Preview

Conditio Sine Qua Non Theory

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1449 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conditio Sine Qua Non Theory
a) In order to determine whether or not there is a factual causal connection between the injuries inflicted upon X during the fight and the eventual loss of X’s business, we need to look at the method of the conditio sine qua non theory and determine if there was actually a factual causal nexus. According to Van der Merwe and Olivier, conditio sine qua non theory is when an act is the cause of a result if the act cannot be thought away without the result also disappearing. This means that for an act to be the cause of a result, the result must not exist when the cause is mentally removed. This factual test for causation was accepted in the case of International Shipping Co (Pty) Ltd v Bentley. In the case of X, if the fight between X and Y …show more content…
Some believe that this theory is based on clumsy thinking and often people land up right where they started when trying to determine the connection. This theory also fails in cases where there is more than one act that caused the result. Some also believe that this theory is not a legitimate test of causation because it merely expresses a predetermined causal nexus.

Despite these criticisms the conditio sine qua non test has a flexible approach as seen in the case of Lee v Minister of Correctional Services. In Minister of Finance v Gore, the court states that the conditio sine qua non theory is ‘a matter of common sense’. The flexible approach to this theory is supported because it accepts the practical way of thinking and is based on the real life experiences of people. The application of the conditio sine qua non, even in its flexible form can still lead to the denial of liability in certain cases since justice would denied if the defendant did not cause the
…show more content…
At this point we now need to determine what factual causation is. Factual causation is a link/connection between at least two facts, where one fact arises from the other. One fact is the cause of another, one fact only exists because of the other. Because life is quite dynamic, it is quite difficult to find a general test for causality. A test for factual causation would then be based on what facts could be proved. This means that the factual causation would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Factual causation is pure question of fact, it either exists or it doesn’t. Courts will usually test whether or not there was causation by examining the available evidence.

When determining whether or not there is factual causation, the courts will usually look at whether a defendant’s conduct has in any way contributed to the damage sustained by the plaintiff.
It is a fact that the fight between X and Y resulted in X being hospitalised and subsequently getting an infection, being administered penicillin and having an allergic reaction to it, resulting in brain injury and which ultimately led X to lose his

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Legal Memo PA110

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A similar case would be Timmerman v Modern Industries, INC. 960 F.2d 692; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 6205. This case involved a collision between a truck (Defendant, Modern Industries) and a person (Timmerman). Timmerman died due to his injuries resulting from the accident. The decedent’s mother brought a wrongful death suit against Modern Industries. Timmerman was found to be 51% at fault thus the claim against Modern Industries was denied. Timmerman’s actions before he collided with Modern Industries are what led to the accident in the first place. An example of one of Timmerman’s contribution to the accident is:…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In all actions brought to recover damage for negligence resulting in death or injury to person or property, the fact that the plaintiff may have been guilty of…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Causation – Causation is the direct link between the act of the defendant and the outcome of the crime. Causation is the finding out of what caused the outcome of the crime.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LSTD301 QUIZ 1

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To meet the intent element required for possession, a defendant should be aware of the possession.…

    • 259 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Upon review of the case, the Supreme Court determined that both partners were jointly and severally liable for the…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A guilty mind is the second general feature that has to be established and is probably the most complex because it involves subjective evaluation of the mind.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cause in fact: Except for the breach of duty by the tortfeasor, would the injured party have suffered damages?…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Factual Cause – the defendant’s conduct was the actual cause of, or a substantial factor in causing, the injury…

    • 5389 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hsa 515 Law and Health

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Washington Case Law Case

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Under Washington case law, plaintiffs are required to prove causation with expert testimony if alleged injury involves obscure medical factors. [cite]. The trickier question is whether the expert needs to demonstrate a direct causal link between the alleged injuries and the negligent act or if the expert merely must demonstrate that the plaintiff’s injuries are of a type that can be caused by the negligent act. Washington courts have come down on both sides of this question.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Factual cause is when the defendant’s conduct actually caused the injury. From what I witnessed, there was no proof of causation that the manicure was the reason for the infection, since nearly three weeks had passed in between the manicure and the hospitalization. There could have been later evidence creating causation, but from my day in court, it appeared that the defendant’s breach of duty did not cause the plaintiff’s harm. Proximate cause is when the type of harm is…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torts Study Guide

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Defendant’s actions were the proximate cause (nearest cause/ number of factors that collectively caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) or actual cause (specific factor that caused the Plaintiff’s injuries) of the harm to Plaintiff…

    • 4740 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrongful Conviction Paper

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The argument contained in the paper while correct does not withstand critical scrutiny. The paper correctly notes that wrongful convictions occur when innocent people are found guilty by criminal courts. However, the paper does not take into account that courts that deal with civil cases can in specific instances order the conviction of individuals. The assertion that wrongful convictions occur on a daily basis is not supported by any evidence. Where it is proven that there are wrongful convictions in the US justice system, it would be erroneous to attribute any adjective as to the prevalence without subjecting the justice system to scrutiny through scientific inquiry. The necessity of utilizing modern investigative mechanisms to…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Causation and Correlation

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Correlation does not imply causation. According to “statistical Language Correlation and Causation” (Correlation is a statistical measure (expressed as a number) that describes the size and direction of a relationship between two or more variables. A correlation between variables, however, does not automatically mean that the change in one variable is the cause of the change in the values of the other variable.) And (Causation indicates that one event is the result of the occurrence of the other event; i.e. there is a causal relationship between the two events. This is also referred to as cause and effect.) Causation and correlation can be difficult to discern from one another because they are so closely related to one another.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Causation is an implicit element of a crimes actus rea ( an action). Difference is causation is only applicable where a result has been achieved.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics