The colonies of Massachusetts and Virginia were located in separate regions of the New World and had many social and economic variations. The very laws and ideas these people have put into work are what have shaped America into the county it is today. When looking at these two colonies we know one thing is for sure, trade, land, religion, and natural resources were vital parts of their being. In this free-response essay I will contrast the colonies by how their societies were ran and how their economies affected their way of life.…
Virginia and Massachusetts were both colonies that were set up by the British empire, they were both some of the most populated colonies and most economically thriving. They both were setup by people who crossed to the New World from England, and…
There is many differences between the New England and the Chesapeake colonies, for example their different economic sources. The New England people left Europe in hopes to find economic prosperity and a better chance at life. For instance many young families set out to the Americas during the early 1600’s according to document B. In the New England Colonies the main source of profit was through Fishing, ship building, and lumbering. The colonist knew that this economy basis would bring in the most profit because of the infertile soil in the area. In addition the climate was very different in contrast to the Chesapeake colonies were they would make cash crops due to the high humidity. The Chesapeake colonist made profit through cash crops and a plantation economy. We see that many men went to Virginia in hope to get money quick, and they did not plan to stay long due to the lack of women incorporated in document C. The economies of the Chesapeake region where centralized around cash crops like tobacco, rice, and indigo. This was the easiest and most efficient way to make money due to the cheap labor from indentured servants. Indentured servants would later show problems in Bacon’s Rebellion thus making wealthy land owners turn their heads to slaves from Africa through the triangular trade for free labor. The Chesapeake and the New England colonies had ways to make money, but where very different in how they made it due to geographic and social differences.…
The main cause for the differences in their economy is due to the climate and location of each of the colonies. For example, the Virginia colony had good fertile soil and had the perfect weather condition for growing crops, while on the other hand, Massachusetts was a mountainous region that did not have as good of soil. Because of this, Virginia’s economy was based on crops, mainly tobacco, and the Massachusetts colony had to find other ways to use their natural resources to boast their economy. The Massachusetts colony had a lot of forests and trees, so they specialized in shipbuilding. The New England economy also consisted of fishing, and a small amount of crops, but nothing comparable to what Virginia was putting out in tobacco. The economy was clearly more diverse in the Massachusetts colony but there was something the Virginia colony had that Massachusetts did not, and that was land. Because there was an abundant amount of cheap land, it drew more colonists to that region. Another part of their contrasting economy was trade. Virginia was involved in the triangular trade, which traded slaves from Africa with goods from the colonies and England. Massachusetts trade differed from that of the south in two ways, “The lack of staples to exchange for English goods was a relative disadvantage, but the abundance of their own shipping and mercantile enterprise worked in their favor” (Tindall, 123).…
Virginia was founded by merchants and adventurers looking to profit from the land. Massachusetts was founded by Puritans looking for freedom from the Church of England. These Puritans settled in the north, in New England, whereas the Virginia Company settled in the south. By the 1660s in Virginia, wealthy families owned fifty…
Western Europe and specifically France had continuities and changes that occurred in the political and social structures over the time period of 1600 to 1850.…
The variations within the share of categories were improbably massive and their entire economic structure differed from one another. Virginia had additional risky culture and social science where-as Massachusetts had an additional stable economy. The economy of Virginia was primarily based exclusively on the assembly of tobacco. The plantation homeowners had to shop for slaves to figure the fields that the slave traffic trade in Virginia was conjointly an enormous issue. The plantation homeowners were within the terribly made, elite class and just about ran the politics.…
Two of the first two regions of America to be colonized, Virginia and Massachusetts had many similarities. However, their differences are what defined their society and economy and made them unique. Virginia and Massachusetts differ socially in terms of religion and demographics and economically in terms of production focus and labor usage.…
Throughout the 17th century, the New World was being developed and the colonies were being formed. Two of these newly founded colonies were Virginia and Massachusetts. Between the two colonies, there were many similarities as a result of similar backgrounds of those who founded and were running the colonies. Although there are many reasons as to why people, the majority being from Europe, fled to the colonies, there are also multiple different aspects of how they were developed and run. The economic, cultural, religious, social, and political cultures were different as well as similar in various aspects.…
The settlements of Virginia and Massachusetts were both established during relatively the same time, but the ways that they were established differed tremendously. Virginia had difficulty establishing itself; there were many errors and failures, especially in the beginning. Massachusetts, on the other hand, was extremely successful. The settlers made smart decisions in provisions and planning that resulted in a prosperous colony. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their leadership quality. Virginia, initially, had weak leadership until John Smith who established a much more rigid government system within the colony. Massachusetts enjoyed successful leadership from the beginning with Joseph Winthrop. Joseph Winthrop was able to successfully develop the settlement, and a respected, well thought out society. Virginia and Massachusetts also differed in their work ethic. Virginia produced slothful workers and relied heavily on labor from the Natives. The Puritans of Massachusetts held onto a rigid lifestyle and were very hard-working. The differences in the settlement’s upbringing were not the only thing that divided the two colonies; the differing views on religion helped to shape the economy of both…
The economics of these colonies varied due to the area in which these colonies were located. Virginian economics were based on a cash-crop industry. This helped lead to the importing of slaves from Africa. Due to this importation of slaves there was a drastic divide in the social structure of Virginia, resulting in a three-layered society. Slaves were at the bottom, small farmers and laborers were in the middle, and wealthy plantation owners were at the top. Society in New England was not nearly as layered. The majority of families occupied what we today call the “middle class”. Although many New England families did own slaves, they typically owned only one or two.…
This did not happen because it was designed as a profit making strategic society from the beginning. Their plans of fur trading, commercial farming, and manufacturing all did not work. The fur traders encountered Indian hostility, commercial farming didn’t work because of the absence of a ready market, and manufacturing was delayed because of the lack of knowledge in the local minerals. Their plan did not work at all but tobacco comes to save the Maryland colony. Maryland soon was known as the ‘tobacco colony”. Maryland and Virginia might have had similarities with economic and demographic experiences but they were very different when it came to politics and religion. The Maryland colony wanted a family centered colony but that didn’t happen either. They had a religious division between gentry and servants. Gentry members were Catholic and servants where mainly Protestants. Most servants were young males who were unmarried. Men outnumbered women more than three to one, married late in their twenties, and died before their mid-forties. They lacked strong family ties and often didn’t have parental…
These to colonies had different ways to make money. Virginia was a plantation based and cash crop oriented economy. Each plantation became a community unto itself. This led to the importation of slaves from Africa to work the land. The population was mostly black slaves and there were rarely women. Even though this colony made lots of profit they had no families. There were lots of diseases and there was a high mortality rate. In the other hand the New England colonies made money by fishing and ship building. They couldn’t use the soil to build plantations because the soil was unfertile and the weather was extreme. During the winter the weather was extremely cold and during the summer the heat was extremely hot. Unlike the Virginia colony this colony had lots of families. There was a high birth rate that contributed to that factor. Even though it was a populous colony there was whole lot diversity. They also had a less mortality rate and lived a longer life. They lived up to 70…
The New England colonies and the Southern colonies are slightly similar in some aspects, but drastically different in most. For example the new england colonies were strictly puritan and they did not tolerate any other religion but the southern colonies were not dominated by a single religion which gave way to more liberal attitudes and some religious freedom. The economy of New England was powered mostly the manufacturing in factories, whereas the Southern colonies’ economies were more agriculturally based. The social structures were different, because the New England colonies didn’t believe in slavery, so the social ladders were not the same. Religious tolerance was another major difference in these two regions. Overall the New England and Southern colonies are slightly similar, but their differences set them apart from each other.`…
Compare and contrast economic, social, and political developments in the North and South between 1800-1860. How do you account for the divergence between the two sections?…