Preview

Comparing the Australian Legal System with the Legal System of Your Country of Origin.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1096 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing the Australian Legal System with the Legal System of Your Country of Origin.
Introduction:
The task here is to compare the Australian Legal System with the legal system of the country of origin therefore the comparison is with the Pakistani Legal System. The structure of the Common Wealth Government, Australia briefed in the constitution is divided into three branches, the legislature (Senate “upper house” and House of Representatives “lower house”), executive (the administrative arm of Government) and judiciary (the legal arm of the Government). While in Pakistan the Parliament and Federal Government also consists of Senate the upper house and National assembly the lower house.
‘The ability of the common law to adapt itself to the differing circumstances of the countries in which it has taken root is not a weakness but one of its great strengths. Were it not so the common law would not have flourished as it has, with all the common law countries learning from each other.’
Lord Lloyd, Invercargill City Council v Hamlin [1996] 1 All ER 756 at 764–765
Legal System in comparison - The Australian jurisprudence forms the basis on common law of United Kingdom and similarly the root of Pakistani Legal System stretches from beyond medieval period which passes through Hindu era, Muslim period involving Mughal dynasties, British colonial and the post independence period. When Pakistan was born in August 1947, the Government Act of India 1935 prevailed as a provisional constitution. Thus the judicial and legal British system continued with further modifications and adaptations concluded at ease of the new republic. The Constitution and Shria Law is superior to all other sources and is followed by Legislation which contains Ordinance, delegated legislation and Act constitutes the case law. The Act of Parliament entitles the delegated legislation and equity remains over common law.
The difference in Australian law and Pakistani Law is the introduction of Sharia Law in 1980’s. This is basically an Islamic Law that was incorporated in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Australia has similar liberal political and legal values, similar to the UK and the United States. Policies and laws are implemented to protect both the people and the government. Laws and regulations are set in place and reflect both criminal and noncriminal punishments. The government is set up similar guidelines in terms…

    • 1963 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adms 2610 Notes

    • 28633 Words
    • 97 Pages

    -adaptability of the Common Law has enabled it to absorb many legal principles, customs and laws from…

    • 28633 Words
    • 97 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    [ 39 ]. Tony Blackshield and George Williams, Australian Constitutional Law: Law and Theory (The Federation Press, 5th ed: 2010), 9.…

    • 4001 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Australian legal system does not deliver justice for all Australians. In the issue of the relationship between laws to ethics, morals and values this can be seen clearly. This is supported by the case of Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss. This case consists of a woman by the name of Dame Elizabeth…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The influence of international law on Australian domestic law has enhanced the values of Australia in various ways. International law is law that governs the relationships between nation-states and domestic law is the law of a nation. Both international and domestic law has been affected negatively and positively due to state sovereignty rights. State sovereignty is where states have the authority and power to make and enforce rules for it population without interference of external states or bodies. Australia’s domestic polices are shaped by its international obligations.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Mohamed Haneef Case. 2014. Mohamed Haneef Case. [ONLINE] Available at: http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/lawcouncil/index.php/10-divisions/145-mohamed-haneef-case. [Accessed 21 August 2014].…

    • 1077 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The centuries-old tradition of English law is that judges decide each case as it comes to court, and give reasons for their decisions. These reasons, or judgments, are published in books called law reports (and now also on the internet). The accumulation of judges’ decisions over many years is what is called the common law – law made by judges in deciding common disputes. NSW inherited the English common law, and from early in the 19th century judges in NSW have been developing the common law in Australia. The key to the law being “common” is its consistency of application.…

    • 3531 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia 's Federal System is dynamic and the division of lawmaking power between the Commonwealth and State since 1901 has changed dramatically; Critically discuss, focussing on the major reasons for those changes.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Highcourt

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The source of law in Australia is coming from two resources which are courts and parliament. Courts enact the judge-made law, also called common law, Parliament lays down statutory law. From s109 of the Cth Constitution law, when there is a contradiction between common law and State legislation, common law “prevails”. Common law is stare decisis, it allows judges apply doctrine of precedent to later cases having similar facts. When interpreting the law, courts makes decisions based on doctrine of precedent, however there are no exact two same cases, decisions contains majorities’ subjectivities. Under common law, the decision made by courts follow the hierarchy from local or Magistrates Court & other courts and tribunals to High Court of Australia. From the hierarchy, it illustrates High court of Australia has power over Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. In another way, High court of Australia has the ability and authority to overturn or refuse applying the ratio or decision of a lower court which are Supreme Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of the same jurisdiction.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    5. What do the terms “common law” and “statute law” mean? If there is a conflict between common law and statute law which law prevails?…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Which type of law is sovereign?,Classification of Law,Regulation of human behaviour,Criminal law,Classifications of Crime,Objectives of sanctions,Civil Law,Types of civil wrongs,Civil remedies,Types of civil remedies,Crimes…

    • 2211 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aboriginal customary laws, before white settlement in 1788, were considered primitive by the British, if considered at all. But Aboriginal laws and customs had lasted hundreds of years, based on traditions such as kinship ties and rituals.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Senate Reparations

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The High Court of Australia and the Supreme Court of the United States have important roles in determining the federal distribution of powers and acting as ‘Constitutional guardians’. Both courts also exercise their powers as ultimate appellate courts to safeguard liberal rights and to protect their citizens from arbitrary governmental powers under the rule of law. The quality of these courts is underpinned by the ‘impartiality, integrity, and independence’ of the judges, which depends largely on the framework of judicial appointments.…

    • 2035 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lau, Martin. (2008). Islamic Law and the Afghan legal System. Retrieved on December 12, 2008…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Istihsan Case Study

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In most legal system, the court of law is given the task to interpret the law when there is a dispute as to its meaning arisen or even when in the case there is now statutory provisions of the law. Although the general perception that Islamic law is destined to be eternally fixed in its provisions because its religious and doctrinaire character, close examination shows that its detailed provisions have constantly been subjected to interpretations.…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays