Preview

Congress Bashing For Beginners Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
Congress Bashing for Beginners Response In his analysis Nelson W. Polsby discusses how although there is congressional disagreement and conflict, there shouldn’t be talk of changing the constitution framework. Polsby starts out by giving background information and how this has been going on for a century. At first it was the liberals doing most of the bashing, however more recently the conservatives have been complaining. Polsby tells us that this conflict switches often but the losing party always seems to complain about congress status and how they are achieving their goals through a lack of separation of powers. Polsby points out that he dislikes the talk of constitutional reform to “cure political ailments”. This is what Polsby refers …show more content…

A congress basher would see this as beneficial so they can get more opportunities to gain control in congress, but the reality is this only further weakens the powers of congress because with such short terms constantly up for reelection it is difficult, and almost impossible to achieve anything. Polsby notes the importance and the difficutly of the jobns members of congress have. He specifies with hey manage small group offices and attempt to please ther constituents. They serve on committees that oversee executive branch activity. They participate in general legislative work. They keep track of their own political business and they educate the people they come in contact with. These are just a few of the many duties of congress members, and there is reason things take so long in congress. Each member has to deal with all of the fore mentioned and more. One would be crazy to expect a member of congress to be successful in all of this in less than the current 6 year term. Polsby points out the reason so many members get reelected and it’s because they pay attention to the wants of their constituents. Bashers complain about the high reelection rates but the reason is clear, and this idea of a shortened term will only harm congress. Like Polsby, I think this attempt at congressional reform is a poor idea and can do nothing but harm the governmental system. …show more content…

Polsby perfectly depicts how it would be a poor decision to lower the salaries by citing that a upper middle management of a car company makes 100,000 dollars a year which is 2,000 dollars more than congress. It seems ridiculous to say that that manager does more work than a member of congress and is more worthy of pay. One would point to the wealthy status of congressmen and that with their backgrounds they don’t need as much money. This isn’t the case with all representatives. Many are hard working Americans who he constituents voted for because they closely relate to and represent their views. If pay was lowered these kinds of people wouldn’t seek a congressional post because they’d be more concerned with finding a job that pays well to support their family. So lowering the pay will only drive away worthy candidates for congress positions. Polsby cites another example of the underpayment of congressional members showing that first year law firm employees out of law school make a similar amount of money to a congressman. The importance and difficulty of the first year employee is minuscule compared to a congressman. A congressman needs to please his constituents and many other tasks while a first year at a law firm may be in charge of getting coffee and doughnuts for a meeting. Being sensible Polsby realizes that talk of a pay increase will only cause

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 2 of Our Undemocratic Constitution, Sanford Levinson analyzes the Constitution, focusing on the legislative branch of government and the ways in which it enforces ideas and powers presented in Article I. Strong bicameralism is a system within the United States government that allows for two legislative chambers (the House of Representatives & the Senate) to come to a compromise upon proposed legislation. These groups are granted separate but equal powers and in the United States are unusually strong, in that they have appointed members meant to serve in the favor of the national majority which do not, according to Levinson, “prevail against the opposition of one another” (Levinson, p. 30). Bicameralism, in general, causes the number…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This new way of forming the Senate would randomly select Canadian citizens, bringing together people from all aspects of Canadian society. If one uses the Netherlands as an example of how to make selections, this approach would form a Senate from a pool of randomly selected citizens, employers, politicians, civil servants, and artists. As Chwalisz notes, other countries and cities around the world including Ireland, Australia, and Vancouver are implementing similar structures to form new kinds of government bodies and advisory committees. This kind of new representation in government would remove the elitism and partisanship the Senate is known for, and truly represent the diversity of Canada. It would also help to make the electorate feel more engaged in the democratic…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be said that in a democracy, unity among the many cannot exist without compromise. Following the conclusion of the American Revolutionary War in 1776, the Articles of Confederation (the “Articles”) were written to allay fears about, and promote liberty, for its citizens, by legitimizing the rights of individual states. However, the Articles provided such restrictive powers for the underfunded national government to counteract deficiencies, that the union was at risk of collapse. A series of meetings, known as the Constitutional Convention (the “Convention”), was held to fix America’s dysfunctional political system, resulting in re-writing the American Constitution. Throughout the process of ratifying this historic document, many disputes…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of Congressmen keeping lifetime positions just increases the thirst for power in the men and women whose titles of importance generally determine their ability to keep a job. The recycling of these responsibilities would bring forth new ideas and perspectives to Congress. Term limits are already being issued in several states and need to continue to be addressed. Until boundaries are placed on our Congressional leaders, they will continue to take advantage of the system they seem to continuously abuse.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know it is technically possible for someone to hold a position in Congress for a long as they wanted? For years, term limits have been a very sensitive topic in discussion as it is a debatable issue that contains two different sides; there should be term limits and there shouldn't be any term limits. Perspective one, which is in favor of term limits, explains how corruption and bad power influence would be limited. Perspective two, which is not in favor of term limits, states that experience matters more and that it needs to be preserved in Congress. There should be term limits in Congress to ensure less corruption, less personal gain, and more fresh ideas.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For starters, the expectations of a member of congress are highly different from that of a typical citizen. The expectation and duties of a Member of Congress are extensive, encompassing several roles that could be full time jobs within itself. One Outstanding difference is there income. Most members of Congress are considerably wealthy and earn a pretty high income where as a typical citizen usually doesn’t come close.. In the year 2010 a member of Congress earned around 174, 000 which is more than 5 times what a typical citizen made.…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Congress Term Limits

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So, most automatically assume that their term limits should be cut in half because it is a simple job. But the impact can be destructive on the government. Their work includes managing small political offices, serving on committees that have to deal with executive branch activities, participating in general legislative work, keeping track of their own political business, and educating the public on certain issues. The many jobs of a congress member are complex and take time to master. Most of the congressional-bashing actually complains about high reelection…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a matter of fact, congressional term limit legislation was actually proposed in 1994 in the “Citizen Legislature Act” proposal which was introduced by then Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich and other Republican leaders (Mullikin). Other than the aforementioned instance, term limitation related legislation has been proposed several other times, but was never actually voted for in either house of Congress. The simple problem with any type of restrictive legislation is that the people who are voting on the legislation are the ones who will end up being affected by it when all is said and done. The recurring issue when proposing anything that may limit Congress members is the fact that relinquishing power is something that they are not very good at. As a matter of fact, as of 2016, there are 13 members of Congress that have served over 36 years in Congress and are still serving currently. To put it in perspective, these select people have had some role in the leadership of our country since at least the days of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. Former President Harry Truman once said that it is impossible to become rich in politics unless you are a crook. By allowing career politicians the ability to stay in office for as long as they desire, we are essentially allowing our country to be guided by crooks who, for the most part, only seek personal…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am in favor of congressional limits because I think times have changed. It is a touchy subject because it is considered unconstitutional but I still believe it should be pushed. If term limits are implemented more women and minorities would be included into the congress seats. There are currently no term limits for Senators or House members, but it has been discussed for years. If term limits were to be implemented, most members of Congress would disqualify about half of those who are currently serving. President Trump has pledged to implement term limits since winning the election. He proposed to set a three-term (six-year) cap for House members and two-term (12-year) cap for senators, according to my source Time.com. I agree with the terms…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yeah

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Until I return, Peter Sagal, host of NPR's "Wait, Wait ... Don't Tell Me," will be giving my first 4 lectures by you watching each of his following 4 PBS videos on line, each of which is 53 minutes long. Important points of each WILL BE on exam # 1. The four episodes include... (1) A More Perfect Union, (2) It's a Free Country, (3) Created Equal, (4) Built to Last, and they each can be viewed at http://video.pbs.org/program/constitution-usa-peter-sagal/ Peter Sagal breathes new life into the traditional civics lesson, by travelling across the country on a Harley Davidson to find out where the U.S. Constitution lives, how it works and how it doesn't ... how it unites us as a nation and how it has nearly torn us apart. Sagal introduces some major constitutional debates today and talks with…

    • 1060 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Yes, there should be term limits for our US senators and representatives. One reason is congress needs new ideas and procedures and having someone new would help that issue because, there fresh and have new ideas to start while someone who's been in office for a long time has no ideas to help. Another reason that there should be term limits is that it will help with corruption. The people we have now in office are very corrupt and is not working. bring in new people constantly will either help or stop corruption in the government because of this it would overall help the US altogether. One thing there side might argue is that if people don't want them in office then they would get voted out. However there marketing is totally unfair, Wealthy…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the early years of our nation, there was not a great deal of brotherly love, peace and agreement that could be found in the government. Two political parties had evolved that possessed interests that spanned both ends of every argument and political idea. The Federalists believed that the nation should have a very centralized government and stood firm that this would bring about the most order and prosperity. To the contrary, Republicans wanted the rights to stay with the people and States and therefore felt that the federal government should have little control to protect the rights of the people. Many historical documents record the struggles between the two parties. The main struggles revolved around three areas. The first area…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics