Preview

Compare and Contrast Plato and Aristotle on Well-Being

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6148 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast Plato and Aristotle on Well-Being
Compare and contrast Plato and Aristotle on well-being.

Well-Being: The state of being healthy happy or prosperous.
It seems obvious to suggest that the goal we all are aiming at is total happiness; total success and fulfillment. In the Nichomachean ethics, Aristotles' main aim is to provide a description of what this so-called happiness actually is, and how we can go about our day to day lives in order to achieve the best life that we possibly can. He begins book one with what philosophers call a 'Teleological conception of life'. That is, everything we do is aiming at some end: 'every art and every investigation, and similarly every action and pursuit, is considered to aim at some good. Hence the good has been rightly defined as 'that at which all things aim' ' (NE 1.1) What Aristotle means here by 'good', is not the generic term that we use to describe something enjoyable or favourable, but more of an ultimate, supreme good; a satisfactory and wholesome end. An end at which we all are aiming.
In book 1, Aristotle calls the ultimate end (or telos) eudaimonia, which is commonly translated as happiness, but also as success or fulfillment. (1097a28-34). He proposes that we ought not to regard happiness as a property, but as a goal for the sake of which we act. So Aristotles' examination of happiness is a practical one, practical because he not only wants us to befall upon a theory of what happiness actually is, but his approach is guided by the thought that such an end is nothing less than the object of all rational action. Aristotle proposes that the first step we can take towards acquiring a successful life, is to realise what good action consists in, and to use this to guide us in our pursuits. He goes on to say that we should use the criteria of this supreme good to 'evaluate (other) goods, such as pleasure, wealth, honour, moral virtue, and philosophical contemplation' (Lear, G.R Happy Lives and the Human Good,1.1)- we are to take these to be the keys to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Book I, Aristotle mentions that happiness is an end goal and “one day, or a short time, does not make a man blessed and happy”. In agreement with this statement, happiness is something that takes time and each person should strive for it every day. Road blocks are bound to occur and bad days will happen. By keeping the end goal in mind, it makes it easier to avoid getting stuck in a rut. Within Book I, Aristotle also questions whether or…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle doesn’t think that happiness is something that comes and goes continuously, he sees happiness as a goal in ones life or the ultimate value of ones life so far. “Verbally there is a very general agreement; for both the general run of men and people of superior refinement say that it is happiness, and identify living well and doing well with being happy; but with regard to what happiness is they differ, and the many do not give the same account as the wise” (Nicomachean Ethics, 4). Aristotle finds that only the wise know what true happiness is and it has to do with doing well for oneself, which can be interpreted differently from person to person. There is no exact thing Aristotle is relating to doing well, it’s more like one personally sets a goal or decides whether their life is good which translates into happiness. Maybe what Aristotle is saying isn’t that one will be continually happy with the position they are in in their life, but that one will be content with how their life is going and accept it, as in happiness depends on what a person does to make themselves happy. When a person usually thinks of anyone being happy they probably think of someone smiling or laughing while doing some kind of activity, but who is to say that is what happiness is? Happiness could just be getting out of a tough time in one’s life and being in a…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book 1, Aristotle states “but in every activity and undertaking, it is the end, for it is for the sake of this that they all do the rest” (Arist. EN 1.7, 1097a21, trans. Rowe). By excising this rationality for goodness, it ultimately leads to happiness, which is the reason for all action. Here, Aristotle supplies his teleological perspective that humans are goal or purpose oriented. For businesspersons, the goal could be considered to supply goods and services while adding value to all stakeholders. Although, Aristotle would argue that the goal of the businessperson is not an end in itself, rather it is a subordinate end that creates means to higher ends. Thus, to understand how to be a good person, one must understand the higher end purpose, happiness, which is pursued for its own sake. Aristotle's conception of happiness focuses on the activity of success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 9). Aristotle considers happiness as an activity. For the businessperson this could mean receiving a promotion. Happiness is not a single activity, rather it is the consistent exercise of reason and appropriate virtues that lead to success and fulfillment (Green, R. M. G. A., 2013, p. 10). The virtues…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI2000 The Good Life

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle believes that one’s accomplishments in being happy are the driving force to a “Good Life”. The good life creates a happiness that relates to one functioning well and reason. Aristotle believes that it takes time, hard work and restraint to get to the employ the habits of reasoning and according to him everything has a purpose (Rachels and Rachels, pg 54). Aristotle states that “Good” has rightly been defined as “that at which all things aim” and that people identify happiness with living well or doing well (Sommers & Sommers, 2010).…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This comparative essay, will be comparing three different themes that relate to the novel “Lord of the Flies” by William Golding and the movie” The Blindness” directed by Ferdinando Meirelles. In both novel and movie, the people try to make successful societies, but with all society there is power struggles, loss of innocence’s and survival of the fittest. This is evident throughout both the movie and the novel. The novel and the movie create a vivid image of what is going on. In the novel the group of boys are trying to survive and attempt to create a society but loses control because of power, and this also In turn creates loss of innocence’s. In the movie, the same thing happens when they are quarantined and have to survive the doctor 's wife tried to take control but one of the rebellious blind men found a gun and took the food and supplies. They also created chaos within the quarantined area which led to the death of innocent lives Because of the soldier’s foolish acts.…

    • 1447 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Responsibility

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Aristotle’s theory of morality, Nicomachean Ethics, he surmises that all human activities aim at some end or good. There are three types of good, sensual (pleasure), political (noble virtues for citizens), of life of thought (contemplation) (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 51). He states “every scientific inquiry, and similarly every action and purpose may be said to aim at some good”. What he is saying is that everything has an end point which is something good. Everything we want to accomplish is for some good. The ends are many, and he goes on to say the end of the medical art I health, the end of the shipbuilding is a vessel, the end of strategy is victory, and the end of economics is wealth. One piece, to point out is Aristotle states there is a final end. For example some may think of money as an end, however, without something to purchase, money is meaningless. Working for example is an action not a goal, work is not the good, so what is the supreme end, what are you working to attain? “Perhaps happiness is the supreme good” (Arthur & Scalet, 2009, p. 52).…

    • 1604 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this section I will explain Aristotle’s definition of eudaimonia and its relationship to happiness, morality and the virtues. Aristotle defines eudaimonia in the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics as “virtuous activity in accordance with reason” and that this is the highest good for human beings. For Aristotle, eudaimonia can be translated into a “human life of flourishing” since it occurs throughout a person’s life. This lifelong happiness is complete and sufficient in itself, meaning that a person lives it as an end in itself and not for anything else beyond it. An important aspect of reaching our own eudaimonia is to function well as human beings. Aristotle presents his concept of the human function by stating that what makes human function so distinct is not just to obtain nutrition and to grow because that aspect of life is shared with plants and it is also not perception because that is something shared with animals. Our ultimate human function therefore is reason and not just reason alone but to act in accordance to reason.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle and Happiness

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. According to the text a full functioning completely happy person will be mentally, physically, spiritually, financially, professionally, creatively, and socially healthy & well rounded individual. Happiness involves being really alive and not just existing. Aristotle believes that a person should work hard doing what they love, they also shouldn’t devote their lives to acquiring riches since riches don’t provide happiness. One should also reject fame and public success to become happy as self sufficiency is believed to provide happiness. Happiness is a process starting from infancy. A happy life is a life where spiritual, physical and social needs are met under reason and moderation. I think Aristotle recipe of happiness involves a person making a conscience decision to do the right thing in all aspects of their life. I think the happiness he refers to is obtained by living a healthy life, being in tune with our psyche, having a career that we enjoy, having friends and family to love, and having enough riches to support ourselves without gloating about them.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Aim of Man

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle point he is conveying throughout his essay is that the end and aim of all that we do is happiness. His most prominent rhetorical technique that he uses is definition. He confirms the definition of happiness several times in his essay; which makes his writing strategy even more substantial. In the section, “Confirmation by Popular Beliefs”, he isolates happiness as the ultimate good. Aristotle uses the example of competitors at the Olympic Games. Aristotle says, “In life…those who carry off the finest prizes are those who manifest their…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bus 405: The Aim Of Man

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Aristotle in "The Aim of Man," is trying to provide us with some guidance in this matter. As you read, you will note that in Aristotle's view, there is nothing more noble, nothing more fulfilling, nothing more important, than statecraft, or government service. His ideal, that for which each of us should strive, is "the good." We might be able to agree with him that all things (and people) strive for "good," but aren't there exceptions? Don't some people seem to aim for evil? He goes on to argue that "Wherever there are certain ends over and above the actions themselves, it is the nature of such products to be better than the activities." He is saying that the ends are better than the means. Do you agree?…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Aristotle’s Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, he explains that virtue of character is the mean to the ultimate end, which is happiness. Aristotle states that, without a goal or ultimate end (happiness), life does not have a purpose. Therefore every action in a person’s life has to be made with true virtue of character in mind in order to achieve…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was Plato’s prize pupil who discussed the types of moments where moral correctness may be applied to certain events, nature of virtues involved in the sound morality of humans as well as the ways to achieve happiness in one’s life. The overall question that Aristotle tends to ask himself and try to answer is the question that pertains to human character and personality, what do we as humans need to do, to be considered as a good person. Aristotle explained that every activity has a final cause and purpose at which it aims to achieve and he argued that since there is not an infinite amount of goods, there has to be one type of good that is the highest and most important which humans strive towards. He continues to describe this ultimate good and decided that it could be called happiness, however the only puzzling question left is, what is happiness? Due to its existence in so many forms it is tough to describe happiness as one true thing…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy 120w

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Looking at the world as a big picture and everyone who is in it, they all seem to strive for the same thing in life, happiness. Happiness or Eudemonia as Aristotle calls it, is created through the process of combining five different components. These are the following components: Human function, the rational part of the soul, habituation, character, and virtue. Since our society craves happiness and views it as the best achievement we could have, Aristotle described it as the ultimate end.…

    • 1079 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The basic idea behind Aristotle’s book is that the ultimate goal in life is to achieve true happiness. This particular idea makes the most sense to me. “Happiness, then, is found to be something perfect and self-sufficient, being the end to which our actions are directed” (Aristotle, Page 15). This quote states that happiness is the final, the end and all other things will lead up to this. Happiness is stated to direct our actions because people all want to be happy. This idea gives people the feeling of “self-sufficient” because no other person can make another person achieve the ultimate good because it is all dependent on the person. Happiness is a perfect thing because no one truly knows what it is until they reach it themselves. The idea of happiness is subjective around the world given the different cultures so it is impossible to even begin to describe specifically how to reach the ultimate good. He also says "Since happiness is a certain sort of activity of the soul in accord with complete virtue, we must examine virtue; for that will perhaps also be a way to study happiness better" (Aristotle, 16). Happiness is a virtue and in order to know happiness then you need to have an idea of what a virtue is. Virtue is the behavior showing high moral standards. Moral standards are important in all culture and especially in the Geek culture because of the gods who…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Virtue Ethics

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    has more to do with character and the nature of what it is to be…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays