The contention of the artist is that we need to figure out a way to clarify this congestion by showing the freeway is barely receiving any movement.
The artist uses the technique by showing a motionless picture of a traffic congested freeway composed of cars and vans to show that our freeways are not optimised for this amount of traffic. Which leads us to the question, ‘Is our transport system sustainable?’
Some vehicles are even taking advantage of the emergency lane to get around faster. This encourages the viewer to react/respond to a sense of urgency to find a solution to this problem of congested freeways; Also, showing …show more content…
The contention of the artist is that we need to build more ways of sustainable and accessible transport for the people.
The artist uses the technique of a delighted family looking up to the sky rail and using the colours of green and blue (The blue sky covers most of the background, setting the mood to a positive way) to symbolise that this method of transport is ‘ecologically’ sustainable and to show that our cities need improved ways of transport. I.e., different sustainable ways to travel around the city.
Connecting rural areas with the more developed cities. Currently, our transport is capable of getting people around; However, it is not sustainable to the environment. This encourages the viewer to react/respond by feeling a sense of need towards better transport. And putting the thought in; ‘Are our transport systems as sustainable as claimed or as we feel?’
This image is composed out of a family watching a sky rail passing over them. This sky rail is built right behind their house. The perspective/angle of this image is below the sky rail. Making the viewer feel that the subject is more ‘powerful’ than the viewer. Creating an atmosphere that feels for an urgency sky rail to be yet constructed. The usage of the colour green and blue connotes the idea of the sky rail being very ecological friendly/sustainable; also, sets the