Preview

Comparing The Idiot's Guide To The US Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
263 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing The Idiot's Guide To The US Constitution
There is a break down from The Idiot’s Guide to the U.S. Constitution (pg 80). The right of every American to own a gun versus society’s need to get guns off the street to prevent violent crime. I feel like the Democrats who are so focus on gun control confuses the two. When gun violence occur, legal gun owners have nothing to do with it. We are not the ones that need more control, we are law-abiding citizens that get the short end of the stick every time illegal gun owners go gun crazy. The book also points out that the second amendment can be very confusing, that the court never really decided on what it means. It seem like they just left it open to twist and turn the way they need it to go. Each book I have read and studied always made

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the book “A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution” by Carol Berkin she explains the constitution from start to finish from how it all began, to the debates inside the convention and finally the end product. Berkin takes the reader and puts him directly in the middle of the convention of 1786; throughout the book you can feel the excitement, the frustration, the tensions between delegates and the overall commitment to making a new government work for all.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Not to Read the Constitution is an articles that addresses the abstract qualities of the Constitution and how it should be interpreted as a living, changing document. In 1787, the Constitution was signed, included in this historic document were guaranteed basic rights, fundamental laws and the establishment of America’s national government. However, the Constitution was not America’s first governing document, the Articles of Confederation were. Under the Articles of Confederation America’s national government grew week. The states functioned individually like countries. In result of this, some national leaders decided that the Articles of the Confederation was a fail and it was time to try something new. In 1787, at a convention some delegates…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The declaration of independence, the bill of rights, and the U.S constitution, we are written around the same time frame and by the same people, the 1776 founding fathers. These three papers are America's most important documents in history. Each of these documents started off with a preamble. The constitution and the declaration were founded by the congress and the bill of rights were founded by the congress who met at the federal hall. Each document has a relationship with each other. One big idea that each of these three have in common is the idea that the government is here to protect and all people no matter the race, size, or sex have the same preliminary rights. Each document was made for different purposes but were based around the…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Comparing the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, it is clear that there are many differences in things such as interests and intentions. As I have read through the documents and researched others insight on the documents I have found the differences very interesting.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    it spread to europe when the returning troops helped the spread renaissance to the north then to the rest of the world throughout 17, 18, 19th centuries…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Those two things seem to coincide with each other. Lately on the news there have been a number of mass shootings, terrorist attacks, violence in neighborhood, etcetera. As the number of these crimes seem to happen more often throughout the years, peoples fight or flight instincts tend to kick in, and they feel like they have to do what they need to do in order to protect themselves. And that usually results in people's fight response being activated, and wanting to be feel like they are able to keep themselves and their family safe end up with them going out and getting a gun. As of last October, the Gallup poll was taken and stemmed out into saying that 63% of Americans believe that having a gun in their household makes them feel a whole lot safer than having a home without a gun. According to the Pew Research Center Survey only 37% of adults own a gun in their household. While the numbers may appear to not seem like a lot, as a researcher it's hard to pinpoint the exact number of individuals who do have a gun in their possession due to not everyone answering the survey on whether or not they have acquired a gun. So the big question for the people and the government are "Is the right to keep and bear arms a civil right?" and " Should we have restrictions when obtaining a gun?" So the present today debate on the Second Amendment main focus is on the protection of an individual right to bear arms or is it a right than can only be protected by the…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Those against gun control believe in these private protections. The Framers weren't able to predict everything the future would hold including the rapid growth in crime and violence. James Madison, who wrote the Constitution believed in the freedom and liberty of the individual, he discusses the advantages the private individual in America contained at the time with the right to bear arms compared to the many individuals of the nations in Europe. With the increase in violence and crime within the United States today the beliefs of James Madison and the framers become even stronger. In District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) the court recognizes that the government can regulate gun rights but that the Second Amendment does establish an individual right to bear arms. The Court said its decision should not be interpreted to question the right of government to: prohibit felons and the mentally ill from owning weapons, prohibit guns in schools or public buildings, ban certain categories of guns not commonly used for self-defense, and to establish certain other conditions on gun ownership. Thus, the Washington D.C. gun ban was overturned just as many other cities have done since then. If we eliminate this right to bear arms then we…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I still remember being in an eighth grade U.S. History class back in my junior high years. One distinct memory of that course, perhaps the most memorable of all the projects we had, came in the first month of the school year, in the curriculum’s first unit: the founding of the United States as its own nation. As the textbook timeline approached 1787 we prepared ourselves for a daunting task: memorize and recite the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution. We as students would wait anxiously as, one by one, each of our peers would step up to the front of the classroom and begin to recite from memory. Few people could recite the Preamble smoothly, but for those who stumbled, we all seemed to remember perfectly the first and last chunks: “We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union…” and “…do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” To us back in eighth grade, that missing middle section was just a group of words to be more-or-less forgotten the next day. To our forefathers, however, that middle section was vital in creating the basis for the supreme law of the United States.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The U.S. has been in a hot debate over a tough issue for hundreds of years now. The subject of that debate is gun control laws. With mass murders and break-ins happening all over America it brings up two groups of people. One group believes taking away the guns will solve the problem. I believe, along with lots of other people, that taking away the guns will not solve the problem. We need to protect our Second Amendment, as well as ourselves, and stick to our guns.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Carrying a concealed handgun could help stop a public shooting spree.” The second amendment and open carry laws give law abiding citizens give those who apply the sense of security, protection, and safety to those who cannot protect themselves. Banning the right to bear arms and the right to openly carry would cause more harm than allowing legal citizens to legally carry firearms for self-defense. Banning guns can cause a major issue in many ways. For example, if you ban public carry of guns, what's gonna happen if a spree shooting takes place in front of you and your unarmed. You have just become a sitting duck. Taking away guns takes away a sense of security for about 11 million citizens trying to protect themselves and their families. “People are safer in states where law-abiding citizens are allowed to carry concealed weapons.” Most parents would do anything to keep their children safe, even give their life for the well-being of their kids. For example, the movie theater shooting in colorado. If a parent and their child were seeing a movie and the parent was armed, they could better their chances to get out alive if they are carrying then sitting and waiting for the police to disarm the criminal. Taking away or not allowing that right to be enacted is increasing the chances of harm more than making the streets safer without guns. “Banning weapons does not guarantee safety.” The saying goes, “A right unexercised, is a right that is lost”…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The debate over the restrictions of gun control is centered on the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which gives people the right to bear arms. Gun control supporters believe that this explicit right does not extend to ownership of military-style firearms. For example, groups like the National Rifle Association argue that gun control infringes on the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens. Gun control is an on-going debate because each year more people are killed by the use of guns. However, guns are not the result in the number of homicides each year, the problems rests with the irresponsible gun users. Gun Control would do nothing but harm America because guns offer protection and security…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment states, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Proponents of more gun control interpret it as being meant for the militia and that the gun laws should be stricter for the average American citizen or ban guns altogether. However, opponents of more gun control believe that the amendment is protecting an individual’s rights right to own guns and protect themselves. However, gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime. Guns will still exist even if it’s not legal for civilians to own them because there is always a way for criminals to get a hold of them, it has been proven in history, and don’t prevent gun related deaths.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With heated debates and arguments about gun control, politicians are forced into “trying” to find a solution. Gun control is a popular subject though does have slow process process in America. Twice in the past two years the gun issue has reached the nation’s highest court. In the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller the court ruled that the Constitution protects an individual’s right to own a gun for personal use. But the decision only applied to federal laws and failed to address local and state laws. Thus, in July 2010 the Supreme Court ruled that the federal right to bear arms also applies at the state and local level. The ruling lifted a nearly 30-year-old Chicago gun ban. Obama calls for a “Sense of Urgency” to fight gun violence in a video recorded by “CNN”. Obama advocates for a better and improved ways to distribute guns such as creating more or hiring more people to do background checks. Obama having a Democratic viewpoint, respects the 2nd amendment but wants to bend it to what he believes will decrease violence. On the hand republicans believe the Second Amendment guarantees an individual's right to gun ownership and that government efforts at regulation were unconstitutional. Ownership of guns should be up to the people and not by the government. These two viewpoints besides abolishing the 2nd amendment is what separates American citizens attitudes toward gun control. In…

    • 1842 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the biggest controversial topics in America today is Gun Control, whether we should or should not have gun control. The Government claims that if they take the guns away, that there will be a drop in deaths and crimes. The Second Amendment state that every citizen of the United States of America has a right to bare arms(ProCon#1). The Gun Control Law will take away that right completely, along with some of our freedom. If the Gun Control Law is enforced in the United States, our hunting right will be removed, our self-defense right will be taken away, and it will amplify the problem.…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays