Preview

Comparing Loyalty In Julius Caesar And Machiavelli's The Prince

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Loyalty In Julius Caesar And Machiavelli's The Prince
In a comparative study of texts and contexts, the Shakespearean historical tragedy Julius Caesar and Niccolo Machiavelli’s political treatise The Prince, both discuss the concept of personal morality and through this, reveal similarities between one another, whilst reinforcing the texts distinctive qualities. Personal morality in both texts influences the key concerns of loyalty and its opposite disloyalty and how it can be used to gain and maintain power, Machiavelli proves that the success of leader lies with the loyalty of the people and this is mirrored in the downfall of Julius Caesar, as well as this, both texts makes comment on the deceitful nature of manipulation, how it can be used cunningly convince the fickle public in order to gain …show more content…
Both Julius Caesar and The Prince both focus on the moral question on what would drive a good man to commit an evil act, and the reading of these two texts in relation to one another, strengthens their similarities whilst upholding the texts distinctive qualities.
The key concern of loyalty and its opposite disloyalty is extremely apparent in Julius Caesar and The Prince, in both texts the writer makes a comment on the loyalty of the public and how important this is for a leader to maintain control of their empire, and through this both texts speak of the question of morality. In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses the significance of a loyal public, he states in a didactic prose that “where a
…show more content…
In The Prince, Machiavelli uses his didactic essay to offer practical advice on how to rule a city like sixteenth-century Florence, he states that a successful prince must display virtu which is shown to translate into strength and skill. Machiavelli advocates the swift ruthlessness of brutal tyrants and acknowledges very little to what it means to be moral. In chapter eight ‘states won by crime’, he states that a leader “should calculate the sum of all the injuries he will have to do, and do them all at once”- through this high modality statement, Machiavelli is only concerned with the maintenance of power, rather than the morals surrounding it. This idea for the brutality of tyrants is used as justification which can be seen throughout Julius Caesar. Shakespeare demonstrates that a successful leader must be expedient, amoral (is this the correct term?) and ruthless and this is no better shown then through the character of Caesar who pronounces himself as “dictator for life”. Caesar states that “The gods are showing disapproval of cowardice… Caesar would be a beast without a heart if he stayed home today from fear”. The visual imagery shows Caesars ambition and strong tyrannical hold over Rome, it shows that he has no fear and will not be stopped- this is what Machiavelli argues is needed in order to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli believes that a government should be very structured, controlled, and powerful. He makes it known that the only priorities of a prince are war, the institutions, and discipline. His writings describes how it is more important for a prince to be practical than moral. This is shown where he writes, "in order to maintain the state he is often obliged to act against his promise, against charity, against humanity, and against religion" (47). In addition, Machiavelli argues that a prince may have to be cunning and deceitful in order to maintain political power. He takes the stance that it is better for the prince to be feared than loved. His view of how a government should run and his unethical conduct are both early signs of dictatorship.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Machiavelli was an author and an aspiring political figure who had a strong influence on several aspects of Europe’s government. Due to his critical writings in The Prince, many historians see Machiavelli as a cruel and diabolical political figure whose true intentions were to gain power for himself. However, after looking further into Machiavelli’s political past, one can see that Machiavelli is in fact an intelligent man who possesses a hidden motive to write his novel. In his work, he covered several topics that were used by future city-state leaders to help them become successful. Machiavelli proves to be an astute political mind who used his political experience to assess the actions of famous princes and to write The Prince as a noteworthy…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Machiavelli was a Florentine man of many skills. He was a renowned politician, author, and philosopher during the Renaissance, whose views and opinions affect the way people still think today. The Prince is his most famous work and in it he essentially states that humans are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive and deceiving”. For that reason, a leader should rule through fear rather than love. However, what Europeans needed during the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries were compassionate rulers. They were already frightened and disunited during the middle ages, thus adding a fearful leader to the mix would not help citizens feel safer.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prince may gain power, but not glory. He gains esteem and glory through his courage. He must have wisdom to choose the least risky venture and act on it courageously and wisdom in picking his advisors. It is extremely important to gain the support of the people because you will need it in times of trouble. It also takes that same courage and wisdom to keep up the morale of his people during those troubled times. That is why a prince needs to relate to his people. He does not have to be loved by the people, but he must not be hated and should always be respected. However, Machiavelli makes a powerful case that it is better for a leader to be feared than loved. He feels that men respond more strongly to fear than love. Fear is constant, but love of the people can easily change. The prince cannot make people love him, but he has control over his people’s fear of him. Therefore, the course of action that the prince can best control is what he should pursue. In answering the question of whether it is better to be loved than feared, Machiavelli writes, “The answer is, of course, that it would be best to be both loved and feared. But since the two rarely come together, anyone compelled to choose will find greater security in being feared than in being…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The play Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare revolves around how power manifests in different characters. The most obvious being Caesar, whose power inevitably led to his downfall. Through his development of the characters Cassius, Brutus, Anthony, Shakespeare reveals that the nature of power compels people to act more toward their own gain.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Virtue’s significance in society has changed over time and its relevance can be used to contrast differing social and cultural contexts. The prescribed non-fiction text, “The Prince,” written by Niccolo Machiavelli in 1532, is a didactic explanation of the political struggles of Renaissance Italy. Similarly, William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar,” composed in 1599, depicts the historical events surrounding Julius Caesar’s assassination. The ideas of manipulation and fate versus free will are presented through literary devices in “The Prince” and dramatised staging features in Shakespeare’s play. While virtue is presented as a key theme in both texts, its portrayal differs due to the context in which it was set or written.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Machiavelli’s The Prince, he tackles of issues in society and the government as a whole. Machiavelli believed a good ruler is one that could give justice and provide some type of order to his citizens. He believed that a good ruler should focus more on the present rather than what could be. Machiavelli used several examples to demonstrate his way of thinking in a humanistic way and running a government. He used the fox and the lion for an example. A good ruler should be able to use cunningness and brute force per situation in which it is called for. Machiavelli believes that there are two ways of fighting something, that is by law or by force and he believed those are…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, Machiavelli shows that in order to be an effective prince, one must disregard the morality of one’s actions in certain times for the welfare of the state. This strong belief shows that Machiavelli’s best interests are in the state and not in the general population. Because he…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli's philosophy was that "The end justifies the means." This meant that the end result is the most important, and how you got there was of no importance. The Prince was a book of advice to rules on how to found a state and how to stay in power. Machiavelli explained in his book the many different ways to gain power. One way was to acquire land. The four methods that he discusses to acquire more land is: Your own arms and virtue, fortune, others' arms, and inequity. To Machiavelli, the word virtue meant manliness and strength. Machiavelli also advocates the use of evil to achieve any goals. He gives an example of Agathocles of Syracuse as a proof that this works and will enable the prince to rule the land peacefully through fear. "Born of a potter, this one always had an iniquitous life throughout his years: nonetheless, he accomplished his iniquities with such virtue of spirit and of body that, having joined the militia, he rose through its ranks to become praetor of Syracuse. Being established in rank, and having decided to become prince and to keep with violence and without obligation to others what had been conceded him by agreement... ...one morning he convened the people and the senate of Syracuse, as if he had had to deliberate things pertinent to the republic; and at a preordained nod…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Prince was written by Niccolò Machiavelli while he was in exile. In his efforts to return to politics, Machiavelli wrote the Prince in order to exert the true nature of a successful leader, and once again be in the good graces of the Medici’s who were rising to power in Italy. The Prince reveals what Machiavelli views to be a successful leader. The Prince also reveals how Machiavelli views the nature of humans and how that effects how a dictator/leader should rule. Machiavelli believes human beings are selfish, greedy, easily manipulated, and incapable of self-governing as it often ends in their own demise. “[F]or men change their rulers willingly, hoping to better themselves, and this hope induces them to take up arms against him who rules: wherein they are deceived, because they afterwards find by experience they have gone from bad to worse” (Machiavelli 201). Human selfishness inhibits the individual’s ability to make rational long-term decisions thus deeming them incapable of self-governing. If given the people the right to make their own decisions, their greed ill cloud their judgment and cause them to make decisions that may not be in their best interest. If the society is not capable of self-governing they will need a strong leader and Machiavelli has the recipe for the perfect…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Cicero states: “men may construe things after their fashion”, in the midst of subjective conflicting perspectives upon a certain personality, what would you draw from it? William Shakespeare lends this thought to the audiences of his time as well as ours through the play, Julius Caesar. Was Julius Caesar really the noblest man that ever lived, an ambitious tyrant, or both? Enhanced by the personal values of Cassius and Brutus, we can discover that studying the conflicting perspectives of Caesar and his power can bring us closer to the truth of his character whilst cultivating a more diverse and provocative insight to Shakespeare’s context and audience.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar clearly presents conflicting perspectives of the assassination of Caesar, a powerful and respected leader, viewed by the conspirators as overly ambitious, but by Marc Antony as a loyal servant of Rome. Brutus and the conspirators believe that Caesar’s death is necessary in retaining democracy, whereas Antony regards the act as brutal murder.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abortion is not a ‘women’s only’ issue. Beginning at conception, every pregnancy involves two or more bodies. Typically a man does not have a role in this process. Here we see three short stories that show the readers a range of abortion situations. “Hills Like White Elephants”, Ernest Hemingway shows the readers a woman struggle to make a decision wether she could keep this unborn child or keep her male dominated the relationship. “Good People”, David Foster Wallace is about two young Christian couple who are concerned with ensuring they are making the right decision between abortion and keeping the unborn child. “Black Man and White Woman in a Dark Green Rowboat”, Russell Banks is about a young white woman who decided to get an abortion…

    • 1324 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Prince is said to be a classic of the early Renaissance period that addresses politics of Machiavelli's time. Even though Machiavelli's approach is controversial, but it also very plausible when applied to modern politics or situation. Machiavelli meant for this to be a guidebook for future leaders based off of past leaderships. For example, the section about Cesare Borgia addresses how resilience is a good quality for a leader to keep power. Borgia was not able to keep power because he relied heavily on his father, Pope Alexander VI. Other than that, this story focuses a lot on the idea of morals and ethics. People based all of their decisions on morals and ethics. A reason that may or may not be accurate is that classical literature would sometimes influence public figures. In that case, something like the Prince is ideal for leaders who want to know how to keep power and be feared while in the best interest of his…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The smell of the crisp fresh air, the little whinny of the horses from the barn munching down their grain; another beautiful day at the barn. But then something unexpected; turning a corner six little heads turn to look at the stranger walking by. New foals, with their fuzzy little coats and spiky manes. Five were brown and one gray, their eyes glowing with curiosity. But something was wrong-- they had no mother. Curious, I was quick to find the answer; they had been abandoned, left to die. Quietly I slipped into the pen of theses foals. they were skittish at first, not quite sure if they could trust me. It was then I noticed the lack of fur and goopy eyes. These little babies were suffering with an assortment of issues, mental and physical. These small creatures were the byproduct of the racehorse breeding industry.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays