Paper delivered to the Sociologial Association of Ireland Postgraduate Conference, 7
March 2014.
Jamie Gorman, Centre for Rights, Recognition and Redistribution, Department of
Applied Social Studies, NUI Maynooth. jamie.gorman@nuim.ie Abstract
This paper argues that neoliberalism, as a common threat for social justice and environmental concerns, can create mutual consensus for political action across diverse interest groups. The paper highlights neoliberial trends towards the commodification of community and the marketisation of the environment. It identifies three characteristics of commercialisation, depoliticisation and cosumption. The paper finds that many proposed solutions remain within the neoliberal paradigm and seek to capitalise on the crisis rather than provide for transformative social change. It therefore explores how counter-hegemonic sollutions might be developed through effective alliances between community development and the environmental movement. It maps out the diverse spaces where consensus for political action might be achieved, highlighting examples in marginalised and pollution affected communities, communities promoting sustainability and communities resisting unsustainability. The paper suggests that processes of dialogue and alliance building can support more
effective
engagement
between
community
development
and
environmentalism. This paper has implications for how the social professions responds to environmental issues at a time when climate change is increasingly affecting communities with whom they are concerned and with whom they work for social justice.
Key words
Community development, environmental justice, neoliberalism, action research
1
Introduction
As societies across the globe grapple with the challenges that climate
Bibliography: Bhatti, M. (2001) Greening housing: a challenge for publc policy? Hume Papers in Public Policy (8) 4 Bisset, J. (2008) Regeneration: public good or private profit? Dublin: TASC/New Ireland. Bradbury, H. and Reason, P. (eds.) (2006) Handbook of action research. London: Sage. 11 Community Workers’ Co-operative (2009) Towards standards for quality community work. Hilman, M. (2002) ‘Environmental justice: a crucial link between environmentalism and community development?’, Community Development Journal, 37 (4), 349-60. ______ (2012), Community development post alignment: ensuring critical community work. Jackson, T. (2009) Prosperity without growth: economics for a finite planet. Oxford: Earthscan. Ledwith, M. (2011) Community development: a critical approach. Bristol: Policy Press. _________ (2007) ‘On being critical: uniting theory and practice through emancipatory action research’, in Educational Action Research Moore, H. and Kahn Russel, J. (2011) Organising cools the planet: tools and reflections to navigate the climate crisis Murphy, K. and Irwin, A. (2012) Towards Climate Justice: a strategy guide for the community sector in responding to climate change Pavee Point (2011) Irish Travellers and Roma: Shadow report- a response to Ireland’s third and fourth report on the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Petras, J. (1997) ‘Imperialism and NGOs in Latin America’. Monthly Review, Punch, M Randsome, P. (2012) Ethics and values in social research.London Palgrave Macmillan. Shiva Vandana, (2013) Making peace with the earth. London: Pluto Press. Shor, I (2011) ‘Forward to the second edition’, in Ledwith, M. Community development: a critical approach Storey, A. (2011) ‘Placing limits on economics: possibilities for rehumanising our world’, Be the revolution Wilding, N. (2011) Exploring community resilience in times of rapid change. Fife: Carnegie UK Trust.