March 19, 2007
Essay #2
Soci 181
Conflict Theory
With the end of World War II three perspectives on sociological theories emerged-structural functionalism, conflict theory, and symbolic interactionism. These three theories reflected "national cultural and political trends" in Northern Americ (Garner, 307). Structural functionalism created an ideology that society consisted of shared values and a system of social cohesion. In contrast of the functionalist theory; conflict theorist repudiated the notion that society was relatively harmonious. In fact, conflict theory by no means viewed society as a system; rather it was depicted as dichotomous groups inhabiting unequal power and unequal life chances. The conflict theory argues that the unequal distribution of wealth, power, status, and opportunity is the center feature of our society. The conflict theory was inspired by the works of the great historian, Karl Marx. Marx was the most influential socialist thinker from the 19th century. He was considered to be a great historian, philosopher, social scientist or revolutionary. Through Marx's works, such as The Power Elite, he proposes the theory of conflict within many aspects of society. One of these aspects are in our economy. The competitve nature in capitalism creates a gap between the haves and the have nots. People engage in conflict everyday to gain more power than others in society. Marx plays close attention to the conflicts between different social classes. As the industrial revolution moved forward in society, so did the widening gap between class structures. Karl Marx.. Marx was he saw conflicting interest of the owner class and the the great theorist and and political activist, has inspiried many social theories, including the conflict theory. Marx argues that our capitilist driven society is in constant coflict due to our competitve manner. Marx stresses the impotance of structures within our society, and the role they play in the influences of individual behavior. The emergence of conflict theories in post war North America is portrayed by the works of C. Wright Mills. Mills was a sociology professor at Columbus University during an intense welter. The 1950's post Cold War was a period of ascetic political attitudes and a vastly enforced abiding enviornment. Despite the conditions, Mills opposed the "political timidity in his writing and teachings" (Garner, 322). Mills analyzed and attacked the tautology of sociologists, especially structural functionalists. He argued that terms such as functional imperatives' were concepts "that were drained of political meaning" (garner, 322). Through the writings of Mills it shows his increasingly interest in public issues, political concerns, and people's everyday lives. In his book The Power Elite he identifies the three fold elite as the ruler of the United States. The three fold consists of the following: executives of laarge corporations, the executive branch of the federal government and the decision makers in the martial industry. These institutions continuously hold the power; which consequently leave the public powerless with no means to voice concerns. Ideally these institutions are established to protect and assist the civilians of the United States. But what the conflict theorist believes is quite the opposite; we have been plagued by government corruption, an increase of demagogue, and false promises to the powerless public. Oppression, capitalism and are key concepts within the conflict theory. Karl Marx, a German philosopher and political activist 00. Economic exploitation leads directly to political oppression, as owners make use of their economic power to gain control of the state and turn it into a servant of bourgeois economic interests. Police power, for instance, is used to enforce property rights and guarantee unfair contracts between capitalist and worker. Oppression also takes more subtle forms: religion serves capitalist interests by pacifying the population; intellectuals, paid directly or indirectly by capitalists, spend their careers justifying and rationalizing the existing social and economic arrangements., The theory is mostly applied to explain conflict between social classes, proletarian versus bourgeoisie; and in ideologies such as capitalism versus socialism. The theory attempts to refute functionalism, which considers that societies and organizations function so that each individual and group plays a specific role, like organs in the body. Competition. Competition over scarce resources (money, leisure, sexual partners, and so on) is at the heart of all social relationships. Competition rather than consensus is characteristic of human relationships. 00. Structural inequality. Inequalities in power and reward are built into all social structures. Individuals and groups that benefit from any particular structure strive to see it maintained. 00. Revolution. Change occurs as a result of conflict between social class' competing interests rather than through adaptation. It is often abrupt and revolutionary rather than evolutionary.
War. Even war is a unifier of the societies involved, as well as war may set an end to whole societies.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Karl Marx developed the conflict theory and concluded that "the key to human history is class struggle. In every society, some small group controls the means of production and exploits those who are not in control (Henslin,2004 pg.15)". According to Karl Marx "authority that people consider…
- 897 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Conflict, rather than being a disruption in the normal state state of affairs, conflict is the normal state of…
- 124 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The conflict theory perceives society as stratified, that is, having significant divisions. It puts forward a more challenging, questioning view on society. People who support this view claim that in every institution there are some people with more power, opportunities and status than others. This view is about inequalities, disagreement, and the use of power to advantage some while…
- 1257 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Marx believed that control in society was held by elite and economically-powerful groups who maintained social order for as long as it suited their own interests. However, this social dominance would eventually lead to a crisis point where the "exploited" (the working class) would challenge the "exploiting" (the elite groups) and the existing social order. It is at this point that conflict between the classes becomes the mechanism for social transformation. According to Marx, this class conflict would eventually lead to both the overthrow of capitalism and the establishment of a communist society.…
- 1269 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The two stories I chose were “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin and “The Carnival Dog, the Buyer of Diamonds” by Ethan Canin. Both conflicts have similar ideas, which can be compared and contrasted as I have below. These elements include theme, setting and characters.…
- 1349 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
“Conflict theory shows how major patterns of inequality in society produce social stability in some circumstances and social change in orders” (Brym, Roberts, Strohschen, lie 2015:18). I would use conflict theory to explain women running for office in this campaign and why men are more than women in terms of election in different parties. Research and theory associated with studying gender issues propelled the sociology of gender from the margins to become a central feature of the discipline ( Why is it that there are more men involved in elections compare to women? Women have to be given the chance to compete in the election, showing sign of equality amongst men and women which is the fundamental principals of human rights and…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the main actors with Conflict theory is the “capitalist class” (for some, known as the elite). The elite class includes individuals and/or groups that are seen as figures/symbols of fortune and power; in addition, these people own the means of production or own the forms of accessing it. The second group involved in this system is the working class (also known as the lower classes), which involves the powerless individuals that have no choice but to sell their labor to the higher class in order to make a living and survive in the real world. I like to see this system as the boss and the ones that work for the boss. The elite are able to maintain power over the working class because the higher class is seen as having more power than the…
- 609 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
• The Conflict Perspective – Competition for scarce resources, i.e. how the elite control the poor and weak. – Macro – this theory focuses on the negative aspects and conflicted areas of society, the ever changing areas. – Society is ever struggling and inevitably changing sometimes it is beneficial and other times it is negative and violent. Inequality is widely spread.…
- 1045 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Conflict theory is based entirely in power and how those in power do all they can to hold the majority of the population down and to keep them from gaining power, so as to secure their own position. Conflict theorists would say that obesity is a product of the living conditions, stress and poor quality of food and health education. Obesity is seen as deviant and problematic and therefore conflicts with the ideal society of being fit and thin. The more obese the less power and stature you have in society.…
- 583 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Karl Marx conflict theory involves struggle as well. The struggle consists of two major groups. These groups involve the higher level of persons such as the rich or elite or…
- 1843 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Functionalist, conflict, and interactionist perspectives are all similar in the fact that they are different ways of analyzing sociology. The functionalist perspective is a positive method of analyzing a society and the individuals that work together in order for the society to fucntion properly. For example, a person has multiple body systems and each system must work together in order for the body to function properly. On the other hand, the conflict perspective focuses on individual's behaviors and the factors that may contribute to their behaviors or actions. Conflict focuses on the different classes in a society and the struggles the society may face. I feel that the functionalist and conflict theories are very different in the aspect that one view focuses on a society functioning properly and the other focuses on the differences and struggles of the society. I feel that the interactionist theory fits in the middle of the functionalist and conflict theory. This is due to the fact that the interactionist perspective focuses on the individuals and the individual's understanding or rationalization of certain categories. I feel that the interactionist theory does not label, it is a way of learning and understanding individuals based on their definition of things. Overall, all three views focus on analyzing socioloigy, but i feel that each theory is very different in the approaches and methods that are…
- 1399 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
The theory suggest that each person or group strives to attaint the maximum benefit, and that this causes society to to alter all the time due to social inequality and social conflict. Those who believe in conflict theory think social order comes from those in power insuring lower groups are loyal to the dominant groups. People who are not compliant to being loyal to the laws and boundaries made by those in power will have forces used against them until they obey. Who benefits from certain social arrangements and how people in control stay in control and receive benefits from others is questioned often by conflict theorist. The conflict perspectives are condemned for “...concentrating too much on conflict and change and too little on what produces stability in society” (Tischler, pg.19, 2014), as well as being too ideologically based and not using much research to back up their theories. In response to this criticism, conflict theorists claim that society simply cannot be strategically analyzed, and that trying to do so causes sociologists to not realized the real causes of human…
- 503 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The conflict theory is one of three major ideologies of sociology that explains social life. It conveys life as a constant struggle between groups for power and scarce resources. This rationale was established by Karl Marx who observed small powerful groups exploiting the people in social classes below them. Marx and other conflict theorists believe that we need inequality to survive, and struggle among social classes is normal. The conflict theory best explains social life than other theories for many reasons. One being it explains the inequalities of money, gender, class, and age in the most accurate way. These types of characteristics obviously create advantages and disadvantages for people. They inadvertently…
- 1912 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
American society today is made up of all three of the theories. In my opinion, these theories all thrive off each other as a whole. I feel that the chain is something like this, Symbolic Interactionism, as well as Functionalism, lead into Conflict Theory. However, I feel that Conflict Theory is the largest component American society is made from, here is why!…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This theory is like structural-functional theory, as far as the level of analysis of being a macro-level (Macionsis, 2013). Furthermore, how the economy is will determine the type of jobs people can access. In addition, social-conflict theory also interpret that work place problems are a result of the disruption from the economy. In fact, “conflict is the most basic feature of social life (Conflict theory, 2001)”. Those that have the power to exploit labor workers, forcing them into lesser paying jobs. Nonetheless, social-conflict theory is different from the other functional theories.…
- 749 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays