanics.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Mill would definitely defend Wolff’s right to speak his mind freely in this way on this subject. Freedom of expression “being almost of as much importance as the liberty of thought itself and resting in great part on the same reasons” (71) is practically inseparable from freedom of thought. Mill argues for both together saying that we need to have the freedom to think as we please and form our own opinions whether they be right or wrong and to be able to have free discussion forums to present our different opinions. The opposing views of others stand to challenge our current opinions on a subject and the ability to have a free discussion is vital to figuring out the whole truth. If we don’t allow for someone to speak his or her…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays