Preview

Comparison Of Sutherland And Cressey's Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparison Of Sutherland And Cressey's Theory
In Sutherland and Cressey’s (1947) theory suggests that criminal behavior is learned behavior that occurs through intimate communications, as well as Learning criminal behavior involves learning the techniques, motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes.. Therefore, a child’s displays of violent or aggressive behavior might be due to the observation of parents that use acts of violence and aggression in order to solve everyday obstacles. Regular observations of adults demonstrating acts of violence and illegal behavior could potentially result in an individual becoming involved in delinquent behavior, because their understanding of the legal code as rules are structured around finding criminal and deviant behavior to be normative and …show more content…
The duration and frequency of one’s exposure to criminal behavior or non-criminal behavior plays an important role in determining how involved one will become with such behaviors. “Priority” refers to the idea that lawful behavior developed during childhood may persist throughout life, and delinquent behavior developed in early childhood may also persist throughout life (Sutherland & Cressey, 1960, pg. 138). The concept of “Intensity” has more to due with emotional reactions and responses to criminal and non- criminal involvement. The process of acquiring crime specific skills and knowledge occurs through one’s association and interaction with individuals who have experience in committing particular types of crimes, ultimately facilitating the learning of new techniques of committing crime, as well as increasing potential criminal …show more content…
“One day my stepmother told William to take me to the railroad yard to break into boxcars” (Shaw, 1930, pg. 52-53). Stanley develops a relationship with his step brother who is a few years older then him and together they begin to partake in robberies and as a result they were rewarded for their criminal behavior. Stanley is taken under the guidance of his stepbrother and subsequently he is being taught first hand how to commit robberies and how to effectively make money through illegal methods. The positive reinforcement that Stanley received from his stepmother and stepbrother for partaking in criminal behavior, from an early age influenced his understanding of criminal and deviant behavior, by normalizing crime and portraying it to be favorable. As a child Stanley became exposed to a crime based environment in which he was continuously exposed to and encouraged to engage in deviant behavior, ultimately normalizing in his mind future criminal based

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Harris-Moore Crime Spree

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages

    However, what began as criminal activity to meet basic human needs (food, etc.) quickly grew to include the theft of luxury items which would suggest that the criminal behaviour was motivated by something beyond survival, possibly the challenge and excitement that evading capture brought. In addition, for a young man who likely received very little positive attention as a boy, this behaviour could very well have been driven (and reinforced) by the negative attention provided by the system. In this way, the system could be faulted for failing Harris-Moore by responding to his behaviour with punishment rather than identification and treatment of the root causes.…

    • 573 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a mixture of beliefs, environment, education, parental ties, and peer associations that benefit in deciding if any is to develop a criminal or not. Irrespective of who or what the concept goals, in the present’s society, each concept embrace some standards in measuring crime, and some concepts embrace great standard in the clarification of crime and the tendency to becoming criminal. A possible addition of two or more concepts could assist in explaining some methods of crime or absence of. The concepts emphasis on the person’s childhood and in order to determine what the individuals actually learn from their future behaviors and why it happened. While one concept might emphasis on the criminal and why they commit crime, another concept may emphasis on the setting as a motive for an individual’s need to commit crimes.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In criminology, biological and psychological explanations of behavior have been out of style for some time. In fact, the authors of the leading criminology text from the 1920’s to the 1970’s, Edwin H. Sutherland and Donald R. Cressey, “clearly rejected the importance of biological factors” in explaining criminal behavior. Scholars such as Glenn D. Walters and Thomas W. White developed the thesis that both criminal and noncriminal behavior are related to cognitive development and that people choose the behavior in which they wish to engage. They have concluded: “the root causes of crime…are thought and choice (Walters and White 8). I agree wholeheartedly with Walters and White that people choose the behavior they wish to engage in and if its criminal behavior then they will have to accept the consequences.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s society juvenile delinquency is the root of major issues that lead to adult delinquency which leads to prison overcrowding and 8.6 percent of the California’s general fund being consumed by the prison system in 2006-2007 fiscal year (Lawrence, 232). Learning theories contend that criminal behavior is learned from others and this learning process necessarily involves the internalization of values, norms, and behaviors that vary across areas and groups. Therefore, neither free will nor biological or psychological characteristics are associated with delinquent behavior, but rather the social environment effect on the maturation process (i.e. your product of your environment). Edwin Sutherland’s differential association theory suggests criminal behavior is learnable and learned in interaction with other deviant persons, causing the behavior to be learned at a young age. Sutherland’s (1947) theory lays down the foundation for explaining deviant behavior in correlation to juveniles. In this paper, I hope to use social learning theories to further understand the relationship of juvenile deviance and the environment they try to prosper in, i.e. the influence it has played in their young lives. I believe that an individual is influenced through their personal trials and…

    • 4017 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminality and Factors Marie Hall Introduction to Criminality Ms. Marlene Ramsey March 2, 2014 Criminality and Factors Criminality is a complex issue that can be viewed from many different vantage points. While I can find bits of truth in the life course theory, I tend to relate more to the latent trait theory. The latent trait theory proposes that there are certain traits or attributes that are present at birth (or established very early in life) that remain stable throughout life. Some of these traits can be viewed as negative or defective, and increase the likelihood that one engages in criminal activity. While parenting and opportunity can play a part in committing crimes, according to the latent trait theory, the propensity for an individual…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social learning theory posits that criminal behaviour is not biological, rather it is behaviour that is learned as an individual navigates through their environment (Cullen & Wilcox, 2010). The theoretical assumption of Bandura’s social learning theory is that an individual’s behaviour is the result of a three-way interaction between internal factors, the external environment and the behavioural response to stimuli (Cullen & Wilcox, 2010). Social learning theory also suggests that behaviour is learned from three modelling sources: direct sources, such as family, friends and peers; community sources, the location of an individual’s residence and status of the neighbourhood; and media sources, such as television, internet and general media (Bandura,…

    • 2300 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Over the last several decades psychologist, sociologist and criminologist have tested the different theories of what causes criminal behavior. Prior to defining criminal behavior, it is important to first define crime in itself. Is crime merely the act of breaking the law or does the depths of crime go beyond what theories have been established? In accordance to S.Gottfredson, & Bersani, B. (2009), “Crime is the breach of rules or laws for which some governing authority such as the legal system can ultimately prescribe a conviction”. (Criminal Justice System, para. 1-4). Although most people would agree that crime is an act in which a person makes a conscious choice to break the law; not all violations of the law are considered a crime. If we were to break down the word crime, we find that it originates from a Latin root meaning ‘charge’ (in law) and a Greek root meaning ‘judgment’ (Harper, 2007). When we think about the word judgment we consider courts, justice system, and even corrections. This is how the connection between crime and law go hand in hand.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    They also explore the myths about the connection between genetic factors and criminal behavior. The first myth they looked at was "Identifying the Role of Genetics in Criminal Behavior Implies That There Is a "Crime Gene."" This myth is dismissed because of the unlikelihood that that a single gene is responsible for criminal behavior. The second myth they look at is "Attributing Crime to Genetic Factors is Deterministic." This myth is also easily dismissed because of the fact that just because someone has a predisposition to a certain behavior doesn't mean that the person will take on that behavior.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which leads along the developmental pathway tracks individual follow that lead to antisocial behavior (Bartol, Bartol, 2016). Also, Social Learning Theorists place a great emphasis on the cognitive processes that are the processes of thinking and remembering (Bartol, Bartol, 2016). Thus, internal factors and external factors would possibly play significant roles in behavior (Bartol, Bartol, 2016). Therefore, to understand criminality, we must understand and explore people’s perceptions, thoughts, expectations, competencies, and values (Bartol, Bartol, 2016). Richard Kuklinski would have had his own personal way with these internal and external factors at play in his development and growth as a human…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the mid 1920’s, overtaking the belief to the causation of crime was linked between learned experiences that lead to criminal tendencies was developed. According to social learning theorist Albert Bandura, individuals are not born with violent traits, but the different traits are later developed through their various life experiences (Wofsey, 2015). Although there are various criminal behavior theories, which mainly revolve their concentrate around the individual themselves, the Social Learning Theory magnifies their attention on the concept of the environment surrounding an individual. Many of the other theories may have a better explanation to why criminals and ordinary individuals act in specific ways, but the Social learning Theory takes a look back in an individuals…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By adding a social element to the understanding of criminal activity, Sutherland and Akers were able to explain how a person’s interaction with his or her environment and surrounding others could easily influence deviant behavior. The best method to address the question of whether or not an offender is intentionally persistence on becoming a career criminal, is to examine the patterns of behavior presented by Sutherland and…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Specifically, social learning theory states that learning can take place through responses, either social or nonsocial, to an individual’s behavior. Specifically, Akers believes that definitions favorable to crime are learned through a process of differential reinforcement, where criminal behavior is more likely to occur if the person believes it will be rewarded and not punished. According to social learning theory, crime is: (1) Learned according to the principles of operant conditioning; (2) Learned in nonsocial situations and through social interaction where situations and behaviors are reinforced or discriminative for criminal behavior. In addition, (3) Learning occurs in groups which comprise the individuals major source of reinforcement; (4) Learning is a function of effective and available reinforces and existing reinforcement contingencies; and (5) Strength is a direct function of the amount, frequency, and probability of its reinforcement (Akers 1973;…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Anomie Theory

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cartwright, B (2011). Crime and the American Dream. Social Explanations of Crime and Deviance (pp.51-53). Boston: Pearson Learning Solutions.…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Social Learning Theory

    • 2541 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Social learning theory is one of the most frequently looked at theories in the field of criminology. The theory clarifies that criminal and deviant behavior stems from imitation and reinforcement of one’s environment. Its applications attempt to describe why certain people tend to participate in criminal activities and why others abstain from it. Social learning theory specifies the importance of human interactions as well as the effect they have on manipulating the way individuals learn and participate in crime itself. This theory was introduced into the criminological field by Ronald L. Akers, which originated from the differential…

    • 2541 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Theories Of Crime

    • 4363 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Psychoanalytic theories of crime stress the role the inner processes and conflicts play on the determinants of behaviour (Blackburn, 1993; Hollin, 1989). Blackburn (1993), summed up the psychoanalytic theory of crime as subscribing to three claims: (1) socialization depends on the internalization of society’s rules during early childhood; (2) impaired parent-infant relationships are causally related to later criminal behaviour; (3) unconscious conflicts arising from disturbed family relationships at different stages of development are the causes of some criminal…

    • 4363 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays