Preview

Constitution Simulation Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
354 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitution Simulation Analysis
The Constitution Simulation have depicted a clear an unbiased picture of the state of the land after the revolutionary war. A widely divided country with deeply rooted issues. Suffice to say the population was not very fond of government especially strong central government. The founding fathers, Madison, envisioned the new constitution as the foundation of the new republic “a mean to improve the weak”. According to the Constitution simulation, one of the driving force of the resistance to the new Constitution was the fear of a too powerful central government. To mitigate those fears it became imperative for the framers of the constitution to come up with an option that would reduce those fears. I also learned that, to Achieve this goal, James …show more content…
“according to Hobbes, is born political society. For the past 300 years, we have told ourselves a story in which humanity is a collection of rational self-seeking individuals; that society is the conflict of interests; that those conflicts are resolved by a central power given legitimacy by a social contract in which individuals recognize that it is in their interest to yield up part of their unfettered freedom; and that governments have emerged as the source of power through which conflicts are mediated.” (Hobbes, T., & Gaskin, J. C. A. (1998). Leviathan. Opposing Viewpoints.)

The addition of the Bill of Rights was instrumental on getting the reluctant colonies on board according to the Constitution Simulation. The social contract famously formulated by Hegel is underlined in the new constitution. The constitution simulation clearly indicates that the guarantee of individual rights as a major causal force behind the resistance, therefore a path dictates the necessity to embrace those rights, to move forward.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine oneself back at the constitutional convention in seventeen eighty-seven. All of the brightest minds and most respected people in one place, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the southeast of the state, near New York. Because it is May, and just beginning to be summer, it is hot, and because all the windows are closed in the interest of secrecy, it is stifling as well. Fifty-five well known thinkers of the age, all white males, have come. They range in age from James Madison, an up-and-comer and a prodigy who is twenty five to Benjamin Franklin, a wise, venerable, learned man who is eighty one. Delegates from eleven states are present, New Hampshire not turning up until July, and Rhode Island not at all, thinking to veto the proceedings by their absence. The problem that had caused these proceedings was that the Articles of Confederation, the current system of government was too weak. although the Northwest Ordinance resulted of it, and it fixed the fear of a strong central government and dominance by large states, there were unfair competition among states, unenforceable trade agreements, no power over states governments, no president, no judicial branch and the government could not pay debts because they could not force states to pay taxes. As the cons out-weighed the pros, it was clear that something had to be done. The framers decided to create a new government completely. The question was; How do we give the government the power it needs while preventing tyranny? This essay will address the many and varied was the constitution guards against tyranny. In this essay, the word tyranny refers to James Madison’s definition, which states, “The accumulation of all powers…in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” (James Madison, Federalist Paper #47, Hook Document). The constitution addresses tyranny in four main ways: the balance of powers between national and state…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Revolution brought along much change in the now United States. Post war changes occurred in the republic, this included politics. One important event was that of the Constitutional Convention in which men formulated and revised state constitutions and also developed the method by which frames of government were written and approved. The status of women was being defined and the idea of abolition rose in the North. The central government’s power of the nation was too low. Unity and power lacked in the Confederation. National debt, trade, and protection against the Spanish and Brits were several of the problems facing the Confederation. Economic troubles also gloomed over the new developing country. A major issue dealt with paper currency and how quickly inflation had occurred. Shays Rebellion was an issues in which state governments would not come to the aid of debtors in New England, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, and South Carolina. During the reformation of the constitution, the question was whether to amend the Articles of Confederation or to write a completely new one. The Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan were two that were proposed. Conflict ensued between the states until the Great Compromise came to and established a bicameral congress which included the House of Representatives and the Senate. Men who fought against this new constitution were known as anti-federalists. But in the end the Federalists prevailed and the ratification of the Constitution…

    • 252 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A newly developed constitution brought upon adverse opinions as to its “new republic form being as enshrined” as well as it being a “danger”. Both oppositional and approval views were discussed within Madison Federalist No. 10 and Patrick Henry’s Speech against Ratification.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The time between the American Revolution and the presidency of George Washington was one of learning, experimentation, and confusion. No patterns existed to model the new government being established for the thirteen American states. Although it would be incorrect to say that the government of the Articles of Confederation was a complete failure, it would be logical to advance the idea that the more powerful national government established under the constitution of 1787 was essential to the survival of the American Union. Between the two documents there were some drastic differences of opinion on governing tactics as mentioned in the Articles of Confederation compared to the Constitution of 1787 (Doc. C). Major differences were composited of issues such as taxation powers, regulation of commerce, powers of the judiciary, and the executive and method of amendment.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Wood is convincing in his argument that the US Constitution reflects a change in political thought during the first decade after the Revolution. The new US Constitution coming out of it reflected the republican character of the American Revolution by restructuring the state governments and putting limits on them. Madison said that the US Constitution “created a republican remedy for the diseases most incident to republican government.” The new US Constitution in that regard sought to secure the republican ideals of the Revolution. The Constitution ensured the survival of those republican ideals. It ensured the survival of the United States as it brought an end to populist democracy and excessive state power by returning to republican…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    From the years 1781 to 1789, the United States of America were governed under a document known as the Articles of Confederation. Prior to the ratification of today’s United States Constitution, this paper was the layout for the federal government that united the separate thirteen colonies in their movement for independence from Britain. It was put to the test as an effective form of command by a number of problems and events that arose shortly after America gained independence from its mother country. The signing of the Treaty of Paris granted the state’s new land and a new position in the world as a nation. Various ordinances came about in the mid 1780’s to address westward expansion. The Articles of Confederation were most successful in dealing with westward expansion due to the effectiveness of the Ordinances that were drafted under it and the benefits it brought. However the Articles of Confederation were substantially less ideal in managing America’s foreign relations. Therefore, rather than fixing the existing Articles, a new constitution was required. The Convention would draft an entirely new frame of government, at last it was “drafted in secret by delegates to the Constitutional…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Hobbes, a government is needed to create social order. Because humans are naturally self-persevering, they are always in a state of conflict with one another. There are fundamental laws that a government set is place to restrain natural human…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    lolololololol

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    During the Revolutionary War, the thirteen colonies’ reason for fighting the war shifted from reconciliation from Great Britain, to the want of independence mainly due to Thomas Paine’s pamphlet of Common Sense, which shunned British rule and reminded everyone what they were fighting the war for. State governments needed to be recreated in order for them to have any effect on the nation at war, and to embody the heart of the change in stances. In order for this to happen, each state needed to write up or rewrite their state’s constitution, by changing or removing any presence that Britain had had on the colonial governments before. The specific way in which the constitution had to be written in order to be the foundation for the law in the states, and the challenges of making the executive branch of state government balanced with the legislative branch affected the challenges that the states had in creating their governments.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1776, all 13 colonies had signed away their connections to Britain. America had declared independence from the mother country and started the Revolutionary War. The starting of the Revolutionary War severed all ties from the previous commitment to Britain, leaving the US to decide their new government and its rules by themselves. July 4th, 1776, the United States gained its independence from Britain, starting their own government that would attempt at getting representation for everyone. However, the Constitution was an aiding factor in the movement for more representation, this paper wanted a stronger central government and more power to the people. The Articles of Confederation are one area where it was weak, and the people didn’t have much power, most of the power went to the states. Therefore, the American Revolution helped the past citizens apply ideals that they wanted for their future government by showcasing everything wrong with the representation in the government they had before the revolution.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper aims to explore how and why Amendments become part of the Constitution, the problems with the original document that motivated the adoption of the Bill of Rights and its effects. In addition, the paper also details the problems with the original document, or changes in society that necessitated later amendments. Finally, the paper chronicles the thirteenth through fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution.…

    • 1443 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Again, as with independence, there were no guarantees undergirding this process of national development; the outcomes were neither assured nor foreordained. Rather, the Americans had to do some heavy political lifting to prepare the political ground for reform of their government, and some heavy intellectual and theoretical lifting as well to devise the mechanisms and institutions that they felt ought to be put into place as a new national constitution."19 The impact of the Articles of Confederation on the Constitutional Convention of 1787 is underlined "by more than 150 years of conventional wisdom which deemed the Articles to be a total failure. Not until 1940, did historian Merrill Jensen - in his first book, The Articles of Confederation (1940)-set out to redeem the articles from the strictures of conventional wisdom. Today we have a clear-eyed view of the strengths and weaknesses of the Articles and of the achievements of the government under the Articles as well as the…

    • 1923 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This author focused on the ideals at the time of the creation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and how societal changes forced lawmakers to pass Amendments in order to change with the times. It also touched a little on how expansion of the United States helped to cause this legal change.…

    • 2809 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays