Preview

Compare and Contrast the Response of Economic Policymakers to the Great Depression of the 1930’s and the Great Financial Crisis Today.

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast the Response of Economic Policymakers to the Great Depression of the 1930’s and the Great Financial Crisis Today.
David Pattinson

‘Industrialisation, Imperialism and Globalisation: The World Economy since 1800’
Professor John Singleton

Compare and contrast the response of economic policymakers to the Great Depression of the 1930’s and the Great Financial Crisis today.

Essay 2
10/1/13
Word count: 2,299
The financial crisis that began in 2007-8 was the first time since the 1930’s that both the major European countries and the US had been involved in a financial crisis. In comparison, the disastrous 1931 banking crisis involved countries that accounted for 55.6 per cent of world GDP, whereas the banking crisis of 2007-8 only involved countries that accounted for 33.5 per cent of world GDP. Though, all the key economic variables fell at a faster rate during the first year of the later crisis. Keynes had argued in 1931 that ‘there is a possibility that when this crisis is looked back upon by the economic historian of the future it will be seen to mark one the major turning points.’ Keynes was correct. As a result of the lessons that were learned, policy in response to the Great Financial Crisis has contrasted sharply with policy during the Great Depression era. I will examine how national policy responses and international co-operation have differed, as well as highlighting how in creating the Euro, policymakers have unwittingly replicated many of the structural weaknesses of the Gold Standard. I will also consider how policy in the recovery phase has so far compared to policy during the recovery from the Great Depression.
The Great Depression was marked by bank failures. A total of 9,096 banks failed between 1930 and 1933 amounting to 2.0% of GDP. Friedman and Schwartz highlight the failure to increase the money supply whilst liquidity was tight as the primary cause. Bordo and Landon-Lane provide econometric analysis using examiners’ reports on failed banks that support this argument. Epstein and Ferguson have suggested that Federal Reserve officials understood



Bibliography: Barrell, R. and Holland, D., ‘Monetary and Fiscal Responses to the Economic Downturn,’ National Institute Economic Review, No. 211, (Jan 2010) pp.51-62. Bernanke, B., ‘Nonmonetary Effects of the Financial Crises in the Propagation of the Great Depression,’ American Economic Review (June 1983), pp. 257-76. Bordo, M. and Landon-Lane, J., ‘The banking panics in the United States in the 1930s: some lessons for today,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2010), pp. 486–509. Calomiris, C. and Mason, J., ‘Consequences of Bank Distress during the Great Depression,’ American Economic Review, Vol. 93, (2003a), pp. 937–47. Cole, H. and Ohanian, L., ‘New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis,’ Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department, Working Paper No. 597, (July 2000). Crafts, N. and Fearon, P., ‘Lessons from the 1930s Great Depression,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2010), pp. 285–317. Epstein, G., and Ferguson, T., ‘Monetary Policy, Loan Liquidation, and Industrial Conflict: The Federal Reserve and the Open Market Operations of 1932,’ Journal of Economic History (December 1984), pp. 957-83. Fishback, P., ‘US Monetary and Fiscal Policy in the 1930s,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2010), pp. 385–413. Friedman, M. and Schwartz, A., 'A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1960’ (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963). Goldstein, M., ‘Integrating Reform of Financial Regulation with Reform of the International Monetary System,’ Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper No.11-5 (February 2011). Irwin, D., ‘Trade Policy Disaster: Lessons from the 1930’s’ (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011). Kee, H. L., Neagu, C., and Nicita, A., ‘Is Protectionism on the Rise? Assessing National Trade Policies during the Crisis of 2008,’ World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5274, (2010). Hannah, L., and Temin, P. (2010), ‘Long-term Supply-side Implications of the Great Depression,’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 561–80 Helleiner, E Vines, D., ‘The Global Macroeconomic Crisis and G20 Macroeconomic Policy Coordination,’ The Journal of Applied Economic Research, Vol. 4, No.2, (2010) pp.157-175. Vines, D., ‘Fiscal Policy in the Eurozone After the Crisis,’ Paper prepared for lunchtime talk at Macro Economy Research Conference on Fiscal Policy in the Post Crisis World, (Tokyo, 16 November, 2010). Wheelock, D., ‘Monetary Policy in the Great Depression: What the Fed Did, and Why,’ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Vol. 74, No. 2, (March/April 1992) pp. 3-28. White, E. N. (1986), ‘Before the Glass–Steagall Act: An Analysis of the Investment-banking Activities of National Banks,’ Explorations in Economic History, Vol. 23, pp. 33–55. Wicker, E., ‘Federal Reserve Monetary Policy, 1917-1933’ (Random House, 1966). Wolf, M.,‘Why China’s Exchange Rate Policy Concerns Us,’ Financial Times (8th of December 2009) Wray, L.R., ‘The rise and fall of money manager capitalism: a Minskian approach,’ Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol Yu, Y., China’s Policy Responses to the Global Financial Crisis, Richard Snape Lecture, Productivity Commission, Melbourne (25th November 2009). [ 2 ]. J. M. Keynes, ‘An Economic Analysis of Unemployment’, from Q. Wright (ed.), Unemployment as a World Problem, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931). [ 3 ]. C. Calomiris and J. Mason, Consequences of Bank Distress during the Great Depression, American Economic Review, Vol. 93, (2003a), pp. 937–47 [ 4 ] [ 5 ]. M. Bordo and J. Landon-Lane, The Banking Panics in the United States in the 1930s: Some Lessons for Today, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2010), pp. 486–509 [ 6 ] [ 7 ]. P. Fishback, US Monetary and Fiscal Policy in the 1930s, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Vol. 26, No. 3, (2010), p. 394. [ 8 ]. E. Wicker, Federal Reserve Monetary Policy, 1917-1933, (Random House, 1966) [ 9 ] [ 16 ]. D. Irwin, Trade Policy Disaster: Lessons from the 1930’s, (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2011) Ch. 1 [ 17 ] [ 23 ]. L. Wray, The Rise and Fall of Money Manager Capitalism: A Minskian Approach, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 33, (2009) pp. 813 [ 24 ] [ 25 ]. R. Barrell and D. Holland, Monetary and Fiscal Responses to the Economic Downturn, National Institute Economic Review, No. 211, (Jan 2010) p.56 [ 26 ] [ 29 ]. D. Vines, Fiscal Policy in the Eurozone After the Crisis, Paper prepared for lunchtime talk at Macro Economy Research Conference on Fiscal Policy in the Post Crisis World, (Tokyo, 16 November, 2010). [ 32 ]. M. Wolf, Why China’s Exchange Rate Policy Concerns Us, Financial Times (8th of December 2009) [ 33 ] [ 34 ]. L. Kee et al, Is Protectionism on the Rise? Assessing National Trade Policies during the Crisis of 2008, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5274, (2010), p. 3 [ 35 ] [ 36 ]. M. Goldstein, Integrating Reform of Financial Regulation with Reform of the International Monetary System, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Working Paper No.11-5 (February 2011), pp. 5-7.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Field, A. (2009, July-August). The great depression, the new deal, and the current crisis. Challenge Magazine, 52 (4) 94-105.…

    • 4009 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The prosperity of the roaring 1920s left Americans unprepared for the economic depression they would be facing in the 1930s. On October 29th, 1929 (Black Tuesday), the stock market crashed, and President Hoover was expected to lift the nation back onto its feet. However, like many previous presidents, Hoover maintained the government’s laissez-faire attitude in the economy. Soon after, the election of FDR and his many “alphabet soup” programs in his first 100 days addressed the nation’s call for help. Although Roosevelt’s administration was not very effective in curtailing the Great Depression, it left a lasting legacy in the role of the federal government by creating lasting programs, satisfying many of the needs of the citizens, and increasing the federal government’s power.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Document3

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    | |“What Caused the Great Depression”. The DBQ Project. 2008. |(Carmen and Syrett, Doc. 3) |…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH DBQ S Since 1995 1

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2003 – Analyze the responses of FDR’s administration to the problems of the Great Depression. How effective were these responses? How did they change the role of the federal government? 1929-1941…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: Kaplan, Edward. The Bank of the United States and the American Economy: (Contributions in Economics and Economic History). Praeger, 1999. 1. Print.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ Fdr's New Deal

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Great Depression was the worst economic depression the US had ever faced in history. Set in motion after the crash of the stock market in 1929, the Depression led to the dramatic rise in unemployment rates, the vast migration of people, especially farmers, looking for jobs, food shortages, and an increasing hatred towards Hoover’s advocacy for laissez-faire and polices for reform. The years from 1929-1932 reflected a dark era in which Americans were afraid and unsure of what was to come next. With the nomination of Franklin D. Roosevelt as president, a feeling of hope emerged with the thought that this problem could be solved. With FDR’s New Deal, the nation was able to revitalize itself to the way it once was. Although WW II ultimately…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The creation of the stock market, credit card spending, and actions of American banks were the main factors of America’s economy. During the early 1930s, Americans were constantly investing into the Stock Market. The Stock Market is a place where stocks are bought and sold. Stock is ownership in a company and it is sold in shares. If the corporation succeeds, its value may rise. This means that the value of its stock also rises If the corporation does not do well, it may lose value. This would drive the value of the stock down (Holt, 673). For much of the decade, the easy availability of credit had allowed many Americans to buy the automobiles, radios, vacuum cleaners, and other products rolling quickly off the nation’s assembly lines. By the end, of the decade, however, many consumers were reaching the limits of their credit. The pace of purchases slowed. Warehouses became filled with factory goods that no one could afford to buy. Investors also used credit to purchase stocks. This risky practice increased during the 1920s as the stock market rose sharply (Holt, 675). The Federal Reserve Board takes actions and sets policies to regulate the nation’s money supply in order to promote healthy economic activity. In the late 1920s, the Federal Reserve’s move was partly successful, at least at first. Borrowing from banks by brokers began to decrease, but it was replaced by money from a new source. Large American corporations began providing brokers with the cash to make margin loans to investors. As a result, the run-up of the stock market continued despite the Federal Reserve’s actions (Holt,…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    roosevelt

    • 7986 Words
    • 20 Pages

    THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND THE NEW DEAL, 1929-1939 THE CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE By the 1920s, the corporate industrial economy had grown for more than half a century. Along with its strengths, serious weaknesses developed. Few Americans noticed them because of the hot pursuit of material wealth. The consumer culture of the 1920s and a businessoriented government promoted the pursuit not only of money but of debt as well. When mass purchasing power could no longer sustain prosperity, the economy collapsed. The greatest depression in history dawned, bringing massive unemployment, withering prices, and a stagnated economy. Unlike his predecessors, Herbert Hoover took action. No president before him had dared to stimulate the economy for fear of throwing it hopelessly out of balance. But Hoovers policies, for all his good intentions, were too wedded to the old order to make any difference. The New Deal was no revolution in public policy. In many ways it was quite conservative. It sought ultimately to reform capitalism by modifying some of the excesses that led to the Great Depression. If there were a revolutionary aspect, however, it lay in the New Deals willingness to commit government to compensating for swings in the economy and to supporting those in need. The New Deal marshaled the government activism and executive leadership of Progressivism, but with none of the moralizing that often accompanied progressive reform. With the New Deal, the modern liberal state was born. OVERVIEW This chapter opens with federal investigator Lorena Hickok traveling across America in search of the New Deals impact on the lives of ordinary people. The deprivation, anguish, and courage she finds upsets the common stereotype of lazy loafers in search of government handouts. She also discovers that the New Deal is restoring hope and confidence, and because of it Americans are looking to Washington as never before for help. The stock market crash of 1929, one of the worst in the nations…

    • 7986 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Great Depression Dbq

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Great Depression in the United States brought an end to a long era of economic expansion and social progress which had been in full bloom since the 1890s (Mitchell 1947). There had been monetary recessions in 1907, 1913 and 1921, but these reversals were never severe enough or long enough to shake the deeply rooted confidence in the American economic system or to generate any widespread national discontent. Many history books tell of the depression of the '30s; they often begin with the stock market crash of October 1929 (Estey 1950). Among economists, a tendency to decry the importance of the crash as a cause of the depression: "The crash was part of the froth, rather than the substance of the situation" (Shannon 1960). The fundamental…

    • 1939 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1933, FDR began regulating banks with the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation). This administrative measure allowed for better management of the banking system through a “banking holiday”, a three-day hiatus for banks nationwide so that they would be able to be refunded without interference from the outside (i.e., people trying to withdraw money in large amounts). This further stabilized the banking system and added another preventative measure so that nothing like the Great Depression would ever happen again. 2 long years later, in 1935, did banks began their slow, but steady rise back to regular working order once these precautions were put into…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1920's Economic Changes

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Roaring Twenties and the Great Depression had many different policies, enabling them to prosper and later, die down. Using unemployment and inflation as our guide, we see that during the Roaring Twenties, unemployment began at a rate of 11.7% and rose to a maximum of 4.8% in 1929. Throughout 1929-1939, unemployment was already at an economically disastrous rate of 24.9%, only to end at 17% in 1939. It is very apparent that the policies, both monetary and fiscal, of the years 1919-1929 were much more effective than the policies of the years 1929-1939. With no fiscal policy in place, the Roaring Twenties seemed to have been thriving and by having a “tight” monetary policy, the economy appeared to be a lot more beneficial and…

    • 2123 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Attalla Louis U.S History Mr. Laurneck 2/25/15 Opinion Essay During the Great Depression there were many causes and effects which resulted in one of the greatest financial crises in U.S history. Many people who believed in the banking system had stored their money In a bank. Little they knew that the money which was supposed to be safe was being loaned to others.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Great Depression of the 1930’s was the worst economic period in the history of the United States. Taking over the presidency in 1932, three years after the Depression began, Franklin Delano Roosevelt became responsible for leading America’s quest to escape the Depression. Roosevelt passed the New Deal in an attempt to help the nation recover through a series of initiatives focused on economic recovery. While most people would agree that the New Deal had a definite impact on the United States throughout the early-1930’s, there are some critics that think that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression. These critics believe that different initiatives could have returned the United States to prosperity much sooner, and that the Depression would’ve continued much longer if not for the start of World War II.…

    • 1990 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Depression had a legacy of being the worst economic event in the history of the industrialized world. After the stock market crash of 1929, spending and investment dropped between consumers and companies, causing declines in industrial output and employment as companies laid off workers. Fifty billion dollars were lost in the first two years of the depression (Elliot). To continue, “From 1930 to 1933 about 9,000 banks in the United States suspended operation and the money supply fell by one-third” (Great Depression). The United States market lost two-thirds of its value by 1933, and the number of banks fell thirty-five percent during that time period as well (Szostak).…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Great Depression, an event that happened 70 years ago still conjures images of families waiting in soup lines and thousands of men looking for work. In October of 1929 the American economy came to screeching halt and would not see growth for the next three years. This was a major event that sent ripples throughout the world economy. In September of 2008, roughly 79 years later, financial crisis gripped the U.S. once again, and by default, the rest of the world. This time, the one sound investment that millions of Americans make in their lifetime, their homes, lost value. The one sure fire investment for over 60 years now became a liability. These events are two of the most significant historical events that happened in the 20th Century. As you read on, I will compare these two events to show the similarities between them. Also, in some ways I will show how this current recession could be called a depression because by some standards is worse than the depression of 1929.…

    • 1817 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays