Preview

Compare And Contrast Robespierre And Gandhi

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
73 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast Robespierre And Gandhi
Both Robespierre and Gandhi were similar in their quest to change the government structure. However, they did have their differences as well. Robespierre, unlike Gandhi, was the most feared leader, and used terror to gain control. Gandhi, on the other hand, was very peaceful, and told his fellow Indians not to give into the British’s violence. However, their goal was the same, to change the governmental structure that they were greatly respected under.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Robespierre Thesis

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre, also known as Maximilien de Robespierre, was born on May 6, 1758 in Arras, a city in France approximately 162 kilometers north of Paris. Robespierre was the oldest of four siblings, and his mother died when Robespierre was six years old. Shortly thereafter, his father left him, leaving his maternal grandparents to tend to the four children. The Robespierre family was a member of the Third Estate, which consisted of anyone in France that was not a noble and not a member of the clergy (administrators of the Roman Catholic Church). However, Robespierre earned a law degree from the Parisian Lycee (School) Louis-le-Grand, proving that he was a member of the highest class of the Third Estate.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With many different views it is difficult to remember Martin Luther King and Malcolm X were both fighting the same war for the same people. King and Malcolm X fought the same battle using different methods. Both wanted to end racism and discrimination. King agreed with Malcolm X that Blacks had to love themselves. Both were instilled with a hope for a better day, society and world. King dreamed of a society of peace, freedom, justice, and equality. They became role models for African-American youth and achieved much with their efforts. They introduced self-pride to their people. Both methods were effective. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X were both great men who died trying to make their home and country better but in the end both men’s…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he did protest segregated seating on trains by sitting in cars reserved for whites, this is just…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln and Robert E. Lee wanted to achieve diverse goals during the Civil War. Lincoln was determined to save the Union and help the United States move into a new era. He wanted to settle the issue of slavery in the United States, founded on the principles of liberty and equal rights for all. Robert E. Lee fought the war for the Southern traditions. Lee wanted to defend Southern traditions. He fought the war not only to protect slavery, but also to preserve a whole culture, a way of life. Southerners' wealth and identity belonged to the land they lived on. Lee fought to protect sovereignty, pride, identity, and a decision to secede from the Union. Despite the differences, both men will be heroes for American people.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was not perfect especially during the 19th century when conflicts arose regarding slavery, women’s rights, politics, and corruption. Sojourner Truth and Abraham Lincoln discuss some of those issues that were the highlight of the civil war. Some of the issues they talked about were slavery and women’s rights. Throughout the both well thought out speeches, Lincoln and Truth use resembling strategies that were very persuasive. Their persuasive speeches were used in an attempt to further their cause and establish their objective. Both speeches are influential and give clear objectives which makes them all the more promising.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malcolm x and Martin Luther King Jr. are both powerful leaders. Malcolm X believed in violence and Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence. These two leader shared belief and hopes but they also had their differences. Malcolm X was born in Omaha, Nebraska on May 19, 1925. Malcolm did not believe in nonviolence or advocate integration. (Harold 610) He attracted black people’s attention and was eloquent, passionate, and a courageously out spoken champion of black people and a critic of American racism.…

    • 562 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The undisputed two most renown leaders of the civil rights movement, Malcom x and Martin Luther king could not be further apart in there ways to achieve equality. One of the most controversial topics in the historical movement was the question of integration vs segregation which left both iconic leaders opposed in what should have been a united forward thinking ideological movement. It is argued that, Martin Luther king offered a more beneficial program of civil rights as opposed to Malcolm x. In order to define “beneficial” or to set a benchmark to determine which of the two leaders policies were best the following criteria is set:…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However with different motives; Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau were both admirable men that strived for a better government. As respected spokesmen they served as rebels against what they thought to be bad one's stopping at nothing. Not even jail.…

    • 506 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    and understand which allowed him to build a rapport and gain their trust also led to the connection with Dr King and the audience. The audience members felt like they knew him even though they did not recognize him personally all these traits combined with the powerfulness in the compassion of his voice you could literally feel the Holy Spirit. All of these things combined allow Dr King the ability to move the audience in a way no one has ever been able to manage it.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Common Sense Lesson, Thomas Paine distinguishes or defines society as, “Society is produced by our wants … the former promotes our happiness POSITIVELY by uniting our affections.” That everything constructive and good that people are joining together to accomplish. For Government he describes it as, “restraining our vices.” and that, “Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil.” The purpose of the government is to protect us from our own wicked behaviors, and to protect life, liberty, and property. The government is a necessary evil at best and their decisions determine themselves. The differences was also stated in the Lesson at the first paragraph, “whereas they are not only different, but have different…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ideals of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution were both rooted from the desire to abolish absolute authority, ensure the natural rights of men, and develop a stable government. Napoleon Bonaparte, a prominent military general and French Emperor, strived for these political ideologies, but was corrupt in his way of approaching them. He was strictly egotistical and selfish; these characteristics served only as a catalyst to his abolition. Mohandas Gandhi, a pacifistic revolutionary that led India’s emancipation, stated that “power based on love is a thousand times more effective and permanent then the one derived from fear of punishment”. Napoleon, however, seized control over France by ruling oppressively and ruthlessly; citizens followed him only in fear of his boundless power. Although Napoleon did help establish political and social equality in France, his uncontrollable desire for personal supremacy suppressed the ideals of the revolution and violated the basic principles of the enlightenment.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Frederick Douglas and Malcolm X were two men who were very important to Americans, especially those of African descent. These men made important speeches and organized special movements that eventually led to the beneficial changes of the Civil Rights Movements. The powerful words helped unify the United States to its present state, and better the world for all people.…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with all men. These words spoken by Christ can be found in Romans 12:8 that refer to living in peace with everyone. Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X are both men that fought and petitioned for equality for black people. Did they both have different approaches and views on how to obtain said peace and equality? Absolutely. Martin Luther King Jr. believed in the pacifist way for reaching the level of peace that was desired by the general black community and himself. Malcolm X, on the other hand, was not as passive and didn’t believe in the nonviolent method that Dr. King did. Malcolm X believed that getting peace by any means necessary and…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Joseph Ellis describes in his novel Founding Brothers, slavery was the most divisive problem in America. The states were divided not by their difference of size or but whether or not they had slaves. Instead of coming together and considering a compromise the North and the South each began to form the own arguments on the slave issue and began one of the biggest debates in the United States history. The beginning of years of debates came on February 11,1790 when two quaker delegates presented a petition to the House asking for the federal government to to put an end to the African slave trade.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Being just is an indispensable part of leadership. It is a full-time duty where one is always a spectacle for others in his actions. There are two very contrasting examples of leaderships that could be compared in this context. The first one is Nelson Mandela who is known as the epitome of peace and courteousness whereas the second one is Saddam Husain who is known for his tyrant ways of leading people. The former is the inspirational figure for a lot of people in the world in terms of sympathy and love. On the other hand the latter is famous for treating people like animals and doing wrong things behind the veil of his leadership.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays