Comparing Shakespeare's Sonnets 116 And 130

William Shakespeare shows in all his writing how talented he is. William Shakespeare shows many differences and similarities in both sonnets 116 and 130. However, his theory is that love is a true bond that two companions possess as rare. Even though he wasn’t a hopeless romantic, he does show a slight softer side in a lot of his work. Most people might feel like a lot of his work is hard to read it’s easy to pick up the similarities his work shares. In his sonnets he has some resemblances that are quite easy to point out. First, both these poems speak about true love. No matter what stage of a relationship true love is a gift that shouldn’t be taken lightly. They both show a particular type of bond. No matter the way each person looks love doesn’t die, and it continues to grow until the end of time. Even when a person has imperfection love is a fire that both people are willing to hold onto. As both of the writing share many similarities they also have some differences as well.
For instance, one of the sonnets is about a singular woman which is his love. The other sonnet is about the overall general concept of marriage. In sonnet 130, Shakespeare uses almost a mockery and an insult to get his point across. Most people have an image a perfect love when in fact love is far from perfect. He also, comes across insulting his love when he is actually saying she just isn’t perfect. In sonnet 116, he simply just lets the reader know what marriage simply is. Although they share many differences his theory has a much larger