Preview

Constitution of Express Trusts/UK Law

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1612 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitution of Express Trusts/UK Law
� PAGE * MERGEFORMAT �1�

Property 2

Constitution is the last of the formalities that the law requires to create an effective and enforceable trust. Failure to constitute a trust will mean that no gift or trust is applicable; and the law that relates to perfect constituted gifts and trusts will not be appropriate. Moreover, the axiom of equity will intervene: "equity will not perfect an imperfect gift". The state of equity at the start of 21st century has changed significantly through a number of noteworthy cases that are relevant to Pennington v Waine (2002) 4 All E.R. 215.�

Milroy v Lord (1862)� the donor in this case used an inappropriate document to pass the interest to the relevant donee, court's decision was that this could not be an effective transfer of shares since the document was wrong and did not comply with the requirements of the bank to constitute the transfer. Milroy is the first case that presents the three different ways that a voluntary settlement may occur. First, by declaration of self as a trustee, where there is no need to transfer the legal title. In case that the land involved is not registered; the transfer of the relevant legal title to trustees must be transferred by deed and comply with S.52 LPA 1925. In registered land the trustees will become legal owners ones the transfer is also registered and comply with S. 27 LRA 2002. The second available way is by an outright gift and, the third way is by appointing someone else a trustee where the transfer of the legal title is necessary. Another particularly crucial point from this case is that it clarifies that if a failure occurs by one of the above ways then the settlement will not succeed through the other methods. The settlement that will occur depends from the nature of property that the donor wishes to transfer. Milroy v Lord (1862), Re Fry (1946), Jones v Lock (1865) and finally Richards v Delbridge (1874)� all these cases although are four different types of property that needed

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    9) Mike transfers securities to an irrevocable trust and gives Rachel the power to determine who will receive the trust's income and assets. Rachel, her estate, and her creditors cannot be beneficiaries or receive the trust assets. Rachel has a general power of appointment.…

    • 9691 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nora Lindsay Case Study

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The observations of Kirby P in this case provided that when the court is able to draw sufficient evidence from an informal document that the deceased intended to direct the bestowal of his or her property after death, such documents constituted the deceased’s Will. These observations were supported by Justice Hodgson’s in Costa v The Public Trustee of NSW. Justice Basten also identified from Pahlow-Silady v Siladi that the deceased’s understanding of the nature of the will is a relevant consideration in assessing intention. The case of The Public Trustee v Gerritsen was also referred to with respect to the third element from Hatsatouris. Justice Beech concluded that documents which are written and signed by the deceased do not require evidence of separate acts or words to support his or her intention that the document constitutes their…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    LRWA carmichael analysis

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To determine whether a person has “possession” of a property the court considers four factors: (1) whether the buyer exercises control over the property adverse to the seller; (2) whether the buyer has an exclusive right to control the property; (3) whether the buyer pays for taxes and improvements, and; (4) whether the both parties publically acknowledges the transfer. Dawson v. Tumlinson, 242 S.W.2d 191 (Tex. 1951); Johnson v. Bridgewater, 140 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940, writ dismissed); Sharp v. Stacy, 535 S.W.2d 345 (Tex. 1976); Thorton v. Central Loan Co., 164 S.W.2d 248 (Tex. Civ. App. 1942, writ refused). The court does not consider who occupies the property. Sharp, 535 S.W.2d at 348. The details of the oral agreement are also not considered. See Dawson, 242 S.W.2d 191; Johnson, 140 S.W.2d 282; Thorton, 164 S.W.2d 248; Id. Every factor is considered, but all of them need not be present. Johnson. Presently, Carmichael paid for taxes and improvements, but each other factor is at issue.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hodel Vs Irving Summary

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Here rights to property disposal at death would be totally eliminated even if you could make a complex trust do the same thing.…

    • 4767 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cope, M, 'A comparative evaluation of developments in equitable relief for breach of fiduciary duty and breach of trust ' [2006] QUT Law Journal 7…

    • 3483 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Section 351 Tax Essay

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Cited: (2) Hoffman, Raabe, Smith, and Maloney. Corporations, Partnerships, Estates and Trusts. N.p.: South-Western, 2012. Print.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    TABL1710 Autosaved

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages

    EMPIRNALL HOLDINGS PTY LTD V MACHON PAULL PARTNERS PTY LTD (acceptance not communicated through docs- but continuous REGULAR actions means acceptance)…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Blaw

    • 3523 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Question 4. Read the report of Lebdeh v Smith. (See below). Then answer the following questions on the basis that the Sale of Land Act 1962 (Vic) and the report of Lebdeh v Smith are the only relevant legislation and case-law. (a) In which court was this case heard and…

    • 3523 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Notes on Trusts and Estates Law

    • 24793 Words
    • 100 Pages

    1) could give up to $12,000 each to all your friends and nobody pays taxes…

    • 24793 Words
    • 100 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This will contained a clause which prevented the trustee from selling stock in the New York World newspaper. Over time, the New York World became unprofitable and threatened to devalue the trust, leading the trustees to ask the Court for approval to sell the stock. The Court agreed because it found that the settlor’s primary intent in creating the trust was to pass wealth to its beneficiaries, and ensure that the corpus was preserved. The Equitable Deviation Doctrine was born. Following the Pulitzer case, courts permitted the trustees of a trust to deviate from the settlor’s intent where circumstances not known or foreseen by the settlor arose, and where such change in circumstances would defeat or substantially impair the accomplishment of the intended trust…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    * The court have to decide whether the parties were contractually bound by the sale note(which has been signed by both of them) or whether they would only have formed a binding contract by Cameron’s solicitors(which could not apply, since Masters did not signed.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Unconscionability

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages

    [ 6 ]. Cobbe v Yeoman 's Row Management Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 1752 Lord Walker 92…

    • 2687 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Formation of Contract

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under the assumption that Edwina has paid for the property the House of Lords ruled on a similar case of Sharp v Thomson saying that “a person who has made delivery of a conveyance and accepted…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. Legal Sufficiency 1. Adequacy 2. Unilateral Contracts 3. Bilateral Contracts 4. Illusory Promises a. Output and Requirement Contracts b. Exclusive Dealing Contracts c. Conditional Promises 5. Pre-existing Obligation a. Modification of a Pre-existing Contract b. Substituted Contracts c. Settlement of a Undisputed Debt d. Settlement of an Disputed Debt B. Bargained-For-Exchange 1. Past Consideration 2. Third Parties C. Contracts without Consideration 1. Promises to Perform Prior Unenforceable Obligations a. Promise to Pay Debt Barred by the Statute of Limitations b. Promise to Pay Debt Discharged in Bankruptcy c. Voidable Promises d. Moral Obligation 2. Promissory Estoppel 3. Contracts under Seal 4. Promises Made Enforceable by Statute a. Contract Modifications b. Renunciations c. Firm Offers…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employment Law A4

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pate Estate v. Galway-Cavendish and Harvey (Townships), 2011 ONSC 6620 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/fpvgz> retrieved on 2013-04-02…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics