Preview

Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1317 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber
Comparing the Ideologies of Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim, and Max Weber were three historical sociologists. Their views have become world renown and have shaped many ways of interpreting the social structure of many modern societies. This essay will take a glimpse into the three sociologists’ ideals and expose the similarities and differences they may have. Karl Marx’s view of society was based around the economy. All other social structures according to Marx, such as religion, family values, and politics stem from the base, the economy. Religion played no part at all in Marx’s sociological views. He is known as an atheist. He believed that religion was nothing more than a burden on society. “The economy that forms from the means of production results in the division of labor and forms property” (Simon 1). Division of labor can be described as the way in which tasks are divided in a society. Certain people are assigned certain tasks which help to make sure that the social structure progresses smoothly. As society becomes more advanced, the division of labor becomes more advanced, because more tasks become necessary for society to stably exist. Therefore, in Marx’s opinion, the economy grows and advances society which fuels the division of labor that is necessary for harmonious living. Marx believed that social struggle was the main cause of social evolution. In a society there is always a group that is in some way oppressed. If we look back just a few hundred years we see this in slavery, and before that serfdom. So how does oppression promote social change? “It is the ruling economic class that determines the dominant ideology in a society… And it is class interest that the proletariat must oppose with revolution.”(Simon 2). The upper class in society rules over all the lower classes. When the oppression becomes an unbearable horror for the lower class, they must revolt, according to Marx. We saw this with both given

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The author Terrell Carver assesses the Marx’s social theory in his book (Marx’s Social Theory). This is a fascinating account of Terrell Carver about Marx’s social theory. Writer discusses the influence of Marx on almost every discipline of knowledge from aesthetics to theology, including anthropology, geography, jurisprudence, and history, almost all branches of philosophy, political science and psychology.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx a Marxist sees religion as an illusion and that the phenomenon of religion is part of what Marx refers to as an alienation of people which causes conflict in society. He saw society as divided into two social classes with one dominating the other. And he saw religion as promoting inequalities and class conflict in society. He argues that religion is part of a dominant ideology that is the idea that religion is a tool used by the bourgeoisie (Ruling class) to convince the working class to accept low paid jobs and so exploits the working class, reproducing and reinforcing false consciousness.…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In society there are many different factors which divide us and result in social inequality. In this essay, I will be covering social class. Karl Marx believed that in society, there are two major social classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. The bourgeoisie are basically the upper class; in order for you to be classed as a part of them you must own the means of production such as factories etc. In order for these factories to run, they would need workers, which is where the proletariats come in. The proletariat only owns their labour force which they sell in order for a wage. Karl Marx stated that the proletariats are exploited through low pay and poor work conditions, but due to capitalism, we deal with it as were tied down to the economy.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As an economic determinist he believed economic structure is the powerful force driving human existence and behavior. Consciousness is ascertained via our social relationships and interaction which is based on how we labor and produce material goods. Therefore Marx believed the type of society we have is based on how the means of production within society is established Example Slavery or Capitalism.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Karl Marx did not believe in god. He was well known for his ideas about alienation. He believed everyone was born with a creative spirit, i.e. species being. Conflict is to fight or to battle, Karl Marx was the founder of conflict theory, according to sources conflict theory argues that the competition of groups and individuals for power and wealth is a fundamental process shaping the social structure. Conflict is manifested through Marx by who gets what and why, Marx argued that the labor market was shaped by class conflict. The capitalist class, which owned the means of production, promoted division of labor to maximize their profits and to disempowered workers.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Karl Marx, religion is like a social institution as it is dependent upon the material and economic realities in a given society. It is apparently the ‘creature of productive forces,’ as Marx wrote, ‘The religious world is but the reflex of the real world.’ Marx believed that all religious, moral and political life that exists is rooted in economics. He stated that people have needs and desires (material and social etc) and society structures itself to meet those needs and desires. Due to this belief, this has given rise to a capitalist society, where the workers produce goods and services and rich industrialists and landowners profit from their labours.…

    • 1693 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim are widely recognized as the trinity of sociological theory. While these three sociologists were trailblazing social theorists who enhanced the study of human behavior and its relationship to social institutions, other, more contemporary scholars were just as innovative - one of those scholars being W. E. B. Du Bois.…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Along with Marx and Durkheim, Marx Weber (1864-1920) is one of the most influential classic sociologists. Weber was born in Berlin, Germany. He enrolled in the University of Heidelberg in his eighteen, and attended the University of Berlin later. Even though he received education in law and history, Weber was fascinated with social sciences after his professorship. In his early academic life, Weber became an important scholar in economic and legal realm. Weber did not divert his attention from economics to the field of sociology until he underwent a serious psychological breakdown. The majority of Weber’s sociological works, including the Protestant Work Ethic, was written after this mental breakdown…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Karl Marx, like Gilman and Du Bois was interested in seeing society change. Karl Marx was interested in seeing a classless society in which capitalism was abolished. Karl Marx saw the world with a materialist view and the first “to develop the structural method, without which there could be no social theory...”(Lemert 2007; pp 49). Through this, Marx was able to to structurally analyze the world he was living in; a world in capitalism was beginning to flourish. He saw society on a macro level, which meant he saw society as a whole. Since Marx longed for a classless society, he first analyzed the current situation he was in. He concluded that capitalism was inherently exploitive since it alienates workers from their labor and the goods they produce (the workers have no say in their workplace and do not own what they produce). His materialist view of the world is apparent in the Communist Manifesto in which he says that class conflict is what makes history, that is, real events instead of ideas like the idealist view.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sociology is based on two frameworks, namely structure-agency and conflict-consensus. These frameworks center around three founders of sociology, Emile Durkheim, Karl Marx and Max Weber. This essay will attempt to demonstrate which author explains sociology within which framework. The structure used for this essay will be a point-by-point structure. This essay will start off with structure, move on to agency and then to conflict and lastly conclude with consensus.…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furthermore Durkheim emphasized the significance of sociologists studying society as a part of its circumstantial and dependent environment. He contends that the sociologist “will therefore consider economic facts, the state, morality, law and religion as so many functions of the social organism and will study them as a phenomena which occur in the context of a definite bounded society” (Giddens 57). Durkheim profoundly stressed the importance of sociologists studying society through analysis of facts and…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Durkheim, Emile, “The Rules of Sociological Method”. Trans. W.D. Halls. New York: Free Press, 1982. Pp. 97-107.…

    • 1337 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Karl Marx viewed religion as a system of beliefs that was a feature of a class divided society. Religion creates a false idea of community in which we are all equal in the eyes of God. The state fills this need by creating an illusion of a community as citizens, all equal in the eyes of the law. In Marx’s view, religion operates in order to be used by the ruling class to justify the economic equalities faced by the poor as something that is outside of their control and God given. Marx saw religion as an opiate caused by oppression, which was brought about by economic and social injustices. Religion is seen as an opiate due to the belief in post-mortem rewards and punishments. Religion does not fix the causes of peoples pain but rather it helps…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Marx Durkheim Weber

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages

    6. Critically examine the specific methods used by Marx, Durkheim, Weber for the analysis of social forces and relations in modern society.…

    • 2343 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The work of Marx, Weber and Durkheim has proved critical in the study and development of theories relating to the sociology of work. They are widely considered the ‘founding fathers’ of study in this field. These highly regarded sociologists are often described as three separate pillars who amalgamate to form a triangle of classical theories that delve deep into the intricacies surrounding the sociology of work. While Durkheim invested his efforts into the concepts of social solidarity, integration and control, Marx concerned himself with the ideas of social fragmentation, disintegration and conflict. In addition, Weber developed his theory regarding rationality and bureaucracy. (Grint & Nixon, 2015)…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays