Preview

Compare and Contrast, "The Story of and Hour" and Richard Cory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare and Contrast, "The Story of and Hour" and Richard Cory
Compare and Contrast Criminals are tried in our court system everyday for crimes they are accused of committing. In these court cases, witnesses are called to give an account of what happened in the particular incident and then a jury of twelve members decides the criminal's ruling on the case. The jury does not listen to just one witness; it takes into account the stories of many witnesses in order to decipher the truth. "The Story of an Hour" by Kate Chopin and "Richard Cory" by Edwin Arlington Robinson show one cannot fully rely on what other people say in certain situations. The reader does not know exactly what happened to Richard Cory. All the reader has to go by is what the townspeople say. The townspeople say Richard Cory went home and put a bullet in his head. That sounds like he kills himself, but it might not be that way. The reader does not know anything about what Richard Cory feels from this poem so he cannot assume anything. The townspeople are not fully reliable because they do not know Richard Cory personally. All they know is he is rich and thought to be well off. Because of this unreliability, the reader is left in the dark as to what happens to Richard Cory. In "The Story of an Hour," Mrs. Mallard only goes on what her sister Josephine tells her about her husband's death. As soon as Josephine tells her, Mrs. Mallard begins to weeps and locks herself in her room, not knowing that her husband was actually alive. Mrs. Mallard could have verified this information from Josephine from another source and made sure it was correct instead of fully relying on one report. Not doing this led to her locking herself in her room and isolating herself from everybody else. This is not saying that Josephine is not a reliable person; she just might not have known all the facts, a good reason for Mrs. Mallard to get other opinions on the issue and find out for herself what exactly happened. In Richard Cory, the reader relies on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In a crowded jury room, opinions collide as discussions about the innocence of a young boy are decided. The dark and foreboding storm clouds that hang over the heads of the jurors are beginning to lift as time progresses and new facts are presented. The two men that cannot put their personal emotions aside are juror 3 and juror 10. These men are motivated by their emotions rather than the evidence.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Monster, by Walter Dean Myers, the reader learns from Steve Harmon’s experiences that sometimes guilt or innocence of a person might not be determined by solid evidence but by onlooker’s opinions and interpretation of the crime. There is not a large amount of scientific evidence in the case against Steve Harmon, so the jury must rely on Steve’s background information, their opinions of guilt and innocence, and the testimonies of the witnesses who are mostly criminals.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Truth can be represented in differing ways according to the values and attitudes of the persona whose representation of truth is being expressed. Throughout Geoffrey Robertson’s The Justice Game the responder is convinced to accept the composer’s representation of truth through the use of composing techniques such as the short story structure, Robertson’s social status, various language techniques, symbolism and the use of examples and quotations to back up Robertson’s statements. The perspective on truth held by the other participants in each trial is however also included. The term ‘truth’ refers to accurately placing information in accordance with fact or reality. The ‘truth’ in The Justice Game is essentially about revealing to its readers “What is kept from the public, and what the public wish to be kept from”. Each case was chosen by Robertson to provide different representations of the ‘truth’ based on different values and attitudes.…

    • 2522 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men is a book written by Reginald Rose and takes place late one hot summer afternoon in the jury-room of a New York Court of law. The story revolves around a Jury that is trying to judge a murder trial. The 12 jurors must decide whether the defendant is guilty or not. The power of persuasion does not only influence characters in the book, but also persuades us to rethink, ‘Should something be changed in the judicial system?’…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People whom observe the judicial system from afar can come to the conclusion that justice may be “blind”. However, this is not always true. In Rose’s piece of writing, it becomes the duty of twelve jurors to “try and separate the facts from the fancy” (Rose, 5). This means that the jurors would have to decide whether or not a 16-year-old boy was guilty of allegedly stabbing his father to death and committing “murder in the first degree- premeditated homicide” (Rose, 5).…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Twelve Angry Men” asserts that justice is far more important than truth. Do you agree? In Reginald Rose’s gripping play, “Twelve Angry Men” the assumption that justice is more important than the truth is explored. The play illustrates the necessity to eliminate all preconceived ideas when deciding a verdict based on the standard of proof, ‘beyond reasonable doubt’. Antagonists, jurors 3 and 10 find it almost impossible to administer justice fairly as they are too bound up on their own personal prejudice towards the defendant. Juror 8’s ability to dig below the surface of what seems to be a decisive case exposes flaws in the witnesses’ testimonies and other admissible evidence, ultimately…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twelve Angry Men

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In today’s fast-paced world we often find ourselves making hasty, split-second decisions on the seemingly unimportant matters with which we are faced. According to The Critical Thinking Handbook “...critical thinking evaluates reasons and brings thought in line with...” our best sense of what is true enabling us come to insightful conclusions on which we base our actions. In Twelve Angry Men a group of twelve ordinary citizens are faced with an important choice whose consequence is the fate of a sixteen-year-old boy accused of killing his father. Initially deemed an open-shut-case, throughout the play we witness the jurors, under the direction of Juror 8, slowly break down the evidence and testimony on which they later base their final verdict. Each juror with his unique approach to reasoning raises important arguments, suggesting both the innocence and guilt of the accused and further adding to the complexity of the case. In Twelve Angry Men, three pieces of evidence that proved crucial in shifting the jury in favor of acquittal were the murder weapon, the old man’s testimony, and that of the woman who claimed to have seen the murder from across the street.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play, “Twelve Angry Men” is of how there could’ve been flaws in the Judicial system; however one juror tries to prove that the man isn’t guilty and persuades the others to follow his reasoning. One of the many themes is reasonable doubt, meaning a doubt of the guilt in a criminal due to lack of evidence or thorough examination. Reginald Rose feels that reasonable doubt is often portrayed in many real life juries partly because of testimonies, lawyers, consideration, and facts or opinions.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Night by Elie Wiesel describes his experiences as a Jew in the concentration camps during World War II. During this time, Wiesel witnessed many horrific acts. Two of these were executions. Though the process of the executions were similar, the condemned and the Jews’ reactions to the executions were different.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Imagine having to decide a young boy’s fate who is accused of murder in the first degree. This is the case in “Twelve Angry Men”, the prize-winning drama written by Reginald Rose. Some jurors address relevant topics, while others permit their personal “judgments” from thoroughly looking at the case. After hours of deliberation, the jurors reached the decision that the boy is not guilty, due to the fact of reasonable doubt. While few jurors are motivated by their respect and determination for the justice system, Juror 10 is motivated by his personal prejudice.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this poem, the main character, Richard Cory, is portrayed as the “American Dream” that everyone wants to achieve in his town. Throughout the poem, Richard Cory went through stages of deep depression that no one had known about since he never showed his inner emotions in person. For example, Richard Cory was said to be “quietly arrayed... he was always human when he talked…he fluttered pulses when he said, ‘Good morning’, and he glittered when he walked”(lines 6-8). Richard Cory was a man of integrity, always dressed nice, and presented himself as a guy that was always happy and shined in the eyes of people when seen. In these lines, Richard Cory’s generosity delivers a positive message to his surroundings, showing how he is fully satisfied with his own life. It isn’t until the end of the poem when Richard Cory, “Went home and put a bullet through his head”(line 16). The people that Richard Cory was surrounded by never really knew about his inner world. Richard Cory was respected way too much to the point that he was more of an idealization rather than a living, breathing person. As a result, he was never truly befriended by any of them; consequently, he became isolated and permanently lonely causing his depression. Richard Cory had all of the money in the world but didn’t gain his happiness, which correlates to my thesis…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eye Distinguishing Proof

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Distinguishing proof by eyewitnesses is not generally reliable confirmation. The human mind is basically not built so as to capacity as a moment replay camera and recorder. Diagnostic thought of the mental measurements of eyewitnesses distinguishing proof has uncovered that the risks from frail physical observation and memory and from suggestive impacts are, much of the time, overpowering. The ideas and unsteadiness of such distinguishing proof are surely understood; the records of criminal law are overflowing with cases of mixed up eyewitness’s testimony recognizable proof.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate; therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss.…

    • 2063 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness Evidence

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When deciding the guilt or innocence of individuals in court, juries, judges, and police investigators rely on three major types of evidence. Often, experts are relied on for information. For example, the mental state of the individual being accused. This “expert testimony,” is not often relied on in Canadian court because some judges believe the information that is offered by experts, Psychologists in particular, is common sense. There are other judges, however, that are more concerned with the jurors reliance on the information being provided rather than evaluating information on their own. Researcher A. Daniel Yarmey discovered that several research involving the testing of eyewitness…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The film “12 Angry Men” is a 1957 drama consisting of a dozen men on jury, who attempt to reach a verdict involving a teenager in a murder case. A guilty verdict was initially predicted, but the jury members start questioning and reasoning the testimonies given in court. Was the boy being accused of stabbing his father really guilty? All the information regarding the timing of the train, the timing of the murder, and the testimonies did not add up. Through much debate, a complex voting process, and many concepts learned through SCOM, the jury managed to attain a not-guilty ruling due to the inadequate testimonies and facts gathered.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays