Comparing Trajan's Column With The Bayeux Tapestry

Trajan’s Column with the Bayeux Tapestry
Name
Institution
Historical narratives have recurrently been found in art across different cultures. This has been done using a variety of media and through the utilization of diverse methods that establish chronology. This use of different forms of media and methods has also been utilized to demonstrate the relationship between separate events. Some historical narratives such as the ones represented in the Trajans Column and the Bayeux Tapestry are continuous, and use many images to depict a series of moments in a single frame. Historical narratives have also been portrayed in cycles and series of images appear within separate frames, but work together to tell a full story. The Bayeux Tapestry and the Column of Trajan have elements that can be categorized into either of these two approaches.
The Trajan’s Column and the Bayeux Tapestry advertise victories of wars using unique platforms that reflect the unique elements of their individual civilization. The Bayeux Tapestry is believed to have been commissioned by Bishop Odo to maintain favorable cooperation with William the Conqueror, his half-brother. Bishop uses imagery in the embroidery to express his close alliance with his brother. The Bayeux
Tapestry is believed to have been made in the late 11th century during the Battle of Hastings. Different views have been presented to describe the purpose of the art; especially relating to its creators, and intended audience. However, many analysists agree that the Bayeux Tapestry serves to convey the Norman conquest of England.
Like the Bayeux Tapestry, the Trajan’s Column was built to advertise the victories of war; the Trojan’s 1st and 2nd successful campaigns against the Dacian’s.
it is fascinating to appreciate the fact that the impressive Bayeux Tapestry was created to communicate a subliminal message to one individual. compared to its original purpose, the piece of art has increasingly become a celebrated historical work of art. In spite of the embroideries fictitious elements, it includes a reminiscence of different historical incidents such as the Haley’s Comet. This serves to add to the validity of the art work; the introduction of publicly endorsed views. As a result, the Bayeux Tapestry is likely to be authentic to its intended
audience.
There is a nonpartisan representation of Harold and William’s factions as the embroidery portrays favorable imagery of both sides. The Bayeux Tapestry is an exhibition of facts and insinuations of truth. This is one of the similarities between it and the Trajan’s Column. The latter is a visual transcript of Emperor Trajan’s triumph over Dacia in two successive wars. The visual transcripts on the monument’s panels are influenced by compositions produced by military artist, who documented the operations of the Roman army using a visual record during the conflicts with the Davian. The official records of the army further add credibility to the monument. This enhanced accuracy heightens the reality of the narrative for the intended audience. It is documented that the emperor dedicated the monument to fallen warriors during the two ways. This further serves to humanize Trojan, and his campaigns against the Dacia.
Similar to the Bayeux Tapestry, Trojan’s column portrays both parties as comparable opponents. The column includes an extensive array of information to historians relating to different aspects of the ongoing conflicts such as medical care, architecture, and weaponry. These constituent elements surpass the narrative to visualize the subplot of accomplishments that were obtained through the wars between the Roman-Dacian Wars. The Trajan column incorporates elements that makes the intended audience aware of the inventions, and complications of victory in war. Between these two works of art, propaganda offers the observer a detailed understanding of achievement and events through commemorative compositions; as was the overall intended purposes.