CJUS261
Professor Cameron
Phase 3 Individual Project
March 11, 2014
. Investing officer misconduct is often more tough than investigating a prisoner. Usually the prison department is closely knit area, with majority of people always silent about breaking the silence. Sometimes the complaint is untrue or overblown. It is therefore required that the officer start the investigation of the complaint from the start (Frye, 2012). The investigation of a complaint of misconduct of an officer starts with the complaint being reported which becomes a starting point for inquiry. The department that would deal with these complaints will be the professional oversight department. The department must operate away from the normal chain of command to avoid any information leaks. The witnesses are called, interviewed and their evidence analyzed. If the officer is found guilty he is punished. In the process of determining misconduct the department of professional oversight acts with due professionalism and they allow the accused officer to file any complaints or submissions. Harassment of the officer is never warranted and at the end of the process a resolution passed is communicated to the officer. After the determination the officer is given time to launch an appeal which must be professionally looked into by another independently constituted body (Frye, 2012).
Content Survey; the officer before being taken through the training on ethics, it is important for the trainer to make a content survey in order to internalize the requirements of the training. If the officers are taken through a learning process that has not been analyzed a forehand, then the moral values they are expected to learning will not be captured as effectively as possible.
To explore in high depths the type of training and the characters that is to be trained. If the characters to be trained are about perception, then the trained