Preview

Conflict in A Man for All Seasons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1677 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflict in A Man for All Seasons
In England, during the Renaissance, Henry XIII wants to divorce his

wife, Catharine of Arigon. To look good in-front of his people, Henry asks Sir

Thomas More, a well respected lawyer and citizen, to support the divorce.

This presents Sir Thomas More with an inner conflict. In Robert Bolt's play,

A Man for All Seasons, Thomas More resists pressures exerted by Henry

XIII through Thomas Cromwell, The Duke of Norfolk, and Alice More.

These pressures involve Thomas More in a battle of will, in which he faces a

moral dilemma. Thomas Cromwell, More's clever enemy, pressures Thomas

More to succumb to King Henry's demands. More's lost friend, The Duke of

Norfolk, "for friendships sake" also wants More to succumb to the king's

demands. Lastly, Thomas's own wife, Alice More, wants him to give in to the

king's demands, so that they may return to their normal lives, and not have to

worry every day for eachothers' safety and well-being. These three people,

though for different reasons, exert pressure on Thomas More to succumb to

King Henry's demands. Though More resists these pressures, and keeps his

moral integrity, he is executed.

Throughout the play, Cromwell pressures Thomas More to go against

his morals, and succumb to King Henry's demands. When More is called to

Cromwell's office, to hear the "charges" that have been brought against him,

More is told that siding with the King would be beneficial to him. "Yet do

you know that even now, if you could bring yourself to agree with the

universities, the bishops, and the Parliament of this realm, there is no honor

which the king would be likely to deny you," (p. 114). Cromwell attempts to

get More to agree with the king by saying, as long as More agrees with

Henry, he will grant More many favors. However, More explains to

Cromwell that he simply can not do this and, by turning down Cromwell, he

sticks to his conscience and morals. Cromwell pressures More with death

when he, Cranmer, and Norfolk are in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    misunderstanding from people of ill will” is the first part of King’s statement. I do not agree with…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    to resolve the issues peacefully. The king refused and even hired Hessian mercenaries ( paid…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the letter, King made many arguments that were refutations to accusations made by the clergymen in their letter to him. King recognized the arguments made by the clergymen and for each argument he provided a strong counterargument. One of King’s counterarguments…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare’s ‘Henry IV Part I’, presents the young Prince Henry as an ambivalent and enigmatic character who is politically cunning in his ability to read situations and respond accordingly. He is a man of the world through his association with his friend Falstaff, but by the end of the play he has also supplanted Hotspur as a soldier and a man of honour who can take astute action when it is called for. By contrast, Hotspur is very much the man of action, though Shakespeare suggests that action, when it is untempered by thought and political acumen, is a dangerous and deadly quality.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Act 1 scene 4 of “King Richard III”, Shakespeare explores the concept of free will clashing with Providentialism through the debate between Clarence and the two Murderers. Shakespeare juxtaposes Clarence’s dream with his murder in order to affirm the value of Providentialism and the Great Chain of Being which underpinned Elizabethan hierarchical society. On wakening from his dream, Clarence describes the torment of his soul in Hell at the behest of Warwick and the murdered Prince Edward who, “dabbled in blood” demands that the furies “take him in torment”. Clarence accepts his crimes and the punishment which is to be his as a just outcome of Providentialism, praying only that God “spare my guiltless wife and children”. This is immediately juxtaposed with the entrance of the two Murderers who, in their decision to murder a Prince, represent the rising power of secularism and free will. Shakespeare explores this dichotomy in Clarence’s pleas for his life; firstly he appeals to their secular greed, promising that “my brother Gloucester…shall reward you” for his life and, when this fails, asks if they “will war with God” by murdering him. Shakespeare’s use of emotive language such as “beastly, savage, devilish” draws attention to the crisis of…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, King related himself to figures in the Bible throughout his letter to convince people and put forth his…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher Emerson once said “every coin has two sides; so do conflicts”. In the pages of human history, conflicts are unavoidable and while major conflicts such as war have been evil forces in the world it can also produce very positive results. That is not to say conflict is entirely positive. When conflict arises there are those individuals that show unexpected qualities; those assets that are sudden and unforseen. These assets can be seen in the movie The Sapphires through the character Dave and on a global scale through Mandela. Unfortunately there are also those individuals who in the midst of conflict express unexpected negative traits. This can be seen through the characters Gail and Kay in The Sapphires and most recently through Eddie McGuire. Ultimately, until individuals are challenged we will never truly know how they will react.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another logical aspect of Kings letter is when he expresses his efforts of negotiations with Birmingham merchants. The negotiations were to be that signs showing racism would be taken down and civil rights protest would be stopped. After awhile the promises of racist signs being removed did not follow through, resulting in Kings direct action. This example used by King, shows that the direct action was not originally the idea for trying to work out discrimination in Birmingham, but rather inevitable. To emphasize his argument, King stated, “You may ask: 'Why direct action? Why sit-ins, marches, and so forth? Isn't…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Michael Leff contends that King, through the use of appeals to higher authority figures, “vindicates and explains his actions,” (Leff, 2004). King draws parallels between himself and eighth-century prophets and apostle Paul carrying the word of Jesus Christ (Leff, 2004). Therefore, he is “too compelled to carry the gospel of freedom beyond my particular hometown," (King,…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the tests of time men and women across the world have shown they really are in times of conflict. In times where the true character of a person is really put to the limit, people are able to see who they really are. These conflicts can serve to reveal unexpected qualities in an individual. Times of conflict can suddenly expose a person’s true moral fibre and the courage of their convictions. A number of people may shy away from their personal qualities, and do their best not to big note themselves, however for some, in times of strong divergence between people or even countries, a persons ability to reason with their counterpart and show elements of compromise and understanding can all of a sudden come to the fore. Conflict can inadvertently result in the discovery of a person’s true beliefs, and their ability to express them with no fear of their opposition’s retaliation. The quality to stand up for what you believe in can reveal itself in these times of disagreement, just like when Martin Luther proclaimed that he ‘Had a Dream’, he went against the grain of society and discovered his enormous will and determination to rise up for what he stands for. However these qualities are not always positive ones, and can emerge from the most brutal of circumstances. The willingness to take a fellow humans life is especially evident in times of war and terror, revealing vicious and unruly qualities in some individuals. The late Osama bin Laden has been notorious for displaying these qualities, perplexing the world at the extent of his inhumane behaviour in instances of…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dr. King Speech

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. I would be the last to advocate disobeying just laws”. In this statement I believe that King is making the point that, although it may be a law, that doesn't make it morally correct. It is our job as people to follow just laws, but it is not an obligation to follow the unjust laws. Although there were laws preventing…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    to do what’s right. King was the leader of civil-rights group that supported protest against…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utopia Sudy Guide

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. More and Giles believe Hythloday would make a great advisor to a king. Does Hythloday agree with this? Why or why not?…

    • 889 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mlk Speech Purpose

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also King also wanted to let America know that throughout all that has happened from police brutality to all the discriminations, he still had a dream. A dream that at the time was unheard of and unreal, a dream that simply relied on faith and hope, a dream that could possibly change the America we all live in and enjoy today, and lastly a dream that could possible change the world. This dream he had was simply for everyone to be equal, “I have a dream that one day…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    D. Explanation: What King means by this, is that in previous centuries, Churches had the most power. They were able to make large political, economical, decisions even for the king. However, as time passed on churches lose power and have simply become a place where people bring all their troubles where they expect to be fixed. And the Churches are forced to adapt to the environment they are in.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays