Preview

Comparing Stanley Hauerwas's On The Church And The Christian Story

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
977 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Stanley Hauerwas's On The Church And The Christian Story
In my first essay on Freud and Lewis, I say like Lewis, I have had my doubts, but have always taken a leap of faith. Through the course, my view has been affirmed to take that leap of faith. A text that has definitely affirmed and develop that same view is Stanley Hauerwas’s On the Church and the Christian Story. I have always been a believer in the Lord, and stuck to his belief. However, through my life I have always had my certain doubts and uncertainties about certain things. Things like, what happens after you die, and is going to church necessary to be a dedicated Catholic. Furthermore, I have questioned the stories of the bible and their truth to them. Hauerwas helps touch on these stories and how instead of deciding which was true and …show more content…

For example, when Russel states, “Science can teach us, and I think our own hearts can teach us, no longer to look around for imaginary supports, no longer to invent allies in the sky" (576). When I read this it truly struck me. In a way it hurt my feelings and everything I believe in with the Lord. He is essentially calling my relationship with the Lord imaginary, and fictitious. Reading further into it he uses science to support his claim. Which in part, is a true atheist claim. They like to use science and the details of science to argue why the Lord is imaginary, and why religion is fictitious. While I wanted to brush off what he said and keep on with my faith, it inevitably made me question my faith slightly, and challenged me. When he said Christians essentially “invent allies in the sky” (576). It made me question my belief because I grew up with the belief in the Lord. How I am suppose to know whether it was just imaginary, since I just grew up believing in Christianity? Especially when science is around, I can look at clear facts about certain creations in the world, and why certain things happen as there are statistics for a lot of what the bible claims does. Just the fact that he brought in science something we can today and is up to date made me challenge my …show more content…

Freud presents strong claims and evidence towards his atheism. His life as a child based on his evidence seems to have been one of the greatest impacts on his strong views towards atheism. His epistemological assumptions of his father appear to be a substantial reason for his atheism. I don’t like how Freud sticks to rationalizing religion through science. As a result, he is an atheist. There are so many different views in the world, and still you have to take a leap of faith one way or another. I strongly disagree with Freud because I believe his view doesn’t take into account the idea and philosophies behind the bible. Even if there wasn’t a Lord, doesn’t the morals and principles taught in the bible create good character? Furthermore, it is my personal choice to believe in the Lord. I have had my doubts in the past, but throughout my life, I have no doubt that the Lord is real. I believe in the bible, and prayers. Science can answer lots of things yes, but science cannot answer what happens to the spirit after one dies, or anything in regards to religion. They are two different realms. Science is fact based, religion is faith and opinionated based. Reading his argument seems a lot like Russel’s in a way It is hard to relate to the argument since it strictly uses science as the argument. Something I strongly disagree with Freud with is when Nicholi states, “Freud referred to the teachings of Jesus as

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He quoted a man by the name of Hugh Ross, an astrophysicist who founded a religious ministry that “seeks to show that science supports Christian scripture.” Ross made an agreeable point in stating that “It’s just planet Earth that has spiritual beings in need of redemption. … That doesn’t rule out dolphins or grass or bacteria on another planet. … It’s not Jesus Christ dying on 1,000 planets.” These quotes point to a different spectrum of Christianity, one where the belief system is not quite as biased or critical as the…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    obvious conflict between the irreligious tenets of Freudianism (of which he is a great admirer) and his…

    • 250 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to argue that “it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence” (as cited on p190). The aim of this essay is to establish whether indeed this view offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is convincing. In order to do this I will consider the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that which to believe anything based upon insufficient evidence always does harm and so is wrong. Such a statement is in direct opposition to those religious believers who regard their blind faith as a virtue and for whom evidence is something that is unnecessary in order to believe. Along with discussing Clifford I will detail the responses given by James who disagreed with Clifford and in response attacked his views within his own paper “The Will to Believe”. James believed instead that it is more important to achieve truth than to avoid error. Both men, in my opinion, offer strong and persuasive arguments however I do not believe that either stands without criticism, therefore throughout I will offer my own views on the foundations of their arguments, which I hope will establish, that although many of Clifford’s points are valid in particular and specific circumstances they do not offer, as proposed, a convincing view of religious faith.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud and Tillich

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Now the gods have been replaced by science and a singular God (a father), who became more sophisticated than his predecessors, promising compensation for all the hard aches. Freud claims, that religion isn’t the essence of morality, that society didn’t adapt to the Ten Commandments but the…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud focused on the brain and how that thought processes worked on different levels. One of these levels was called the ‘super-ego’ which was responsible for how we chose and understood the difference between right and wrong; thus suggesting that a divine moral law giver, such as God, may not be responsible for how we act morally as intelligent beings.…

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whilst Freud had some valid point some philosophers disagreed with his ideas. Nelson and Jones disagreed with Freuds opinion that the individuals relationship with God is dependent on their relationship with their father. They found that the concept of God correlated more highly with a person’s relationship with their mother than with their father. Kate Loenthal distinguished between projective religion (which is immature) and intrinsic religion (which is serious and relative)…

    • 1054 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    C. S. Lewis

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Possibly one of the most famous literature Authors is C. S. Lewis; however, with this fame comes controversy of the content produced by this writer. This bestselling literature, author did not only stick to fiction but after Becoming a Christian wrote a number books on the topic of religion. Many of these books, while containing aspects of Christianity, are written as stories with symbolism referencing Christianity rather than the doctrine alone. Many creative liberties were taken in the writing of these books, one of which was the great divorce. With discernment, readers will see through the exaggeration and profit from the great spiritual learning. Despite the potential confusion, C. S. Lewis’ books pertaining to Christianity are a…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sigmund Freud was referred as being one of the most important thinkers of the last century, according to Time Magazine in 2001. According to an article in Newsweek back in 2006, Sigmund Freud was called “history’s most debunked doctor.” Even though his theories have always been the subject of considerable controversy and debate, his impact on psychology, therapy, and culture is undeniable. (About.com, 2015) Freud believed that when we explain our own behavior to ourselves or others (conscious mental activity) we rarely give a true account of our motivation. This is not because we are deliberately lying. Whilst human beings are great deceivers of others, they are even more adept at self-deception. Our rationalizations of our conduct are therefore disguising the real reasons. Freud’s life work was dominated by his attempts to find ways of penetrating this often subtle and elaborate camouflage that obscures the hidden structure and processes of personality. (Mcleod, 2013) Freud drew heavily upon the emphasis of philosophers such as Nietzsche, Dostoevsky, and Kant. Freud’s theories continue to influence much of modern psychology, and his ideas also resonate throughout philosophy, sociology, and political…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Freud argues that religion is a symptom of collective neurosis, which is a mental imbalance of the Id, ego and superego. This is definitely a negative view as Freud is suggesting that all religious people are suffering from a mental imbalance and that is the only reason they believe in religion. Freud saw a link between his patients that were suffering from neurosis and religious people. For example he saw ritualised behaviour in neurotic’s methodical washing of hands and in religious people genuflecting.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, if by… No, and yes. Absolutely not! Not necessarily. Of course not. No. No, but it should. No. Yes. No, not at all. It depends. Of course not. No, but only if……

    • 13856 Words
    • 56 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is there really anything behind the book of Genesis in the Bible? Is there anything behind all the stories of creation science? How can you be sure? You cannot. The theories involved with creation science are backed up only by faith in myths that can be easily diminished through scientific fact. There is not enough information to support creation science, and the theory of naturalistic evolution is undoubtedly correct.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Pleasure Principle

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    We don’t agree that religion holds the answer to the question of the purpose of life, although Freud suggests this.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Griffin, David Ray, Two Great Truths: A New Synthesis of Scientific Naturalism and Christian Faith, Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2004.…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays