Preview

Compare And Contrast The Philosophical And Religious Implications Of Dualism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
741 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare And Contrast The Philosophical And Religious Implications Of Dualism
Zaid Dabus
Dr. Young
Acquisition of Knowledge
Philosophical versus Religious Implications of Dualism The quintessential notion of dualism implies that there are two basic foundations: mental and bodily foundations. This is called substance dualism and its central proponent was Rene Descartes. The 17th century philosopher and devout Catholic defended the position that the mental foundation can exist outside of the bodily foundation, and therefor the body cannot think. Descartes argued that the physical body and the mind are two independent entities that happen to coexist, as we know them. However, the mind is categorically capable of existing entirely unattached from the body. Substance dualism seems to hold the greatest compatibility with most theological beliefs of the immortal soul living in the mortal vessel that we call the body. It is no wonder the devout Catholic, Descartes, vehemently defended this philosophical position.
…show more content…
The role of the “immortal soul” is to make judgments, decisions, and perceptions. When paralleled to the philosophical dualist “mind,” we find striking similarities. The role of the “mind” in the philosophical sense is the whole and indivisible substantiating entity of thought, doubts, and distinctions. This is where Descartes easily draws the distinction between the “mind” and the brain. The mind is a nonphysical substance or force that utilizes the brain as the locus of interaction between the “mind” and its bodily

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Descartes argues the mind is seperate from the physical body. With advances in nueroscience and the contious brain injuries gives strong evidence in supporting materialism. Defining what Cartesian dualists mean by the brain, mind, body and soul, an argument by Cartesians dualists may be reached. Responding to evidence confronting brain injuries from claims that the brain is only ‘an instrument of the soul’. Concluding there is a simultaneous support for materialism resulting from neuroscience and the Cartesian dualism argument, may be wrong.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes was a brilliant thinker, philosopher, scientist, physiologist, and early psychologist whose theory of mind-body connection has become an integral part of modern medicine (Goodwin, 2008). His dualist view, asserted the mind was ethereal and autonomous in relation to the physical and strictly material body, and to account for their interaction, he proposed the pineal gland was where the intersection of the two transpired (Goodwin, 2008). He theorized the mechanistic, reflexive nature of certain human behaviors, although his one caveat was that reasoning and thoughts were unique properties of the human soul (Wickens, 2005). Descartes 's work laid some of the fundamental parameters for modern thought in psychology, encouraged further research on the localization of brain function, and promoted further experimental research of the nervous system (Goodwin, 2008).…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Based upon the belief that the mind and body are two separate entities, philosophers, such as Rene Descartes, support the Substance Dualism theory of mind, arguing that the mind, which is a thinking entity, may exist without the body, which is a physical extension, because it is its own individual substance of matter. In Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy, he puts all concepts of previous certainty into question, intentionally leaving the reader with skepticism towards the concept of knowledge and mental capacity at large. Further, he continues to contend that the mind is distinctly different than the body and can be innovated due to its ability to think, whereas the body is merely a tangible and measureable dimension with no greater abilities, such as thinking or experiencing emotion. Additionally, Descartes further describes the ideas held by Substance Dualists through detailing that under this theory of mind, all entities are…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final Paper PHL Kloke

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These larger questions of the soul and the mind and their existence beyond human death has been debated and explored throughout time. Yet, we lack hard evidence to support the idea of the existence of the soul and its continued ‘life’ beyond the death of the body. Individuals have not returned from the grave to transmit this knowledge in any manner that can be tested, studied, and deemed true. What a soul is and why we have it is unique to the human experience. The Abrahamic traditions defines the soul as the “I” that lives within our body and acts through it. The soul is what makes each individual unique according to theologian Thomas Aquinas. Noted philosophers Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, all argued that the psyche or, the soul, was the “crown of the logical facilities”. Yet the mind is responsible for processing our human experiences and storing them as learned experiences that shape and mold our continued existence.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scholars such as Plato and Descartes are dualists. Dualists, unlike hard materialists believe that the body and soul are distinct things that are joined together in some way for now. They also believe that when the body dies, the soul lives on. Dualists believe that even though the body and soul are joined, they are still distinct and can live without each other.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among Descartes’ many notable arguments, in the Sixth Meditation he makes a case for the real distinction between mind and body. This idea that mind and body are distinct was not common during Descartes’ time and conflicted directly with the popularly accepted scholastic view of the human being as a hylomorphic substance. The argument of the Sixth Meditation draws on much of Descartes’ own work concerning substance, attributes and distinction. In this paper, I will argue that he arrives at the conclusion that mind and body are in fact distinct by a categorical syllogism, focusing primarily on defending the minor premise that mind and body can be conceived as separate.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Searle Dualism

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Searle and Rene Descartes both had opinions on dualism. John believe different aspects like mental and physical both are one substance. Rene, on the other hand, believes two different substances like mental and physical are different things. Rene even talked about how thoughts and feelings that are nonmaterial exists in material place.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes Divisibility

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rene Descartes believes that the mind and body is different things and that the body is dividable but the mind is not dividable. I’m not sure what I believe, but I think I believe at least for now that the mind and body is two different things. I will explore why Descartes thinks you can divide a body and why he thinks a mind is not dividable. As well as what Descartes response should be to Armstrong’s criticism. Was Descartes right or not? I think this is all up to the interpretation of Descartes Divisibility. There is a number of ways this may be interpreted.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The mind, or ‘soul’ as it has come to be known to some, is classified as a ‘non-physical entity’ that is separate from the brain by Cartesian Dualists and linked to (but still different from) the brain by Property Dualists. These are perfectly reasonable ways to look at it as such concepts as qualia and privileged access and the fact that mental phenomena lack spatial features support these theories. While Materialists may doggedly reject Dualism, it can be noted that some of their arguments are by no means iron-clad, including their trump card, the ‘interaction problem’. Also, Materialistic arguments fail to address and explain our mental experiences taking…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Dualism

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The first argument I put forward to support dualism is; the brain and mind of human beings are different from each other. They both have unique properties and distinctive roles in human beings. The brain has definable characteristics that can be observed and analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). For example the activity of the brain when sleeping is examinable on electroencephalograms (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.452). A magnetic resonance imaging reveals the location of different functions of the brain (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.432¬). When dissected, the brain’s physical properties, such as size, shape and colour can be analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). On the other hand the mind is not discernible to science, it does not have physical properties like the brain. The mind is a mental awareness of the interactions occurring within and around the human body (Robinson, 2012, p.7). It observes and moderates our thoughts, emotions and reactions (Robinson, 2012, p.2). The mind is the human body’s mental state. It is private and only observable to other humans, by that human’s behaviour, actions and voiced output…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dualism and monism is a famous philosophy topic from ancient to now. The word "Dualism" means that our physical and our mental are independent. And our body and our mind cannot be the same. It is because of mind and body is two separate substances. In the contract, the "monism" means that both of the physical and mental are combined being one. And our mind and body are indivisible and are each influenced by the other. The monism and dualism individually has its strengths and weaknesses.…

    • 1561 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mind Body Debate

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Philosophers have been debating for centuries the relationship between the mind and the body and whether they are separate entities, or if they are one. This is known as the mind/body problem. If the mind being our consciousness and the body being our brain is separate parts, do they relate to each other or work together? If they are one, do they depend on each other? The idea that the mind and body are one is called monism. The idea that the mind and body are separate is called dualism (Newall, 2005).…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes planned the cogito, the possibility that since one considers, they should fundamentally exist ("I think therefore I am")(South University, 2016). This attestation shapes the establishment for his framework demonstrating that our tactile observations are dependable. This reality is basic for science. By the by there are issues with his framework, and there are not kidding results that take after from his suggestions. Descartes is a standout amongst the most powerful masterminds of cutting edge time. He lived from March 31,1596…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Unfortunate Dualism

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    My view of dualism is accurately depicted through Raymond Smullyan’s story “The unfortunate dualist.” Smullyan states the dualist belief that mind and matter are separate substances, however the dualist cannot explain how this phenomenon works. The problem I found with Smullyan story is that he fails to state whether the dualist is a substance dualist or property dualist. This makes a difference because the substance dualist believes that mind and body are separate and independent substances, while the property dualist believes that there is only one substance. Although, I find Smullyan’s paper to be amusing, I believe that he started his paper by mischaracterizing the dualist. Smullyan made him into the straw man by stating that the dualist believes that the mind and the body are separate substances, but that the dualist might find that the miracle drug, made of material substance, can rid him of a non-material substance, his soul.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People are monists, dualists or pluralists depending on whether or not they believe that reality is composed of one, two or more substances. These positions may be represented as here indicated.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays