The Magna Carta and the Petition of Rights are very important in the history of England that both of them are significant to the development of England. They have similarities and differences. In my opinion, both of these two were put forward to limit the crown of the King. And both of them were signed by the King who were forced to sign them. What is more, both of them were abandoned by the King at last, but they also had very important effects on the development of England. Now let me show my opinions of their differences to you. The Magna Carta (1215) was the constitutional document which was signed by the King John, who was forced to sign it. The purpose of the document was to ensure the independence of the policy and the rights and interests of the economy of the feudal lords. And it is also bad for energizing the crown. The document was the first one that limits the power of the seignior, and the cornerstone of the English Constitution Monarchy. The Magna Carta had 63 items and most of the contents ensured the rights and interests of the feudal lord, the most important effect of it was to limit the crown. With the strengthen of the crown in 15 or 16 century, the Magna Carta was ignored. But during the English Bourgeois Revolution, the bourgeoisie gave it new sense to fight the crown of the feudalism and it finally became one of the most important parts of the Constitution of the United Kingdom. The Petition of Rights actually was signed by the King, who was forced to signed it because of he need the military expenditure to engine on the foreign wars. The Petition of Rights was also the successful result of the fight which the congress fought against the King for liberty and rights. And it was the first Bill of Rights in the history of England. Generally speaking, the main purpose of the Petition of Rights was to limit the crown of the King and to protect the personal liberty and the safety of the property of the subjects of the feudal ruler. The Magna Carta was put forward to improve the position of the congress and to limit the crown of the King. The key note of it was that it formed a finite monarchy. The Petition of Rights was put forward because of the reign of the Stuarts in England limited the development of the capitalism. The focal point was the problem of levy. The contents of the Petition of Rights was similar to the Magna Carta, but the Petition of Rights stock up the rights and interests of the new feudal lords and the bourgeoisie.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The Declaration of Independence states that the purpose of the government (in terms of the social contract) that selected leaders and people are to ensure the protection of their rights and that they won't be taken away from them. If they happen to feel that they are not getting their proper protection, they are able to abolish it and create a new one... These were the things that the King had violated.…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A. King James, the first of the dynasty, denied the importance of England’s fundamental laws and claimed that he was appointed the law giver by “divine right”.…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Although the Magna Carta did not directly lead to human rights or the Declaration of Independence its significance is found in being the the first written laws that challenged the absolute power of a monarch. Clause 39 was one of the few passages that were applied to a commoner and not only an aristocrat. It states that the king could not seize land or arrest someone without a proper cause or a fair trial. Like Gregory explains the Magna Carta mostly, “favored the property interests of rich barons… and not the poor who suffered under a harsh feudal system.”. This is a vital part of Western Tradition because it shows a difference from the other passages where they focused only on the needs of the rich. Clause 39 is different because the people…
- 223 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
It is apparent that all was not well in England in the years building up to the Magna Carta in 1215. The barons of the day, not royalty, but the upper crust of society, forced King John to sign the document because it greatly reduced the power he held as the King of England and allowed for the formation of a powerful parliament. In return, the barons took an oath of loyalty to King John under the agreement that all abide by it. The Magna Carta became the basis for English citizen's rights and it is evidence that the people of England faced many political, social, economic, and ethnic tensions with King John and his empire.…
- 626 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Magna Carta was a document signed by King John of England in 1215 because of a negotiation. “[it] affirmed that monarchs were subject to established law, confirmed the independence of the church and the city of London, and guaranteed the nobles’ hereditary rights” (419). Basically the monarchies were not above the law: they had to obey…
- 1268 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The Magna Carta was a document Issued and signed by Kind John of England in 1215. It was recognized particular natural rights. “The Magna Carta did not declare rights for all Englishmen” (Hall & Feldmeier, 2013).…
- 1151 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The English Bill of Rights was made to protect the basic rights of citizens. The English Bill of Rights was important to the colonists because it allowed them to have basic rights, no matter who they were. An example is education. A law passed requiring that all large towns have a school. Some colonial governments allowed the colonists to vote. Voting was a freedom; and was typically given to the white, land owning men. These governments also protected the basic rights of life, liberty, and property.…
- 455 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
If this contract was not kept, the people had the right to overthrow the government. There was also the idea or the Separation of Powers. It was the idea that the government should be split into branches. The British government was mistreating the colonies. The king was passing crazy laws and taxes and the people were getting mad.…
- 265 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Going back to talking about with the Magna Carta. They king was over extending his power so the nobles wrote themselves a…
- 807 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
2. What were some of the fundamental rights and principles established in the Magna Carta, the Petition of Right, and the English Bill of Rights?…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
It was first drafted by the Archbishop of Canterbury to make peace between the king and a group of rebel barons, it promised the protection of church rights, protection for the barons from illegal imprisonment, access to swift justice, and limitations on feudal payments to the Crown, to be implemented through a council of 25 barons. When English colonists left for the New World, they brought royal characters that established the colonies. The Massachusetts Body of Liberties had many similarities to the clause 29 of Magna Carta. When drafting, the body of liberties, the Massachusetts General Court viewed Magna Carta as the chief representation of English common law. The other colonies would follow their example. In 1638, Maryland sought to recognize Magna Carta as part of the law of the province, but the request was denied by Charles I. In the late 18th century, the United States became the supreme law of the land, recalling the manner in which Magna Carta had to come to be known as fundamental…
- 576 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The declaration of rights and grievances of the colonies was a document made up by the first congress of the American colonies in opposition to the tyrannical acts of the british parliament. The document gives light on the stamp act from the colonies perspective, it was drawn up by representatives from 9 of the American colonies, a group that would be known as the stamp act congress. The Stamp act made it so colonists had to buy and affix to all sorts of printed matter, it was used as a way to raise money for the british government through the colonies. The document consists on 13 grievances the congress had with the stamp act, a major point being that the mother country had no right to force a tax on the colonies when the colonies were not…
- 191 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
At this time they still viewed themselves as British subjects but felt that these taxes were a violation of their rights. This petition was sent to the king and Parliament in hopes to protect their rights as British…
- 1234 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
However, these specific issues were the reason the declaration was drafted. It is doubtful that the colonists would have proposed such a declaration had the Crown not imposed such harsh restrictions and tyranny…
- 463 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The King was interfering with the colonists' right to self-government and a fair judicial system. Acting with Parliament, the King also instituted legislation that affected the colonies without their consent. This legislation levied taxes on the colonists. It also required them to quarter British soldiers, removed their right to trial by jury, and prevented them from trading freely. Additionally, the King and Parliament were guilty of outright destruction of American life and property by their refusal to protect the colonies' borders, their confiscation of American ships at sea, and their intent to hire foreign mercenaries to fight against the colonists. The colonial governments tried to reach a peaceful reconciliation of these differences with Great Britain, but were continually ignored. Colonists who appealed to British citizens were similarly ignored, despite their shared common heritage and their just cause. After many peaceful attempts, the colonists had no choice but to declare independence from Great Britain.…
- 421 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays