In the Iroquois constitution, they talk about the tree that binds them together and they have laws that involve their religion. The U.S. constitution leaves this out because they wanted people in the U.S. to have the freedom of religion unlike the Iroquois and Britain. This caught on because today, many countries now share this separation of government and religion.
The Iroquois have social classes like Lords and Chiefs that are different from the U.S. and also are given different rights than the normal Iroquois man. We have similar classes such as senators and congressmen, but outside of their job, they have the same rights as a normal U.S. citizen. The Iroquois give favor to their Lords and Chiefs. However, both the constitutions do share the idea of electing the officials through voting.
The major similarity of the two constitutions is the fact that they talk about having checks and balances in the government. That is one of the major things needed for a successful government. The Iroquois have three parties that decide what the council is going to do, the U.S. has three parties too, and two of the Iroquois parties discuss what action to take while the third makes sure that there are no errors in what the first two parties are saying, this is an example of one of the checks and balances. The U.S. government does similar things with congress and the senate.
I think the U.S. took ideas from the Iroquois constitution and refined them but also left some things out, like the religion intertwined with the government. They also changed it to fit the need of the growing country. This helped the U.S. start a successful government that is one of the best today.
source: Iropuois Constitution, U.S. Constitution, Online U.S. History Book
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
In 1781, the newly independent states in America developed the first written constitution in the United States, known as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation served as the written law in the United States. The Articles of Confederation grouped the individual states with a weak central government to be sure the government of the United States would not be similar to that of Britain. This document took Americans through the American Revolution successfully, but…
- 945 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…
- 396 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
There were other ways in which the power of the states was stated and the confederation type of structure was emphasized under the Articles. The original Congress of the United States was founded on the principle that each state was the equal…
- 1180 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Articles of Confederation, written on November 15, 1777, served as the written document that established the functions of the national government of the United States after it declared independence from Great Britain. However, in September 1787, the U.S. Constitution was written, which helped endure the national government. Many believe that the U.S. Constitution is better than the Articles of Confederation because the Constitution helps strengthen the national government. For example, most power is held by the national government, there are three branches of government, legislative branch has many powers, executive branch is led by the president, there is a judicial system, and there is a firm system of checks and balances. On the other…
- 220 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Although there are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the U.S. Constitution there are two principles that showcase the greatest differences; separation of powers (three branches that all have different obligations to the people of the U.S.) and checks and balances (the three branches that keep one from becoming tyrannical).…
- 52 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Had I been alive in the year the Constitution was submitted to the states, I can honestly say that I would have supported the…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Throughout the history of the United States it is amazing to think that it has only operated under two different constitutions. The first was the Articles of Confederation beginning March 1, 1781 and then the Constitution on June 21, 1788. After only seven years, the Articles were analyzed and re-written by a lot of the same people who constructed them. The Articles of Confederation created the national Congress. The Congress consisted of one single chamber.…
- 596 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In the modern world, both the Iroquois Constitution and US Constitution pertain to many areas regarding personal and government affairs; however, one has almost been abandoned while the other is still alive and thriving. Both Constitutions are controversial; moreover, one can find many similarities and differences among them through the features of human equality, personal rights, and security of self and state. Each document has more to it than what meets the eye, therefore, by comparing and contrasting, an understanding is pursued through deep analyzation of the principles.…
- 1755 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
It is about the Five Nations that formed the Iroquois Confederation and what they should and should not do. (Constitution and laws) The Five Nations included the Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga, and Seneca tribes.…
- 1678 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution were both recognized and followed by the same group of people. Even though the same group of people followed these two documents, these documents are very different. One example is the writing style of each document. The Articles of Confederation were repetitive, less direct and less certified for quoting than the Constitution. The two documents have a different approach towards the type of government and its control over the matters.…
- 271 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Legislation was one of the biggest differences in the two documents. In the original Article of Confederation, each state received one vote regardless of size. This angered many of the more populous states because they felt that it was unfair that smaller…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Understanding the differences of the U.S. Constitution as the Texas Constitution allows for a deeper understanding of the two. A written constitution is a contract between the government and its citizens. Thereof a Contract must be explicit, clear, and concise as to ensure all interested parties' rights and requests are reflected accurately. The Constitution should be treated in the same way. The Texas Constitution is uniquely outlined and provisioned is such a way to support its…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…
- 1033 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“The Constitution of the United States was ordained; it is true, by descendants of Englishmen, who inherited the traditions of English law and history; but it was made for an undefined and expanding future, and for a people gathered and to be gathered from many nations and of many tongues” (Zalman, 2008 PG 1). —Justice Stanley Matthews…
- 1339 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
They had strong, central leadership while the Natives tended to do things in harmony , consensus . They also had a little regard for women , while many Native cultures were actually matriarchal which means the group or family is led by the women , the women's leadership was more powerful than any other men's . Europeans passed information along through writing. Native Americans passed information verbally and had no written language. They did use symbols for…
- 572 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays