Preview

Constitution and Bill of Rights

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
998 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitution and Bill of Rights
"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." The Constitution affected the United States government by giving it power and protecting the United States from absolutism. Starting out as the weaker Articles of confederation and later advancing into the stronger Constitution, the "Supreme Law of the Land" is the back bone of the United States government known today. Without the strong foundation of the Constitution, the frail nation that was America could not have survived for more than a few more years on the Articles of Confederation before crumbling into chaos. The severe deficit in Congressional power, a deprived government, and no Bill of Rights helped to show Americans that the Articles of Confederation were inadequate for a long-term government and the Constitution was better suited to govern their nation. The new Constitution was a better choice for the American people because of the improved congressional and governmental powers and the eventual adoption of a Bill of Rights. The Articles of Confederation was the start it everything. It was an inferior choice to the Constitution because the Constitution gave more power to Congress. For example, under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could not control foreign commerce nor could it control interstate commerce. This inability to regulate led to crippling competition between states. Trouble overseas, such as Barbados pirates, also hindered foreign trade to an already weak system. Next, Laws could only by passed by Congress under the Articles of Confederation. Compliance from the States was entirely optional. The Constitution, as stated in Article VI, forced all states to obey the laws set forth by Congress, thereby unifying


Bibliography: Parpworth; Constitutional and Administrative Law, 4th edition, (2006) Oxford Press Bradley and Ewing; Constitutional and Administrative Law, 14th edition, (2006) Longman Barnett; Constitutional and Administrative Law, 6th edition (2006) Cavendish Alder; Principles of constitutional and Administrative Law, 4th edition (2002) Palgrave The Independent ; The Big Question: Why doesn 't the UK have a written constitution, and does it matter? 14th February (2008) The Independent; leading article: rights and wrongs, 14th February (2008) www.direct.gov.uk http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/bbc_parliament/2562495.stm http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/british_constitution1.htm http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/ld200102/ldselect/ldconst/11/1103.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was the first American constitution completed by the Continental Congress in 1777. The Articles of Confederation created a “firm league of friendship” between all 13 states. Each state agreed to send delegates to the Confederation Congress where each state will cast one vote in Congress. Under the Articles Congress had no possession over trade or passing laws regarding taxes. However, Congress can declare war, appoint military officers, coin money, and foreign affairs. Unfortunately, there were some downsides to the Articles of Confederation that people from all 13 states did not agree with or argued about it such things as alliance, passing laws, courts, money, and trade. (Davidson, 189)…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1781 and 1789, the Articles of Confederation provided the United States with an ineffective government, Although there were flaws, strong steps were taken in the attempt to try and make the United States a better country. The Articles set up a government that gave individual states the power to make their own laws and enforce them. This was ineffective for the following reasons: 1) The Continental Congress controlled public affairs but there was nothing in the Articles that gave Congress the power to enforce laws or unify the states. 2) There was no solid system of money to ensure that taxes would be paid or protect commerce, both nationally and with foreign trade. 3) The country lacked unity and strength because there was no leadership.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation was approved in 1781. At that time was a loose confederation of states. The nation was less together each state was running like independent countries instead of being one whole nation. In that time the national government was small, it was only comprised of one single legislature. In the Congress of Confederation, there was no president, and there was no judicial branch. The Articles of Confederation gave power to the Congress to conduct war, regulate currency, and govern foreign affairs. However, in reality these power…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Articles of Confederation served as a stepping stone to the United States Constitution, which was later to be written. There were no federal courts, no authority to act directly upon individuals, no power to coerce states, and there had to be unanimous approval of the states for an amendment to be put into action. Unfortunately, the people could not get any help from the government because of the fact that Congress had no power to regulate commerce and that the Articles of Confederation, due to different views, created foreign disputes.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolution The major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution was the strength in governmental foundation, protection of rights, and proper representation. The Articles of Confederation was a single legislative body with no separation of branches. The Constitution sought to provide a stable foundation for a better qualified government. The Articles of Confederation had provided too much control and supremacy for the government in any decisions they made. The Articles of Confederation didn’t seem to care much for sustaining the protection of rights for the people, whereas the Constitution strived to uphold those protections (Divine, Breen, Williams, Gross, Brands, 2017).…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prior to the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation provided the states with too much power, not granting the central government the ability to make decisions. The Constitution is significant because it provides the central government with power while ensuring individual justice through the 27 Amendments and the Bill of Rights. Since 1787 when it was ratified by our Founding Fathers, the Constitution has continued to be relevant today by granting the government power to make decisions and by providing individual freedoms and liberties to the American…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many differences between the Articles of Confederation and the United States Constitution. The Articles of Confederation is the first constitution of the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation was agreed on by the Congress on November 15th, 1777 This made the people of the states fear the central authority and lengthy land claims before it was ratified. It was ratified on March 1st, 1781. While the states were under the Article of Confederation, they stayed as they were and remained autonomous and independent. The congress served as the last resort on the appeal of disputes. Congress was given the authority to do many things. They were given the authority to make treaties and or alliances if they wanted. They were…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The written constitution and the Bill of Rights produced early in the history of the United States was at least to some extent a reaction to the British rule of colonial times. Britain has thrived for centuries without a written constitution but it became clear that British colonies were not being governed in the same way that the home land was.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    By 1787, Americans were dissatisfied with the current form of the United States government. The Articles of Confederation, although adequate when created, had some major draw backs. An elite group, known as the framers, assembled to form a more perfect union. The framers believed the United States needed a Constitution that would be for the common man. Over the summer of 1787 several committees met to create the preamble for the people. The most renowned committee responsible for writing the preamble consisted of William Johnson, Rufus King, Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and Gouverneur Morris. This assembly, known as the Committee of Stile and Arrangement, was tasked with gathering all of the previously agreed upon articles and clauses and arranging them into a coherent order. On September 12, 1787, they revealed the final copy of the Preamble and it was signed into law five days later.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    634675362

    • 5062 Words
    • 51 Pages

    BASICS OF PHILIPPINE MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE AND ETHICS 2010 EDITION JOSUE N. BELLOSILLO BU C. CASTRO EMMANUEL LJ. MAPILI ALBERT D. REBOSA ANTONIO D. REBOSA Published by CENTRAL BOOK SUPPLY, INC. 927 Quezon Avenue, Quezon City Philippines TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword/in Preface/vii AcknowledgmentsI-a. Chapter 1 MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE 1.1. Medical Jurisprudence defined/l 1.2. Distinction with legal and forensic medicine/2 1.3.…

    • 5062 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Judicial Activism

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. Sathe, S.P., Judicial Activism in India: Transgressing Borders and Enforcing Limits, Oxford University Press,…

    • 354 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution of Uk

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nigel Morris: ‘The Big Question: Why doesn 't the UK have a written constitution, and does it matter?’ published on 14/02/2008, accessed from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/the-big-question-why-doesnt-the-uk-have-a-written-constitution-and-does-it-matter-781975.html…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Administrative Law

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Richard, G. Eimear, S. And Rhona, S. (2001).Constitutiona and Administrative Law.(9th ed).London: Sweet and Maxwell.…

    • 1811 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bill of Rights

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The national territory comprises the Philippine archipelago, with all the islands and waters embraced therein, and all other territories over which the Philippines has sovereignty or jurisdiction, consisting of its terrestrial, fluvial and aerial domains, including its territorial sea, the seabed, the subsoil, the insular shelves, and other submarine areas. The waters around, between, and connecting the islands of the archipelago, regardless of their breadth and dimensions, form part of the internal waters of the Philippines.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    bill of rights

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A democracy must ensure that individuals have certain rights and that the government will always recognize these rights. Therefore it is often a practice in most democratic countries to list the rights of the citizens in the constitution itself. Such a list of rights mentioned and protected by the constitution is called the ‘bills of rights. A bill of rights prohibits government from thus acting against the rights of the individuals and ensures a remedy in case there is violation of these rights.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays