Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Comparison essay of Shakespeare's Tragedy of King Lear to Kurosawa's Ran

Good Essays
960 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison essay of Shakespeare's Tragedy of King Lear to Kurosawa's Ran
The film RAN and the play The Tragedy of King Lear can be related to each other in many ways. Kurosawa was able to produce a film that was a valid, effective and relevant portrayal of Shakespeare's play. The first way is in how they relate to each other on a plot based theme. The second way is how they can both be analyzed to themes such as; family, betrayal, loyalty, and selfishness. The third way that they relate to each other is how RAN uses Japanese drama to portray a Shakespearean tragedy. Kurosawa, the director of RAN made a very effective and valid film on interpreting the key points of The Tragedy of King Lear. The two works give lessons to the audience, and these lessons are learned once finishing studies on RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear.

The characters for the play and the film are very similar, first you have King Lear who is represented by The Great Lord Hidetora in the film, Goneril, Regan, and Cordelia are represented by Taro, Jiro, and Saburo respectively. Kent, the King's loyal advisor is represented by Tango, and Cornwall and Albany are represented by Lady Kaede, and Lady Sue respectively.

The first comparison of RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear is how plot is similar. The plot is very similar in both works as RAN is based on The Tragedy of King Lear so of course there will be similarities. The plot is how a family can be torn apart by the powers of; greed, stubbornness, and betrayal. In both works the family of King Lear, Regan, Goneril and Cordelia are torn apart, eventually all members of the family die. The message these works are trying to get across is how important family is; whether it be in the 17th century Britain, or 20th century Japan. Even though the two works are separated by three centuries, they are still being used as an example to students everywhere.

The themes of betrayal, selfishness, and loyalty are all present in both RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear. In RAN the character Tango stays loyal to Hidetoro throughout the entire film. This shows true devotion to Hidetoro on Tango's part. In The Tragedy of King Lear, Kent stays loyal to King Lear. Kent and Tango both stay loyal to their King or Master. Kent and Tango can be seen as symbols of family for Lear and Hidetora because they stay with their leader, and even when they know he is wrong, they still back him up. These are qualities that a family shows each other, however in both RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear the protagonist's family deserts them, and the protagonist deserts his family. The theme of betrayal is used in both works and betrayal is a big theme for this particular story because without betrayal the lesson can not be learned for the audience. Characters that betray in King Lear include; Regan, Goneril, and Edmund. The common trait these betrayers share is the fact that they betrayed their family. The theme selfishness and stubbornness can be seen in the film RAN and the characters of Hidetoro, Taro, and Jiro. Hidetoro is seen in the stubborn characteristic because he will not go to Saburo for help after he banished him. Hidetoro will not ask for his forgiveness because he is afraid that he will be thrown away from Saburo just like he had been by Taro, and Jiro. Hidetoro believes this even though Saburo is the only one who will accept him and love him like a father. Taro and Jiro can represent selfishness in RAN because after they had lied to Hidetoro for a great position of power, they cast Hidetoro away like he was not their father. Taro and Jiro felt threatened from Hidetoro's presence because they felt he would try and take back the reigns as the highest being.

The director of RAN is Mr. Kurosawa; he tried to portray Shakespeare's The Tragedy of King Lear in a form of Japanese Drama. The genres of the two works are Tragedy and Drama. The two genres can be related, and Kurosawa did it very effectively. Kurosawa made some changes to his production however. He changed the gender of King Lear's daughters. This was effective in its own way because it gives Kurosawa a chance to give a bigger power role to these characters. A relationship between RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear that was very accurate was the scene in which Hidetora and King Lear go crazy. It was impressive how Kurosawa gave the Fool a good role to show how smart and dedicated he was to keeping his master safe.

Kurosawa's interpretation of King Lear was valid and relevant to Shakespeare's King Lear through how he portrayed the plot relation, the themes of; family, betrayal, loyalty, and selfishness, and how he made his version into a Japanese drama. RAN must be shown when people are studying The Tragedy of King Lear because it not only helps understand what is happening on a visual aspect, but it gives you a background on how the two can be related. The lessons to be learned from both RAN and The Tragedy of King Lear are; staying true to yourself, your family, and to see that not everyone will be telling you the truth. These lessons that the Shakespeare and Kurosawa are trying to portray in their work can be detrimental towards how you live your life. It is putting your trust in the right people, knowing that no one is more important than your family, and finally that you must know what the right thing to do is for not just yourself but everyone effected by it.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The setting is by a wide margin the largest difference between the two. The setting is responsible for changing most of the rest of the book also. For example, King Lear is in medieval Europe. As a result of this the characters are members of the ruling class. The only people with land of their own back then. Because of their high rank in society the struggle not only affects them, it affects their entire estate. In Lear, because of the setting, the family is fighting over power, wealth, and loyalty. Their estate is a country so many other people are affected by the rift in the Lear family.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In many of the plays by William Shakespeare, the central character goes through internal and external changes that ultimately shake their foundations to the core. Numerous theories have been put forth to explain the sequence of tragedies Shakespeare wrote during this period by linking it to some experience of melancholy, anger, despair, and the antagonist 's ultimate fall from grace in their lust for power. But such theories overlook the fact that it is in this very same period and in the same tragic works that portray the heights to which human nature can rise and fall in its purest and noblest, if not happiest terms. Surely the creation of so much light alongside the darkness and the perfection of the artistic medium through which Shakespeare gives them expression argues against the idea that the greedy side of human nature is his chief concern. His efforts to portray human life in its rarest form and not only the dark depths, but also the treasure rooms of our being. He tries to pierce beneath the superficial motives and forces of surface behavior, social, and cultural expressions and to the deeper levels of individual character and human nature. Shakespeare then places these aspects of human existence in their true relation to the wider field of universal life. In relation to the tragic hero, there are many similarities between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare 's plays the central characters ' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare 's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero 's fall from grace.…

    • 1448 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the tragedy King Lear, William Shakespeare tells a story of sibling rivalry, the necessity of human action rather than fate to administer justice, and loyalty and lack thereof among several other themes. All of these specific themes are eventually tied in with violence during the play. This use of violence allows Shakespeare to not only comment on his modern society (Elizabethan England) but to also reveal a darker side to mankind. Shakespeare’s use of violence in King Lear emphasizes major themes such as loyalty, sibling rivalry, and justice which in turn reveals how cruel mankind can be. The fact that characters from all levels of society take violent actions reveals how Shakespeare is really making a commentary on all of mankind rather…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kurosawa’s Ran is a ‘glocal’ film which retells the Western King Lear story in an Eastern way; it localized the story by adding personal history to the characters and applying Japanese Noh elements to the way of acting. Ran has a similar plot design to King Lear but is not a straight adaptation of it. The parallel plot based on coincidence and theme in Shakespeare becomes a revenge plot related as cause and effect in Kurosawa. Kurosawa transfers the historical setting of the film from pre-Roman Britain to Medieval Japan. He enriches the Shakespeare play by adding a reason to King Lear’s suffering and Taro, Jiro and Lady Kaede’s evil; he also splits and combines some Shakespearean characters to create new ones; the Shakespearean language was also replaced by rewritten dialogues. In addition, the Noh influenced way of acting, which is featured by silence, emptiness and stillness has been crucial to the carving of characters. This essay will take Lady Kaede, the evil character as example, to analyze the change of plot and the influence of Noh in creating characters and acting styles.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear was written around 1603-06. A contextualised political reading interprets King Lear as a drama that gives expression to crucial political and social issues of its time: the hierarchy of the Jacobean state, King James' belief in his divine right to rule, and the political anxieties that characterised the end of Queen Elizabeth's reign: fears of civil war and division of the kingdom triggered by growth of conflicting fractions and a threatening underclass.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Loyalty is a strong feeling of support and allegiance in which it is reflected upon two proclaimed movies with different setting and subplots, but possesses a similar understanding to what the writer was trying to convey. By watching Olivier’s “King Lear”, and Kurosawa’s "Ran”, the audience finds there are many themes that are portrayed throughout each movie, but the one that provides the largest impact within the plot has to be loyalty. King Lear displays the meaning of loyalty in a western approach with high class Elizabethan characters as its main cast. The second movie, Ran, is based on an eastern society with conflicting warlords who rule during a particular era. With their differences, also come their similarities. Many characters within their respective movies all share one common analogy, that one should be loyal and faithful to their master.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters in both are incredibly alike. Mufasa and King Hamlet equally ruled their kingdoms in peace and prosperity. After their deaths however, they became much more then the kings they once where. They became a martyr of sorts. The sons were compelled to avenge their deaths and take responsibility for what their uncles have done. The villains in both The Lion King and Hamlet can be similarly compared to one another as well. Both Scar and Claudius are brothers of the king, murder their sibling to seize the throne, and take their brother's wife as their queen.…

    • 587 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    William Shakespeare wrote one of his tragedies, ‘King Lear,’ a play which focuses on the…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Deception in King Lear

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    has no love for him and it does not exist. The same goes for her sister, Regan,…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading the Taming of the Shrew and watching Ten Things I Hate About You. I have realized that their are many similarities and differences between the play and the movie. I will be going into detail about these similarities and differences later in my paper. I will also be explaining a more in depth description of the major characters. Also if you have not read the Taming of the Shrew or watched Ten Thing I Hate About You, I would highly recommend it.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lear and Gloucester are similar because they both had a high status. Gloucester is a duke and Lear is a king. They both had a long beard, the beard could symbolize the significance of intelligent or the age is getting older. They both had a bad son or daughter caused them has nothing. Gloucester lost power and his mind because Edmund frames Edgar, this effected he can believe in nobody .Lear lost his power, Cordelia and Kent. Lear believes in Cordelia 's siblings lies even he didn't need that hundred soldiers, so there are no one besides him…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Slideshow

    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Lear By: Bryce Romeo King Lear: Loyalty and Betrayal In William Shakespeare’s play, “King Lear”, the reader will see many juxtapositions throughout the scenes.…

    • 417 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear is one of Shakespeare’s most refined works. In accordance to the majority of Shakespeare's tragedies, the characters in King Lear are well developed and portray evident personalities. Their characteristics and actions are so extreme that they closely mirror those of animals. In particular, Shakespeare uses animal imagery in King Lear to illustrate the vulnerability, cruelty, and perceptivity of critical characters.…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare's Context

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages

    William Shakespeare is one of the most successful and well-known playwrights in the world. His plays even though from a way back in the past have still survived today and are still held in very high esteem. The context of William Shakespeare’s King Lear proposes many differences from our world today.…

    • 1082 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Play vs. Movie

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages

    King Lear by William Shakespeare tells the tragedy of Lear, King of England, who slowly, throughout the course of the play becomes mad and eventually dies. There have been many film adaptations of the play all of which try and remain as close to the original play; however, none appear to keep the same meaning of Shakespeare’s text more than director Richard Eyre’s film version of King Lear (1997). Shakespeare focuses in on each character’s flaws and their contributions to the consequences at the end of the play and although Eyre does the same in his film, he adds minor actions and scenes to the play to give characters of the play a light that emphasizes their nature.…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays