Preview

Comparison Of Hughes's Argument Against The Treaty Of Versailles

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
563 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of Hughes's Argument Against The Treaty Of Versailles
On the 28th on June 1914, the world descended into chaos, forced into all-out war through hasty alliances and aggressive manoeuvres. 5 years and 37 million casualties later, a truce was made. The 28th of January in 1919 saw the Palace of Versailles play host to a meeting of the world’s superpowers. Woodrow Wilson of the United States, Lloyd George of the United Kingdom, and Georges Clemenceau of France were all present to re-draw the map of the world, introducing a highly controversial treaty that protected their interests, but pointed all blame to the ‘Triple Alliance,’ consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy.
The Treaty of Versailles is the peace treaty that directly affects and ended the war between Germany and the Allied Powers.
…show more content…
The Honourable Prime Minister William Hughes has represented Australia on the world stage as a strong and independent nation. Firstly, Mr Hughes argued that Australia, and indeed other British nations be privately represented in President Wilson’s proposed League of Nations. Although a strong supporter of British rule, Mr Hughes noted that Australia’s considerable war effort justified the need for our nation to be independent in this regard. The Prime Minister also argued for compensation of Australia’s war costs, stating that Germany should pay for our war expenditures. Finally Mr Hughes lobbied against the inclusion of a clause to be included in the treaty guaranteeing the “Equality of nations and equal treatment of their nationals.” (Bridge C, 2014) William Hughes felt that the White Australia Policy of 1901 was threatened by the equality of different races. His successful lobbying prevented nations such as Japan from privately joining the League of Nations. Mr Hughes’ final request was for ownership of former German New Guinea. The Prime Minister believed the portion of land to be Australia’s ‘strategic front door,’ protecting us from attack and so securing our great nation’s safety. Unfortunately Mr Hughes was strongly opposed during today’s negotiations by the American President, however, when asked by Mr Wilson “Am I to understand that Australia is prepared to defy the opinion of the whole civilised world, Mr Hughes?” William simply replied “That's about the size of it, Mr President; I represent sixty thousand dead” (Australian Government,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Primary Sources: Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, House of Representatives. Current Notes, Vo1.28, November 1957 Secondary Sources: Andrews, E.M., A History of Australia 's Foreign Policy: from dependence to i n dependence , Longman Cheshire , Melbourne, 1979. Cain, F.,`Australia 's road to Vietnam - Non-Labour and Anti-Communism 1920-1966 ', original manuscript supplied by the author Clarke, G., 'Vietnam, China and the Foreign Affairs Debate in Australia, a personal account ', in King, P., (Ed.), Australia 's Vietnam, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, 1983. Cooksey, R., 'Assumptions of Australia 's Vietnam Policy ', World Review, October 1966. Renouf, A., The Frightened Country, Macmillan, Melbourne, 1979. Pemberton, G., All the Way, Australia 's Road to Vietnam, Allen &; Unwin, Sydney, 1987. Sexton, M., War for the Asking, Australia 's Vietnam Secrets, Penguin Books, Ringwood, 1981. Watt, A., Vietnam, An Australian Analysis, F. W. Cheshire, Melbourne, 1983. Wiesbrod, H., 'Sir Garfield Barwick and Dutch New Guinea, Australian Quarterly, June 1967.…

    • 7337 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Myra Willard’s 1920’s context influences her view that the ‘White Australia Policy’ was valid to ensure that the Australian population formed a stable society and a strong sense of nationalism. Willard states that the reasoning for the ‘White Australia Policy’ originated from the 1850’s gold rush era. It was believed the policy needed to be established as countries, including America, struggled with the influence of non-white races. The 19th Century thought that continued into Willard’s context was that “British-Australian nationality” (as cited in Gare and Ritter, 2008, p.261) needed to be maintained for the sake of Australia’s future. When first established, the policy’s main objective was to preserve the British presence in the colonies.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Curtin spoke in parliament house stating“Without any inhibitions of any kind, I make it quite clear that Australia looks to America, free of any pangs as to our traditional links or kinship with the United Kingdom. We know the problems that the United Kingdom faces...but we know too, that Australia can go and Britain can still hold on.” (Trevanion, E. 2011) The choice to turn to neighboring countries was an excellent decision made by John Curtin. Curtin sent word out to America that Australia needed to be defended because of the startlingly low number of military protecting his home turf. He also made a decision to bring back his troops from the Middle East. His decision to bring back the Australian soldiers to their homeland made UK and Australia go into a conflicting argument. “As the victorious Japanese forces moved southwards, Curtins disputes with Churchill intensified; there were heated exchanges when Churchill sought to divert the Australian divisions returning from the Middle East to Burma.” (Australian War Memorial, 2013). Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister of Britain, insisted that the Australian military should be sent to Burma…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    -connection with Britain extended to foreign policy of Australia, legally bound to Britain foreign policy…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia was in a position where it needed to think about its countries welfare, and its responsibility to America. After World War I Australia knew it could not defend itself against any enemy on its home ground, so Menzies sought to strengthen Australia’s relationships with United States and Britain relying on “great and powerful friends”. The ANZUS treaty (1951) and the SEATO treaty (1954) were a way to create a closer link to America, although it does not say that US must help Australia’s it gives them a closer relationship. The SEATO treaty linked the United states, Britain, France, Australia, New Zealand, Thailand, Pakistan and the Philippines this gave Australia strong alliances with nations equally apposed to the communist ‘disease’ in South East Asia.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles took important land away from Germany, Reduced Germany’s military significantly, made Germany pay all the war reparations alone, and the treaty put all the blame of the war on Germany. Germany was being punished harshly and severely, and as Hitler came into power he turned the German people against the Treaty of Versailles and they eventually fought back. The Treaty of Versailles helped cause World War II by punishing Germany to the severity that they…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Treaty Of Versailles

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 1919, President Wilson joined delegates of Italy, France, England, and Japan in the Palace of Versailles to negotiate peace. When the conference was adjourned, the Treaty of Versailles had been created. However, the treaty was killed by Congress. It was not the strength of the opposing forces' argument, but rather the incompetence, rigidity, and obstinacy of President Wilson that lead to the Senate defeat of the Treaty of Versailles.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The end of World War I was finalized by the signing of the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919. It was signed by Great Britain, France, Italy, and Japan but not the United States, as the U.S. drafted its own treaty with Germany in 1921. Many historians argue that the Treaty of Versailles was the major cause of World War II which occurred twenty years later. On the Treaty's most superficial level, the extreme punishment and fines that were levied by the Allied Powers on the Germans were causes enough for war. Historians argue that this and the international fallout that resulted most notably with the United States were simply too powerful to avoid war at all. The ramification of the Treaty sent the German economy into a severe depression…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was hoped that there would be both economic and diplomatic advantages if Australia could be involved during future peace treaty negotiations. After World War II, Britain reasserted some of its lost dominance in the south-west Pacific. However, British power was clearly declining as the American alliance that was forged in the dark days of 1942 has remained of central importance to Australia to this present…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This administration was the first in decades to drop anti-communist rhetoric and formerly recognise China, North Korea and Eastern Germany. Despite overwhelming international and domestic criticism, Whitlam pressed forward in his foreign policy goals and paved the way forward for many western societies. Robert Manne in his book The Australian century political struggle in the building of a nation, points out that “such recognition was part of a broad foreign-policy realignment with the cold war super-powers… Australia, almost alone among western nations, recognised the post-war Soviet annexation of the three Baltic States according to law rather than fact.” Whitlam also took a strong non-colonialism stance and abhorred the continued western occupation of post-World War 2 countries. It is safe to say that Australia’s foreign policy is forever changed by the Whitlam…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia Cold War

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The conclusion of WWII didn’t mark the termination of wars and conflicts in a global perspective; as a result, Australia’s involvement in wars had perpetuated through various foreign conflicts and confrontation. From 1945 to mid 1970s, Australia’s perception of aid and support towards copious world powers, namely US and UK had resulted in our involvement in pivotal Asian conflicts from the northern sector to the Pacific war. However, was the driving force behind Australia’s military participation within the Asian region an initiative to please her constituent? Or was there an agenda for Australia’s government to please the major powers? In order to analyse this proposition, it is substantial to examine the role of Australia in major Asian conflicts…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Treaty Of Versailles Dbq

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “This is the Greatest Moment in history”.The Treaty of Versailles was the peace settlement signed after World War One had ended in 1918 and in the shadow of the Russian Revolution and other events in Russia. The treaty was signed at the vast Versailles Palace near Paris – hence its title – between Germany and the Allies. The three most important politicians there were David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau and Woodrow Wilson.The Versailles Palace was considered the most appropriate venue simply because of its size – many hundreds of people were involved in the process and the final signing ceremony in the Hall of Mirrors could accommodate hundreds of dignitaries. Many wanted Germany, now led by Friedrich Ebert, smashed; others, like Lloyd George,…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1914, it was the first moment of when Australia’s joined World War one, The Australian government decided that it was a mature move to support its “Mother Country’ Britain. Australians were proud of being part of the British Empire; it was the biggest empire the world had ever seen rivalling over many great ancient empires such as the Romans. Australian’s felt proud to be a part of the empire because Britain had always supported and protected them all as individuals and they felt it was time for them to show their bit in joining in to fight along with Britain in war.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fall of Singapore

    • 1207 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While Britain’s Empire crumbled, so did the loyalty Australia had so willingly placed in Britain since the late 1700’s. This loyalty began to disappear when Australia allied themselves with the US, and when Australian Prime Minister, John Curtin altered the country’s foreign policies; however, the ‘nail in the coffin’ was Britain’s lack of support in Australia’s time of crisis. With Britain’s apparent ‘fortress of the east’ having fallen, Australia was left extremely vulnerable to direct attack, and four days after the Japanese took Singapore, Darwin was bombed with 240 civilian casualties, and as a result the Pacific became Australia’s largest priority (Skwirk.com, 2014). Almost immediately, Australia looked towards Britain for assistance, however British…

    • 1207 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty that officially ended World War I between the Allied and Germany. The Allies created a League of Nations and armed with concept of a 14 point treaty that would stop war forever. The treaty was forced on Germany, in doing so they had to accept sole responsibility for starting the war. And that they had to pay for all the damages, decrease their military and surrender territory. With Germany unable to pay for the war and the hardship that it was putting on the people. The people wanted a change. Hitler and his Nazi party were quickly voted in. With his promise to recreate Germany and get its territory back. Hitler was able to created jobs by rearming the military and producing war equipment. By 1939 Hitler was ready to take back what was Germanys.…

    • 2537 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays