Preview

Comparing The Balance Between Privacy And National Security

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
147 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Balance Between Privacy And National Security
Privacy is every person’s ‘fundamental right’, but when we try to interpret it from the security perspective, it becomes intricate, somewhat complicated. Privacy is our fundamental right, but we, as a nation, also strive to uphold the idea of national security to protect the safety of the entire country and all citizens. This debate has bollixed our countries for years. Which is more meaningful, important for us as citizens, proper protection of our privacy or better security systems to protect us from terrorist attacks? What about a nation that stands to be protected by all terrorism? To find a perfect balance between these two concepts throughout history has proven to be nearly impossible. We can never strike a balance between privacy and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    A Policy Brief of NSA Reform

    • 3654 Words
    • 12 Pages

    I. Introduction: Since the acknowledgment of abused power by the NSA by former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden, long debate about the constitutionality of the collection of private records of American citizens has ensued in the senate. As a result of this issue that has and can continue to transgress on the civil liberty of privacy by all persons and entities, The USA Freedom act has been created which seeks to limit and to regulate the power of US surveillance agencies to collect private information from third parties. The USA Freedom directly addresses issues that are included in the USA Patriot Act, an act that was created to combat and to create protection against the threat of terrorism, which was a fear that heightened in response to the 2001 September 11 attacks (Savage). While this bill proved necessary at the time, in the act, are provisions that overstep constitutional boundaries that go beyond the intention and framework of the original plan.…

    • 3654 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author of this article is Daniel J. Solove. He discusses the different perspectives and opinions of various people of the government’s control of viewing personal information. The article demonstrates this through examples of what people say, book references, and the opinion of the article himself. In the article, “The Nothing to Hide Argument”, Daniel J. Solove argues that the information- gathering programs the government uses to track and record information from people are problematic.(739) This still remains the case even if the information gathered from these programs was information people did not mind being uncovered. (739).…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I chose to focus my analysis on Edward Snowden and his disclosure of classified domestic surveillance documents. When the leak first came out, I was upset at the thought of my privacy being violated by the NSA. However, the feeling dissipated when I considered the protection making that sacrifice affords. The NSA, like many organizations, are sometimes faced with ethical dilemmas. Occasionally, there is no right answer. Thus, the decision made, while not ideal, is the lesser of evils. In his TED talk interview, Snowden stated, “Your rights matter because you never know when you're going to need them” (TED, 13:20). While I admit his statement did trigger the reexamination of my stance, I arrived at the same position. Perhaps, I will look back…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does the NSA have a good enough reason to spy on its own citizens along with the other billions of foreigners when there are laws implemented to stop that exact act? Is it necessary to create more terrorists because of the hate towards this program, just to possibly catch the current ones we face now? What is the real end goal? Is it to create a black mail mega-data for the government to have insurance due to the debt? Maybe the U.S.A is planning a global attack themselves, or it really is meant to stop terroristic acts against the United States.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    from an inadequate definition of what privacy is and the value that privacy possesses. The adherents of…

    • 2748 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rubel, Alan. "Privacy and the USA Patriot Act: Rights, the Value of Right, and Autonomy." Law and Philosophy 26.2 (2007): 119-59. JSTOR. Web. 10 Oct. 2011. .…

    • 2253 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Final English 122

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Privacy is perhaps one of the most personal issues in today’s society. Privacy is an intensely personal issue, and perhaps not only to the right of the individual to dress the way he or she desires, worship in any way he chooses, but also to expect that those rights be protected by the government that upholds them. At one point or another, every individual in our society has asked the question, “Is privacy in the 21st Century possible?” The answer lies in the exploration of what privacy really means, and what privacy issues society faces in today’s modern, informational, and digital age of what we call the 21st Century.…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many of strategies for diminishing the injustices associated with surveillance. There are strategies at an individual level such as educating the public, engaging in civil disobedience, civil procedures, and guerilla tactics that can help one achieve justice. There are also strategies at an organizational level to help seek justice such as educating the public, civil actions in court, civil disobedience, and violence or threat of violence.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When it comes to protecting and saving lives of the American people, private invasion used in order to locate and capture potential terrorist should be unlimited. The 911 attack has provided active proof to the American peoples of the damage that terrorist groups can impose on our society. Therefore, invading the privacy of individuals may prevent future terrorist attacks.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Privacy is Utterly Dead Peter Singer is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor at Princeton University and the University of Melbourne that studies Bioethics, Philosophy and Public Ethics. His essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” focuses on transparency and personal privacy. One can see after reading this essay, Singer is in favor of openness, but he also notes that the government misuses these technologies by having sousveillance and surveillance cameras. A person needs to understand how privacy, surveillance and sousveillance is defined to understand why he was in favor of openness.…

    • 1306 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article’s main arguments are domestic surveillance prevents terrorism, the government needs to be able to have quick access suspects, and surveillance is constitutional and protects United States citizens. The point of this article is to inform readers on the controversy over domestic surveillance. Topics covered include how surveillance prevents terrorist attacks, why the government needs to be able to access private informations in a quick manner, and, overall, how this method protects the people. To summarize, the article mentions the various reasons as to why the government to partake in domestic surveillance and how, by doing this, Americans will be better protected.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Privacy, he said, was a very valuable thing. Everyone wanted a place where they could be alone occasionally” (Orwell 114). Indeed, privacy shouldn’t be taken for granted, but it is almost becoming a thing of the past as seen in George Orwell’s 1984. The protagonist, Winston Smith, lives in a society where the totalitarian government controls all aspects of life. Telescreens, which are ubiquitous in Oceania and sometimes hidden, are used to monitor every member’s thoughts and actions in order to maintain uniformity, control, and power.…

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Patriot ACT has greatly affected how America deals with situations involving terrorism, or threats of terrorism, but the main problem is simple, and that is that it deprives American citizens of certain rights and liberties. And now imagine if you had to choose between your privacy and your safety. Pretty hard choice, right? And this is how many Americans feel today, because they have to make this choice. And this essay will break down what the Patriot Act is and the argument for, and against, the act itself. And this act is relatively new, as it was created in the early 2000’s under the presidential leadership of George W. Bush. And there are multiple reasons why the Patriot Act is unconstitutional, and they will be mentioned, and elaborated on, throughout this essay, such as our right to privacy as American citizens, and our right to our amendments, and will also touch on how the opposition believes that this act is necessary to our survival as a nation and why they are wrong.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privacy is a fundamental moral right in a democratic society. It is the right bestowed upon individuals that strengthen the freedoms of speech, press, association, and assembly which are crucial for a free, democratic society. However, advancement in technology threatens privacy and autonomy which reduces the control over private data and exposes individuals to undesirable consequences. Thus, a loss of privacy leads to a loss of an individual’s freedom in society.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We will not trade our liberty for security. Not now, not ever”! (dilemmas p. 2) Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky stated in a security speech to the CPAC. There are two conflicting views emerging in today’s American society. Supporters of each of these perspectives are strengthened as they fight for their opinions to be the ideal enforced by laws. The conflict is over, which is more important to the American people; national security, through which the government strives to protect its people, or the individual citizen’s right to privacy and freedom. An individual’s “privacy is the state or condition of being free from being observed or disturbed by other people”,() specifically, the government authorities. “National security is a concept that a government...should protect the state and its citizens.” () Privacy for the individual citizen is more important than national security, because the 4th Amendment to the Constitution prohibits illegal searches and seizures, minimal government surveillance of the past has grown beyond an acceptable point, and individual’s right of privacy and freedom is the ultimate strength and protection for Americans. (debatewise p 1, 2, 3)…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays