In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…
The issue of moral obligations towards the global poor has always been a contentious affair to be discussed for fear of problematic resolutions that may affect academia on a personal level. Peter Singer, most notable for his authorship of “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and the drowning child analogy, presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection, ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless, Singer builds his argumentative framework in regards to moral obligations to the global poor on solid…
For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…
After reading “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” one can feel motivated to help those in need. Earl Shorris appeals to emotion when he talks about creating a program to start to make a difference in the lives of the less fortunate. He starts out the story to say he is writing a book which makes him an author which is an example of ethos because he seems reliable. Shorris then states that the poor have been “Cheated” which is substantially true because the rich were given the opportunity to succeed more as someone who is poor and cannot even afford to feed themselves. In order to help the less fortunate out he has to create a program to help the poor succeed. After a Rhetorical analysis of “As a Weapon in The Hands of The Restless Poor” by Earl Shorris one can conclude that most people take for granted even the little things in life, if one were to open their eyes and see there are many people who do not have a dollar to their name, and we have so much that we tend to lose focus on helping the less fortunate succeed in the world we live in today.…
In the essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” author, Peter Singer, exercises his theory about everyone’s moral obligation to help world hunger. Every day people make choices, whether it be what pants to wear, what food items to buy at the store, or whether or not you donate money to those suffering. Across the world there are avoidable sufferings according to Singer as long as people do their part; “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, we ought to morally do it” (889).…
Of Mice and Men brings up the sensitive and controversial humanitarian idea of whether or not it is ethical to take the life of someone who is pained by living. Twice in the novel a life is taken because the other characters come to the conclusion that their life is not worth living any more and the deceased would be better off without having to face their troubles for another day. This is a topic relevant to charity…
“Crush humanity out of shape once more, under similar hammers, and it will twist itself into the same tortured forms. Sow the same seed of rapacious license and oppression over again, and it will surely yield the same fruit according to its kind” (3.15.1). In the first paragraph of the final chapter of the riveting A Tale of Two Cities, Charles Dickens reinstates the idea that humanity’s ongoing suffering is not exclusive to the French Revolution, but is a theme that is prevalent wherever violence and injustice thrives. The revolution starts because of the misery and pain that the French aristocrats bestow upon the Third Estate, the peasants. However, the reign of newly formed, newly empowered French Republic, comprised of the oppressed Third Estate, turns into another tyrannical regime as they thirst for vengeance for themselves and their families. Analyzing Charles Dicken’s characterization and plot development of the Marquis St. Evrémonde and Madame Defarge in A Tale of Two Cities, readers can further understand the notable social commentary of how excessive power is capable of leading to violence and suffering.…
In the text of “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor.” Garrett Hardin introduces the lifeboat ethics, which is in complete antithesis to the humanism of helping people in need. To state his point of view, the author makes the metaphor of a lifeboat and divides the world into rich nations and poor nations. The rich nations seems like people inside the lifeboat, while the poor ones are people outside the boat. And then lots of assumptions are made, to illustrate the harm and danger for rich nations to help those poor ones.…
The ethical issue of altruism has been a question of debate among philosophers. This is something explain that nature of the concepts. In “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case against Helping the Poor,” Hardin employs the metaphor of a lifeboat to illustrate the potentially destructive consequence of unlimited foreign aid, as to oppose the act of altruism; in “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” the singer makes scenario that two series to the people to help children who are in poverty. First of all, people have a lot s of differences of views, but these imaginary situation make us to a distorted reality. The usage of hypothetical scenarios and statistics have the problem of misrepresentation and oversimplification of actuality. Therefore, the incorrect…
The statement social responsibilities is meant in multiple different ways, for different people. Some people believe that social responsibility goes to the people, likewise others believe it leans toward the government. In the essay of Arthur Jarvis’, there is an ability to see what Arthur Jarvis truly sees to whom the social responsibility belongs. In Arthur Jarvis' essay there are multiple ideas that were once permissible and are no longer permissible: this leads us to fully understand what his view on social responsibility was.…
6. How in this chapter does Dickens reveal his advocating social reforms, as well as his hatred of social injustice?…
As human beings it is in our nature to be driven by self-interest. This is where the view of psychological egoism derives from. Even though it may seem like we are taking part in an unselfish act, in different ways it can also be considered selfish. It is because of this view that morality is needed in society in order for us to live in harmony with one another. In this essay I will discuss how it is possible to reconcile egoism with morality and why we should be moral due to our psychological egoism. These discussion points include; the social contract, importance of morals not governed and the prisoner’s dilemma theory. Throughout my argument I will refer to Thomas Hobbes’ idea of social contract theory explained in depth in James Rachels’ book The Elements of Moral Philosophy as it is an important concept in understanding the view of psychological egoism. Additionally, I will also discuss Peter Singer’s view point on acting morally from his book Practical Ethics.…
Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are philosophers who addressed the issues of morality in terms of how moral traditions are formed. Immanuel Kant has presented one viewpoint in The Grounding For The Metaphysics of Morals that is founded on his belief that the worth of man is inherent in his ability to reason. John Stuart Mill holds another opinion as presented in the book, Utilitarianism that is seemingly in contention with the thoughts of Kant. What is most distinctive about the ethics of morality is the idea of responsibilities to particular individuals. According to Kant and Mill, moral obligations are not fundamentally particularistic in this way because they are rooted in universal moral principles. Mill and Kant are both philosophers whom have made great impact on their particular fields of philosophy and a critique of their theories in relation to each other may help develop a better understanding to them and their theories individually.…
Society functions because of what people do within their societies. The impact of the way people interact with each other allows power to be distributed to individuals. Individuals experience many different ways of life as seen throughout many different aspects of literature. Humanity is based on the interaction between humans and how acts of compassion, especially from strangers, evokes emotion. All across the world exists class systems, and extensive ways of thinking that shape the people that live within them. Within the literature from an expanse of authors, these readings allow a great insight into the world and a deeper examination of different regions and how they operate.…
Humanitarianism is a moral of kindness, benevolence, and sympathy extended to all human beings. No distinction is to be made on the grounds of gender, sexual orientation, race, caste, age, religion, ability, or nationality.…