Preview

Conflicting Perspectives

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1056 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Conflicting Perspectives
To what extent has textual form shaped your understanding of conflicting perspectives?
In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.
Interpretations are merely influenced by one’s personal beliefs, experiences and the way the situation is presented. William Shakespeare’s play, “Julius Caesar”, and David Deane’s news article, “Cop’s Visa Denied over Autistic Daughter”, present these interpretations by cleverly embedding the thoughts of different parties, and where these thoughts are stemmed from. Shakespeare’s conversion of Plutarch’s histories into a play exposes the responder to a visual interpretation of Julius Caesar’s event, and Deane’s article allows the text to be presented in a more authorative and formal approach to the readers. The expression of emotions and stage directions depicted within the play provides more depth to revealing the true intentions and nature of a character, whereas the news article simply persuades the audience through the structural official form of the text, presenting the information as objective and factual, rather than personal opinions.
Both texts portray a character neglecting their private feelings and loyalties in favour of protecting and supporting the future of the public. The play characterises Brutus as a noble Roman, genuinely loving Julius Caesar, yet ironically murdering him, afraid from handing power to a tyrant. Shakespeare hides this irony through his emotional statement “Any dear friend of Caesar’s, to him I say that Brutus’s love to Caesar was no less than his… not that I loved Caesar less, but I love Rome more”. His nobility is depicted through Shakespeare’s clever use of repeating the word ‘loved’ within the contrast of Caesar and Rome, providing an affectionate outlook towards Brutus, and also by using third person instead of first, as it presents a selfless impression. Antony’s view of Brutus is betrayal, killing a close friend

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 858 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Now, Shakespeare was a famous playwright of the time and it seemed logical for him to express his ideologies through his popular plays to comment on his society. Shakespeare was able to use scenes such as the Brutus vs. Antony orations to stress the conflicting ideals between truth and propaganda, as well as their effects on society. Shakespeare captures Brutus’s honesty when he states “I honour him; but as he was ambitious, I slew him” through his use of prose within the speech. Prose reveals to the audience of plebeians Brutus’ rational and logical thinking behind assassinating Caesar, to which he emphasised “not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more.” The way in which Brutus excuses his actions appears to be beneficiary to the population instead for his selfish purposes, as well as depicting Caesar as a negative influence to the Roman Empire. This is soon contradicted by Antony’s oration which was written in blank verse. The speech mocks as well as contrasts Brutus’ intentions implicitly though the repetition of “But Brutus is an honourable man” which follows conflicting contradictory statements. This depicts Antony’s oration skills as both more superior and authentic to Brutus’s speech as it exposes the contrast between higher and lower order rhetoric. Brutus’s and Antony’s orations, create a powerful…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He asserts, "Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more" (III, ii, 21-22), framing the act as a sacrifice for the greater good of the Republic. This logical appeal aims to convince the audience of the righteousness of his cause. However, despite Brutus's eloquence and persuasive techniques, Antony's speech surpasses his in terms of emotional impact and strategic manipulation of the crowd's sentiments. Antony, while ostensibly paying tribute to Caesar, cleverly undermines Brutus's credibility and incites the crowd against the conspirators.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This reflect poorly on Brutus' character because it shows that he was fine with betraying someone who thought so highly of him. It makes him seem uncaring, a trait that someone in power should not have. This portrays Brutus as cold-hearted. By saying this, Antony is building up Caesar's character. He shows his compassion for the people, and how he sees himself no better as the people- when they are sad, it affects him too. The makes him seem like a good…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    business

    • 1516 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    work file

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Brutus was only a friend a good friend in the beginning of the story. Brutus only pretended to be he's friend because he wanted to find out everything about Caesar's knowledge as becoming emperor of Rome. Brutus would put words in Caesar's mouth. Brutus was lying to Rome and he's people. Throughout the whole scene Brutus treated Caesar like if Caesar had every back stabbed Brutus. After Caesar's death, Brutus had no emotional feelings until the ghost of Caesar appeared. Convincing himself that he was the best for Rome.…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The exposition of Julius Caesar, Shakespeare immediately presents the ideals that underpin the differing views of Caesar’s rising power through his two protagonists, Brutus and Cassius. Both characters posses different interpretations on Caesar’s reign on Rome, one being loyal to Rome and a love and respect for Caesar “I love him well” but the other being a spiteful and vitriolic towards a “feeble old tyrant.” This highlights the notion of Cassius’s selfish prejudice towards his own contentment, which is only shown behind closed doors. Brutus on the other hand is victim to Cassius’ vitriol and becomes the pawn as he is manipulated “poor Brutus, with himself at war,” Brutus is troubled emotionally, torn by his patriotism and his respect for Caesar, above all he has an undying love for Rome, “Brutus had rather be a villager than to repute himself a son of Rome.” It is this love for Rome that causes such internal turmoil for Brutus, through Shakespeare’s use of juxtaposition of characters, he is able to highlight to the audience, the lengths that man will go to in order to…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conflicting Perspectives

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages

    “An important outcome of studying this elective is the realisation that all representations of perspectives are designed to provoke an intended response.”…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Justice Game

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text of your own choosing.…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    History and Memory

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In your response, make detailed reference to your prescribed text and at least ONE other related text.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antony convinces Brutus that he’s Caesars best friend, so Brutus lets Antony speak at the funeral. Since Antony can only talk good about Brutus, he actually does at the funeral, but not only does he talk good about Brutus, but he uses reverse psychology on him. “But Brutus says he was ambitious, And Brutus is an honorable” (III.II.95-96). Antony says this quote three times during his speech. This quote means that Antony is being sarcastic, when he says “Brutus is an honorable man”, Antony’s saying Caesar did good and no harm, but then in real context, its saying Brutus says Caesars bad. Another way how Antony is the most important character is by being Caesars best friend and…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Brutus was Caesar’s closest companion, he let himself assassinate his own best friend for the good of Rome, therefore becoming a hero of his country but forever a traitor in the dead eyes of Caesar. Will Brutus ever forgive himself for this? William Shakespeare wrote Julius Caesar to leave readers pondering upon the boundaries of sacrifice, the loyalty (or absence of) in friendships, and how peer pressure and needing to “fit in” persuades our own decisions. Sacrifice: to surrender or give up for the sake of something else.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One of Shakespeare’s plays that can be considered more notable than others is No Fear Julius Caesar. Through the actions of many characters, many different mini-climaxes begin to develop. Each of these climaxes lead to a major conflict between two characters; Brutus and Antony. The introduction to this conflict is at the funeral of a man who was once a friend of both Brutus and Antony, until Brutus and other conspirators murdered him for the good of Rome. After Brutus speaks about the death, Antony approaches his opportunity to persuade the Roman people. Antony is trying to make the crowd believe Brutus and the other men are murderers, while Brutus is trying to prove their innocence. Antony captures…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays