Preview

Compare Morgan Rockefeller And Carnegie Were Robber Barons

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
70 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Compare Morgan Rockefeller And Carnegie Were Robber Barons
response:
Morgan,Rockefeller and Carnegie were robber barons They were considered cruel and ruthless. Carnegie made his employees work long hours and gave them little pay he even tried to stop unions in his company. Employees pointed out that Rockefeller could have paid his workers a fairer wage and settled for being a half billionaire. Morgan criticized for creating monopolies by making it difficult for any business to compete against his.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I've never viewed either of these men as bad men or as robber baron, i've always admires the men of the 19th and 20th century who saw these new industries developing and adapted to make a mostly honest profit. These men were friends of consumers because the put pressure on their competitors to provide better goods and services and reasonable prices. They embraces competition, made good products and sold them for low prices. When companies compete the consumer usually…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Pierpont Morgan was a successful financer, that more than once saved the U.S economy; he would manipulate the economy to his will, before the Federal Reserve was assembled. As a result in order to acquire all of this power he would create monopolies. John Pierpont Morgan was trying to create a steel monopoly, and was already a stockholder of every railroad company. According to investopedia John would merge with other strong competitors, this would expand his reach throughout the market and have more control over certain businesses, as well reduce competition, therefore, creating monopolies. Under those circumstances, people started questioning the immense control that he held over the economy, he was praised and criticized for his involvement…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John D. Rockefeller has earned a spot in the hall of shame. He became wealthy because of ruthless and dishonorable business tactics which then hurt the nation. Rockefeller became wealthy because, he lowered his prices way down and forced the Pennsylvania Railroad to lower their prices, and he also ran smaller companies out of business and then took them over for his own. After he took over most of the smaller businesses, he raised his own prices back up in order to bring in a bigger profit. Rockefeller’s robber baron side was reflected by this action because, he went behind people’s backs and turned the other way when it came to business partners.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The industrial capitalists of the late 19th century should be regarded “Robber Barons” for many reasons. One example was with religious places. Money corrupts anyone. Many people think that if they had that much power or money, then they’d only do good with it, and help everyone, but in the end, it corrupts them all. It’s human nature to want power and money and humans do what it takes to do so.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2000 Dbq Analysis

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Carnegie did believe in survival of the fittest and that the rich was more competent and educated than the poor, middle class but, he also believed in aiding the less fortunate in a non-direct way by “ ...bringing to their service his superior wisdom, experience and ability to administer,...”(Doc 4). In controlling multiple industries he provided the less fortunate with jobs and work experience, bettering them in a non-direct way. John D. Rockefeller on the other hand believed in boosting himself using horizontal integration, monopolizing the smaller businesses, expanding his industry further and further. Rockefeller once had monopolized almost 90% of the oil and oil refining businesses. He lowered his prices to attract a customer base slowly eliminating all of his competitors by either buying them out or forcing them out of business, to then jack up his prices once he owned most of the industry. Because of his monopoly in the oil industry he and the railroad tycoon Vanderbilt were in league together giving “discriminating rates” to outside , small business competitors (Doc 7). In 1890 the Sherman Antitrust Act was passed to…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    of the time were John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan. The definition of a…

    • 600 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It has come to my attention that during the late 1800’s there has been many industries that shaped the rules and regulations of our society today. There have been many names that these companies have been named but two of them really stand out to me. They are “Captains of Industry,” and “Robber Barons.” I firmly believe that these companies can be looked at as “Robber Barons” instead of “Captains of Industry” because these companies take advantage of their employees (including children), they leave the people powerless, and also, they eventually leave these poor citizens unemployed.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Who Were The Robber Barons?"A friendship founded on business is better than a business founded on friendship." These words ring true in the ears of business owners and CEOs even today. Who was the man that spoke these words that still have thought and meaning today? Why, none other than John D. Rockefeller. Rockefeller was one of the many "robber barons" of the gilded age. In case you were wondering, a robber baron is a "ruthlessly powerful U.S. capitalist or industrialist of the late 19th century considered to have become wealthy by exploiting natural resources, corrupting legislators, or other unethical means." In other words, a real life depiction of "Mr. Pennybags" from the popular Monopoly game.…

    • 2897 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe that John D. Rockefeller should be viewed as a Robber Baron because he used illegal tactics to gain his wealth and he destroyed any competition he had. Therefore, that makes him a robber baron.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1860 Dbq Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In document 7 it states that “In 1882 the Carnegie Steel Company...inaugurated a policy whose object was to control all factors which contributed to the production of steel, from the ore and coal in the ground to the steel billet and the steel rail.” Andrew Carnegie’s company basically owned iron mines, steel mills, railroads, and shipping lines. Rockefeller used his profits to buy other oil companies and ended rivalry in the oil industry by forming the Standard Oil Trust. J.P. Morgan created a banking monopoly, Swift and Armour possessed meat packing, and Vanderbilt created a railroad…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robber Barons Dbq Analysis

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The time period from 1870 until 1900 has been called the Gilded Age. This name coined by Mark Twain speaks volumes to what was occurring at the time. The big businesses were rising and along with them technological progress and a lower cost of living; this is the gold plating. Also during this time, corruption was running rampant and poor workers were exploited in order to produce more for their robber baron bosses; this is the gold layer peeled back. Big businesses played a massive role in the economy and politics during the gilded age, as the trusts made the U.S. into a manufacturing powerhouse and they corrupted politicians into not acting on injustices, leading to varying responses from the people such as unionizing, protesting, or rioting.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the 1880’s, American industry grew due to many factors including “the emergence of a talented and often ruthless group of entrepreneurs” (Brinkley 396). According to those in favor of these entrepreneurs, these men worked hard, innovated technology and strategized competitively to transform the American economy; these “Captains of Industry,” such as Andrew Carnegie, Cornelius Vanderbilt, J Pierpoint Morgan and John D. Rockefeller, used their wealth to help their communities and should be honored for their philanthropy. An advocate for these entrepreneurs is John S. Gordon. As a specialist of business and financial history, Gordon claims…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    J.P. Morgan was a post-civil war “captain of industry,” separating him from the other “Greats” such as Cornelius Vanderbilt, John D. Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie because of his motives and his upbringing. A “robber baron” is most simply defined as an individual who has financial ambitions that cause him to knowingly take advantage of others for his own personal gain. A “captain of industry” seeks solutions to common problems, and though the outcome may prove to be monetarily beneficial, others are not harmed in the process.…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    J.P. Morgan: the banker who bought the Carnegie steel empire which became the core of the United States Steel Company.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. As a reporter covering the strike at the Homestead Mill, I would say that Frick and Carnegie are Robber Barons. Although they claim to be Captains of Industry, creating jobs and invigorating the economy, they take and take and take. Carnegie and Frick eliminate all…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays