Comparing Gilgamesh, The Tempest, And Heart Of Darkness

One method commonly used to analyze literature is postcolonial theory. Through this type of analysis, the reader can obtain a profound understanding of the literature. Although not the original intent, literature from various time periods can be analyzed, not just those from the post-colonial era. For example, works ranging from the common era to present day can be interpreted using this method.
Additionally, postcolonial theory consists of multiple interconnected themes. Otherness is one such theme. Specifically, to be the Other means that an individual is labeled as different, often times because that person is perceived as being an outsider. Also, both individuals and groups are subject to this labeling. However, otherness rarely stands alone in literature. Particularly, in The Epic of Gilgamesh, The Tempest, and Heart of Darkness, otherness overlaps with the theme of identity.
Notably, Prospero neglected his duties as duke in order to pursue his deep love of knowledge; and, this caused his brother to view him as the Other. Shakespeare writes, “but by being so retired, o’er-prized all popular rate, in my false brother awaked an evil nature” (2003, pg. 6). So, although unintentional, Prospero’s withdrawal from his official responsibilities caused Antonio to perceive that his brother no longer fit in which served as justification for Antonio’s plot to overthrow the duke. Essentially, once Prospero was labeled as the Other, his brother regarded him with disdain and thus had no misgivings about usurping