Preview

Compare and Contrast the Demographic Perspectives of Thomas Malthus and Karl Marx with respect to the causes and consequences of population growth

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
931 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast the Demographic Perspectives of Thomas Malthus and Karl Marx with respect to the causes and consequences of population growth
Compare and Contrast the Demographic Perspectives of Thomas Malthus and Karl Marx with respect to the causes and consequences of population growth

“As we venture further into the 21st century, the global population seems to be growing at an alarming rate. By 2030 the world is to home of estimation 8.3 billion, as compared to 6.12 billion just 30 years prior.” (UN 2008) This quote speaks to the increasing population growth that the world is facing right now. A demographic perspective is an understanding of how the causes of population are related to the consequences. Thomas Malthus and Karl Marx are population theorists who are concerned with the control of the population, modernization and economic growth, to name a few.
Firstly, Poverty was one of the leading problems that both sociologists saw would come out of the population growth. However they both ascertain it to two different causes. “Population growth is generated by human beings who like other species are driven by a special urge to reproduce.” (Malthus) Malthus posited that it was due to persons in poverty with all their free time and their timeless passion that poverty is on the rise. He believes that persons in poverty because they have nothing to do during the day just engage in sexual activity and reproduce causing population growth at an exponential level. On the other hand Marx attacked the writing of Thomas Malthus retorting that “free time to have sex” wasn’t the cause but in fact the cause was an exploitation of the workers by the owners of the means of production. He attested that the specific relations of exploitation which obtained at that time between wage workers and capitalists, and the antagonistic relations between the landed and the industrial interests, changing them into the operation of the natural law of necessity that manifests itself through positive checks to population growth.
Furthermore Marx and Malthus differ in opinions on if society continues to increase can they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    There was also a population increase which was out of government control which meant that as the population was growing there soon became problems for people who lived in poor conditions. Malthus suggested that the population increase meant that the amount of food would not be enough for the population and therefore the amount of food produced agriculturally would not be able to feed the amount of people. This was another reason for discontent as this resulted in poor health conditions, over-crowded places and a foul and uncomfortable place for the poor to live in.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, Marx focused on the economic aspect of societal progress or the material conception of history. He highlighted how one society progressed to another because of the pursuit for the economic means of production. On the other hand, Mill emphasized on the importance of liberty as he pointed out that this is the driving force of societal progress. This is what he called the philosophy of history.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Soc 100 Final Sg

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thomas Malthus was an English economist. Wrote a book called An Essay on the Principle of Population – theorized that although the food supply increases arithmetically (1,2,3,… etc.), population grows geometically (exponentially) (2,4,8,16,…etc). (pg 568)…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Today, there is both agreement and disagreement of Thomas Malthus’ essay on the principles of population. Malthus stated that population grows exponentially or at “geometric rate” and food production grows at arithmetic rate, or linearly. Geometric rate grows in a series of numbers (2,4,8,16,32…etc.), which shows that children will grow up and each have their own children, and those children will have their own children. Eventually the base numbers of children will be so high that the population will grow rapidly, out pacing food production. Food production grows arithmetically in a series of number (2,3,4,5,6…etc.)…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    25: Neomalthusians: Neo-Malthusianism argues that two characteristics of recent population growth make Malthus’s thesis more frightening.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Results of Abolition and Emancipation of slaves in the United States and emancipation of serfs in Russia…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his essay called An Essay on the Principle of Population , the English political economist Thomas Malthus (1766-1834), stated that since production increased arithmetically (2,4,6,8,10) and population increased geometrically (2,4,8,16,32), in favorable conditions the population of a region will eventually increase until there are not sufficient resources to support it. From 800 to 1300, the total production of Europe had increased steadily. Although there had been scattered food shortages in which people died of starvation, for the most part, the standard of living in Europe had risen even while the population had steadily increased.…

    • 2869 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx and Andrew Ure have two different perspectives the society and the main function to keep everything together as a whole. The society is looking for the idea that will progress instead staying within the same idea for many years. There are always pros and cons to every philosopher and the outcome could effective many people living in that society. The idea of Marx is about the social structure of urban society and the development of ideals taken from past revolutions. There is always room for development and that is what the society is all about.…

    • 1770 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx was, somehow, influenced by Hegel. If Hegel started from the “idea”, Marx, on the contrary, in all his philosophical, juridical, and political studies took his start from a strictly empirical principle. The Hegelian idea of “development” was completely “reversed” by Marx. He put in the place of the timeless development of the “idea” the real historical development of society on the basis of the development of its material mode of production.…

    • 4590 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Iraq--Just War?

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you believe the invasion of Iraq successfully meets the principles of a just war?…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Communist Manifesto Essay

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compared to the fragmentation of Europe in the Middle Ages, which remained the prevailing economic, political, and social rule for centuries, because of Industrialization and the consequent creation of cities, the proletariat identity was then able to transcend national identity, constructing a far more unstable society. Written just 50 years earlier, Thomas Malthus's An Essay on the Principle of Population supports Marx’s claims. Malthus writes, Almost everything that has been hitherto done for the poor, has tended, as if with solicitous care, to throw a veil of obscurity over this subject and to hide from them the true cause of their poverty” (Malthus). Marx’s theories about society closely parallel Malthus's, as they both believe hitherto, obscurity and fragmentation had kept the working class’s ideals conservative. However, in 1848, newfound clarity drove European working classes’ to realize their exploitation and become thirsty for change. Marx’s work served to unite proletariats as a revolution erupted in France, forcing King Louie to abdicate just three days after The Communist Manifesto was…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx is regarded by many as the first social scientist ever. Although it is argued that Adam Smith was the first great economist, and David Ricardo the first great modern economist, Marx is undoubtedly the economist that has had the biggest impact on economic history. It was he that masterminded the concept of a socialist utopia, which ultimately led to over a third of the world been ruled under the communist regime , a model that Marx concocted. Born on 5 May 1818, in Trier, one of Germany's oldest cities, Marx was the first economist who infused history, philosophy, economics, sociology and political theory all into his work. Marx was ahead of his time, his theories were ground breaking, only time would tell whether his predictions would come to fruition. Marx's main claim was that capitalism would eventually fall due to its own internal contradictions and faults, to be replaced by a socialist utopia, so to speak. Marx had many complex motives behind the eventual fall of capitalism, he delves in to great detail about these reasons in his masterpiece Capital (1867), in this text Marx writes about how the capitalist system will falter over time due to the way it operates. It is these faults of the capitalist system that are brought in to question when analysing an issue of this nature, what weaknesses did Marx identify in his writings and were these weaknesses evident in the capitalist system come the end of the twentieth century?…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a sociologist, economist and especially a political theorist wrote The Communist Manifesto, one of the most significant pro communism manuscripts, in the year 1848. During this time period the Industrial Revolution was blooming which had created two separate classes. Marx characterizes this class difference as a form of social inequality between the Proletariats and Bourgeoisies. According to Marx these two classes arose mainly due to Industry Revolution and its blooming economic markets.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the help of industrialization, large cities, and massive populations in more dense areas, the disparity between the working class and aristocracy had an ideal setting. John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx were two philosophers who analyzed industrialization and the detrimental conditions which were influenced by it. Each had their own perspective, very distinctive perspective, on the best way to improve society. Although Mill and Marx differed on many issues, they were rather clear on their industrialized society's main failing; the fact that the lower class, "proletarians," was being constantly exploited by the upper class, "bourgeoisie."…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociological Thinking

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Wright Mills in 1959. The principals are the same; Marx talks about lower classes being socially oppressed by the upper classes society as Mills talks of individuals being oppressed by society, over 100 years apart but still the idea remains similar. They both take into account social history, and the ways in which individuals can change their social circumstances, Marx wrote of social revolution and the fall of capitalism and the transcendence into Communism, Mills wrote of ‘quality of mind’ and the individual seeing past their individualistic assumptions and viewing things with a sociological perspective to better themselves, this can be seen as a revolution in itself. The work of Marx, not strictly a Sociologist but also a philosopher and historian, are highly political and incorporates the use of various other social sciences, his work often related to the category of ‘grand theory’ due to the large scale of his ideas. The work of Marx falls under modernist Sociology which usually focuses on 3 main elements; economic, political and…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays