Preview

Comparing Nietzsche Vs Machiavelli

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1410 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Nietzsche Vs Machiavelli
Analysis In The Gay Science, Friedrich Nietzsche talks about how “To grow tired of a possession is to grow tired of ourselves,” and how sexual love is “a craving for a new property.” In The Prince, Niccolo Machiavelli talks about “whether it is better to be loved rather than feared, or feared rather than loved.” In Nietzsche’s text he focuses on how greed and love are similar to each other, while in Machiavelli’s text he contrast the idea of being feared rather than loved. The arrangement of both texts clearly show how their ideas demonstrate their unique style of writing, using different examples two prove their points. Nietzsche first, he begins by stating “Greed and love: such different feelings these terms evoke!” Greed is to feel a strong desire for something that one does not have, while love is a feeling of affection for someone. One can see how he compares …show more content…
Nietzsche’s is more based on the idea of comparing the greed for something new to the love for it, while Machiavelli contrasts the idea of whether is it better to be feared than to be loved. One can see how Nietzsche comparison really shows the natural idea of comparing two terms or ideas. He focuses on how one grows tired of old possessions and compares that to how a man wants to be everything for his partner. These two instances are similar in that one grows tired of a landscape they live on and crave a new one, and how a man needs more and more attraction from their partner in order to feel satisfied. In Machiavelli’s text one can see how he contrasts on the difference of being feared and being loved. He shows this with two examples, explaining how a prince and a captain should show themselves to be feared rather than to be loved because if feared than others will respect them for how they are. If they tried to be loved but do not succeed, others might hate on them and instead lose the respect they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The racist and fascist foundation of Nazism has often been attributed to the writings of Nietzsche. In actuality, however, not only did Nietzsche not espouse such ideas, but also he also expressly opposed them. The blatant racism, oppression, and mass mentality of the Nazi regime are incompatible with Nietzsche's writings. Conceptually, it is difficult to fathom how Hitler managed to warp Nietzsche's ideas and writings to fuel his own totalitarian Nazi agenda. Although Nietzsche's writings did influence Hitler, it was only through misinterpretation and manipulation that Hitler came to believe that Nietzsche held pro-Nazi beliefs and promoted his works as the philosophical underpinning of the Third Reich.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Machiavelli, N. (2010). The qualities of the prince. In L. A. Jacobus (Ed.), A world of ideas: Essential readings for college writers (pp. 39-52). Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Rwandan genocide of 1994 was the largest mass slaughter of human beings since the Holocaust. Canadian Lieutenant-General Romeo Dallaire, commander of the UN Assistance Mission in Rwanda, tasked with overseeing the Arusha Accords and the transition of government. Dallaire soon realized something much more critical was being set in motion. A doomed mission in hindsight after watching the documentary, Shake Hands with The Devil. Stationed without a sufficient number of troops or weaponry to combat such an insurmountable force of people, Romeo Dallaire, as the commanding officer, realized he would have difficult decisions to make over the course of his mission. What do Romeo Dallaire’s actions…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have very different aspects about how a prince should govern his people. Machiavelli dwells over the fact, whether it is better to be loved or feared. He believes that the…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reading the works of Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu in succession highlight how truly at opposition the messages are.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare the ways in which ambition is presented in Act 1 of ‘Macbeth’ and chapter 5 of ‘Frankenstein’. Pay close attention to the writers presentation of ideas and relate your thoughts to the social and historical content of the texts.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After discussing Nietzsche in class, I could not help but draw connections between his philosophies and the movie Groundhog’s Day. The first Nietzchean concept seen in the film is the idea of the eternal recurrence or the “eternal return of the same”. This concept is integral to the plot of the film because the film follows Phil Connors a weatherman who is cursed to relive the same day over and over. Phil’s life becomes a predictable cycle, one in which escape seems impossible. Phil at first seems hesitant to accept that his life is an endless recurrence of the same but eventually he begins to take advantage of his predicament.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu Vs Machiavelli

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli seem to have a clear-cut view on how they believe the government should run. In some ways, both men have very similar ideas; more often, though, they couldn't be more opposed. A few similarities brought forth are that people in power must not strive to make everyone happy, nor must they be considered unmerciful and they should avoid being despised. The final view they both share is that they believe if the common people think they are happy, then whomever is in power will not fear for their power. However, it seems for each similarity they have, several oppositions occur in their place. From the way they believe how a leader should govern, especially in times of war, to the way that they feel about simple lies shows us how different Lao-tzu and Machiavelli's opinions really are.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes Vs Machiavelli

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page

    Lastly, both Hobbes and Machiavelli agree in their opinion of man what is one that is very negative. In the novel The Prince, Machiavelli states that men are “ungrateful, fickle, deceptive, and deceiving, avoiders of danger, eager to gain” (Machiavelli < 1542 > 2006). Similarly, in the novel Leviathan, Hobbes states how the life of a man is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes < 1651 > 2009). This shows how both Machiavelli and Hobbes see men and their lives as very negative aspects, but differ in what there perspectives are of it. Machiavelli explains how men are unreliable and not worth trusting when Hobbes is explaining how life naturally is terrible and without sovereignty, life and man are nothing.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction: Many people who have read The Prince by Niccoló Machiavelli were appalled by Machiavelli’s fierce and authorative tone he used to assert his ideas, especially his concept of how the ends justify the means, which slowly made people begin to criticize him and his book as immoral, wicked, and evil. For this reason, Machiavelli began to be insulted as a ruthless and evil person, or in the adopted term, a Machiavellian. Machiavelli didn’t wish to care for morals or spiritual integrity; however, he didn’t arrange to establish the approach to wickedness. As a matter of fact, he argues that the concept the ends justify the means are meant to be followed, but only when necessary commands for it to happen.…

    • 2621 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lao-Tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher during the 6th century. Conversely, Machiavelli was an Italian historian, author, diplomat, philosopher, and politician that lived almost two thousand years later during the Renaissance. Although both are from completely different times and cultures; neither would disagree that leadership is essential in the success or failure of society. After all, at its simplistic core government is just a hierarchy of leadership that exist to serve its fellow citizens. When utilized correctly, government and effective leadership can be the difference between societal paradise and peril. The question then in lies what is the correct way. This is the question in which these authors diverging opinions and philosophies are strongly rooted. Additionally this is the question that is independent and based on one factor, each author’s view of human nature.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Prince

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Machiavelli says it is better for a prince “to be both loved and feared” because if a prince is only feared then his…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The way in which a leader governs his country can differ for different countries. Two polar opposites would be Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli. They're both on opposite sides of the spectrum for their ideas on how a leader should govern. Lao-Tzu leans more towards a less intrusive government, while Machiavelli believes in powerful rulers. Some of their ideas are shown today in our society, some good and some bad.…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Compare and Contrast"The protagonists, Poham in "How Much Land Does a Man Need?" by Leo Tolstoy, and Faust in "Faust," part 1 written by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, are similar and different in many ways. The characters of the devils as drawn by Goethe and Tolstoy also have many things in common. Both of the stories are about greed and what people are willing to do to get what they want.…

    • 765 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in exile, Niccoló Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes wrote about their political views on how to inaugurate a sturdy government. During each of their lives, they both contributed political philosophies that had differences and similarities. In Machiavelli’s The Prince and Hobbes’s The Leviathan, their philosophies are portrayed on how to maintain a stable government. Hobbes is recognized as the founder of the most later Western political philosophy in response to the social contract theory he established in his 1651 book Leviathan. Machiavelli is also a founder of an important term that has a lot of meaning in history. He is the founder of “Machiavellianism”, the person considers their goals to be of prime importance and that any method may be used to achieve them.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays