Preview

Compare and Contrast Nurit Bird-David’s and Kaplan’s Different Takes on Marshall Sahlin’s Theory of the Original Affluent Society & Argue Which View You Think Is Most Convincing.

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1413 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Nurit Bird-David’s and Kaplan’s Different Takes on Marshall Sahlin’s Theory of the Original Affluent Society & Argue Which View You Think Is Most Convincing.
In Stone Age Economics, Marshall Sahlins offered cross-cultural interpretations of various economic practices. The most powerful argument in the opus concerned the economic behaviour of hunter-gatherers. It was a general anthropological assumption that hunter-gatherers were pre-occupied only with the quest for food and lived on the edge of starvation. However, in his book, Sahlins used anthropological field studies which revealed that contemporary hunter-gatherer societies not only have an adequate diet, but enjoy much more leisure time than supposedly more advanced agricultural peoples. Sahlins concluded that prehistoric hunter-gatherer communities were the “original affluent society.” The term did not go unnoticed amongst the scholars. Most anthropologists embraced the thesis, but some also showed some objections against the thesis. As a result, a hot debate was created within the scholars of economic anthropology.

Nurit Bird-David and David Kaplan form part of those who have emitted criticism of the original affluence thesis. In this essay, I discuss the opinions of the two scholars one at a time, showing the main arguments of their works. Then I shall proceed to describe points of commonality on which the two authors agree. Finally I will posit my own argument as to which scholar’s takes I think is more convincing.

Nurit Bird-David’s article - “Beyond ‘The Original Affluent Society’: A Culturalist Reformulation” (1992), the latter discusses the anterior work of Sahlins “Original Affluent Society.” She reviews Sahlins’ main contentions under a culturalist perspective. For Bird-David Sahlins’ work definitely succeeded in breaking the anthropological assumption that hunter-gatherers were poor, starving people; a view that David Kaplan as well share. However, for Bird-David Sahlins perpetrated a mistake; the one of confusing cultural ad ecological evaluations: “He overprocessed the ecologically oriented quantitative data from the […] studies and in the



Bibliography: 1. Bird-David, N., 1992, Beyond the “Original Affluent Society”, Current Anthropology, 25-47 2. Kaplan, D., 2000, The Darker Side of the “Original Affluent Society”, Anthropological Research, 301-324 3. Sahlins, M., 1972, Stone Age Economics, Chicago, Aldine Publishing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Prologue: According to the author, why did human development proceed at different rates on different continents? What is his personal view on civilized and progressive societies versus hunter- gathers?…

    • 3088 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this period, individuals were atrociously malnourished and the extreme issues of inequalities were alarming. In fact, Diamond offers a meticulous account of how distinct activities of hunter-gatherers as well as farming cultures changed in the modern period, the Age of Encounter. He provides incomparable data that mentions that the modern hunter-gatherer populations obtained food between 12 and 19hrs per week (Diamond, 1987). accordingly, I exceptionally agree with Diamond that the immense shift from hunter-gathering to agricultural activities was undeniably the nastiest mistake of the imperative human race because of its…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies written by Jared Diamond travels through the different aspects of human societies starting from modern human’s pre-Homo ancestors comparing the different variations that have occurred throughout time, ending at the modern Homo sapiens in the world today. The focus of this book is why some societies strive while other fail. Diamond looked at the different advantages and disadvantages of the areas these societies lived in and in his own words deriving the thesis “History followed different courses for different peoples because of differences among people’s environments, not because of biological differences between peoples themselves” (25). Diamond’s thesis follows the lines of the overarching question; have geography and the distribution of natural resources…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Guns Germs and Steel

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This documentary goes deep into history and answers the main question of, “How did our worlds become so different?” Jared Diamond takes on the challenge most philosophers wouldn’t dare try of dividing the haves and have-nots of the world. His journey began in the forests of Papua New Guinea. As of 30 years ago, they were still using some of the techniques used in the Stone Age. People hunted by tracking their prey and used bow and arrows. Their main source of food was the Sago tree; this only provided about 70 pounds of food and did not provide the nutrients needed to survive. Women did most of the gathering and processed the pulp taken out of the Sago tree.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The era of foragers, also known as the “Paleolithic era” deals with the lives of hunter-gatherers, who had survived for over 240,000 years. Their nomadic lifestyles of traveling and hunting has created a huge impact to the environment and their sophisticated technology, such as sticks and stones allowed them to settle adaptively across the globe with different climates. Succeeding foraging is the agrarian era, that lasted for almost ten thousand years. In this era, advancement with agriculture and pastoralism were a necessity as it allowed cities, states, and empires to form. Complex societies, especially hierarchy, followed along. The modern era is described to be the fastest out of the three eras proved that tremendous in population, innovation, and productivity in less than a millennium was possible. The industrial revolution was the next level of domination after agriculture and since has shaped the world through today where better sophisticated technology (such as the steam engine that allowed quick supply of cheap energy) was able to expand to all regions. After the main text, this book ends with the resource pages, periodization chapter, and the index. (need…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SOCI 1301 Paper 5

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hunting-and-gathering society: A preindustrial society in which people rely on whatever foods and fibers are readily…

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    He is currently the Curator of Mesoamerican and Central American Anthropology for Chicago’s Field Museum of Natural History. Dr. Feinman is known for his work in the development of an archaeology survey, as well as his research in the Oaxaca Valley in southern Mexico. Dr. Feinman asserts that the purpose of this title is not to redefine accepted theories and facts in anthropology and archaeology, but to consolidate them all into a single reference source. This is a compilation of anthropological data and theories as it stood during the new millennium. This text will assist me in providing relevant archaeological findings and anthropological theories on the topic of the foundation of neolithic cultural leisure. This text is similar to Dr Hanks and Dr Linduff 2009 title, Social complexity in prehistoric Eurasia. The primary difference is the scope of Dr. Feinman is much broader in the exploration of a wide variety of topics, while Drs Hanks and Lindruff provide a more detailed look at relevant finds in and around the Eurasian…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ANTH100 – Introduction to Anthropology APUS Assignment: Be An Anthropologist 2 Due by 11:59p on Sunday of Week 6 Purpose: The goal of this exercise is to observe a ‘cultural scene’ as an anthropologist would (i.e. based on everything you have learned in the course to-date). The student will analyze their observations in terms of themes from the subfield of cultural anthropology such as how it helps frame our societies (family, lifestyle, lineage, language and communication) and, in some ways, its evolution. Description: Culture as we have discussed in our readings and lecture notes is an incredible advantage that has allowed humans to enter almost every niche in nature. The development and maintenance of culture is what sets humans apart from…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ! King Tribe

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They have lived in relatively small groups, without centralized authority, standing armies, or bureaucratic systems. Yet the evidence indicates that they have lived together surprisingly well, solving their problems among themselves largely without recourse to authority figures and without a particular propensity for violence. American anthropologist Marshall Sahlins to call them, in another famous phrase, "the original affluent society:' Most striking, the hunter and gatherers have demonstrated the remarkable ability to survive and thrive for long periods, in some cases thousands of years without destroying their…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam Studies

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Exam 2 Review Cultural Anthropology . . What does the discipline of ecology study? o What term did we use to refer to “a beneficial adjustment”? o What is different about ecological studies of humans? What does patterns of subsistence mean? o What is the difference between food foraging and food producing? o Can you define horticulture? Pastoralism? Agriculture?  What is swidden? o When did some human populations begin to switch to agriculture? o What is Jared Diamond’s main argument in “Adaptive Failure: Easter’s End”? What is the definition and application of the following modes of exchange? o Market exchange? Redistribution? Reciprocity?  What are the three types of reciprocity? How are they different from each other? o What does Lee Cronk tell us about the Kula Ring in “Reciprocity and the Power of Giving”?  What is it? Where does it take place? Who participates? What does the economy organize? o Are peasants a part of the global capitalist system? Why or why not? o What is the difference between capitalism and socialism? What is the function of politics as a social institution? o What is the definition of the following forms of political organization?  Bands  Chiefdoms  Tribes  State o What is a nation? How does this differ from a state? o What types of leaders does Marvin Harris identify in “Life Without Chiefs”? o What is bureaucracy?  What are Weber’s six theoretical components? o What did Antonio Gramsci call the indirect power that he identified? What is the difference between status and role? o What are the two types of status? Can you provide examples of each?  What is a master status? o What are the two types of social groups? o What do we call any system of social ranking?  What is the definition of class? Caste? Meritocracy? What are the two sides in the debate on the cause of poverty? o What did Karl Marx say about the origin of class distinctions? Can you identify people, places, and topics from the film Roger and Me?…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Etruscans

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: Adler, Philip J., and Randall L. Pouwels. World Civilizations. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Belmont CA: Thomson Wadsworth, 2006. 117-118.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I feel that this is a trick question. Sahlin makes a great argument about the hunter- gathers being the original affluent society. Great points are brought up about them being able to survive with what we would think of as little or just enough. Food and water were the most important and valuable things that they had. I hate to say things because they are necessities. Everything else is really more things we want and don't need. Through out history and even in movies there are those few people who want more then what they have. Thats why I say this is a trick question. Again, the article has a great argument, but I would want more. Those are my thoughts.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hair

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Giddens, Anthony, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Applebaum and Deborah Carr. 2012. “Introduction to sociology.” New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Eighth ed., pp. 15-78.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    classism

    • 7854 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Bullock, H. E., & Lott, B. (2010). Social class and power. In A. Guinote &…

    • 7854 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Macionis, John J. (2011). Society: The Basics (11th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Retrieved from University of Phoenix Axia, Soc120 – Sociology course website.…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics