Preview

Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber’s Analyses of the Development of Capitalism

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1529 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Marx and Weber’s Analyses of the Development of Capitalism
Compare and contrast Marx and Weber’s analyses of the development of capitalism

Capitalism is defined as ‘An economic and political system in which a country 's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit.’ It is based on the division between two classes, one of which owns the labour of the other. Not only do the upper classes, or the bourgeoisie, own the means of physical production but also the means of ‘mental production’. They control and manipulate society through the rule of education, religion and the media. Althusser distinguishes between repressive state apparatuses and ideological state apparatuses and argues about how the bourgeoisie manages to maintain its rule. He argues that the repressive includes the police and the army in which use physical force to control the working class as opposed to the ideological apparatuses such as the media and religion which control the development of ideas. A key component of capitalism is that the working class are forced to sell their labour in exchange for wages in order to survive. However, they do not receive an equal exchange for the labour they produce, but only the cost of subsistence. The difference of what the bourgeoisie receive from the labourers and the amount they pay back is called the surplus value, meaning the profit they make.

Max Weber was one of the founding fathers of sociology and contributed highly to our knowledge of how society works. Weber’s work can be highlighted by referring to his study The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, first published in 1905 (22 years after the death of Karl Marx in 1883). Weber argues that the Protestant Reformation introduced a new belief system of Calvinism (a form of Protestantism founded by John Calvin during the reformation) which promoted a high work ethic and which eventually led to the rise in capitalism. Calvinists believed that God preordains the ‘elect’ meaning of who would be saved after death and go onto heaven and



Bibliography: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1932). The German Ideology . Moscow: David Riazanov. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels (1848). Manifesto of the communist party. London. Max Weber (1978). Economy and Society. California: University of California Press. Thomas Hobbes (1988). The Leviathan. London : Penguin . Phil Bartle. (2007). Marx vs Weber. Available: http://cec.vcn.bc.ca/cmp/modules/cla-mweb.htm. Last accessed 10th October 2012. Louis Althusser. (1970). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Available: http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm 970. Last accessed 10th October 2012 Michael Lowy. (2006). Marx, Weber and the Critique of Capitalism . Available: http://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article1106 . Last accessed 10th October 2012. No Author. (1999). Max Weber. Available: http://uregina.ca/~gingrich/s30f99.htm. Last accessed 10th October 2012. D. Sayer, Capitalism and Modernity: An Excurses on Marx and Weber, pg. 4, London: Routledge, 1991. Cuff, E. C., W. W. Sharrock and D. W. Francis, Perspectives in Sociology, third edition, London, Routledge, 1992.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    How and why does Weber seek to establish a connection between the Protestant ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism?…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Althusser advances two theses on ideology: "Ideology represents the imaginary relationship of individuals to their real conditions of existence" and "Ideology has a material existence". The first thesis tenders the familiar Marxist contention that ideologies have the function of masking the exploitative arrangements on which class societies are based.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It gives us input in understanding the social world. Weber’s Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is a significant example of comparative-historical research because it examines the social phenomenon over a prolong period of time. Weber had a phenomenon. Why the European capitalist economic system was working in some parts of Europe but not others. Weber was investigating why Protestantism might have been connected to the early rise of capitalism (67). He concluded that being economically successful was a way of showing your value to god. However, consuming whatever you have been a sign that you were not one of the choice who would be led to Heaven (67). Weber showed how sociologists can draw upon history to test important propositions about society by using historical variance to test a theory about the importance of religion (67). The goal of research is the hope of gaining more knowledge of the social…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Critically analyze the following claim: ‘Class is no longer relevant in Australia in the twenty-first century.’…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    According to Louis Althusser, the state consists of two elements or apparatuses, both which work to keep the bourgeoisie in power. Firstly, the repressive state apparatuses (RSAs), which maintain the rules of the bourgeoisie by force or the threat of it. The RSAs include the police, courts and army. When necessary they use physical force to repress the working class. Secondly, the ideological state apparatuses (ISAs), as mentioned in Item A, maintains the rule of the bourgeoisie by controlling people’s ideas and beliefs. The ISAs include religion, the mass media and the education system.…

    • 1665 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, Max Weber and Georg Simmel are the dominant classical voices when studying or analyzing the rise of civilization from a more cooperative, collective feudal social order to a modern capitalistic society. All four of these sociological philosophers contributed to the contemporary understanding of the nature of society and social change. Each of them eventually surmised that economic conditions directly influenced the relationship between individuals and their fellows, and individuals and their world. Although they had differences in their viewpoints, they were acutely concerned with the evolving market society and its effect on human interaction. Marx developed his concept of “alienation”, Durkheim expressed thoughts on social solidarity, Weber and Simmel emphasized how the emergence of capitalism affected the way people think, making the rational calculation of means and ends more ubiquitous and placing significant importance on rationalism and disenchantment. The outcome for the modern citizen was not naturally grounded in humanitarianism…

    • 3246 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The German philosopher, Karl Marx, has made many contributions to the ideas of capitalism and is credited for his critiques of political economy. Marx was interested in the issue of the class struggle between the proletarian, the majority of the population who own nothing but their labor power which they sell to the bourgeoisie, and the bourgeoisie, the minority of the population who own the means of production in society. One of Marx’s critiques on political economy is the invention of private property in society, as well as the estrangement that labor within the capitalistic mode of production produces.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is Marxism Anti Democratic

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order to answer this question the parameters of the discussion must first be set, with key terms in the title defined. Marxism I define to be ‘an economic and socio-political worldview and method of socio-economic enquiry which focuses upon a materialist interpretation of history, a dialectical view of social change and an analysis and critique of capitalism. ‘ Democracy, I define to be an ‘egalitarian form of government in which sovereignty is vested in the people and exercised by them or elected agents.’ In the following essay I will present two opposing interpretations of Marxism, with both leading to wildly divergent conclusions regarding the democratic nature of Marxism. The first perspective revolves around a literal interpretation of Marxism; with the emphasis being entirely on Marx’s writings as oppose to any subsequent interpretations or manifestations of his beliefs. The second perspective involves an empirical study of Marxism, with various Marxist regimes analyzed and the extent to which they are democratic being the primary means of assessing as to whether Marxism is democratic or not. The following two quotations, I believe demonstrate the polarity of opinion existing on Marxism and Democracy and accurately summarize the two perspectives I will be arguing; Hal Draper (1978) states ‘Marx’s socialism maybe most quickly defined, as the complete democratization of society, not merely of political forms,’ and Joseph Femia ‘Communist despotism was a logical consequence of Marxist theory.’ In the first part of the essay, I will outline Marx’s theory of the state and democracy which supports the argument that Marxism is not theoretically anti-democratic. In the second part of the essay I will present the view that as a result of their being such significant empirical evidence in opposition to this thesis I believe it is hard to argue that Marxism can be viewed as democratic. Marx stated ‘The question whether human…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marx vs. Weber

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Karl Marx and Max Weber offer two very different but valid approaches to social class in modern capitalist society. In a capitalist society the private ownership of the means of production is the dominant form of providing the things needed to survive. What distinguishes capitalism from other types of society is the emphasis on the rights of property and the individual owner’s right to employ capital, as she or he thinks fit.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Weber's essay The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism is his most famous work. It is argued that this work should not be viewed as a detailed study of Protestantism, but rather as an introduction into Weber's later works, especially his studies of interaction between various religious ideas and economic behavior. In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Weber puts forward the thesis that the Puritan ethic and ideas influenced the development of capitalism. Religious devotion has usually been accompanied by rejection of mundane affairs, including economic pursuit. Why was that not the case with Protestantism? Weber addresses that paradox in his essay.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cubalast

    • 2023 Words
    • 6 Pages

    When dealing with the Communist Manifesto, one has to comprehend what makes this text preserve its hermeneutic and ideological power a whole 150 years after its first publication. The answer to this question is to be found in its revolutionary-scientific character, i.e. to the fact that it constitutes an analysis of the typical features of the capitalist mode of production, as it emerged from the history of class-struggles, and was consolidated into a system of class power and class exploitation with historically unique structural characteristics. This scientific character of the Manifesto, its ability to reveal the real character of a social order which presents itself as a regime of “freedom” and “human rights”, makes it also an ideological weapon in the hands of the working class, i.e. all those who are subjected to capitalist power and exploitation. And as Louis Altusser argued, "It is absolutely necessary for one to have adopted proletarian class positions, in order, very simply, to see and understand what is happening in a class society. It is based on the simple finding that (...) one cannot see everything from everywhere. One can discern the texture of this reality of conflict only if one adopts within the conflict itself, certain positions and not some other ones, because to passively adopt some other positions means that she/he has caught up in the logic of class illusions, which shall be named ruling ideology. Naturally this pre-condition opposes the entire positivist tradition -through which the bourgeois ideology interprets the practice of natural sciences" (Althusser: “Für Marx und Freud”, in Louis Althusser: Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate, Hamburg/Westberlin, pp. 89-107, 1977).…

    • 2023 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx, Karl. "Wage Labor and Capital." Rivkin, Julie and Michael Ryan. Literary Theory: An Anthology. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2004. 659-664.…

    • 2424 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sociology - Class

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Both sociologists have agreed that economical factors were crucial in the shaping of social class and the inequalities of society. The key difference within these two theories is that Marx believes that two groups within society are important in understanding the workings of society, his groups are divided by the ownership of the means of production (property assets). Where Weber believes there are many more important groups and strata within those groups that need to be understood. Weber realised that there was other groups that needed to be recognised, as there is important conflict within Marx’s two classes, which needs to be understood to comprehend how the society operates.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The essay ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses’ by Althusser makes a theoretical statement about the function of ideology in life and the way ideology gets produced and evolved through what are called state apparatuses. In Althusser’s essay, we see a clear demarcation between two kinds of state apparatuses. The former constitute administrative, political, crudely repressive, and the latter refer to the forms of the superstructure.…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Di sisi lain, ketertarikan Weber pada struktur otoritas dipengaruhi oleh kepentingan politiknya. Weber bukanlah seorang politikus radikal; bahkan, ia kerap dijuluki "Marx borjuis" sebagai cerminan kemiripan ketertarikan intelektual Marx dan Weber sekaligus perbedaan orientasi politik keduanya.…

    • 2452 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays