Preview

Comparing Plato´s The Republic And Aristotle's Virtues

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Plato´s The Republic And Aristotle's Virtues
In a way Plato's Republic and Aristotle's ethics are the same. They are the same because it revolves around happiness and the people. Also they are the same because they explained that each person is influenced by something rather it be from within or their surrounding or bad and good. But in way’s Plato’s Republic and Aristotle's ethics are different. They are different because even though they revolve around happiness they explain happiness to come from different things. For instance, in the Republic they talk about that to have a just soul it is to be a calm, untroubled, healthy and a happy one. But and Aristotle's ethics it is said that happiness comes from a virtuous habit because virtue is a habit and a choice. But a lot of the happiness …show more content…
In Plato's Republic every individual is born to some class. Guardians must rule, auxiliaries must maintain ruler’s convictions and producers are to maintain their nature granted skills such as blacksmiths, farming, ect. It is important that everyone fulfills their role and to not interfere with any other to keep the system going smoothly. This would or could compared to a surgical team. On a surgical team you have the surgeon or "ruler" they call all the shots and you go as they say. Next you have the anesthesiologist this person would be known as the "auxiliaries" in this case to make sure the patient is on board and ready for operation and has no fear or pain for instance the auxiliaries would make sure people understand what the rule is and abide by the …show more content…
Aristotle's says that we find other goods to find happiness, when really happiness is in itself. So how do we find happiness? Happiness is based off human existence and virtue. We develop virtuous habits so every time we run through something different in life we tend to compare it to our past experiences of virtuous habit which has been altered overtime. Which brings us to continence and incontinence. When a person is continence they are tempted but they still do what is right instead of giving into temptation. Then you have incontinence, When the person knows what is right but does what is wrong so they given to temptation and there is usually a reason. Living a contemplative life is impossible. Without the right environment, the right environment impossible, without the right government. So if the harmony of the city is not functioning well Aristotle's said the harmony of the human will not function well

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s ethics focuses on virtues of character and good habits. His big term he uses is eudemonia, which means happiness.…

    • 514 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    ‘Aristotelianism is defined as happiness as the quality of a whole life time.’ “Happiness is the purpose for which we live. Aristotle concluded that happiness is not a moment to moment experience of pleasurable things but rather a way of characterizing how one’s life is being conducted. Happiness is living and having lived a good life”. (Janaro & Altshuler, 2009)…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This essay discusses and clarifies a concept that is central to Plato's argument in the Republic — an argument in favour of the transcendent value of justice as a human good; that justice informs and guides moral conduct. Plato's argument implies that justice and morality are intimately interconnected, because the excellence and goodness of human life — the best way for a person to live — is intimately dependent upon and closely interwoven with those 'things that we find desirable in themselves and for their consequences [1]. Hence, we acknowledge that Plato Is moral thesis cannot be interpreted either as a deontological or as a consequentialist argument — or as an act centred or agent centred moral concept. Plato's thesis is informative, in philosophical terms, precisely because it enables us to find new and more fruitful ways of looking at those basic questions concerning justice and morality, and the manner in which they are interrelated [2].…

    • 3158 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Nicomachean Ethics, states that Happiness is virtuous activity that fulfills the human’s proper function which brings pleasure. However, our ultimate end isn 't pleasure; if it were, we 'd be no better than the animals. Aristotle believed that physical pleasures tempt us with excesses and lead us away from virtue and happiness (Aristotle, 2009).…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. The role of virtue is an important one for Aristotle. Without virtue, it seems one cannot obtain happiness. Virtue acts as a linking factor to happiness.…

    • 1514 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Aim of Man

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristotle starts off in his essay explaining the definitions of Good, Primacy of Statecraft and the study of Ethics. He defines good as where all things are to be aimed, for example health. He then defines Statecraft as citizens of a state, a country, and of the world need to do good for their own good but more importantly for the good of the state. He also characterizes various types of good. Finally, the definition on study of Ethics. This talks about the pure excellence of justice that involves the disagreements and agreements of uncertainty and certainty. Aristotle also talks about happiness and where a certain point can be overlooked and how arguments can be led from first principles. First principles came about in a variety of ways: by induction, direct perception, and habituation. The question then leads to where the sources of happiness come from but a result of virtue of learning or some kind of training. Because the virtue of learning and the some kind of training is rewarded by a blessing that is generally shared but with the exception of the virtue being stunted. Aristotle concludes his essay by examining the most human element, the soul, and its relationship to virtue. Aristotle’s definition of happiness is, “Happiness is a certain activity of the soul in accordance with perfect virtue”.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plato's 4 Virtues

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Plato sets out the depiction that the city comes into being because not everyone is self-sufficient, but rather everyone needs different things in order to survive. Each person in the city is going to have one specific function to perform, which establishes the proper order of a just city contains three different classes: the guardians, the auxiliaries, and the artisans. In having established this ideal city, one can determine that it is completely good, therefore, it should be seen as wise,…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis P. Pojman's Analysis

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle’s general ideology is that all things in the universe have a certain characteristic function that they can properly use to perform different types of tasks. Therefore the good that exists at all times must involve the interaction of human life and take it into consideration as a whole which must pertain to the soul and express genuine virtue. In Louis P. Pojman’s Philosophy the Quest for Truth, “The masses and cultured classes agree in calling it happiness and conceive that to live well or to do well is the same thing as to be happy,” meaning that politics and ethics seem to agree on living well and ethically is similar to happiness however they do not agree on what happiness actually is (522). In turn this means that humans should…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato and Aristotle have similar perspectives about human function. They also share some of their ideas about how human function is related to other philosophical notions such as virtue, good, justice, and the soul. According to Aristotle the chief good (and the human function, which has its end in itself) is happiness. But his definition of happiness is different from what ordinary people usually think. Happiness is neither pleasure nor wealth, nor is it even a kind of honor (Nicomachean Ethics, Chapter 5). It is rather a final state and all human activities attempt to reach this final state. Plato holds that the human function is justice and that it ensures happiness for both the individual and the society when practiced correctly. But this ideal of justice is not for individuals who have special professions or “crafts.” Justice is rather an ideal that every person should pursue for himself/herself. While their definitions seem to be more or less similar, the two philosophers differ on the relative importance of these notions. That is to say, while according to Plato justice is the most important ideal (and happiness is its derivative), Aristotle holds the opinion that happiness is the most significant good which has its end in itself. A correct definition of happiness however is not simple pleasure, according to Aristotle, but a state of moral well-being (which assumes both justice and virtue.) The two philosophers agree on the issue that in order to be happy, we must exercise our human function (and reach the ideals this function requires). They also seem to agree that the human function (justice for Plato, happiness for Aristotle) is impossible to exercise without being virtuous. All these concepts refer to each other and they sometimes even seem more or less equal. This paper will therefore argue that the two philosophers share similar views on the nature of the human function and how happiness and virtue relate to…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle, discusses that to have a truly happy life we would have to perform virtuous actions that are within the mean; neither excessive, nor deficient. Aristotle also emphasizes that happiness is more permanent than pleasure. Indeed, he argues further that our ethics is defined by our actions. His main point is that we need to live temperate lives in order to be…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle’s “Nicomachean Ethics” considers the best way to achieve happiness. In every human action, the individual intends for it to end in some type of good, with most of these activities being means to a higher end. Aristotle addresses two types of goods, those of which are subordinate and those of which result in higher ends. Subordinate ends may only be means to higher ends, such as human activity which brings about pleasures, whereas, higher goods are goods that are ends in themselves. The highest ends, therefore, is the supreme good and is the “only final end …the object of which we are in search” (Aristotle 52). There are many disagreements among individuals of what is happiness. For there are three main types of happiness that are disputed, the sensual, the political, and the life of though. Happiness cannot be based on sensualities as animals share this quality with humans and animals are not able to experience happiness. Additionally, it cannot be political because “a man may possess virtue and yet be asleep or inactive throughout life, and not only so, but he may experience the greatest…

    • 1831 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle thinks that we can take a person 's pleasures and pains to be a sign of his state of character. To explain what the virtuous person 's pleasures are like, Aristotle returns to the idea that virtue is an excellent state of the person. Virtue is the state that makes a human being good and makes him perform his function well. Aristotle says in Nicomachean Ethics I.7, is rational activity, so when we perform rational activity well, we are good (virtuous) human beings and live well (we are happy).…

    • 2821 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Moral Theory

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Republic brings many concepts to light, but the major intent of the book is to articulate an extended definition of justice or morality and how it fulfills one’s life as a human being. Plato asserts that if humans are to live an ethical life they must do so as citizens of a just and rational state. Plato expresses that the individual and the state must share the same principles of justice. In a state, different classes work together for the good of the state for all citizens. Likewise, within the individual, the different parts have to work together for the overall good of the individual. Plato believes that it is the soul which gives an individual the ability to be a just person. It is through the soul that one makes decisions, and making decisions is the most important activity of human beings. But in order to make just decisions we have to obtain knowledge as a foundation. Knowledge is what allows humans to formulate moral decisions, not only for themselves but for the good of society. To achieve this state, Plato begins with the soul. The soul is the…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Ideal Society

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages

    he designates different types of educations for three different levels of society - producers, soldiers, and rulers, and says that each class must be kept strictly distinct. education will begin from early childhood, and each level of education will end in an examination to see if the person is qualified to proceed further in his education. for plato, the ruler is a philsopher who know about Forms rather than their images, and is thus the only one who is qualified to rule. his education and testing would last until he is about 50. the soldiers are both gentle and harsh (like a dog- gentle to friends and harsh to enemies) and respect and uphold the authority of the ruler. they are to be educated in both physical training and culture. also, they are to have all wives and children in common so as they do not exhibit loyalty towards…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays