Comparing Wollstonecraft And Liberty Conception Of Rights

First, discussing the differences and identifying liberty conception of right and a claim conception of right, you have to understand why or why can’t a certain individual do something. The Liberty conception of right shows that an individual is entitled to do as he or she pleases as long as they don’t oppose other people’s rights. This view shows freedom from other governments control. The claim of rights allows individuals to have freedom but also allows them to ask for certain things or assistance to be able to achieve their needs or goals. A claim or right is also a right that involves responsibilities, obligations, and duties imposed by other governments or parties. Which is significantly different from liberty's conception of right. A
This is because women should be allowed to do as they please, as long as it doesn’t affect somebody else’s rights. Now with a claim conception it can be said that a woman can’t be educated due to the obligation of the certain party or government. This might be seen as a necessity for well-being. It can be seen the other way around though. You could say that a claim of conception of right portrays Wollstonecraft and liberty conception of right does not. Justifying by saying women need education for their fulfillment or to reach their goals, it just depends on the party or government. So yes, both can be seen to correlate with Wollstonecraft’s view on women’s education if you explain it properly. In most cases it could be seen as a need to be educated, so in which case a claim of right is the correct answer. Although, especially back in the day, it could be seen more as a benefit for the women not to be educated and to stay home while the men went and worked. In this case, they obviously think that women do not or should not be educated, so they don’t have as many rights. Also, in the case of voting, working, or having power over